Topical 10 % Nifedipine Versus 5% Sildenafil in Secondary Raynaud
NCT ID: NCT03027674
Last Updated: 2017-01-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
EARLY_PHASE1
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-08-31
2016-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Methods: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study took place in 10 patients with secondary RP. Topical 10% nifedipine on one hand and 5% sildenafil on the other hand were applied. The thumbs didn't receive any cream and served as a control group. The primary outcome was the improvement of blood flow and vessel diameter of the digital arteries measured by high frequency color Doppler ultrasound before and 1 hour after treatment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Rho-kinase Inhibitor (Fasudil) in the Treatment of Raynaud's Phenomenon
NCT00498615
Nova Cold Hands Raynaud's Disorder, a Disease Which Results in Decreased Blood Flow to the Hands and Feet.
NCT02615964
Rheopheresis for Raynaud's and Digital Ulcers in Systemic Sclerosis
NCT05204784
Dose Response Study of a Topical Gel for the Treatment of Raynaud's Phenomenon
NCT00378521
Lab Study of MQX-503 in Treatment of Raynaud's
NCT00253331
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of topical 10% nifedipine versus 5% sildenafil in patients with secondary RP using high-frequency color Doppler ultrasound Patients The inclusion criteria considered patients with secondary RP associated with a CTD diagnosed and under follow-up in the Department of Dermatology. Diagnosis of CTD was made according to the ACR classification criteria for SSc, the Mixed Connective Tissue Disease criteria proposed by Kasukawa et al, the Bohan and Peter DM criteria and the SLICC SLE criteria. The exclusion criteria were primary RP patients; concurrent infection of any digit; allergic reaction and current use of any CCB or PDE-5 inhibitor;, , pregnancy, hypo and hypertension, history of myocardial infarction, stroke, or life-threatening arrhythmia. All patients signed a written informed consent. The Ethics Committee of Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile approved the study protocol.
Study design This prospective study was conducted in August 2016 (winter). After screening, patients who were being treated with a vasodilator were required to discontinue it for at least 24 hours before randomization. All patients were receiving immunosuppressive treatment for their underlying disease. Patient hands (right versus left) were randomized to treatment with topical sildenafil or nifedipine cream. The thumbs of both hands didn't receive any cream so that each subject served as her own control. Subjects were instructed to apply 5 grams of 10% nifedipine cream in one hand and 5 grams of 5% sildenafil cream to the opposite hand. Vinyl gloves were supplied to improve the absorption of the cream into the hand, leaving the thumb of both hands out of the glove without any cream.
Clinical assessments The temperature of the examination room was set at 19ºC (66ºF) for ≥ 30 min and all patients underwent a high-frequency color Doppler ultrasound examination before and 1 hour after the topical treatments. The same radiologist with extensive experience in dermatologic ultrasound, performed all sonographic examinations. The radiologist was blinded to the clinical data of the study and the senior dermatologist in charge of the supervision of the application of the topical treatments was blinded to the color Doppler ultrasound results. The ultrasound equipment was a Logic E9 XD Clear working with a high frequency (upper range 18 MHz) compact linear probe (General Electric Health Systems, Waukesha, WI). The ultrasound protocol included grey scale, color Doppler and spectral curve analysis of the arterial flow using the settings of the machine for studying skin and superficial structures. The ultrasound device automatically provided the values. The primary outcome was the improvement of blood flow in the digital arteries. For Doppler sonography, peak systolic velocity (PSV, cm/sec) and diameter (mm) were measured at the palmar proper digital (PPD) arteries (proximal phalanx level) of radial aspect of the index, middle and thumb fingers of both hands. Also, PSV and diameter were measured at the dorsal (PD) arterial arch of the proximal nail fold of the index, middle and thumb fingers of both hands. Immediate and late adverse effects were monitored in all patients until 3 months after the study.
Statistical analysis PSV of the PPD artery and PD arterial arch of the index and middle fingers were added for a total PSV. The diameter of the PPD artery and PD arterial arch of the index and middle fingers were added for a total diameter. Due to the low velocity ranges, the values of peak systolic velocities in cm/sec were transformed into mm/sec. Treatment efficacy was assessed by using the differences in digital artery blood flows (total PSV) and diameters (total diameter) at baseline (time \[t\] = 0) and after 60 minutes (t = 60). Difference in digital artery blood flow and the digital artery diameter was defined as (t = 0) minus (t = 60); thus, the efficacy of the treatment was reflected by a negative difference. In all cases, mean differences less than zero indicates that the study drug cream was effective; mean differences greater than or equal to zero indicates that the study drug cream was ineffective. The Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and paired t-tests were used to assess the changes in outcomes within the group before and after treatment as appropriate. All tests were performed using two-tailed probabilities and p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
10% nifedipine cream
Patient hands (right versus left) were randomized to treatment with topical sildenafil or nifedipine cream. The thumbs of both hands didn't receive any cream so that each subject served as her own control. Subjects were instructed to apply 5 grams of 10% nifedipine cream in one hand and 5 grams of 5% sildenafil cream to the opposite hand. Vinyl gloves were supplied to improve the absorption of the cream into the hand, leaving the thumb of both hands out of the glove without any cream.
10% nifedipine cream
Topical treatment for Raynaud
5% sildenafil cream
Patient hands (right versus left) were randomized to treatment with topical sildenafil or nifedipine cream. The thumbs of both hands didn't receive any cream so that each subject served as her own control. Subjects were instructed to apply 5 grams of topical10% nifedipine cream in one hand and 5 grams of topical 5% sildenafil cream to the opposite hand. Vinyl gloves were supplied to improve the absorption of the cream into the hand, leaving the thumb of both hands out of the glove without any cream.
5% sildenafil cream
Topical treatment for Raynaud
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
10% nifedipine cream
Topical treatment for Raynaud
5% sildenafil cream
Topical treatment for Raynaud
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Current infection of any digit
* Known allergic reaction to calcium-channel blockers or phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor
* Current use of calcium-channel blockers or phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors
* Pregnancy
* Hypotension or hypertension
* History of myocardial infarction, stroke, or life-threatening arrhythmia.
13 Years
99 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Cristian Vera-Kellet, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Connective Tissue Diseases Unit, Department of Dermatology Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Dermatology, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Santiago, RM, Chile
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
16-234
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.