Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of K-877 in Adult Patients With Fasting High Triglyceride Levels and Mild or Moderate Renal Impairment (NCT NCT03011450)
NCT ID: NCT03011450
Last Updated: 2022-10-28
Results Overview
COMPLETED
PHASE3
471 participants
12 Weeks
2022-10-28
Participant Flow
Eligible patients entered a 4- to 6-week lifestyle stabilization period. The stabilization period was followed by a 2-week TG qualifying period, and patient eligibility was assessed based on the mean TG value from these 2 visits. If the patient's mean TG level during the TG qualifying period was ≥450 mg/dL (5.09 mmol/L) and \<500 mg/dL (5.65 mmol/L), an additional TG measurement was taken 1 week later at Visit 3.1. The mean of all 3 TG measurements was used to determine eligibility for the study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
K-877
Participants randomized to receive K-877 0.2 mg tablets twice daily in the 12-week Efficacy Period continued to receive K-877 0.2 mg tablets BID in the 40-week Extension Period
|
Placebo/Fenofibrate
Patients randomized to receive placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg BID in the 12-week Efficacy Period initiated fenofibrate dosing at 48 mg once daily at Visit 7 (Week 12). Starting from Visit 8 (Week 16), Investigators were allowed to adjust fenofibrate dosing (to 145 mg once daily) at their discretion according to the local standard of care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
12-week Efficacy
STARTED
|
311
|
159
|
|
12-week Efficacy
COMPLETED
|
299
|
159
|
|
12-week Efficacy
NOT COMPLETED
|
12
|
0
|
|
40-week Extension
STARTED
|
292
|
154
|
|
40-week Extension
COMPLETED
|
275
|
146
|
|
40-week Extension
NOT COMPLETED
|
17
|
8
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of K-877 in Adult Patients With Fasting High Triglyceride Levels and Mild or Moderate Renal Impairment
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo/Fenofibrate
n=159 Participants
Patients randomized to receive placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg BID in the 12-week Efficacy Period initiated fenofibrate dosing at 48 mg once daily at Visit 7 (Week 12). Starting from Visit 8 (Week 16), Investigators were allowed to adjust fenofibrate dosing (to 145 mg once daily) at their discretion according to the local standard of care.
|
Total
n=470 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
<65 years
|
220 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
119 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
339 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
≥65 years
|
91 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
131 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
94 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
134 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
217 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
119 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
336 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
302 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
157 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
459 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
299 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
151 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
450 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not reported/unknown
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Triglycerides
|
793.44 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 390.102 • n=5 Participants
|
759.36 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 395.359 • n=7 Participants
|
781.45 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 391.511 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change in Fasting TG From Baseline to Week 12
|
-58.89 Percent change
Interval -71.69 to -38.42
|
-22.94 Percent change
Interval -43.98 to 9.67
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Remnant Cholesterol
|
-55.51 Percent change
Interval -71.29 to -33.64
|
-13.29 Percent change
Interval -43.3 to 9.76
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in HDL-C
|
23.50 Percent change
Interval 5.24 to 45.13
|
7.33 Percent change
Interval -4.0 to 18.79
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo A1
|
4.05 Percent change
Interval -5.57 to 14.62
|
0.00 Percent change
Interval -7.8 to 10.01
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Non-HDL-C
|
-20.98 Percent change
Interval -34.7 to -4.06
|
-3.43 Percent change
Interval -23.66 to 6.75
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Total Cholesterol
|
-14.55 Percent change
Interval -25.74 to -1.19
|
-2.05 Percent change
Interval -17.59 to 7.37
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in LDL-C
|
31.49 Percent change
Interval 0.65 to 72.06
|
2.30 Percent change
Interval -14.5 to 23.09
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=303 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=154 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in FFAs
|
-25.25 Percent change
Interval -48.37 to 3.74
|
-5.51 Percent change
Interval -32.64 to 28.65
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo A2
|
19.34 Percent change
Interval 7.27 to 35.41
|
0.00 Percent change
Interval -8.09 to 6.38
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo B
|
0.57 Percent change
Interval -14.9 to 16.66
|
-1.67 Percent change
Interval -11.71 to 12.54
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo B48
|
-36.64 Percent change
Interval -71.42 to 17.61
|
19.91 Percent change
Interval -18.96 to 101.41
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo B100
|
2.05 Percent change
Interval -13.31 to 18.13
|
-2.33 Percent change
Interval -14.42 to 12.14
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo C2
|
-4.70 Percent change
Interval -27.33 to 0.0
|
0.00 Percent change
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo C3
|
-41.97 Percent change
Interval -54.44 to -21.64
|
-3.10 Percent change
Interval -25.16 to 18.08
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apo E
|
-29.09 Percent change
Interval -44.73 to -6.92
|
-5.98 Percent change
Interval -28.29 to 12.15
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in FGF21
|
277.97 pg/mL
Interval 37.31 to 650.73
|
12.15 pg/mL
Interval -162.8 to 112.46
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in hsCRP
|
-0.201 mg/L
Interval -1.355 to 0.685
|
-0.100 mg/L
Interval -1.235 to 0.821
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (VLDL Cholesterol-Large)
|
-36.45 Percent change
Interval -55.39 to -5.31
|
-5.95 Percent change
Interval -27.52 to 30.89
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (VLDL Cholesterol-Intermediate)
|
-23.23 Percent change
Interval -42.1 to 1.79
|
0.07 Percent change
Interval -18.32 to 25.73
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (VLDL Cholesterol-Small)
|
-6.07 Percent change
Interval -24.09 to 9.75
|
4.16 Percent change
Interval -12.56 to 21.97
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Intermediate Density Lipoproteins 1)
|
-0.22 Percent change
Interval -17.02 to 22.34
|
2.42 Percent change
Interval -9.7 to 17.69
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Intermediate Density Lipoproteins 2)
|
17.52 Percent change
Interval -2.0 to 39.87
|
3.21 Percent change
Interval -9.58 to 17.69
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins I)
|
44.20 Percent change
Interval 10.67 to 89.89
|
4.81 Percent change
Interval -11.65 to 25.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIa)
|
53.94 Percent change
Interval 14.68 to 112.53
|
4.24 Percent change
Interval -16.31 to 23.16
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIb)
|
48.44 Percent change
Interval 8.96 to 110.09
|
1.89 Percent change
Interval -14.54 to 23.96
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIIa)
|
23.79 Percent change
Interval -19.17 to 76.61
|
-0.80 Percent change
Interval -13.28 to 17.39
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIIb)
|
-5.73 Percent change
Interval -48.62 to 47.19
|
0.71 Percent change
Interval -21.79 to 16.61
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IVa)
|
-30.48 Percent change
Interval -59.53 to 7.01
|
-2.89 Percent change
Interval -20.28 to 16.04
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IVb)
|
-35.08 Percent change
Interval -54.14 to -15.21
|
-0.74 Percent change
Interval -21.22 to 19.16
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IVc)
|
-23.39 Percent change
Interval -38.34 to -11.75
|
0.89 Percent change
Interval -15.75 to 15.88
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (High Density Lipoproteins 2b)
|
-10.65 Percent change
Interval -19.15 to -0.88
|
0.91 Percent change
Interval -9.59 to 11.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksTwo lipoprotein subclasses, HDL3 and HDL2a, were analyzed together as one measurement without distinction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (High Density Lipoproteins 3 and 2a)
|
-2.13 Percent change
Interval -10.9 to 7.5
|
-0.53 Percent change
Interval -8.5 to 9.19
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Ion Mobility (Diameter of the Major LDL Particle (Å))
|
2.67 Percent change
Interval 0.9 to 4.73
|
0.14 Percent change
Interval -0.6 to 0.89
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksTwo types of lipoprotein particles were analyzed together as one measurement without distinction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=310 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL & Chylomicron Particles)
|
-42.76 Percent change
Interval -61.49 to -15.41
|
-5.59 Percent change
Interval -29.0 to 24.71
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksPopulation: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 12.
Two types of lipoprotein particles were analyzed together as one measurement without distinction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=310 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL & Chylomicron Particles-Large)
|
-12.62 nmol/L
Interval -31.63 to -3.27
|
-3.75 nmol/L
Interval -18.37 to 8.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksPopulation: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 12.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=310 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL Particles-Medium)
|
-41.27 nmol/L
Interval -79.42 to -9.78
|
-9.13 nmol/L
Interval -36.78 to 26.18
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksPopulation: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 12.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=310 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL Particles-Small)
|
0.46 nmol/L
Interval -25.09 to 20.86
|
0.07 nmol/L
Interval -16.8 to 20.72
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=309 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particles)
|
17.58 Percent change
Interval -13.32 to 60.38
|
4.97 Percent change
Interval -15.42 to 25.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksPopulation: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 12.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=310 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (IDL Particles)
|
-17.06 nmol/L
Interval -123.66 to 39.24
|
-2.74 nmol/L
Interval -87.3 to 76.76
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksPopulation: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 12.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=310 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particles-Large)
|
54.52 nmol/L
Interval 0.0 to 306.49
|
0.00 nmol/L
Interval -13.04 to 43.85
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksPopulation: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 12.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=310 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particles-Small)
|
83.88 nmol/L
Interval -254.52 to 394.98
|
12.43 nmol/L
Interval -135.98 to 230.34
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=310 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles)
|
5.96 Percent change
Interval -8.43 to 23.02
|
-1.60 Percent change
Interval -13.63 to 11.21
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksPopulation: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 12.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=310 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles-Large)
|
0.22 µmol/L
Interval -0.94 to 1.56
|
0.00 µmol/L
Interval -1.02 to 1.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksPopulation: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 12.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=310 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles-Medium)
|
-0.21 µmol/L
Interval -3.98 to 2.9
|
-0.23 µmol/L
Interval -2.96 to 1.66
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksPopulation: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 12.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=310 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles-Small)
|
1.54 µmol/L
Interval -2.95 to 7.78
|
0.16 µmol/L
Interval -4.19 to 4.35
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=310 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL Particle Size)
|
-5.02 Percent change
Interval -16.79 to 5.79
|
-2.26 Percent change
Interval -11.03 to 7.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=305 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=157 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particle Size)
|
1.02 Percent change
Interval 0.0 to 3.54
|
0.00 Percent change
Interval -0.53 to 0.54
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=310 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particle Size)
|
-1.19 Percent Change
Interval -4.48 to 2.36
|
-0.14 Percent Change
Interval -3.22 to 2.36
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=310 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (Triglyceride)
|
-54.86 Percent change
Interval -70.9 to -31.38
|
-15.24 Percent change
Interval -37.36 to 18.69
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksTwo types of lipoprotein particles were analyzed together as one measurement without distinction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=310 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL & Chylomicron Triglyceride)
|
-55.19 Percent change
Interval -70.8 to -32.36
|
-16.20 Percent change
Interval -37.74 to 21.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=305 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=154 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipoprotein Fraction HDL Cholesterol (Total)
|
5.51 Percent Change
Interval -12.73 to 29.84
|
-2.20 Percent Change
Interval -17.16 to 16.56
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of TG:HDL-C
|
-66.21 Percent change
Interval -79.82 to -42.95
|
-26.81 Percent change
Interval -51.86 to 13.12
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of TC:HDL-C
|
-32.36 Percent change
Interval -47.83 to -10.34
|
-9.02 Percent change
Interval -29.95 to 6.61
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of Non-HDL-C:HDL-C
|
-32.36 Percent change
Interval -47.83 to -10.34
|
-9.02 Percent change
Interval -29.95 to 6.61
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksPopulation: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 12.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of LDL-C:Apo B
|
0.219 Ratio
Interval 0.05 to 0.359
|
0.026 Ratio
Interval -0.096 to 0.138
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of Apo B:Apo A1
|
-1.68 Percent change
Interval -19.68 to 17.39
|
-1.25 Percent change
Interval -13.68 to 9.26
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=311 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=159 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of Apo C3:Apo C2
|
-27.76 Percent change
Interval -45.35 to -7.99
|
-0.47 Percent change
Interval -23.52 to 17.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=274 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=146 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Fasting TG
|
-59.96 Percent change
Interval -74.38 to -41.52
|
-49.55 Percent change
Interval -64.8 to -26.83
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=269 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=145 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Remnant Cholesterol
|
-58.39 Percent change
Interval -72.45 to -39.62
|
-43.31 Percent change
Interval -60.66 to -24.59
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=274 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=146 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in HDL-C
|
18.78 Percent change
Interval 3.03 to 38.46
|
15.59 Percent change
Interval 5.26 to 32.35
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=274 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=143 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo A1
|
3.29 Percent change
Interval -6.51 to 12.1
|
2.56 Percent change
Interval -6.62 to 12.31
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=274 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=146 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Non-HDL-C
|
-21.80 Percent change
Interval -37.89 to -6.95
|
-14.22 Percent change
Interval -31.57 to 3.72
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=274 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=146 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in TC
|
-15.28 Percent change
Interval -29.1 to -4.01
|
-8.64 Percent change
Interval -23.55 to 5.08
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=269 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=145 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in LDL-C
|
31.90 Percent change
Interval 0.0 to 76.62
|
22.96 Percent change
Interval 1.41 to 51.68
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=219 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=127 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in FFAs
|
-21.61 Percent change
Interval -46.76 to 8.15
|
-21.41 Percent change
Interval -45.7 to -1.02
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=274 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=143 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo A2
|
15.92 Percent change
Interval 3.23 to 31.25
|
8.33 Percent change
Interval 0.0 to 20.69
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=274 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=143 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo B
|
-1.73 Percent change
Interval -14.74 to 15.84
|
0.00 Percent change
Interval -14.13 to 12.16
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=273 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo B48
|
-19.43 Percent change
Interval -58.77 to 60.61
|
-15.19 Percent change
Interval -51.08 to 112.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=273 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=143 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo B100
|
-1.32 Percent change
Interval -15.58 to 17.35
|
-0.87 Percent change
Interval -13.44 to 12.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=270 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo C2
|
-9.56 Percent change
Interval -34.5 to 0.0
|
0.00 Percent change
Interval -19.81 to 0.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=273 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo C3
|
-42.80 Percent change
Interval -57.88 to -22.27
|
-26.25 Percent change
Interval -44.64 to -2.73
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=274 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=143 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Apo E
|
-30.82 Percent change
Interval -49.25 to -13.04
|
-30.00 Percent change
Interval -42.59 to -9.76
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=274 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=145 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in FGF21
|
371.80 pg/mL
Interval 97.3 to 795.0
|
194.40 pg/mL
Interval 57.0 to 524.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=274 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in hsCRP
|
-0.100 mg/L
Interval -1.4 to 0.9
|
-0.225 mg/L
Interval -1.7 to 0.75
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=274 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (VLDL Cholesterol-Large)
|
-36.60 Percent change
Interval -57.18 to -9.94
|
-22.03 Percent change
Interval -46.31 to 3.89
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=274 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (VLDL Cholesterol-Intermediate)
|
-25.03 Percent change
Interval -45.41 to -2.97
|
-13.31 Percent change
Interval -32.85 to 10.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=274 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (VLDL Cholesterol-Small)
|
-12.96 Percent change
Interval -28.26 to 8.8
|
-2.31 Percent change
Interval -21.61 to 17.28
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=274 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Intermediate Density Lipoproteins 1)
|
0.69 Percent change
Interval -22.32 to 20.37
|
3.54 Percent change
Interval -14.98 to 19.42
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=274 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Intermediate Density Lipoproteins 2)
|
17.33 Percent change
Interval -4.92 to 45.07
|
15.87 Percent change
Interval -3.79 to 33.13
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=274 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins I)
|
46.51 Percent change
Interval 11.45 to 96.51
|
25.53 Percent change
Interval 7.94 to 57.81
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=274 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIa)
|
61.36 Percent change
Interval 18.02 to 121.43
|
33.66 Percent change
Interval 8.36 to 69.06
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=274 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIb)
|
45.61 Percent change
Interval 10.19 to 110.03
|
27.29 Percent change
Interval 3.08 to 75.15
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=274 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIIa)
|
18.50 Percent change
Interval -17.32 to 76.72
|
19.64 Percent change
Interval -9.16 to 55.84
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=274 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IIIb)
|
-6.92 Percent change
Interval -46.06 to 44.1
|
1.17 Percent change
Interval -33.87 to 37.07
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=274 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IVa)
|
-25.63 Percent change
Interval -59.65 to 4.76
|
-24.80 Percent change
Interval -48.67 to 7.25
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=274 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IVb)
|
-37.26 Percent change
Interval -54.63 to -13.67
|
-24.22 Percent change
Interval -46.23 to -7.72
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=274 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Low Density Lipoproteins IVc)
|
-26.81 Percent change
Interval -39.69 to -12.43
|
-17.41 Percent change
Interval -34.43 to -3.23
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=274 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (High Density Lipoproteins 2b)
|
-11.67 Percent change
Interval -21.85 to -0.44
|
-5.62 Percent change
Interval -18.23 to 5.91
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksTwo lipoprotein subclasses, HDL3 and HDL2a, were analyzed together as one measurement without distinction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=274 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (High Density Lipoproteins 3 and 2a)
|
-4.62 Percent change
Interval -13.84 to 5.23
|
-3.71 Percent change
Interval -13.22 to 5.49
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=274 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Ion Mobility (Diameter of the Major LDL Particle (Å))
|
2.69 Percent change
Interval 1.1 to 4.84
|
1.54 Percent change
Interval 0.71 to 3.24
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksTwo types of lipoprotein particles were analyzed together as one measurement without distinction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=258 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=137 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL & Chylomicron Particles)
|
-40.10 Percent change
Interval -63.62 to -14.91
|
-28.98 Percent change
Interval -48.61 to -2.98
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksPopulation: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 52.
Two types of lipoprotein particles were analyzed together as one measurement without distinction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=258 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=137 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL & Chylomicron Particles-Large)
|
-13.00 nmol/L
Interval -32.7 to -2.4
|
-8.60 nmol/L
Interval -28.8 to -1.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksPopulation: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 52.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=258 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=137 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL Particles-Medium)
|
-41.95 nmol/L
Interval -77.2 to -5.1
|
-26.90 nmol/L
Interval -64.8 to 4.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksPopulation: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 52.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=258 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=137 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL Particles-Small)
|
-0.15 nmol/L
Interval -18.1 to 19.6
|
0.00 nmol/L
Interval -16.6 to 24.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=258 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=137 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particles)
|
14.43 Percent change
Interval -10.07 to 62.78
|
12.79 Percent change
Interval -11.69 to 43.15
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksPopulation: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 52.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=258 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=137 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (IDL Particles)
|
-12.00 nmol/L
Interval -151.0 to 53.0
|
-6.00 nmol/L
Interval -127.0 to 57.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksPopulation: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 52.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=258 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=137 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particles-Large)
|
53.00 nmol/L
Interval 0.0 to 273.0
|
8.00 nmol/L
Interval 0.0 to 199.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksPopulation: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 52.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=258 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=137 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particles-Small)
|
59.00 nmol/L
Interval -198.0 to 425.0
|
97.00 nmol/L
Interval -209.0 to 420.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=258 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=137 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles)
|
4.96 Percent change
Interval -9.59 to 20.58
|
0.00 Percent change
Interval -9.74 to 13.49
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksPopulation: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 52.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=258 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=137 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles-Large)
|
0.20 umol/L
Interval -0.9 to 1.5
|
0.30 umol/L
Interval -1.1 to 1.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksPopulation: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 52.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=258 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=137 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles-Medium)
|
-0.20 umol/L
Interval -3.7 to 2.8
|
-0.40 umol/L
Interval -4.2 to 2.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksPopulation: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 52.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=258 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=137 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particles-Small)
|
1.80 umol/L
Interval -2.9 to 7.3
|
1.40 umol/L
Interval -2.7 to 5.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=258 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=137 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL Particle Size)
|
-7.15 Percent change
Interval -17.67 to 3.71
|
-5.46 Percent change
Interval -15.32 to 3.65
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=237 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=131 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (LDL Particle Size)
|
1.03 Percent change
Interval 0.0 to 3.57
|
0.51 Percent change
Interval -0.51 to 2.03
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=258 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=137 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Particle Size)
|
-1.14 Percent change
Interval -4.35 to 2.27
|
-1.15 Percent change
Interval -4.35 to 1.15
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=258 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=137 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (Triglyceride)
|
-55.03 Percent change
Interval -73.79 to -31.24
|
-42.76 Percent change
Interval -58.82 to -13.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksTwo types of lipoprotein particles were analyzed together as one measurement without distinction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=258 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=137 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (VLDL & Chylomicron Triglyceride)
|
-54.30 Percent change
Interval -73.74 to -30.73
|
-41.55 Percent change
Interval -58.97 to -17.39
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=212 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=120 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipoprotein Fraction (HDL Cholesterol)
|
2.90 Percent change
Interval -15.75 to 24.94
|
-1.19 Percent change
Interval -15.14 to 25.57
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=274 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=146 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of TG:HDL-C
|
-66.38 Percent change
Interval -81.7 to -45.55
|
-56.61 Percent change
Interval -71.34 to -32.09
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=274 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=146 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of TC:HDL-C
|
-31.53 Percent change
Interval -47.32 to -13.74
|
-23.70 Percent change
Interval -41.03 to -5.83
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=274 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=146 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of Non-HDL-C:HDL-C
|
-36.49 Percent change
Interval -53.81 to -16.78
|
-27.67 Percent change
Interval -47.17 to -7.02
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksPopulation: Since there were one or multiple records with a baseline value of 0, the percent change cannot be determined for such records. In such cases, the secondary endpoints were evaluated for change from baseline to week 52.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=267 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=142 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of LDL-C:Apo B
|
0.210 Ratio
Interval 0.05 to 0.42
|
0.150 Ratio
Interval 0.03 to 0.31
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=274 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=143 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of Apo B:Apo A1
|
-3.56 Percent change
Interval -20.0 to 14.91
|
-2.94 Percent change
Interval -19.27 to 10.64
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 52 WeeksOutcome measures
| Measure |
K-877
n=270 Participants
K-877 0.2 mg Tablets
|
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg tablet BID
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Lipid and Lipoprotein Ratios of Apo C3:Apo C2
|
-27.81 Percent change
Interval -43.96 to -4.95
|
-13.17 Percent change
Interval -32.52 to 4.21
|
Adverse Events
K-877: 12-Week Efficacy
Placebo:12-Week Efficacy
K-877: 40-Week Extension
Fenofibrate 40-Week Extension
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
K-877: 12-Week Efficacy
n=311 participants at risk
* K-877 0.2 mg Tablets BID
* Only AEs with onset in the 12-week efficacy period are included.
|
Placebo:12-Week Efficacy
n=159 participants at risk
* Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg BID
* Only AEs with onset in the 12-week efficacy period are included.
|
K-877: 40-Week Extension
n=292 participants at risk
* Participants randomized to receive K-877 0.2 mg tablets twice daily in the 12-week Efficacy Period continued to receive K-877 0.2 mg tablets BID in the 40-week Extension Period
* Only AEs with onset in the 40-week extension period are included.
|
Fenofibrate 40-Week Extension
n=154 participants at risk
* Patients randomized to receive placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg BID in the 12-week Efficacy Period initiated fenofibrate dosing at 48 mg once daily at Visit 7 (Week 12). Starting from Visit 8 (Week 16), Investigators were allowed to adjust fenofibrate dosing (to 145 mg once daily) at their discretion according to the local standard of care.
* Only AEs with onset in the 40-week extension period are included.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Normochromic normocytic anaemia
|
0.00%
0/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.65%
1/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
0.32%
1/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.68%
2/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
0.00%
0/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.68%
2/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.32%
1/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.34%
1/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
0.32%
1/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.34%
1/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina unstable
|
0.00%
0/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.34%
1/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
0.32%
1/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
|
0.32%
1/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.34%
1/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiovascular insufficiency
|
0.32%
1/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
0.00%
0/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.34%
1/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.34%
1/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal inflammation
|
0.32%
1/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis acute
|
0.00%
0/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.34%
1/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
General disorders
Death
|
0.00%
0/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.34%
1/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.65%
1/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
0.00%
0/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.65%
1/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.65%
1/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
General disorders
Sudden death
|
0.00%
0/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.34%
1/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
|
0.00%
0/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.34%
1/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Endometritis
|
0.00%
0/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.63%
1/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.32%
1/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.32%
1/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis acute
|
0.00%
0/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.34%
1/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
|
0.32%
1/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.65%
1/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Metabolic acidosis
|
0.32%
1/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Obesity
|
0.00%
0/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.34%
1/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
|
0.00%
0/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.34%
1/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.00%
0/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.68%
2/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.65%
1/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Gouty arthritis
|
0.00%
0/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.34%
1/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Basal cell carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.63%
1/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung adenocarcinoma
|
0.00%
0/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.65%
1/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung adenocarcinoma metastatic
|
0.32%
1/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate cancer
|
0.32%
1/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ischaemic stroke
|
0.96%
3/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
0.00%
0/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.34%
1/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Coma
|
0.32%
1/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Diabetic neuropathy
|
0.00%
0/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.34%
1/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Haemorrhage intracranial
|
0.32%
1/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hemiplegia
|
0.32%
1/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sciatica
|
0.00%
0/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.34%
1/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.32%
1/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
|
0.32%
1/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.65%
1/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Calculus urinary
|
0.32%
1/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Pelvic adhesions
|
0.00%
0/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.34%
1/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure
|
0.64%
2/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
0.32%
1/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleuritic pain
|
0.32%
1/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary oedema
|
0.00%
0/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.34%
1/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory acidosis
|
0.32%
1/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
0.32%
1/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertensive crisis
|
0.00%
0/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.63%
1/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.34%
1/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.65%
1/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
K-877: 12-Week Efficacy
n=311 participants at risk
* K-877 0.2 mg Tablets BID
* Only AEs with onset in the 12-week efficacy period are included.
|
Placebo:12-Week Efficacy
n=159 participants at risk
* Placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg BID
* Only AEs with onset in the 12-week efficacy period are included.
|
K-877: 40-Week Extension
n=292 participants at risk
* Participants randomized to receive K-877 0.2 mg tablets twice daily in the 12-week Efficacy Period continued to receive K-877 0.2 mg tablets BID in the 40-week Extension Period
* Only AEs with onset in the 40-week extension period are included.
|
Fenofibrate 40-Week Extension
n=154 participants at risk
* Patients randomized to receive placebo matching K-877 0.2 mg BID in the 12-week Efficacy Period initiated fenofibrate dosing at 48 mg once daily at Visit 7 (Week 12). Starting from Visit 8 (Week 16), Investigators were allowed to adjust fenofibrate dosing (to 145 mg once daily) at their discretion according to the local standard of care.
* Only AEs with onset in the 40-week extension period are included.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Investigations
Glomerular filtration rate decreased
|
0.00%
0/311 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.00%
0/159 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
0.68%
2/292 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
5.2%
8/154 • 52 Weeks
Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any adverse event that occurred for the first time after the first dose of double-blind study drug or existed prior to the first dose and worsened during the post-dosing period.
|
Additional Information
Director, Clinical Operations
Kowa Research Institute, Inc.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place