Trial Outcomes & Findings for Improving Resilience and Longevity for Workers Through Exercise (NCT NCT03050320)
NCT ID: NCT03050320
Last Updated: 2018-08-10
Results Overview
The Lower Extremity Function Scale (LEFS) consists of 20 items, on an adjectival scale, that assess difficulty during mobility tasks ranging from transfers to running. Each item is scored from 0 (extreme difficulty or unable to perform activity), to 4 (no difficulty to perform activity). The minimum possible score is 0, and the maximum possible score is 80. Scores closer to 80 represent better self-reported physical function. It is reliable and valid in knee OA and has superior sensitivity to change compared to similar measures
COMPLETED
NA
43 participants
Weeks 1 and 13
2018-08-10
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Exercise
The participants in this arm will be asked to attend 3 group classes per week for 12 weeks taught by a certified exercise instructor. Five class times will be offered per week. These classes included a warm-up, static poses shown to decrease knee joint loading, and a cool down including flexibility exercises. Measurements will be obtained at baseline (before intervention) and at follow-up (following intervention). Outcomes included clinical mobility; pain; isometric leg strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
Exercise: A biomechanical exercise program shown to decrease joint loading will be administered 3 times a week for 12 weeks. Outcomes included mobility performance; pain; strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
|
No Exercise
The participants in this arm will be asked to refrain from changing their physical activity over the 12 weeks and maintain any strategies typically used to manage knee and/or hip pain. Since it is known that exercise is beneficial for pain management and strengthening in knee OA, participants randomized to the no exercise group will be offered the same exercise program following completion of the study. Measurements will be obtained at baseline (before intervention) and at follow-up (following intervention). Outcomes included clinical mobility; pain; isometric leg strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
No Exercise: A no exercise (control) group will be asked to maintain their existing activity level for 12 weeks. Outcomes included mobility performance; pain; strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
21
|
22
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
20
|
21
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Exercise
n=21 Participants
The participants in this arm will be asked to attend 3 group classes per week for 12 weeks taught by a certified exercise instructor. Five class times will be offered per week. These classes included a warm-up, static poses shown to decrease knee joint loading, and a cool down including flexibility exercises. Measurements will be obtained at baseline (before intervention) and at follow-up (following intervention). Outcomes included clinical mobility; pain; isometric leg strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
Exercise: A biomechanical exercise program shown to decrease joint loading will be administered 3 times a week for 12 weeks. Outcomes included mobility performance; pain; strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
|
No Exercise
n=22 Participants
The participants in this arm will be asked to refrain from changing their physical activity over the 12 weeks and maintain any strategies typically used to manage knee and/or hip pain. Since it is known that exercise is beneficial for pain management and strengthening in knee OA, participants randomized to the no exercise group will be offered the same exercise program following completion of the study. Measurements will be obtained at baseline (before intervention) and at follow-up (following intervention). Outcomes included clinical mobility; pain; isometric leg strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
No Exercise: A no exercise (control) group will be asked to maintain their existing activity level for 12 weeks. Outcomes included mobility performance; pain; strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
|
Total
n=43 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
44.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5 • n=21 Participants
|
43.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4 • n=22 Participants
|
43.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3 • n=43 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
12 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=22 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=43 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
9 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=22 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=43 Participants
|
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Canada
|
21 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=22 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=43 Participants
|
|
Type of Osteoarthritis
Hip Osteoarthritis
|
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=22 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=43 Participants
|
|
Type of Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis
|
2 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=22 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=43 Participants
|
|
Type of Osteoarthritis
No Osteoarthritis
|
18 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=22 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=43 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 1 and 13The Lower Extremity Function Scale (LEFS) consists of 20 items, on an adjectival scale, that assess difficulty during mobility tasks ranging from transfers to running. Each item is scored from 0 (extreme difficulty or unable to perform activity), to 4 (no difficulty to perform activity). The minimum possible score is 0, and the maximum possible score is 80. Scores closer to 80 represent better self-reported physical function. It is reliable and valid in knee OA and has superior sensitivity to change compared to similar measures
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Exercise
n=20 Participants
The participants in this arm will be asked to attend 3 group classes per week for 12 weeks taught by a certified exercise instructor. Five class times will be offered per week. These classes included a warm-up, static poses shown to decrease knee joint loading, and a cool down including flexibility exercises. Measurements will be obtained at baseline (before intervention) and at follow-up (following intervention). Outcomes included clinical mobility; pain; isometric leg strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
Exercise: A biomechanical exercise program shown to decrease joint loading will be administered 3 times a week for 12 weeks. Outcomes included mobility performance; pain; strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
|
No Exercise
n=21 Participants
The participants in this arm will be asked to refrain from changing their physical activity over the 12 weeks and maintain any strategies typically used to manage knee and/or hip pain. Since it is known that exercise is beneficial for pain management and strengthening in knee OA, participants randomized to the no exercise group will be offered the same exercise program following completion of the study. Measurements will be obtained at baseline (before intervention) and at follow-up (following intervention). Outcomes included clinical mobility; pain; isometric leg strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
No Exercise: A no exercise (control) group will be asked to maintain their existing activity level for 12 weeks. Outcomes included mobility performance; pain; strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Lower Extremity Functional Scale
|
5.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.0
|
-1.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 1 and 13Change in self-reported knee and hip pain will be assessed with 3 valid and reliable questionnaires: the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), and the Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP) score. The KOOS and HOOS pain scores represent a normalized score from 0 (extreme symptoms) to 100 (no symptoms). KOOS and HOOS scores closer to 100 indicate fewer symptoms. The ICOAP consists of two sub-scales: constant pain (5 items) and intermittent pain (6 items). The score from each subscale represents a normalized score from 0 (no pain) to 100 (extreme pain). ICOAP scores closer to 0 indicate less pain. The items from each subscale are averaged to produce a normalized ICOAP total score, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (extreme pain).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Exercise
n=20 Participants
The participants in this arm will be asked to attend 3 group classes per week for 12 weeks taught by a certified exercise instructor. Five class times will be offered per week. These classes included a warm-up, static poses shown to decrease knee joint loading, and a cool down including flexibility exercises. Measurements will be obtained at baseline (before intervention) and at follow-up (following intervention). Outcomes included clinical mobility; pain; isometric leg strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
Exercise: A biomechanical exercise program shown to decrease joint loading will be administered 3 times a week for 12 weeks. Outcomes included mobility performance; pain; strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
|
No Exercise
n=21 Participants
The participants in this arm will be asked to refrain from changing their physical activity over the 12 weeks and maintain any strategies typically used to manage knee and/or hip pain. Since it is known that exercise is beneficial for pain management and strengthening in knee OA, participants randomized to the no exercise group will be offered the same exercise program following completion of the study. Measurements will be obtained at baseline (before intervention) and at follow-up (following intervention). Outcomes included clinical mobility; pain; isometric leg strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
No Exercise: A no exercise (control) group will be asked to maintain their existing activity level for 12 weeks. Outcomes included mobility performance; pain; strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Self-reported Knee and Hip Pain
KOOS Pain
|
3.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.2
|
-0.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.8
|
|
Change in Self-reported Knee and Hip Pain
HOOS Pain
|
5.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.3
|
2.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.7
|
|
Change in Self-reported Knee and Hip Pain
ICOAP Constant Pain
|
-0.8 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.0
|
0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.0
|
|
Change in Self-reported Knee and Hip Pain
ICOAP Intermittent Pain
|
-6.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.5
|
-2.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.0
|
|
Change in Self-reported Knee and Hip Pain
ICOAP Total
|
-3.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.4
|
-1.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 1 and 13The Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand is a 30-item questionnaire addressing upper extremity physical function and symptoms. The DASH is suitable for people with any upper limb musculoskeletal disorders and can also monitor changes in severity of symptoms and functional abilities over time. Each item is scored from 1 (no difficulty) to 5 (unable). Total scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more upper limb problems.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Exercise
n=20 Participants
The participants in this arm will be asked to attend 3 group classes per week for 12 weeks taught by a certified exercise instructor. Five class times will be offered per week. These classes included a warm-up, static poses shown to decrease knee joint loading, and a cool down including flexibility exercises. Measurements will be obtained at baseline (before intervention) and at follow-up (following intervention). Outcomes included clinical mobility; pain; isometric leg strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
Exercise: A biomechanical exercise program shown to decrease joint loading will be administered 3 times a week for 12 weeks. Outcomes included mobility performance; pain; strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
|
No Exercise
n=21 Participants
The participants in this arm will be asked to refrain from changing their physical activity over the 12 weeks and maintain any strategies typically used to manage knee and/or hip pain. Since it is known that exercise is beneficial for pain management and strengthening in knee OA, participants randomized to the no exercise group will be offered the same exercise program following completion of the study. Measurements will be obtained at baseline (before intervention) and at follow-up (following intervention). Outcomes included clinical mobility; pain; isometric leg strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
No Exercise: A no exercise (control) group will be asked to maintain their existing activity level for 12 weeks. Outcomes included mobility performance; pain; strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Self-reported Upper Extremity Pain
|
-1.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.4
|
0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 1 and 13Population: Data from one individual from the No Exercise group was not collected for this measure due to an unrelated back injury.
The peak torque developed during knee extension and flexion during a maximum isometric contraction will be measured by use of a ergoFET hand-held dynamometer.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Exercise
n=20 Participants
The participants in this arm will be asked to attend 3 group classes per week for 12 weeks taught by a certified exercise instructor. Five class times will be offered per week. These classes included a warm-up, static poses shown to decrease knee joint loading, and a cool down including flexibility exercises. Measurements will be obtained at baseline (before intervention) and at follow-up (following intervention). Outcomes included clinical mobility; pain; isometric leg strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
Exercise: A biomechanical exercise program shown to decrease joint loading will be administered 3 times a week for 12 weeks. Outcomes included mobility performance; pain; strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
|
No Exercise
n=20 Participants
The participants in this arm will be asked to refrain from changing their physical activity over the 12 weeks and maintain any strategies typically used to manage knee and/or hip pain. Since it is known that exercise is beneficial for pain management and strengthening in knee OA, participants randomized to the no exercise group will be offered the same exercise program following completion of the study. Measurements will be obtained at baseline (before intervention) and at follow-up (following intervention). Outcomes included clinical mobility; pain; isometric leg strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
No Exercise: A no exercise (control) group will be asked to maintain their existing activity level for 12 weeks. Outcomes included mobility performance; pain; strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Isometric Knee Extensor and Flexor Strength
Extension
|
0.15 Newton*meters/kg
Standard Deviation 0.29
|
0.00 Newton*meters/kg
Standard Deviation 0.28
|
|
Change in Isometric Knee Extensor and Flexor Strength
Flexion
|
0.07 Newton*meters/kg
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
0.00 Newton*meters/kg
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 1 and 13Grip strength will be assessed using a Jamar hand dynamometer. The hand dynamometer will be set to a fixed position and all values of grip force will be expressed in kg.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Exercise
n=20 Participants
The participants in this arm will be asked to attend 3 group classes per week for 12 weeks taught by a certified exercise instructor. Five class times will be offered per week. These classes included a warm-up, static poses shown to decrease knee joint loading, and a cool down including flexibility exercises. Measurements will be obtained at baseline (before intervention) and at follow-up (following intervention). Outcomes included clinical mobility; pain; isometric leg strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
Exercise: A biomechanical exercise program shown to decrease joint loading will be administered 3 times a week for 12 weeks. Outcomes included mobility performance; pain; strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
|
No Exercise
n=21 Participants
The participants in this arm will be asked to refrain from changing their physical activity over the 12 weeks and maintain any strategies typically used to manage knee and/or hip pain. Since it is known that exercise is beneficial for pain management and strengthening in knee OA, participants randomized to the no exercise group will be offered the same exercise program following completion of the study. Measurements will be obtained at baseline (before intervention) and at follow-up (following intervention). Outcomes included clinical mobility; pain; isometric leg strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
No Exercise: A no exercise (control) group will be asked to maintain their existing activity level for 12 weeks. Outcomes included mobility performance; pain; strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Grip Strength
Dominant hand
|
-0.4 Kg of force
Standard Deviation 5.5
|
0.9 Kg of force
Standard Deviation 5.1
|
|
Change in Grip Strength
Non-dominant hand
|
-0.9 Kg of force
Standard Deviation 4.9
|
1.6 Kg of force
Standard Deviation 3.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 1 and 13Cardiovascular fitness will be calculated using the Single Stage Treadmill Walking Test. Predictions of VO2max will be made from heart rate (measured with a heart rate monitor), walking speed, age and gender.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Exercise
n=20 Participants
The participants in this arm will be asked to attend 3 group classes per week for 12 weeks taught by a certified exercise instructor. Five class times will be offered per week. These classes included a warm-up, static poses shown to decrease knee joint loading, and a cool down including flexibility exercises. Measurements will be obtained at baseline (before intervention) and at follow-up (following intervention). Outcomes included clinical mobility; pain; isometric leg strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
Exercise: A biomechanical exercise program shown to decrease joint loading will be administered 3 times a week for 12 weeks. Outcomes included mobility performance; pain; strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
|
No Exercise
n=21 Participants
The participants in this arm will be asked to refrain from changing their physical activity over the 12 weeks and maintain any strategies typically used to manage knee and/or hip pain. Since it is known that exercise is beneficial for pain management and strengthening in knee OA, participants randomized to the no exercise group will be offered the same exercise program following completion of the study. Measurements will be obtained at baseline (before intervention) and at follow-up (following intervention). Outcomes included clinical mobility; pain; isometric leg strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
No Exercise: A no exercise (control) group will be asked to maintain their existing activity level for 12 weeks. Outcomes included mobility performance; pain; strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Cardiovascular Fitness
|
1.0 mL/kg/min
Standard Deviation 1.9
|
0.1 mL/kg/min
Standard Deviation 1.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 1 and 13Population: Data from one individual from the No Exercise group was not collected for this measure due to an unrelated back injury.
Mobility performance will be measured using the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT). For this test, participants are instructed to walk as far as possible in 6 minutes. The distance covered in 6 minutes is recorded in metres. This measure has produced reliable and valid data in persons with knee OA.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Exercise
n=20 Participants
The participants in this arm will be asked to attend 3 group classes per week for 12 weeks taught by a certified exercise instructor. Five class times will be offered per week. These classes included a warm-up, static poses shown to decrease knee joint loading, and a cool down including flexibility exercises. Measurements will be obtained at baseline (before intervention) and at follow-up (following intervention). Outcomes included clinical mobility; pain; isometric leg strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
Exercise: A biomechanical exercise program shown to decrease joint loading will be administered 3 times a week for 12 weeks. Outcomes included mobility performance; pain; strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
|
No Exercise
n=20 Participants
The participants in this arm will be asked to refrain from changing their physical activity over the 12 weeks and maintain any strategies typically used to manage knee and/or hip pain. Since it is known that exercise is beneficial for pain management and strengthening in knee OA, participants randomized to the no exercise group will be offered the same exercise program following completion of the study. Measurements will be obtained at baseline (before intervention) and at follow-up (following intervention). Outcomes included clinical mobility; pain; isometric leg strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
No Exercise: A no exercise (control) group will be asked to maintain their existing activity level for 12 weeks. Outcomes included mobility performance; pain; strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Mobility Performance (Six-Minute Walk Test)
|
36.8 Meters
Standard Deviation 51.6
|
18.4 Meters
Standard Deviation 29.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 1 and 13Population: Data from one individual from the No Exercise group was not collected for this measure due to an unrelated back injury.
Mobility performance will be measured using the Stair Ascent and Descent Test. For this test, the time taken to ascend, as well as descend nine stairs is recorded in seconds. This measure has produced reliable and valid data in persons with knee OA.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Exercise
n=20 Participants
The participants in this arm will be asked to attend 3 group classes per week for 12 weeks taught by a certified exercise instructor. Five class times will be offered per week. These classes included a warm-up, static poses shown to decrease knee joint loading, and a cool down including flexibility exercises. Measurements will be obtained at baseline (before intervention) and at follow-up (following intervention). Outcomes included clinical mobility; pain; isometric leg strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
Exercise: A biomechanical exercise program shown to decrease joint loading will be administered 3 times a week for 12 weeks. Outcomes included mobility performance; pain; strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
|
No Exercise
n=20 Participants
The participants in this arm will be asked to refrain from changing their physical activity over the 12 weeks and maintain any strategies typically used to manage knee and/or hip pain. Since it is known that exercise is beneficial for pain management and strengthening in knee OA, participants randomized to the no exercise group will be offered the same exercise program following completion of the study. Measurements will be obtained at baseline (before intervention) and at follow-up (following intervention). Outcomes included clinical mobility; pain; isometric leg strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
No Exercise: A no exercise (control) group will be asked to maintain their existing activity level for 12 weeks. Outcomes included mobility performance; pain; strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Mobility Performance (Stair Ascent and Descent)
Stair Ascent
|
-0.5 Seconds
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
-0.1 Seconds
Standard Deviation 0.5
|
|
Change in Mobility Performance (Stair Ascent and Descent)
Stair Descent
|
-0.6 Seconds
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
0.0 Seconds
Standard Deviation 0.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 1 and 13Population: Data from one individual from the No Exercise group was not collected for this measure due to an unrelated back injury.
Mobility performance will be measured using the 30-second Chair Stand Test. This test measures the number of times participants can rise and lower from a standard height chair, without using arm rests, in a 30-second period.This measure has produced reliable and valid data in persons with knee OA.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Exercise
n=20 Participants
The participants in this arm will be asked to attend 3 group classes per week for 12 weeks taught by a certified exercise instructor. Five class times will be offered per week. These classes included a warm-up, static poses shown to decrease knee joint loading, and a cool down including flexibility exercises. Measurements will be obtained at baseline (before intervention) and at follow-up (following intervention). Outcomes included clinical mobility; pain; isometric leg strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
Exercise: A biomechanical exercise program shown to decrease joint loading will be administered 3 times a week for 12 weeks. Outcomes included mobility performance; pain; strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
|
No Exercise
n=20 Participants
The participants in this arm will be asked to refrain from changing their physical activity over the 12 weeks and maintain any strategies typically used to manage knee and/or hip pain. Since it is known that exercise is beneficial for pain management and strengthening in knee OA, participants randomized to the no exercise group will be offered the same exercise program following completion of the study. Measurements will be obtained at baseline (before intervention) and at follow-up (following intervention). Outcomes included clinical mobility; pain; isometric leg strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
No Exercise: A no exercise (control) group will be asked to maintain their existing activity level for 12 weeks. Outcomes included mobility performance; pain; strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Mobility Performance (30-second Chair Stand Test)
|
3.5 Number of chair stands
Standard Deviation 3.2
|
1.6 Number of chair stands
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 1 and 13Resilience will be measured using the Resilience Scale 25 Survey, which is a 25-item questionnaire designed to evaluate a participants ability to adapt to stress and adversity. The test is scored out of 175 (scores ranging from 25 to 175), with higher scores indicating higher resilience.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Exercise
n=20 Participants
The participants in this arm will be asked to attend 3 group classes per week for 12 weeks taught by a certified exercise instructor. Five class times will be offered per week. These classes included a warm-up, static poses shown to decrease knee joint loading, and a cool down including flexibility exercises. Measurements will be obtained at baseline (before intervention) and at follow-up (following intervention). Outcomes included clinical mobility; pain; isometric leg strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
Exercise: A biomechanical exercise program shown to decrease joint loading will be administered 3 times a week for 12 weeks. Outcomes included mobility performance; pain; strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
|
No Exercise
n=21 Participants
The participants in this arm will be asked to refrain from changing their physical activity over the 12 weeks and maintain any strategies typically used to manage knee and/or hip pain. Since it is known that exercise is beneficial for pain management and strengthening in knee OA, participants randomized to the no exercise group will be offered the same exercise program following completion of the study. Measurements will be obtained at baseline (before intervention) and at follow-up (following intervention). Outcomes included clinical mobility; pain; isometric leg strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
No Exercise: A no exercise (control) group will be asked to maintain their existing activity level for 12 weeks. Outcomes included mobility performance; pain; strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Resilience
|
8.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.5
|
3.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 1 and 13The Work Ability Index (WAI) is a widely-used self-report questionnaire that evaluates a worker's capacity to perform a job accounting for their physical and mental well-being in addition to the demands of their job. The WAI consists of seven dimensions including current work ability relative to life-time best, work ability related to job demands, number of current physician-diagnosed health conditions, estimated work impairment due to the conditions, sick leave over the past year, own prognosis, and mental resources. Total scores range from 7 to 49 and can fall under one of four classifications: poor work ability that should be restored (7-27), moderate work ability that should be improved (28-36), good work ability that should be supported (37-43), and excellent work ability that should be maintained (44-49). The WAI produces reliable data.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Exercise
n=20 Participants
The participants in this arm will be asked to attend 3 group classes per week for 12 weeks taught by a certified exercise instructor. Five class times will be offered per week. These classes included a warm-up, static poses shown to decrease knee joint loading, and a cool down including flexibility exercises. Measurements will be obtained at baseline (before intervention) and at follow-up (following intervention). Outcomes included clinical mobility; pain; isometric leg strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
Exercise: A biomechanical exercise program shown to decrease joint loading will be administered 3 times a week for 12 weeks. Outcomes included mobility performance; pain; strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
|
No Exercise
n=21 Participants
The participants in this arm will be asked to refrain from changing their physical activity over the 12 weeks and maintain any strategies typically used to manage knee and/or hip pain. Since it is known that exercise is beneficial for pain management and strengthening in knee OA, participants randomized to the no exercise group will be offered the same exercise program following completion of the study. Measurements will be obtained at baseline (before intervention) and at follow-up (following intervention). Outcomes included clinical mobility; pain; isometric leg strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
No Exercise: A no exercise (control) group will be asked to maintain their existing activity level for 12 weeks. Outcomes included mobility performance; pain; strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Work Ability
|
0.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.3
|
0.6 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 1 and 13Depression will be assessed with the Centre of Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale, a 20-item scale developed for the general population with emphasis on affect. Elements of affect include mood, guilt, worthlessness, helplessness, appetite, and sleep. Each item is scored from 0 (rarely or none of the time), to 3 (most of the time). The items are summed to produce a total score between 0 and 60 with a score of 16 or higher indicating depression.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Exercise
n=20 Participants
The participants in this arm will be asked to attend 3 group classes per week for 12 weeks taught by a certified exercise instructor. Five class times will be offered per week. These classes included a warm-up, static poses shown to decrease knee joint loading, and a cool down including flexibility exercises. Measurements will be obtained at baseline (before intervention) and at follow-up (following intervention). Outcomes included clinical mobility; pain; isometric leg strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
Exercise: A biomechanical exercise program shown to decrease joint loading will be administered 3 times a week for 12 weeks. Outcomes included mobility performance; pain; strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
|
No Exercise
n=21 Participants
The participants in this arm will be asked to refrain from changing their physical activity over the 12 weeks and maintain any strategies typically used to manage knee and/or hip pain. Since it is known that exercise is beneficial for pain management and strengthening in knee OA, participants randomized to the no exercise group will be offered the same exercise program following completion of the study. Measurements will be obtained at baseline (before intervention) and at follow-up (following intervention). Outcomes included clinical mobility; pain; isometric leg strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
No Exercise: A no exercise (control) group will be asked to maintain their existing activity level for 12 weeks. Outcomes included mobility performance; pain; strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Depressive Symptoms
|
1.0 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.8
|
-0.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 1 and 13The Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES) measures arthritis-specific beliefs regarding perception of performance on certain tasks to cope with the disease. The ASES is measured using 20 questions on a 10-100 scale with respect to three main areas: pain management (5 questions), physical function (9 questions), and other symptoms (6 questions). Each question is scored from 10 (very uncertain), to 100 (very certain), in 10-point increments. The minimum score for each subscale is 10, and the maximum score for each subscale is 100. The scores from each subscale are averaged to produce a normalized total score. Scores closer to 100 indicate greater certainty that a participant can cope with a particular task as a consequence of their disease.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Exercise
n=20 Participants
The participants in this arm will be asked to attend 3 group classes per week for 12 weeks taught by a certified exercise instructor. Five class times will be offered per week. These classes included a warm-up, static poses shown to decrease knee joint loading, and a cool down including flexibility exercises. Measurements will be obtained at baseline (before intervention) and at follow-up (following intervention). Outcomes included clinical mobility; pain; isometric leg strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
Exercise: A biomechanical exercise program shown to decrease joint loading will be administered 3 times a week for 12 weeks. Outcomes included mobility performance; pain; strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
|
No Exercise
n=21 Participants
The participants in this arm will be asked to refrain from changing their physical activity over the 12 weeks and maintain any strategies typically used to manage knee and/or hip pain. Since it is known that exercise is beneficial for pain management and strengthening in knee OA, participants randomized to the no exercise group will be offered the same exercise program following completion of the study. Measurements will be obtained at baseline (before intervention) and at follow-up (following intervention). Outcomes included clinical mobility; pain; isometric leg strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
No Exercise: A no exercise (control) group will be asked to maintain their existing activity level for 12 weeks. Outcomes included mobility performance; pain; strength; cardiovascular fitness; and resilience.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Arthritis-related Self-Efficacy
Pain
|
0.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
|
-0.4 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.0
|
|
Change in Arthritis-related Self-Efficacy
Function
|
0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
|
0.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
|
|
Change in Arthritis-related Self-Efficacy
Symptom
|
0.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
|
0.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
|
|
Change in Arthritis-related Self-Efficacy
Total
|
0.8 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.3
|
-0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.0
|
Adverse Events
Exercise
No Exercise
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dr. Monica Maly
McMaster University/University of Waterloo
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place