ENGAGED 2 Study: Experiences With Mammography Screening and Breast Density 2

NCT ID: NCT03029286

Last Updated: 2025-04-30

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

995 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-02-15

Study Completion Date

2019-05-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This trial will test a decision support web based intervention for women at increased risk for breast cancer due to breast density and other risk factors (age, race/ethnicity, family history of breast cancer, history of prior breast biopsies), and to consider MRI and/or chemoprevention to manage their breast cancer risk.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Along with better-known risk factors such as family history having dense breasts is one of the strongest breast cancer risk factors. Extremely dense breast tissue affects about 10% of women, with an additional third having heterogeneously dense breasts. Women in these categories have 3-6 times the risk of breast cancer as compared to women with least density. Although breast density is measured on routine screening mammograms, it is not typically communicated to patients. This is changing as a result of legal mandates and approaches need to be tested to effectively integrate this clinical information in care. Therefore,we have developed an intervention to support decision making about cancer risk management (MRI and chemoprevention) for women at clinically elevated risk using a web-based intervention that will evaluate the efficacy of a web based intervention with personalized risk information communication versus usual care.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Density Breast Cancer Female

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Personalized Web Intervention Arm

Women will be assigned to view a tailored website featuring their personalized risk information for breast cancer related to breast density and other factors.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Personalized Web Intervention Arm

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Women will be assigned to view a tailored website featuring their personalized risk information for breast cancer related to breast density and other factors.

Usual Care Arm

Women will be assigned to view a website that will take them to the American Cancer Society website to view general risk information for breast cancer related to breast density.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Usual Care Arm

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Health information provided by the American Cancer Society Website

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Usual Care Arm

Health information provided by the American Cancer Society Website

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Personalized Web Intervention Arm

Women will be assigned to view a tailored website featuring their personalized risk information for breast cancer related to breast density and other factors.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women, aged 40-69
* Enrolled at Group Health
* Have had a negative mammogram as part of their routine care
* Either (a) an intermediate 5-year risk (\>1.67%-2.49%) and extremely dense breasts or (b) a high 5-year risk (≥2.50%) and either heterogeneously dense or extremely dense breasts utilizing the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium Risk Calculator (http://tools.bcsc-scc.org/BC5yearRisk/)
* Women must also have a valid email address.

Exclusion Criteria

* Not able to speak and read English
* History of LCIS
* Prior cancer diagnosis (including DCIS)
* Known BRCA1/2 family mutation, or previous receipt of cancer genetic counseling
* Do not want to be contacted for research
* Have previously participated in intervention development activities
* Dis-enrolled from health plan between mammogram and start of recruitment.
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

69 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kaiser Permanente

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Georgetown University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Suzanne C. O'Neill

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Suzanne C O'Neill, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Georgetown University/Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center

Karen Wernli, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Kaiser Permanente

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Knerr S, Wernli KJ, Leppig K, Ehrlich K, Graham AL, Farrell D, Evans C, Luta G, Schwartz MD, O'Neill SC. A web-based personalized risk communication and decision-making tool for women with dense breasts: Design and methods of a randomized controlled trial within an integrated health care system. Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 May;56:25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Feb 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28257920 (View on PubMed)

Mahorter SS, Knerr S, Bowles EJA, Wernli KJ, Gao H, Schwartz MD, O'Neill SC. Prior breast density awareness, knowledge, and communication in a health system-embedded behavioral intervention trial. Cancer. 2020 Apr 15;126(8):1614-1621. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32711. Epub 2020 Jan 24.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31977078 (View on PubMed)

Wernli KJ, Bowles EA, Knerr S, Leppig KA, Ehrlich K, Gao H, Schwartz MD, O'Neill SC. Characteristics Associated with Participation in ENGAGED 2 - A Web-based Breast Cancer Risk Communication and Decision Support Trial. Perm J. 2020 Dec;24:1-4. doi: 10.7812/TPP/19.205.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 33482952 (View on PubMed)

Wernli KJ, Knerr S, Li T, Leppig K, Ehrlich K, Farrell D, Gao H, Bowles EJA, Graham AL, Luta G, Jayasekera J, Mandelblatt JS, Schwartz MD, O'Neill SC. Effect of Personalized Breast Cancer Risk Tool on Chemoprevention and Breast Imaging: ENGAGED-2 Trial. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021 Jan 14;5(1):pkaa114. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkaa114. eCollection 2021 Feb.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 33554037 (View on PubMed)

Bowles EJA, O'Neill SC, Li T, Knerr S, Mandelblatt JS, Schwartz MD, Jayasekera J, Leppig K, Ehrlich K, Farrell D, Gao H, Graham AL, Luta G, Wernli KJ. Effect of a Randomized Trial of a Web-Based Intervention on Patient-Provider Communication About Breast Density. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Nov;30(11):1529-1537. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0053. Epub 2021 Sep 28.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 34582721 (View on PubMed)

Conley CC, Wernli KJ, Knerr S, Li T, Leppig K, Ehrlich K, Farrell D, Gao H, Bowles EJA, Graham AL, Luta G, Jayasekera J, Mandelblatt JS, Schwartz MD, O'Neill SC. Using Protection Motivation Theory to Predict Intentions for Breast Cancer Risk Management: Intervention Mechanisms from a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Cancer Educ. 2023 Feb;38(1):292-300. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-02114-y. Epub 2021 Nov 23.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 34813048 (View on PubMed)

Wernli KJ, Smith RE, Henderson LM, Zhao W, Durham DD, Schifferdecker K, Kaplan C, Buist DSM, Kerlikowske K, Miglioretti DL, Onega T, Alsheik NH, Sprague BL, Jackson-Nefertiti G, Budesky J, Johnson D, Tosteson ANA. Decision quality and regret with treatment decisions in women with breast cancer: Pre-operative breast MRI and breast density. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Aug;194(3):607-616. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06648-7. Epub 2022 Jun 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35723793 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015-0687

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Personalized Breast Cancer Screening
NCT06060938 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA