Trial Outcomes & Findings for Improving Neurocognitive Deficits and Function in Schizophrenia With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (NCT NCT03037983)
NCT ID: NCT03037983
Last Updated: 2024-08-15
Results Overview
Changes in scores for working memory performance accuracy will serve as dependent measure for testing the hypothesis that rTMS improves working memory. Working memory performance was assessed using a non-standardized task developed in house, which is basically a Sterberg style delayed response task in which memoranda are displayed and are to be remembered across a short delay period. The hypothesis will be supported if the investigators find greater working memory difference in the active compared to the sham-rTMS-treated groups as revealed by t-tests and two-sided tests at an alpha level of 0.05. Scores will be reported as a change in percent accuracy during this working memory task, where higher percent accuracy is better and scores range from -100% to 100%.
COMPLETED
NA
9 participants
before treatment and after 6-week treatment
2024-08-15
Participant Flow
Of the approached potential participants, many were unable to participate due to difficulties with the amount of time required to participate in the study, or a change in interest.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Active
Subjects will receive actual rTMS treatment.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: rTMS is a non-invasive procedure, in which the administration of a transient magnetic field induces electrical currents in specific, targeted brain regions. The intervention will be administered in 20 sessions lasting 50 minutes each over the course of 2-6 weeks. Up to two sessions may be scheduled per day with a one-hour interval in-between.
|
Sham
Subjects will attend and sit through the session, but no rTMS treatment will be actually delivered to them.
Sham: Subjects will still attend treatment sessions as outlined in the rTMS intervention. However, the device will not deliver any stimulation to the subject.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
5
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
5
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Improving Neurocognitive Deficits and Function in Schizophrenia With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Active
n=5 Participants
Subjects will receive actual rTMS treatment.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: rTMS is a non-invasive procedure, in which the administration of a transient magnetic field induces electrical currents in specific, targeted brain regions. The intervention will be administered in 20 sessions lasting 50 minutes each over the course of 2-6 weeks. Up to two sessions may be scheduled per day with a one-hour interval in-between.
|
Sham
n=4 Participants
Subjects will attend and sit through the session, but no rTMS treatment will be actually delivered to them.
Sham: Subjects will still attend treatment sessions as outlined in the rTMS intervention. However, the device will not deliver any stimulation to the subject.
|
Total
n=9 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
49.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2 • n=5 Participants
|
40.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.5 • n=7 Participants
|
45.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) Composite T-score Score at Baseline
|
33.75 T-score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.10 • n=5 Participants
|
33.5 T-score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.66 • n=7 Participants
|
33.62 T-score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.56 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: before treatment and after 6-week treatmentChanges in scores for working memory performance accuracy will serve as dependent measure for testing the hypothesis that rTMS improves working memory. Working memory performance was assessed using a non-standardized task developed in house, which is basically a Sterberg style delayed response task in which memoranda are displayed and are to be remembered across a short delay period. The hypothesis will be supported if the investigators find greater working memory difference in the active compared to the sham-rTMS-treated groups as revealed by t-tests and two-sided tests at an alpha level of 0.05. Scores will be reported as a change in percent accuracy during this working memory task, where higher percent accuracy is better and scores range from -100% to 100%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Active
n=5 Participants
Subjects will receive actual rTMS treatment.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: rTMS is a non-invasive procedure, in which the administration of a transient magnetic field induces electrical currents in specific, targeted brain regions. The intervention will be administered in 20 sessions lasting 50 minutes each over the course of 2-6 weeks. Up to two sessions may be scheduled per day with a one-hour interval in-between.
|
Sham
n=4 Participants
Subjects will attend and sit through the session, but no rTMS treatment will be actually delivered to them.
Sham: Subjects will still attend treatment sessions as outlined in the rTMS intervention. However, the device will not deliver any stimulation to the subject.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Working Memory Function
|
-7.28 % change in Working Memory Task Accuracy
Standard Deviation 12.95577091
|
-5.9 % change in Working Memory Task Accuracy
Standard Deviation 15.55040192
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: before treatment and after 6-week treatmentGamma oscillation is viewed as a measure of neurophysiologic function. The investigators will be conducting task-evoked electroencephalography (EEG) to measure gamma oscillation before and after rTMS. It is predicted that the intervention will improve gamma oscillations.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Active
n=5 Participants
Subjects will receive actual rTMS treatment.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: rTMS is a non-invasive procedure, in which the administration of a transient magnetic field induces electrical currents in specific, targeted brain regions. The intervention will be administered in 20 sessions lasting 50 minutes each over the course of 2-6 weeks. Up to two sessions may be scheduled per day with a one-hour interval in-between.
|
Sham
n=4 Participants
Subjects will attend and sit through the session, but no rTMS treatment will be actually delivered to them.
Sham: Subjects will still attend treatment sessions as outlined in the rTMS intervention. However, the device will not deliver any stimulation to the subject.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Neurophysiologic Function
|
0 wavelet coefficient in dB
Standard Deviation .025
|
0 wavelet coefficient in dB
Standard Deviation .03
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: before treatment and after 6-week treatmentChanges in Global Functioning Scale scores (GF) will serve as dependent measure for testing the hypothesis that rTMS improves functioning. The hypothesis will be supported if the investigators find greater GF-difference in the active compared to the sham-rTMS-treated groups as revealed by t-tests and two-sided tests at an alpha level of 0.05. Scale's values range from a minimum score of 1 to a maximum score of 10, with a higher score means better functioning.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Active
n=5 Participants
Subjects will receive actual rTMS treatment.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: rTMS is a non-invasive procedure, in which the administration of a transient magnetic field induces electrical currents in specific, targeted brain regions. The intervention will be administered in 20 sessions lasting 50 minutes each over the course of 2-6 weeks. Up to two sessions may be scheduled per day with a one-hour interval in-between.
|
Sham
n=4 Participants
Subjects will attend and sit through the session, but no rTMS treatment will be actually delivered to them.
Sham: Subjects will still attend treatment sessions as outlined in the rTMS intervention. However, the device will not deliver any stimulation to the subject.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Level of Everyday Functioning
|
0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.1
|
-.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: before treatment and after 6-week treatmentChanges in Brief Assessment of Cognition (BACS) score will serve as a dependent measure for testing the hypothesis that rTMS improves cognitive functioning. The hypothesis will be supported if the investigators find greater GF-difference in the active compared to the sham-rTMS-treated groups as revealed by t-tests and two-sided tests at an alpha level of 0.05. Data will be reported as change in Z-score on the scale, where a higher value means a better outcome, with scores ranging from -3 to 3.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Active
n=5 Participants
Subjects will receive actual rTMS treatment.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: rTMS is a non-invasive procedure, in which the administration of a transient magnetic field induces electrical currents in specific, targeted brain regions. The intervention will be administered in 20 sessions lasting 50 minutes each over the course of 2-6 weeks. Up to two sessions may be scheduled per day with a one-hour interval in-between.
|
Sham
n=4 Participants
Subjects will attend and sit through the session, but no rTMS treatment will be actually delivered to them.
Sham: Subjects will still attend treatment sessions as outlined in the rTMS intervention. However, the device will not deliver any stimulation to the subject.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in General Cognitive Ability
|
-.104 Z-score
Standard Deviation .216
|
.505 Z-score
Standard Deviation .374
|
Adverse Events
Active
Sham
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Active
n=5 participants at risk
Subjects will receive actual rTMS treatment.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: rTMS is a non-invasive procedure, in which the administration of a transient magnetic field induces electrical currents in specific, targeted brain regions. The intervention will be administered in 20 sessions lasting 50 minutes each over the course of 2-6 weeks. Up to two sessions may be scheduled per day with a one-hour interval in-between.
|
Sham
n=4 participants at risk
Subjects will attend and sit through the session, but no rTMS treatment will be actually delivered to them.
Sham: Subjects will still attend treatment sessions as outlined in the rTMS intervention. However, the device will not deliver any stimulation to the subject.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Psychiatric Hospitalization
|
20.0%
1/5 • Adverse event data was collected for one month after the initiation of the intervention
No difference in definitions used.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Adverse event data was collected for one month after the initiation of the intervention
No difference in definitions used.
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place