Trial Outcomes & Findings for Effect of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Frontoparietal Attention Network on Anxiety Potentiated Startle (NCT NCT03027414)
NCT ID: NCT03027414
Last Updated: 2022-05-17
Results Overview
Electromyography Facial electromyography (EMG) startle responses were recorded from the left orbicularis oculi muscle at 2000 Hz using a Biopac MP160 unit (Biopac; Goleta, CA) via 15 × 20 mm hydrogel coated vinyl electrodes (Rhythmlink #DECUS10026; Columbia, SC). Startle EMG was bandpass filtered from 30 to 300 Hz, rectified, and smoothed using a 20-ms sliding window. Startle responses were scored as the peak (max during the 20 ms to 120 ms post-noise window) - the baseline (50 ms pre-noise window), and converted to t-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 (tx = \[Zx × 10\] + 50). Greater t-scores mean larger blinks, which could be associated with greater anxiety, however there is no clinically relevent threshold. Noisy trials (baseline SD \> 2x run SD) were excluded, and "no blink" (peak \< baseline range) trials were coded as 0. To calculate APS, we subtracted the response during the neutral ITI from the response during the unpredictable ITI.
COMPLETED
NA
61 participants
Pre and post stimulation
2022-05-17
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Substudy 1 Active and Sham
HVs that receive active and sham TMS over the right dlPFC
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Sham: TMS device is used to determine the effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on anxiety and anxiety-cognition interactions in healthy subjects.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: TMS device is used to determine the effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on anxiety and anxiety-cognition interactions in healthy subjects.
|
Substudy 2 Active and Sham
HVs that receive active and sham TMS over the right dlPFC
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Sham: TMS device is used to determine the effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on anxiety and anxiety-cognition interactions in healthy subjects.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: TMS device is used to determine the effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on anxiety and anxiety-cognition interactions in healthy subjects.
|
Substudy 3 Active and Sham
HVs will receive offline TMS to the lest IPS (FPN)
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: TMS device is used to determine the effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on anxiety and anxiety-cognition interactions in healthy subjects.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
28
|
0
|
26
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
19
|
0
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
9
|
0
|
6
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Effect of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Frontoparietal Attention Network on Anxiety Potentiated Startle
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Substudy 1 Active and Sham
n=28 Participants
HVs that receive active and Sham TMS over the right dlPFC
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Sham: TMS device is used to determine the effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on anxiety and anxiety-cognition interactions in healthy subjects.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: TMS device is used to determine the effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on anxiety and anxiety-cognition interactions in healthy subjects.
|
Substudy 2 Active and Sham
HVs that receive active and Sham TMS over the right dlPFC
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Sham: TMS device is used to determine the effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on anxiety and anxiety-cognition interactions in healthy subjects.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: TMS device is used to determine the effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on anxiety and anxiety-cognition interactions in healthy subjects.
|
Substudy 3 Active and Sham
n=26 Participants
HVs will receive offline TMS to the lest IPS (FPN)
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: TMS device is used to determine the effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on anxiety and anxiety-cognition interactions in healthy subjects.
|
Total
n=54 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
54 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
27.25 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.414392375 • n=5 Participants
|
—
|
30.46153846 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.52701936 • n=5 Participants
|
28.7962963 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.129460894 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
47 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
28 participants
n=5 Participants
|
—
|
26 participants
n=5 Participants
|
54 participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre and post stimulationPopulation: Healthy Volunteers
Electromyography Facial electromyography (EMG) startle responses were recorded from the left orbicularis oculi muscle at 2000 Hz using a Biopac MP160 unit (Biopac; Goleta, CA) via 15 × 20 mm hydrogel coated vinyl electrodes (Rhythmlink #DECUS10026; Columbia, SC). Startle EMG was bandpass filtered from 30 to 300 Hz, rectified, and smoothed using a 20-ms sliding window. Startle responses were scored as the peak (max during the 20 ms to 120 ms post-noise window) - the baseline (50 ms pre-noise window), and converted to t-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 (tx = \[Zx × 10\] + 50). Greater t-scores mean larger blinks, which could be associated with greater anxiety, however there is no clinically relevent threshold. Noisy trials (baseline SD \> 2x run SD) were excluded, and "no blink" (peak \< baseline range) trials were coded as 0. To calculate APS, we subtracted the response during the neutral ITI from the response during the unpredictable ITI.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Substudy 1 Active and Sham
n=19 Participants
HVs that receive active and sham TMS over the right dlPFC
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Sham: TMS device is used to determine the effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on anxiety and anxiety-cognition interactions in healthy subjects.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: TMS device is used to determine the effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on anxiety and anxiety-cognition interactions in healthy subjects.
|
Substudy 3 Active and Sham
n=19 Participants
HVs will receive offline TMS to the lest IPS (FPN)
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: TMS device is used to determine the effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on anxiety and anxiety-cognition interactions in healthy subjects.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Anxiety-potentiated Startle
Active
|
6.032164105 T-scores
Standard Error 1.31706568
|
2.420193836 T-scores
Standard Error 1.174992336
|
|
Anxiety-potentiated Startle
Sham
|
3.412441384 T-scores
Standard Error 1.02011584
|
4.467812115 T-scores
Standard Error 0.966471881
|
|
Anxiety-potentiated Startle
No TMS / Pre-stimulation
|
2.832028871 T-scores
Standard Error 0.989278736
|
4.960918182 T-scores
Standard Error 1.111076546
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre and post stimulationPopulation: No participants were recruited in Substudy 2. Study was stopped because lead investigator (Dr. Balderston) changed position prior to the initiation of Study 2
Sternberg Task: Expose subjects to active or sham TMS to a region of the frontoparietal attention network during the Sternberg WM task. Subjects will have to maintain a series of letters in WM for a brief interval during blocks of safety and threat of shock. Electromyography Facial electromyography (EMG) startle responses are recorded from the left orbicularis oculi muscle at 2000 Hz. Startle EMG is bandpass filtered from 30 to 300 Hz, rectified, and smoothed using a 20-ms sliding window. Startle responses are scored as the peak (max during the 20 ms to 120 ms post-noise window) - the baseline (50 ms pre-noise window), and converted to t-scores (tx = \[Zx × 10\] + 50). Noisy trials (baseline SD \> 2x run SD) are excluded, and "no blink" (peak \< baseline range) trials are coded as 0. These t scores are then averaged across trials within each condition, and threat-safe contrasts are calculated independently for each level of load (low vs. high) and timing (maintenance vs. ITI).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Substudy 1 Active and Sham
Substudy 2 Active and Sham
Substudy 3
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Substudy 1 Active and Sham
n=28 participants at risk
HVs that receive active and Sham TMS over the right dlPFC
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Sham: TMS device is used to determine the effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on anxiety and anxiety-cognition interactions in healthy subjects.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: TMS device is used to determine the effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on anxiety and anxiety-cognition interactions in healthy subjects.
|
Substudy 2 Active and Sham
HVs that receive active and Sham TMS over the right dlPFC
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Sham: TMS device is used to determine the effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on anxiety and anxiety-cognition interactions in healthy subjects.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: TMS device is used to determine the effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on anxiety and anxiety-cognition interactions in healthy subjects.
|
Substudy 3
n=26 participants at risk
HVs will receive offline TMS to the lest IPS (FPN)
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: TMS device is used to determine the effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on anxiety and anxiety-cognition interactions in healthy subjects.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Product Issues
Possible vasovagal syncope
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • During study participation, which typically lasted less than 1 month.
The Principal Investigator was responsible for detecting, documenting, and reporting unanticipated problems, adverse events (AEs), including serious adverse events (SAEs), and deviations in accordance with NIH policy, IRB requirements, and federal regulations. Relatedness to the research of all serious adverse events will be determined by the PI in consultation with the CD.
|
—
0/0 • During study participation, which typically lasted less than 1 month.
The Principal Investigator was responsible for detecting, documenting, and reporting unanticipated problems, adverse events (AEs), including serious adverse events (SAEs), and deviations in accordance with NIH policy, IRB requirements, and federal regulations. Relatedness to the research of all serious adverse events will be determined by the PI in consultation with the CD.
|
0.00%
0/26 • During study participation, which typically lasted less than 1 month.
The Principal Investigator was responsible for detecting, documenting, and reporting unanticipated problems, adverse events (AEs), including serious adverse events (SAEs), and deviations in accordance with NIH policy, IRB requirements, and federal regulations. Relatedness to the research of all serious adverse events will be determined by the PI in consultation with the CD.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Substudy 1 Active and Sham
n=28 participants at risk
HVs that receive active and Sham TMS over the right dlPFC
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Sham: TMS device is used to determine the effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on anxiety and anxiety-cognition interactions in healthy subjects.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: TMS device is used to determine the effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on anxiety and anxiety-cognition interactions in healthy subjects.
|
Substudy 2 Active and Sham
HVs that receive active and Sham TMS over the right dlPFC
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Sham: TMS device is used to determine the effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on anxiety and anxiety-cognition interactions in healthy subjects.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: TMS device is used to determine the effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on anxiety and anxiety-cognition interactions in healthy subjects.
|
Substudy 3
n=26 participants at risk
HVs will receive offline TMS to the lest IPS (FPN)
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: TMS device is used to determine the effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on anxiety and anxiety-cognition interactions in healthy subjects.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Product Issues
mild headache
|
14.3%
4/28 • Number of events 5 • During study participation, which typically lasted less than 1 month.
The Principal Investigator was responsible for detecting, documenting, and reporting unanticipated problems, adverse events (AEs), including serious adverse events (SAEs), and deviations in accordance with NIH policy, IRB requirements, and federal regulations. Relatedness to the research of all serious adverse events will be determined by the PI in consultation with the CD.
|
—
0/0 • During study participation, which typically lasted less than 1 month.
The Principal Investigator was responsible for detecting, documenting, and reporting unanticipated problems, adverse events (AEs), including serious adverse events (SAEs), and deviations in accordance with NIH policy, IRB requirements, and federal regulations. Relatedness to the research of all serious adverse events will be determined by the PI in consultation with the CD.
|
11.5%
3/26 • Number of events 3 • During study participation, which typically lasted less than 1 month.
The Principal Investigator was responsible for detecting, documenting, and reporting unanticipated problems, adverse events (AEs), including serious adverse events (SAEs), and deviations in accordance with NIH policy, IRB requirements, and federal regulations. Relatedness to the research of all serious adverse events will be determined by the PI in consultation with the CD.
|
|
Product Issues
scalp or face discomfort
|
10.7%
3/28 • Number of events 3 • During study participation, which typically lasted less than 1 month.
The Principal Investigator was responsible for detecting, documenting, and reporting unanticipated problems, adverse events (AEs), including serious adverse events (SAEs), and deviations in accordance with NIH policy, IRB requirements, and federal regulations. Relatedness to the research of all serious adverse events will be determined by the PI in consultation with the CD.
|
—
0/0 • During study participation, which typically lasted less than 1 month.
The Principal Investigator was responsible for detecting, documenting, and reporting unanticipated problems, adverse events (AEs), including serious adverse events (SAEs), and deviations in accordance with NIH policy, IRB requirements, and federal regulations. Relatedness to the research of all serious adverse events will be determined by the PI in consultation with the CD.
|
0.00%
0/26 • During study participation, which typically lasted less than 1 month.
The Principal Investigator was responsible for detecting, documenting, and reporting unanticipated problems, adverse events (AEs), including serious adverse events (SAEs), and deviations in accordance with NIH policy, IRB requirements, and federal regulations. Relatedness to the research of all serious adverse events will be determined by the PI in consultation with the CD.
|
|
Product Issues
non-medical device malfunction
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • During study participation, which typically lasted less than 1 month.
The Principal Investigator was responsible for detecting, documenting, and reporting unanticipated problems, adverse events (AEs), including serious adverse events (SAEs), and deviations in accordance with NIH policy, IRB requirements, and federal regulations. Relatedness to the research of all serious adverse events will be determined by the PI in consultation with the CD.
|
—
0/0 • During study participation, which typically lasted less than 1 month.
The Principal Investigator was responsible for detecting, documenting, and reporting unanticipated problems, adverse events (AEs), including serious adverse events (SAEs), and deviations in accordance with NIH policy, IRB requirements, and federal regulations. Relatedness to the research of all serious adverse events will be determined by the PI in consultation with the CD.
|
0.00%
0/26 • During study participation, which typically lasted less than 1 month.
The Principal Investigator was responsible for detecting, documenting, and reporting unanticipated problems, adverse events (AEs), including serious adverse events (SAEs), and deviations in accordance with NIH policy, IRB requirements, and federal regulations. Relatedness to the research of all serious adverse events will be determined by the PI in consultation with the CD.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place