Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Family-centered Intervention for Acutely-ill Persons With Dementia (NCT NCT03046121)
NCT ID: NCT03046121
Last Updated: 2024-06-06
Results Overview
Assessed using the Barthel Index, comparing the change from 2 weeks prior to admission to changes at admission, discharge, and 2 and 6 months post-discharge. Return to baseline physical function (yes/no) was scored as yes if the participant's functional status was the same as baseline, within five points or less than baseline, or greater than baseline. Scores ranged from 0 to 1, with higher scores representing better outcomes.
COMPLETED
NA
461 participants
Change from 2 weeks prior to admission to changes at admission, discharge, and 2 and 6 months post-discharge
2024-06-06
Participant Flow
Recruitment was conducted between November 2017-July 2021 in six medical units across three hospitals.
Unit of analysis: hospital units
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Fam-FFC
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan.
Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC): An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
|
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
229 3
|
232 3
|
|
Overall Study
Hospital 1
|
89 1
|
86 1
|
|
Overall Study
Hospital 2
|
73 1
|
73 1
|
|
Overall Study
Hospital 3
|
67 1
|
73 1
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
183 3
|
160 3
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
46 0
|
72 0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Fam-FFC
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan.
Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC): An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
|
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
32
|
60
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
14
|
12
|
Baseline Characteristics
Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Fam-FFC
n=3 hospital units
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan.
Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC): An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
|
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
n=3 hospital units
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).
|
Total
n=6 hospital units
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
patients · <=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
0 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
0 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Age, Categorical
patients · Between 18 and 65 years
|
0 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
0 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
0 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Age, Categorical
patients · >=65 years
|
229 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
232 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
461 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Age, Categorical
caregivers · <=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=213 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
0 Participants
n=222 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
0 Participants
n=435 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Age, Categorical
caregivers · Between 18 and 65 years
|
127 Participants
n=213 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
120 Participants
n=222 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
247 Participants
n=435 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Age, Categorical
caregivers · >=65 years
|
86 Participants
n=213 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
102 Participants
n=222 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
188 Participants
n=435 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Age, Continuous
patients
|
82.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4 • n=458 Participants
|
81.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3 • n=464 Participants
|
81.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4 • n=922 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
caregivers
|
61.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3 • n=458 Participants
|
62.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1 • n=464 Participants
|
61.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2 • n=922 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
patients · Female
|
145 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
130 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
275 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
patients · Male
|
84 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
102 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
186 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
caregivers · Female
|
166 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
168 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
334 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
caregivers · Male
|
63 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
64 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
127 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
patients · Hispanic or Latino
|
8 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
5 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
13 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
patients · Not Hispanic or Latino
|
221 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
227 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
448 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
patients · Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
0 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
0 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
caregivers · Hispanic or Latino
|
10 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
7 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
17 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
caregivers · Not Hispanic or Latino
|
216 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
221 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
437 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
caregivers · Unknown or Not Reported
|
3 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
4 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
7 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
patients · American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
0 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
0 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
patients · Asian
|
3 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
0 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
3 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
patients · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
0 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
0 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
patients · Black or African American
|
89 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
76 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
165 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
patients · White
|
134 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
156 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
290 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
patients · More than one race
|
3 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
0 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
3 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
patients · Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
0 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
0 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
caregivers · American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
0 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
0 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
caregivers · Asian
|
3 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
0 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
3 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
caregivers · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
0 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
0 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
caregivers · Black or African American
|
85 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
69 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
154 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
caregivers · White
|
133 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
157 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
290 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
caregivers · More than one race
|
5 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
2 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
7 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
caregivers · Unknown or Not Reported
|
3 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
4 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
7 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Marital Status
patients · Widowed
|
96 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
98 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
194 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Marital Status
patients · Married
|
83 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
88 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
171 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Marital Status
patients · Other
|
50 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
46 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
96 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Marital Status
caregivers · Widowed
|
11 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
19 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
30 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Marital Status
caregivers · Married
|
132 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
139 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
271 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
|
Marital Status
caregivers · Other
|
86 Participants
n=229 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
74 Participants
n=232 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
160 Participants
n=461 Participants • Row population differs from the overall population due to attrition, which includes participants who have died, withdrawn, or were unavailable.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Change from 2 weeks prior to admission to changes at admission, discharge, and 2 and 6 months post-dischargeAssessed using the Barthel Index, comparing the change from 2 weeks prior to admission to changes at admission, discharge, and 2 and 6 months post-discharge. Return to baseline physical function (yes/no) was scored as yes if the participant's functional status was the same as baseline, within five points or less than baseline, or greater than baseline. Scores ranged from 0 to 1, with higher scores representing better outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fam-FFC
n=3 hospital units
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan.
Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC): An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
|
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
n=3 hospital units
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Return to Baseline Physical Function Based on the Barthel Index (Change From 2 Weeks Prior to Admission and Changes at Admission, Discharge, and 2 and 6 Months Post-discharge).
Admission
|
0.68 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
|
0.76 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
|
|
Return to Baseline Physical Function Based on the Barthel Index (Change From 2 Weeks Prior to Admission and Changes at Admission, Discharge, and 2 and 6 Months Post-discharge).
Discharge
|
0.77 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
|
0.73 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
|
Return to Baseline Physical Function Based on the Barthel Index (Change From 2 Weeks Prior to Admission and Changes at Admission, Discharge, and 2 and 6 Months Post-discharge).
2-months post discharge
|
0.77 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
|
0.61 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
|
Return to Baseline Physical Function Based on the Barthel Index (Change From 2 Weeks Prior to Admission and Changes at Admission, Discharge, and 2 and 6 Months Post-discharge).
6-months post-discharge
|
0.66 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
|
0.53 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Discharge and 2 and 6 months post-dischargeAssessed by the Preparedness for Caregiving Scale with scores ranging from 0 to 4 and higher scores indicating greater perceived preparedness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fam-FFC
n=3 hospital units
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan.
Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC): An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
|
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
n=3 hospital units
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Caregiver Preparedness
Discharge
|
23.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.65
|
23.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.93
|
|
Caregiver Preparedness
2 months post-discharge
|
24.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.58
|
25.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.38
|
|
Caregiver Preparedness
6 months post-discharge
|
26.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.83
|
26.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.63
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Admission, Discharge, 2 and 6 months post-dischargeAssessed by the Confusion Assessment Method Short Form with scores ranging from 0-7 and higher scores indicating more delirium severity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fam-FFC
n=3 hospital units
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan.
Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC): An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
|
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
n=3 hospital units
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Delirium Severity
Admission
|
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.71
|
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.65
|
|
Delirium Severity
Discharge
|
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.51
|
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.43
|
|
Delirium Severity
2 month post-discharge
|
.98 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.46
|
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.44
|
|
Delirium Severity
6 months post-discharge
|
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.57
|
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.46
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Admission, Discharge, 2 and 6 months post-dischargeAssessed by the Brief Neuropsychiatric Inventory with scores ranging from 0 to 36 and higher scores indicating greater behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fam-FFC
n=3 hospital units
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan.
Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC): An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
|
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
n=3 hospital units
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Behavior
Admission
|
8.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.60
|
7.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.55
|
|
Behavior
Discharge
|
6.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.07
|
6.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.81
|
|
Behavior
2 months post-discharge
|
5.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.03
|
5.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.79
|
|
Behavior
6 months post-discharge
|
5.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.24
|
4.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.56
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: admission, discharge, 2 and 6 months post-dischargeActigraphy data, measured by the MotionWatch 8, includes minutes spent in moderate activity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fam-FFC
n=3 hospital units
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan.
Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC): An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
|
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
n=3 hospital units
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Moderate Physical Activity Level
Admission
|
4.8 minutes
Standard Deviation 14.11
|
8.3 minutes
Standard Deviation 29.35
|
|
Moderate Physical Activity Level
Discharge
|
14.2 minutes
Standard Deviation 42.20
|
19.1 minutes
Standard Deviation 48.86
|
|
Moderate Physical Activity Level
2 months post-discharge
|
23.3 minutes
Standard Deviation 51.65
|
29.9 minutes
Standard Deviation 63.07
|
|
Moderate Physical Activity Level
6 months post-discharge
|
27.3 minutes
Standard Deviation 41.86
|
24.88 minutes
Standard Deviation 43.26
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: admission, discharge, 2 and 6 months post-dischargeAssessed by the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia with total scores ranging between 0 to 38 and higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fam-FFC
n=3 hospital units
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan.
Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC): An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
|
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
n=3 hospital units
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Depression
Admission
|
9.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.70
|
9.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.72
|
|
Depression
Discharge
|
7.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.19
|
7.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.02
|
|
Depression
2 months post-discharge
|
6.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.05
|
6.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.95
|
|
Depression
6 months post-discharge
|
6.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.74
|
5.01 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.44
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Discharge and 2 and 6 months post-dischargeAssessed by the Modified Caregiver Strain Index with total scores ranging from 0 to 26 and higher scores indicating greater caregiver strain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fam-FFC
n=3 hospital units
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan.
Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC): An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
|
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
n=3 hospital units
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Caregiver Strain
Discharge
|
8.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.53
|
7.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.63
|
|
Caregiver Strain
2 months post-discharge
|
8.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.02
|
7.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.90
|
|
Caregiver Strain
6 months post-discharge
|
6.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.83
|
6.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.32
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Discharge and 2 and 6 months post discharge.Assessed using the Short Form Zarit Burden Interview with total scores total scores ranging from 0 to 48, with higher scores corresponding to higher levels of caregiver burden.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fam-FFC
n=3 hospital units
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan.
Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC): An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
|
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
n=3 hospital units
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Caregiver Burden
Discharge
|
10.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.02
|
9.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.79
|
|
Caregiver Burden
2 months post-discharge
|
13.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.05
|
12.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.88
|
|
Caregiver Burden
6 months post-discharge
|
9.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.64
|
7.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.26
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Discharge and 2 and 6 monthsAssessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression subscale with total scores ranging from 0 to 21 and higher scores indicating greater levels of caregiver anxiety.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fam-FFC
n=229 Participants
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan.
Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC): An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
|
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
n=232 Participants
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Caregiver Anxiety
2 months post-discharge
|
4.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.78
|
4.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.76
|
|
Caregiver Anxiety
Discharge
|
5.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.79
|
5.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.72
|
|
Caregiver Anxiety
6 months post-discharge
|
4.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.94
|
4.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.91
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: discharge and 2 and 6 monthsNumber of falls a week after hospital discharge and 2 and 6 months post discharge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fam-FFC
n=3 hospital units
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan.
Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC): An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
|
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
n=3 hospital units
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Falls
Discharge
|
.15 Falls
Standard Deviation .55
|
.14 Falls
Standard Deviation .66
|
|
Falls
2 months post-discharge
|
.52 Falls
Standard Deviation 1.52
|
.41 Falls
Standard Deviation 1.19
|
|
Falls
6 months post-discharge
|
.76 Falls
Standard Deviation 2.71
|
.57 Falls
Standard Deviation 2.17
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: discharge and 2 and 6 monthsNumber of hospitalizations within a week after discharge; number of hospitalizations between discharge to 2 months post-discharge; number of hospitalizations between 2 months post-discharge and 6 months post-discharge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fam-FFC
n=3 hospital units
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan.
Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC): An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
|
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
n=3 hospital units
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Hospitalizations
Discharge
|
.05 Hospitalizations
Standard Deviation .22
|
.10 Hospitalizations
Standard Deviation .31
|
|
Hospitalizations
2 months post-discharge
|
.33 Hospitalizations
Standard Deviation .73
|
.41 Hospitalizations
Standard Deviation .98
|
|
Hospitalizations
6 months post-discharge
|
.32 Hospitalizations
Standard Deviation .86
|
.33 Hospitalizations
Standard Deviation .77
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: discharge and 2 and 6 monthsNumber of ER visits within a week after discharge; number of ER visits between discharge to 2 months post-discharge; number of ER visits between 2 months post-discharge and 6 months post-discharge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fam-FFC
n=3 hospital units
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan.
Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC): An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
|
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
n=3 hospital units
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Emergency Room (ER) Visits
2 months post-discharge
|
.41 Emergency room visits
Standard Deviation .80
|
.44 Emergency room visits
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
|
Emergency Room (ER) Visits
Discharge
|
.06 Emergency room visits
Standard Deviation .23
|
.08 Emergency room visits
Standard Deviation .29
|
|
Emergency Room (ER) Visits
6 months post-discharge
|
.46 Emergency room visits
Standard Deviation .97
|
.35 Emergency room visits
Standard Deviation .71
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: end of intervention at each study site, 12 months after enrollment initiatedPopulation: Only participants in the Fam-FFC intervention group were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) and were included in the overall number of participants analyzed.
cost equals staff and research nurse time (hours worked and training time) to conduct intervention.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Fam-FFC
n=3 hospital units
The intervention consists of :Component 1- Environmental and Policy Assessments; Component II- Education of Nursing Staff; Component III-Ongoing Training/Motivation of Nursing Staff. The Fam-FFC Nurse will work with the champions to mentor and motivate nursing staff to provide: (a) role modeling Fam-FFC, reinforcing performance of Fam-FFC, and brainstorming about ways to overcome challenges; (b) highlighting staff role models; Component IV Implementation of the FamPath Pathway which includes: (a) information on the admitting condition, diagnostics, treatment;(b) family/patient education; (c) transitional hand-off to post-acute providers; and (d) post-acute follow-up to provide ongoing education and modification of the function-focused care plan.
Family-centered Function-focused Care (Fam-FFC): An educational empowerment model for family CGs that includes a care pathway, provided within a social-ecological in-patient framework promoting specialized care to patients with ADRD. The intervention creates an "enabling" milieu for the person with ADRD through environmental and policy assessment/modification, staff education, unit-based champions, and individualized goal setting that focuses on functional recovery during hospitalization and the immediate post-acute period.
|
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
Education of the nursing staff in participating hospital units (exactly as offered in treatment sites), and education of family caregivers about hospital orientation and reinforcement of discharge teaching (medications/treatments, medical follow-up).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Health Care Cost
|
320 cost in dollars
Standard Deviation 160
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Fam-FFC
Attention Control (Fam- FFC Ed-only)
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place