Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Participants With Complicated Urinary Tract Infections

NCT ID: NCT03032510

Last Updated: 2022-01-06

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1205 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-31

Study Completion Date

2018-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of eravacycline compared to ertapenem in treating participants with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of eravacycline compared to ertapenem in treating participants with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI).

This is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, prospective study to assess the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of eravacycline compared with ertapenem in the treatment of cUTI.

Randomization will be stratified based on two criteria: (1) by primary site of infection (pyelonephritis and normal urinary tract anatomy vs all other diagnoses) and (2) by the receipt of a single dose of effective non-study antibiotics for the acute cUTI within 72 hours prior to randomization. An enrollment cap of approximately 50% is planned for subjects with pyelonephritis with normal urinary tract anatomy. Also, an enrollment cap of approximately 20% is planned for subjects who have received a single dose of non-study antibiotics for the acute cUTI within 72 hours prior to randomization.

In this study subjects will be enrolled and randomized to one of two treatment arms in a 1:1 ratio: (i) eravacycline intravenously (IV) / levofloxacin (PO), or (ii) ertapenem (IV) / levofloxacin (PO).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Complicated Urinary Tract Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Eravacycline (Intravenous)/Levofloxacin (Oral)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Eravacycline

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Levofloxacin

Intervention Type DRUG

Ertapenem (Intravenous)/Levofloxacin (Oral)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ertapenem

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Levofloxacin

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Eravacycline

Intervention Type DRUG

Ertapenem

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Levofloxacin

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

TP-434 Invanz Levaquin

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Male or female participant with either:

1. Pyelonephritis and normal urinary tract anatomy (approximately 50% of the total population), or
2. cUTI with at least one of the following conditions associated with a risk for developing cUTI:

* Indwelling urinary catheter
* Urinary retention (at least approximately 100 milliliters (mL) of residual urine after voiding)
* History of neurogenic bladder
* Partial obstructive uropathy (for example, nephrolithiasis, bladder stones, and ureteral strictures)
* Azotemia of renal origin (not congestive heart failure \[CHF\] or volume related) such that the serum blood urea nitrogen \[BUN\] is elevated (\>20 milligrams \[mg\]/deciliters \[dL\]) and the serum BUN:creatinine ratio is \<15
* Surgically modified or abnormal urinary tract anatomy (for example, bladder diverticula, redundant urine collection system) except urinary tract surgery within the last 30 days (placing of stents or catheters is not considered to be surgical modification)
2. At least 18 years of age at time of consent
3. Able to provide informed consent
4. At least two of the following signs or symptoms:

1. Chills, rigors, or warmth associated with fever or hypothermia
2. Flank pain (pyelonephritis) or pelvic pain (cUTI)
3. Nausea or vomiting
4. Dysuria, urinary frequency, or urinary urgency
5. Costo-vertebral angle tenderness on physical examination
5. Urine specimen with evidence of pyuria

1. Dipstick analysis positive for leukocyte esterase (where positive result is at least "++" as indicated on the urine dipstick provided in the laboratory kit), or
2. ≥10 white blood cells (WBCs) per cubic millimeter, or
3. ≥10 WBCs per high power field
6. If male: must agree to use an effective barrier method of contraception (for example, condom) during the study and for 14 days following the last dose if sexually active with a female of childbearing potential
7. If female, not pregnant or nursing or, if of childbearing potential: must commit to either use at least two medically accepted, effective methods of birth control (for example, condom, spermicidal gel, oral contraceptive, indwelling intrauterine device, hormonal implant /patch, injections, approved cervical ring) during study drug dosing and for 14 days following last study drug dose or practicing sexual abstinence

Exclusion Criteria

1. Use of systemic antibiotics effective in cUTI within 72 hours prior to enrollment except under the following circumstances:

1. Participants with suspected acute cUTI who have received a single dose of effective non-study antibiotics for the acute cUTI
2. Signs and symptoms of cUTI developed while on the antibiotic for another indication
2. History of an ertapenem-resistant urinary tract infection within 1 year of enrollment
3. Likely to require \>10 days of antibiotic treatment to cure the acute cUTI or likely to receive ongoing antibacterial drug prophylaxis prior to the Follow Up visit (21-28 days after randomization) \[for example, participants with chronic vesiculo-ureteral reflux\]
4. Unlikely to survive at least through the duration of the study
5. Hypotension, systolic blood pressure ≤90 millimeters of mercury \[mmHg\]
6. Complicated pyelonephritis with complete obstruction or known or suspected renal or perinephric abscess, emphysematous pyelonephritis, or Any condition likely to require surgery to achieve cure (this does not include procedure to place catheters or obtain diagnosis)
7. Known or suspected urinary fungal infection
8. Uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections
9. Suspected or confirmed active prostatitis, or currently under treatment for prostatitis
10. High risk for cUTI due to Pseudomonas (for example, history of prior cUTIs due to Pseudomonas, ≥20 mg once a day prednisone or equivalent steroid, and other risk factors as perceived by the Investigator)
11. History of renal transplantation
12. Presence of an ileal loop
13. Any history of trauma to the pelvis or urinary tract occurring within 30 days of screening
14. Indwelling urinary catheters present at screening which are not expected to be removed or replaced within 72 hours of enrollment (for example, nephrostomy tubes, stents, urethral and suprapubic catheters).
15. Known concomitant human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection with CD4 counts below 200 within the last six months, or an acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) defining diagnosis within the last six months
16. Neutropenia (Absolute neutrophil count \<1,000 polymorphonuclear leukocytes \[PMNs\]/microliters \[µL\])
17. Participation in a study with an experimental drug or device within 30 days prior to enrollment
18. Known or suspected hypersensitivity to tetracyclines, carbapenems, or β-lactams
19. History of seizures
20. Any other unstable or clinically significant concurrent medical condition (for example, immunosuppressive therapy, chemotherapy, class IV heart or lung disease, end stage renal disease, or requiring hemodialysis) that would, in the opinion of the Investigator, jeopardize the safety of a participant and/or their compliance with the protocol
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals, Inc

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Chief Medical Officer

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fullerton, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Torrance, California, United States

Site Status

Coral Gables, Florida, United States

Site Status

Doral, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Georgia, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Baytown, Texas, United States

Site Status

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Linz, , Austria

Site Status

Salzburg, , Austria

Site Status

Pleven, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Razgrad, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Rousse, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Smyadovo, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Varna, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Veliko Tarnovo, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Tallinn, , Estonia

Site Status

Tartu, , Estonia

Site Status

Võru, , Estonia

Site Status

K'ut'aisi, , Georgia

Site Status

T'bilisi, , Georgia

Site Status

Baja, , Hungary

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Miskolc, , Hungary

Site Status

Nagykanizsa, , Hungary

Site Status

Nyíregyháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Sopron, , Hungary

Site Status

Szentes, , Hungary

Site Status

Tatabánya, , Hungary

Site Status

Jelgava, , Latvia

Site Status

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Valmiera, , Latvia

Site Status

Chisinau, , Moldova

Site Status

Brasov, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Craiova, , Romania

Site Status

Oradea, , Romania

Site Status

Arkhangelsk, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Pyatigorsk, , Russia

Site Status

Rostov-on-the-Don, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Smolensk, , Russia

Site Status

Vsevolozhsk, , Russia

Site Status

Yaroslavl, , Russia

Site Status

Nitra, , Slovakia

Site Status

Poprad, , Slovakia

Site Status

Prešov, , Slovakia

Site Status

Svidník, , Slovakia

Site Status

Žilina, , Slovakia

Site Status

Chernihiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Chernivtsi, , Ukraine

Site Status

Dnipro, , Ukraine

Site Status

Ivano-Frankivsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kharkiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Lviv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Mykolaiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Odesa, , Ukraine

Site Status

Poltava, , Ukraine

Site Status

Uzhhorod, , Ukraine

Site Status

Vinnytsia, , Ukraine

Site Status

Zaporizhia, , Ukraine

Site Status

Zhytomyr, , Ukraine

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Austria Bulgaria Estonia Georgia Hungary Latvia Moldova Romania Russia Slovakia Ukraine

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TP-434-021

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.