Impact of Pre-existing Invasive Aspergillosis on Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation
NCT ID: NCT03014934
Last Updated: 2021-01-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
2100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-01-31
2021-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Aim. Assessment of 1-year outcome of patients undergoing allo-HSCT with history of pre-existing IA vs. no pre-existing IA.
Hypothesis. NRM in patients with pre-existing IA is not higher (by a specified margin of 10%) than patients without pre-existing IA.
Study population. First allo-HSCT in patients with acute leukaemia and MDS given stem cell grafts.
Cohort 1: History of probable or proven invasive aspergillosis Cohort 2: No History of probable or proven invasive aspergillosis: this cohort includes also the patient with a history of possible mycosis not documented microbiologically.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Allogeneic Transplantation for Patients With Acute Leukemia or Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML)
NCT00185523
Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation From HLA-Matched Unrelated Donor for the Treatment of Hematologic Disorders
NCT00533923
Study of ASC-101 in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies Who Receive Dual-cord Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation
NCT01983761
Pharmacologic Pretransplant Immunosuppression (PTIS) + Reduced Toxicity Conditioning (RTC) Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Inherited Hematologic Disorders
NCT05293509
MT2013-31: Allo HCT for Metabolic Disorders and Severe Osteopetrosis
NCT02171104
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Recently the IDWP and ALWP performed a retrospective analysis on the impact of preexisting aspergillosis on allo-HSCT outcome.2 In summary, there was a trend towards impaired outcome of allo-HSCT in patients with prior IA but there was no significant impact on important allo-HSCT transplant outcomes, such as survival, GVHD and relapse. The data suggest that a history of IA should not generally be considered a contraindication for allo-HSCT. To be able to more precisely investigate the impact of IA on allo-HSCT, a non-interventional prospective study is needed.
Primary objective:
To determine if pre-existing IA influences non-relapse mortality after allo-HSCT
Secondary objectives:
\- To determine if pre-existing IA influences:
* relapse free survival
* overall survival
* incidence and severity of GVHD
* incidence of relapse
* incidence of IA post allo-HSCT
for the subgroup of transplant with previous IA
• progression of IA
Research design:
Prospective study. Study recruitment is expected to start by May 1st, 2016. It is expected that recruitment will be closed by October 31st 2017. Follow up will be till one year after transplant.
Items:
Data from Med A form, Med C form for all patients, Aspergillus form for patients with probable/proven IA.
Endpoint(s):
Primary endpoint: 1-year non-relapse mortality cumulative incidence
Secondary endpoints:
* 1-year relapse free survival
* 1-year overall survival
* 1-year incidence and severity of GVHD
* 1-year incidence of relapse
* status of IA (before conditioning and at 1 year)
Study population
* First allo-HSCT in patients with AML or
* First allo-HSCT in patients with ALL or
* First allo-HSCT in patients with MDS
Cohort 1: History of probable or proven invasive aspergillosis Cohort 2: No History of probable or proven invasive aspergillosis
Cases: Prior IA = probable/proven IA according EORTC 2008 criteria (Cohort 1) Controls: No prior proven probable IA = all other patients = those really negative for IA and those with possible IA (Cohort 2)
Sample size Assuming a 20% incidence of non relapse mortality in patients without proven or probable history of IA, a total of 2100 HSCTs will be needed in order to test the hypothesis that the incidence of non relapse mortality in cohort 1 (HSCTs with previous history of proven or probable IA) is not higher than cohort 2 (HSCTs without history of IA or with previous history of possible IA) by more than a specified margin of 10%. The estimated proportion of HSCTs in cohort 1 is 5%, thus 105 and 1995 HSCTs will be needed in cohort 1 and cohort 2, respectively, considering an alpha=0.05, a beta=0.2.
Data Collection \& Statistical Analysis Plan:
(List all research variables to be collected and list all outcome variables to be analysed, give a brief description of the method of analysis (in collaboration with the EBMT statistician) All data collection will be performed by the IDWP Data Office (Leiden) according to EBMT guidelines.
Primary endpoint: non relapse mortality The non relapse mortality will be estimated using the cumulative incidence method. Death due to transplant will be considered as an event, whilst relapse of the underlying disease will be considered as competing events. Patients alive at the end of the follow-up will be censored at this date. Cohort 1, vs. Cohort 2 will be compared by the Gray test.
A cause specific Cox model will be performed in order to estimate the risk of dying for Cohort 1 respect Cohort 2.
The following variables will enter the multivariate model as possible confounders: age (as continuous variable), gender (M vs. F), underlying disease (ALL vs. AML/MDS), status at SCT (1st CR vs. ≥ 2 CR vs. Prim Refr/noCR), time from diagnosis to SCT (as continuous variable), donor type (sibling vs. UD vs. Haplo), source of SCT (BM vs. PB vs. CB), donor age, d/r gender match, d/r CMV status, conditioning regimens (MAC vs. RIC vs. TBI), type of immunosuppression (in vivo T depletion y/n, in vitro T-depletion y/n), DLI post SCT (y/n), centre.
Secondary endpoints Relapse free survival and overall survival will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier methods. Incidence of GvHD and incidence of relapse will be estimated by the cumulative incidence methods. A cause specific Cox model will be estimated to compare Cohort 1 and Cohort 2; it will be adjusted by the confounders analyzed also in the primary endpoint.
The severity of GvHD will be described by descriptive statistics. Frequencies and percentages will be use for categorical variables, whilst median, range, mean and standard deviation will be computed for continuous variables.
Additional descriptive statistic will be separately performed in cohort 2. Main characteristics of patients will be also described.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cases: Prior Invasive Aspergillosis
History of probable or proven Invasive Aspergillosis according to EORTC 2008 criteria
No interventions assigned to this group
Controls: No prior proven Invasive Aspergillosis
Patients really negative for Invasive Aspergillosis and those with possible Invasive Aspergillosis
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Acute leukaemia or MDS
* Received stem cell grafts
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation
NETWORK
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Olaf Penack, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Jan Styczynski
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University Hospital, Collegium Medicum UMK
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, , Germany
Institute G. Gaslini
Genova, , Italy
Clinica di Oncoematologia Pediatrica
Padua, , Italy
Ospedale Infantile Regina Margherita
Torino, , Italy
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre
Riyadh, , Saudi Arabia
Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona, , Spain
University Hospital
Basel, , Switzerland
Gazi University School of Medicine
Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EBMT-8414113
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.