Trial Outcomes & Findings for Self-adherent Absorbent Silver Dressing in Adults After Hip or Knee Arthroplasty (NCT NCT03016078)
NCT ID: NCT03016078
Last Updated: 2018-02-14
Results Overview
The primary outcome is damage to the incision and surrounding skin from operation day to last visit in terms of: * Blistering (Yes/No) by visit * Redness under dressing (Yes/No) by visit * Redness outside dressing (Yes/No) by visit * Maceration under dressing (Yes/No) by visit * Maceration outside dressing (Yes/No) by visit
COMPLETED
NA
21 participants
Daily visits, up to 7 days
2018-02-14
Participant Flow
Investigation period: Feb 2017 - March 2017. The study was conducted on 21 enrolled subjects at one site in the US. Subjects included were 18 years, and above, undergoing elective primary hip or knee arthroplasty.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Mepilex Border Post-Op Ag Dressing
A soft silicone foam dressing that absorbs wound exudate maintains a moist wound healing environment and has antimicrobial properties
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
21
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
19
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Mepilex Border Post-Op Ag Dressing
A soft silicone foam dressing that absorbs wound exudate maintains a moist wound healing environment and has antimicrobial properties
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Mepilex Border Post-Op Ag Dressing
n=21 Participants
A soft silicone foam dressing that absorbs wound exudate maintains a moist wound healing environment and has antimicrobial properties
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
68.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
10 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
11 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
21 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Blistering
|
0 Number of blisters
n=21 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Daily visits, up to 7 daysPopulation: The ITT population included all subjects who underwent at least one post-enrolment treatment. The number of participants analyzed varies due to that no data was captured at some visits, since the dressing was not changed at all visits.
The primary outcome is damage to the incision and surrounding skin from operation day to last visit in terms of: * Blistering (Yes/No) by visit * Redness under dressing (Yes/No) by visit * Redness outside dressing (Yes/No) by visit * Maceration under dressing (Yes/No) by visit * Maceration outside dressing (Yes/No) by visit
Outcome measures
| Measure |
The Study Group
n=21 Participants
Only one arm. The target subjects were male or female, 18 years and older, undergoing elective primary hip or knee arthroplasty.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Damage to the Incision and Surrounding Skin
Blistering visit 3
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Damage to the Incision and Surrounding Skin
Blistering visit 5
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Damage to the Incision and Surrounding Skin
Blistering visit 6
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Damage to the Incision and Surrounding Skin
Redness Under Dressing visit 3
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Damage to the Incision and Surrounding Skin
Redness Under Dressing visit 5
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Damage to the Incision and Surrounding Skin
Redness Under Dressing visit 6
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Damage to the Incision and Surrounding Skin
Redness Outside Dressing visit 3
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Damage to the Incision and Surrounding Skin
Redness Outside Dressing visit 5
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Damage to the Incision and Surrounding Skin
Redness Outside Dressing visit 6
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Damage to the Incision and Surrounding Skin
Maceration Under Dressing visit 3
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Damage to the Incision and Surrounding Skin
Maceration Under Dressing visit 5
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Damage to the Incision and Surrounding Skin
Maceration Under Dressing visit 6
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Damage to the Incision and Surrounding Skin
Maceration Outside Dressing visit 3
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Damage to the Incision and Surrounding Skin
Maceration Outside Dressing visit 5
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Damage to the Incision and Surrounding Skin
Maceration Outside Dressing visit 6
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Daily visits, up to 7 daysPopulation: The ITT population included all subjects who underwent at least one post-enrolment treatment. The number of participants analyzed varies due to that no data was captured at some visits, since the dressing was not changed at all visits.
Nurse/ Investigator evaluate: Leakage (No/Yes)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
The Study Group
n=21 Participants
Only one arm. The target subjects were male or female, 18 years and older, undergoing elective primary hip or knee arthroplasty.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Leakage of the Dressing
Leakage visit 2
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Leakage of the Dressing
Leakage visit 3
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Leakage of the Dressing
Leakage visit 5
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Leakage of the Dressing
Leakage visit 6
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Daily visits, up to 7 daysPopulation: The ITT population included all subjects who underwent at least one post-enrolment treatment. The number of participants analyzed varies due to that no data was captured at some visits, since the dressing was not changed at all visits.
Nurse/ Investigator evaluate: Dressing sticks to the staples/sutures (No/Yes)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
The Study Group
n=21 Participants
Only one arm. The target subjects were male or female, 18 years and older, undergoing elective primary hip or knee arthroplasty.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Dressing Sticking to the Staples/Sutures
Dressing sticks to the staples visit 3
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Dressing Sticking to the Staples/Sutures
Dressing sticks to the staples visit 5
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Dressing Sticking to the Staples/Sutures
Dressing sticks to the staples visit 6
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Daily visits, up to 7 daysPopulation: The ITT population included all subjects who underwent at least one post-enrolment treatment. The number of participants analyzed varies due to that no data was captured at some visits, since the dressing was not changed at all visits..
Nurse/ Investigator evaluate: Bleeding caused by dressing removal (No/Yes)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
The Study Group
n=21 Participants
Only one arm. The target subjects were male or female, 18 years and older, undergoing elective primary hip or knee arthroplasty.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Bleeding Caused by Dressing Removal
Bleeding caused by the dressing removal visit 3
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Bleeding Caused by Dressing Removal
Bleeding caused by the dressing removal visit 5
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Bleeding Caused by Dressing Removal
Bleeding caused by the dressing removal visit 6
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 7 daysPopulation: The ITT population included all subjects who underwent at least one post-enrolment treatment. The number of participants analyzed varies due to that no data was captured at some visits, since the dressing was not changed at all visits.
The number of days the dressing can stay on are evaluated
Outcome measures
| Measure |
The Study Group
n=21 Participants
Only one arm. The target subjects were male or female, 18 years and older, undergoing elective primary hip or knee arthroplasty.
|
|---|---|
|
Participants' Dressing Wear Time (Days)
|
6.35 days
Standard Deviation 1.57
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Daily visits, up to 7 daysPopulation: The ITT population included all subjects who underwent at least one post-enrolment treatment. The number of participants analyzed varies due to that no data was captured at some visits, since the dressing was not changed at all visits.
To evaluate the number of dressing changes per subject
Outcome measures
| Measure |
The Study Group
n=21 Participants
Only one arm. The target subjects were male or female, 18 years and older, undergoing elective primary hip or knee arthroplasty.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Dressing Changes Per Subject
|
1.00 Number of dressing changes per subject
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Daily visits, up to 7 daysPopulation: The ITT population included all subjects who underwent at least one post-enrolment treatment. The number of participants analyzed varies due to that no data was captured at some visits, since the dressing was not changed at all visits.
Nurse or Investigator evaluate: Poor, Good, Very Good,Very Good, Excellent on a Likert scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
The Study Group
n=21 Participants
Only one arm. The target subjects were male or female, 18 years and older, undergoing elective primary hip or knee arthroplasty.
|
|---|---|
|
Evaluation of the Dressing Capacity of Handling Blood
Poor visit 6
|
0 Participants
|
|
Evaluation of the Dressing Capacity of Handling Blood
Good visit 3
|
0 Participants
|
|
Evaluation of the Dressing Capacity of Handling Blood
Good visit 5
|
0 Participants
|
|
Evaluation of the Dressing Capacity of Handling Blood
Good visit 6
|
0 Participants
|
|
Evaluation of the Dressing Capacity of Handling Blood
Poor visit 3
|
0 Participants
|
|
Evaluation of the Dressing Capacity of Handling Blood
Poor visit 5
|
0 Participants
|
|
Evaluation of the Dressing Capacity of Handling Blood
Very good visit 3
|
0 Participants
|
|
Evaluation of the Dressing Capacity of Handling Blood
Very good visit 5
|
0 Participants
|
|
Evaluation of the Dressing Capacity of Handling Blood
Very good visit 6
|
0 Participants
|
|
Evaluation of the Dressing Capacity of Handling Blood
Excellent visit 3
|
0 Participants
|
|
Evaluation of the Dressing Capacity of Handling Blood
Excellent visit 5
|
3 Participants
|
|
Evaluation of the Dressing Capacity of Handling Blood
Excellent visit 6
|
19 Participants
|
|
Evaluation of the Dressing Capacity of Handling Blood
Not applicable visit 6
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Daily visits, up to 7 daysPopulation: The ITT population included all subjects who underwent at least one post-enrolment treatment. The number of participants analyzed varies due to that no data was captured at some visits, since the dressing was not changed at all visits.
Residuals of the dressing material in the wound or surrounding skin at any visit (for patients with at least one dressing change). Nurse/ Investigator evaluate with No/Yes
Outcome measures
| Measure |
The Study Group
n=21 Participants
Only one arm. The target subjects were male or female, 18 years and older, undergoing elective primary hip or knee arthroplasty.
|
|---|---|
|
Residuals of the Dressing Material in the Wound or Surrounding Skin at Any Visit (for Patients With at Least One Dressing Change)
|
3 Participants
|
Adverse Events
The Study Group
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
The Study Group
n=21 participants at risk
Only one arm. The target subjects were male or female, 18 years and older, undergoing elective primary hip or knee arthroplasty.
|
|---|---|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Redness at border of derssing
|
4.8%
1/21 • Number of events 1 • Average of one Week
|
Additional Information
Global Clinical Research Director
Mölnlycke Health Care
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place