Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
4000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-07-01
2018-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators therefore propose to conduct a prospective well-designed study to include a representative sample of both adults and children (4000); to verify the validity of the retrospective pilot data, in a South African population.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A proviso to the use of lung function testing is the determination of "normal" values; which are determined for age, gender, height and ethnicity for the relevant population \[3\]. These "normal' values should also take into account the normal lung function decline associated and the aging process. It is well recognised that the comparison of an individual patients' results to an ethnically inappropriate population may lead to the under or -over diagnosis of disease, inappropriate treatments and result in increased burden on individuals, their families and the healthcare system \[4-6\]. There are numerous published reference equations, but the recently published Global Lung Initiative multi-ethnic reference equations published in 2012(GLI2012) collated the largest spirometry data set from individuals aged 2.5 to 95 years \[7\]. The innovation in GLI2012 was that it allowed for the smooth transitioning of data from childhood adulthood using sophisticated statistical modelling.
The investigators have previously collated data in phase 1 of this study using the GLI methodology on published African spirometry data from 26 594 individuals, and found a wide variation in predicted z-scores when fitting the African data to GLI2012, with a fairly good match between the black African males and African-Americans \[15\]. This dataset was skewed as due to the large number of African males and with a disproportionally larger contribution of data from North Africa and therefore requires confirmation. The investigators therefore propose to conduct a prospective well-designed study to include a representative sample of both adults and children (4000); to verify the validity of the retrospective pilot data, in a South African population.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
ECOLOGIC_OR_COMMUNITY
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Study number of at least 300 'healthy' subjects \[7\] per population band as per table 1.
* Availability of essential background information for each subject (birth date, date of test, gender, height, weight, body mass index, socioeconomic status and ethnic group).
* Consent given for adults 18 years and above, and assent for children over the age of 8 years and parental/guardian consent for all children under the age of 18 years.
Exclusion Criteria
* Chronic lung diseases: including asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
* Current or previous tuberculosis infection
* Myocardial infarction
* Stroke
* Muscular disorders
* Previous history of cardiac diseases
* Current smoker
* Past smoker with \>5 pack year of tobacco
* Previous lung surgery
5 Years
95 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
AstraZeneca
INDUSTRY
Medical Research Council, South Africa
OTHER
University of KwaZulu
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of KwaZulu Natal
Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Refiloe Masekela, PhD
Role: primary
Diane Pillay
Role: backup
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BE295/16
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id