Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Family-centered Intervention for Acutely-ill Persons With Dementia (NCT NCT03046121)

NCT ID: NCT03046121

Last Updated: 2024-06-06

Results Overview

Assessed using the Barthel Index, comparing the change from 2 weeks prior to admission to changes at admission, discharge, and 2 and 6 months post-discharge. Return to baseline physical function (yes/no) was scored as yes if the participant's functional status was the same as baseline, within five points or less than baseline, or greater than baseline. Scores ranged from 0 to 1, with higher scores representing better outcomes.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

461 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Change from 2 weeks prior to admission to changes at admission, discharge, and 2 and 6 months post-discharge

Results posted on

2024-06-06

Participant Flow

Recruitment was conducted between November 2017-July 2021 in six medical units across three hospitals.

Unit of analysis: hospital units

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Fam-FFC
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan. Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC): An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).
Overall Study
STARTED
229 3
232 3
Overall Study
Hospital 1
89 1
86 1
Overall Study
Hospital 2
73 1
73 1
Overall Study
Hospital 3
67 1
73 1
Overall Study
COMPLETED
183 3
160 3
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
46 0
72 0

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Fam-FFC
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan. Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC): An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).
Overall Study
Death
32
60
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
14
12

Baseline Characteristics

Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Fam-FFC
n=3 hospital units
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan. Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC): An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
n=3 hospital units
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).
Total
n=6 hospital units
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
patients · <=18 years
0 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
0 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
0 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Age, Categorical
patients · Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
0 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
0 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Age, Categorical
patients · >=65 years
229 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
232 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
461 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Age, Categorical
caregivers · <=18 years
0 Participants
n=213 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
0 Participants
n=222 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
0 Participants
n=435 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Age, Categorical
caregivers · Between 18 and 65 years
127 Participants
n=213 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
120 Participants
n=222 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
247 Participants
n=435 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Age, Categorical
caregivers · >=65 years
86 Participants
n=213 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
102 Participants
n=222 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
188 Participants
n=435 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Age, Continuous
patients
82.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4 • n=458 Participants
81.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3 • n=464 Participants
81.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4 • n=922 Participants
Age, Continuous
caregivers
61.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3 • n=458 Participants
62.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1 • n=464 Participants
61.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2 • n=922 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
patients · Female
145 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
130 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
275 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Sex: Female, Male
patients · Male
84 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
102 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
186 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Sex: Female, Male
caregivers · Female
166 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
168 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
334 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Sex: Female, Male
caregivers · Male
63 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
64 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
127 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
patients · Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
5 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
13 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
patients · Not Hispanic or Latino
221 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
227 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
448 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
patients · Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
0 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
0 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
caregivers · Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
7 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
17 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
caregivers · Not Hispanic or Latino
216 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
221 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
437 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
caregivers · Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
4 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
7 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Race (NIH/OMB)
patients · American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
0 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
0 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Race (NIH/OMB)
patients · Asian
3 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
0 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
3 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Race (NIH/OMB)
patients · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
0 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
0 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Race (NIH/OMB)
patients · Black or African American
89 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
76 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
165 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Race (NIH/OMB)
patients · White
134 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
156 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
290 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Race (NIH/OMB)
patients · More than one race
3 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
0 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
3 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Race (NIH/OMB)
patients · Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
0 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
0 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Race (NIH/OMB)
caregivers · American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
0 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
0 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Race (NIH/OMB)
caregivers · Asian
3 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
0 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
3 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Race (NIH/OMB)
caregivers · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
0 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
0 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Race (NIH/OMB)
caregivers · Black or African American
85 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
69 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
154 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Race (NIH/OMB)
caregivers · White
133 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
157 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
290 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Race (NIH/OMB)
caregivers · More than one race
5 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
2 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
7 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Race (NIH/OMB)
caregivers · Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
4 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
7 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Marital Status
patients · Widowed
96 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
98 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
194 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Marital Status
patients · Married
83 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
88 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
171 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Marital Status
patients · Other
50 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
46 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
96 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Marital Status
caregivers · Widowed
11 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
19 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
30 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Marital Status
caregivers · Married
132 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
139 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
271 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Marital Status
caregivers · Other
86 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
74 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
160 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Change from 2 weeks prior to admission to changes at admission, discharge, and 2 and 6 months post-discharge

Assessed using the Barthel Index, comparing the change from 2 weeks prior to admission to changes at admission, discharge, and 2 and 6 months post-discharge. Return to baseline physical function (yes/no) was scored as yes if the participant's functional status was the same as baseline, within five points or less than baseline, or greater than baseline. Scores ranged from 0 to 1, with higher scores representing better outcomes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Fam-FFC
n=3 hospital units
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan. Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC): An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
n=3 hospital units
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).
Return to Baseline Physical Function Based on the Barthel Index (Change From 2 Weeks Prior to Admission and Changes at Admission, Discharge, and 2 and 6 Months Post-discharge).
Admission
0.68 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
0.76 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
Return to Baseline Physical Function Based on the Barthel Index (Change From 2 Weeks Prior to Admission and Changes at Admission, Discharge, and 2 and 6 Months Post-discharge).
Discharge
0.77 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
0.73 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
Return to Baseline Physical Function Based on the Barthel Index (Change From 2 Weeks Prior to Admission and Changes at Admission, Discharge, and 2 and 6 Months Post-discharge).
2-months post discharge
0.77 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
0.61 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
Return to Baseline Physical Function Based on the Barthel Index (Change From 2 Weeks Prior to Admission and Changes at Admission, Discharge, and 2 and 6 Months Post-discharge).
6-months post-discharge
0.66 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
0.53 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.14

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Discharge and 2 and 6 months post-discharge

Assessed by the Preparedness for Caregiving Scale with scores ranging from 0 to 4 and higher scores indicating greater perceived preparedness.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Fam-FFC
n=3 hospital units
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan. Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC): An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
n=3 hospital units
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).
Caregiver Preparedness
Discharge
23.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.65
23.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.93
Caregiver Preparedness
2 months post-discharge
24.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.58
25.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.38
Caregiver Preparedness
6 months post-discharge
26.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.83
26.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.63

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Admission, Discharge, 2 and 6 months post-discharge

Assessed by the Confusion Assessment Method Short Form with scores ranging from 0-7 and higher scores indicating more delirium severity.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Fam-FFC
n=3 hospital units
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan. Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC): An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
n=3 hospital units
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).
Delirium Severity
Admission
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.71
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.65
Delirium Severity
Discharge
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.51
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.43
Delirium Severity
2 month post-discharge
.98 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.46
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.44
Delirium Severity
6 months post-discharge
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.57
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.46

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Admission, Discharge, 2 and 6 months post-discharge

Assessed by the Brief Neuropsychiatric Inventory with scores ranging from 0 to 36 and higher scores indicating greater behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Fam-FFC
n=3 hospital units
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan. Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC): An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
n=3 hospital units
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).
Behavior
Admission
8.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.60
7.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.55
Behavior
Discharge
6.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.07
6.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.81
Behavior
2 months post-discharge
5.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.03
5.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.79
Behavior
6 months post-discharge
5.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.24
4.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.56

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: admission, discharge, 2 and 6 months post-discharge

Actigraphy data, measured by the MotionWatch 8, includes minutes spent in moderate activity.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Fam-FFC
n=3 hospital units
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan. Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC): An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
n=3 hospital units
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).
Moderate Physical Activity Level
Admission
4.8 minutes
Standard Deviation 14.11
8.3 minutes
Standard Deviation 29.35
Moderate Physical Activity Level
Discharge
14.2 minutes
Standard Deviation 42.20
19.1 minutes
Standard Deviation 48.86
Moderate Physical Activity Level
2 months post-discharge
23.3 minutes
Standard Deviation 51.65
29.9 minutes
Standard Deviation 63.07
Moderate Physical Activity Level
6 months post-discharge
27.3 minutes
Standard Deviation 41.86
24.88 minutes
Standard Deviation 43.26

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: admission, discharge, 2 and 6 months post-discharge

Assessed by the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia with total scores ranging between 0 to 38 and higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Fam-FFC
n=3 hospital units
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan. Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC): An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
n=3 hospital units
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).
Depression
Admission
9.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.70
9.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.72
Depression
Discharge
7.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.19
7.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.02
Depression
2 months post-discharge
6.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.05
6.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.95
Depression
6 months post-discharge
6.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.74
5.01 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.44

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Discharge and 2 and 6 months post-discharge

Assessed by the Modified Caregiver Strain Index with total scores ranging from 0 to 26 and higher scores indicating greater caregiver strain.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Fam-FFC
n=3 hospital units
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan. Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC): An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
n=3 hospital units
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).
Caregiver Strain
Discharge
8.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.53
7.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.63
Caregiver Strain
2 months post-discharge
8.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.02
7.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.90
Caregiver Strain
6 months post-discharge
6.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.83
6.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.32

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Discharge and 2 and 6 months post discharge.

Assessed using the Short Form Zarit Burden Interview with total scores total scores ranging from 0 to 48, with higher scores corresponding to higher levels of caregiver burden.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Fam-FFC
n=3 hospital units
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan. Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC): An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
n=3 hospital units
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).
Caregiver Burden
Discharge
10.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.02
9.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.79
Caregiver Burden
2 months post-discharge
13.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.05
12.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.88
Caregiver Burden
6 months post-discharge
9.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.64
7.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.26

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Discharge and 2 and 6 months

Assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression subscale with total scores ranging from 0 to 21 and higher scores indicating greater levels of caregiver anxiety.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Fam-FFC
n=229 Participants
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan. Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC): An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
n=232 Participants
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).
Caregiver Anxiety
2 months post-discharge
4.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.78
4.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.76
Caregiver Anxiety
Discharge
5.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.79
5.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.72
Caregiver Anxiety
6 months post-discharge
4.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.94
4.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.91

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: discharge and 2 and 6 months

Number of falls a week after hospital discharge and 2 and 6 months post discharge.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Fam-FFC
n=3 hospital units
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan. Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC): An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
n=3 hospital units
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).
Falls
Discharge
.15 Falls
Standard Deviation .55
.14 Falls
Standard Deviation .66
Falls
2 months post-discharge
.52 Falls
Standard Deviation 1.52
.41 Falls
Standard Deviation 1.19
Falls
6 months post-discharge
.76 Falls
Standard Deviation 2.71
.57 Falls
Standard Deviation 2.17

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: discharge and 2 and 6 months

Number of hospitalizations within a week after discharge; number of hospitalizations between discharge to 2 months post-discharge; number of hospitalizations between 2 months post-discharge and 6 months post-discharge.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Fam-FFC
n=3 hospital units
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan. Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC): An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
n=3 hospital units
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).
Hospitalizations
Discharge
.05 Hospitalizations
Standard Deviation .22
.10 Hospitalizations
Standard Deviation .31
Hospitalizations
2 months post-discharge
.33 Hospitalizations
Standard Deviation .73
.41 Hospitalizations
Standard Deviation .98
Hospitalizations
6 months post-discharge
.32 Hospitalizations
Standard Deviation .86
.33 Hospitalizations
Standard Deviation .77

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: discharge and 2 and 6 months

Number of ER visits within a week after discharge; number of ER visits between discharge to 2 months post-discharge; number of ER visits between 2 months post-discharge and 6 months post-discharge.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Fam-FFC
n=3 hospital units
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan. Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC): An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
n=3 hospital units
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).
Emergency Room (ER) Visits
2 months post-discharge
.41 Emergency room visits
Standard Deviation .80
.44 Emergency room visits
Standard Deviation 1.02
Emergency Room (ER) Visits
Discharge
.06 Emergency room visits
Standard Deviation .23
.08 Emergency room visits
Standard Deviation .29
Emergency Room (ER) Visits
6 months post-discharge
.46 Emergency room visits
Standard Deviation .97
.35 Emergency room visits
Standard Deviation .71

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: end of intervention at each study site, 12 months after enrollment initiated

Population: Only participants in the Fam-FFC intervention group were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) and were included in the overall number of participants analyzed.

cost equals staff and research nurse time (hours worked and training time) to conduct intervention.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Fam-FFC
n=3 hospital units
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan. Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC): An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).
Health Care Cost
320 cost in dollars
Standard Deviation 160

Adverse Events

Fam-FFC

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 32 deaths

Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 60 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Marie Boltz PhD

Penn State University

Phone: 215-962-9712

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place