Trial Outcomes & Findings for Effect of Energy Density Over 5 Days in Preschool Children (NCT NCT03010501)

NCT ID: NCT03010501

Last Updated: 2019-07-11

Results Overview

Differences in daily intake of food and beverages by energy, in kcal

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

56 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Days 1-5 in Weeks 1, 2, and 3

Results posted on

2019-07-11

Participant Flow

Children aged 3 to 5 years old were recruited from classrooms at three childcare centers in State College, PA by distributing letters to parents between September 2016 and September 2017.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
80% Food Energy Density First, Then 100%, Then 120%
Participants in the classroom that received the three food energy density interventions across the three periods in the order of 80%, then 100%, then 120%.
100% Food Energy Density First, Then 120%, Then 80%
Participants in the classroom that received the three food energy density interventions across the three periods in the order of 100%, then 120%, then 80%.
120% Food Energy Density First, Then 80%, Then 100%
Participants in the classroom that received the three food energy density interventions across the three periods in the order of 120%, then 80%, then 100%.
80% Food Energy Density First, Then 120%, Then 100%
Participants in the classroom that received the three food energy density interventions across the three periods in the order of 80%, then 120%, then 100%.
100% Food Energy Density, Then 80%, Then 120%
Participants in the classroom that received the three food energy density interventions across the three periods in the order of 100%, then 80%, then 120%.
120% Food Energy Density, Then 100%, Then 80%
Participants in the classroom that received the three food energy density interventions across the three periods in the order of 120%, then 100%, then 80%.
Study Week 1
STARTED
9
15
7
7
7
11
Study Week 1
COMPLETED
7
14
7
5
7
11
Study Week 1
NOT COMPLETED
2
1
0
2
0
0
Study Week 2
STARTED
7
14
7
5
7
11
Study Week 2
COMPLETED
7
14
7
5
7
11
Study Week 2
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0
0
0
0
Study Week 3
STARTED
7
14
7
5
7
11
Study Week 3
COMPLETED
7
14
7
4
7
11
Study Week 3
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0
1
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
80% Food Energy Density First, Then 100%, Then 120%
Participants in the classroom that received the three food energy density interventions across the three periods in the order of 80%, then 100%, then 120%.
100% Food Energy Density First, Then 120%, Then 80%
Participants in the classroom that received the three food energy density interventions across the three periods in the order of 100%, then 120%, then 80%.
120% Food Energy Density First, Then 80%, Then 100%
Participants in the classroom that received the three food energy density interventions across the three periods in the order of 120%, then 80%, then 100%.
80% Food Energy Density First, Then 120%, Then 100%
Participants in the classroom that received the three food energy density interventions across the three periods in the order of 80%, then 120%, then 100%.
100% Food Energy Density, Then 80%, Then 120%
Participants in the classroom that received the three food energy density interventions across the three periods in the order of 100%, then 80%, then 120%.
120% Food Energy Density, Then 100%, Then 80%
Participants in the classroom that received the three food energy density interventions across the three periods in the order of 120%, then 100%, then 80%.
Study Week 1
Withdrawal by Subject
2
1
0
2
0
0
Study Week 3
Withdrawal by Subject
0
0
0
1
0
0

Baseline Characteristics

Effect of Energy Density Over 5 Days in Preschool Children

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
All Study Participants
n=49 Participants
Enrolled participants who completed the trial and whose data was not excluded from analysis
Age, Continuous
4.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
49 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Days 1-5 in Weeks 1, 2, and 3

Population: Data of 1 enrolled participant was excluded from analysis for absence from meals on 3 or more days in multiple intervention periods.

Differences in daily intake of food and beverages by energy, in kcal

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
100% Food Energy Density
n=49 Participants
Baseline Food Energy Density Food Energy Density: Food Energy density manipulated
80% Food Energy Density
n=49 Participants
Lower Food Energy Density Food Energy Density: Food Energy density manipulated
120% Food Energy Density
n=49 Participants
Higher Food Energy Density Food Energy Density: Food Energy density manipulated
Differences in Food and Beverage Intake by Energy
956 kilocalories
Standard Error 37
884 kilocalories
Standard Error 38
1041 kilocalories
Standard Error 38

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Days 1-5 in weeks 1, 2, and 3

Population: Data of 1 enrolled participant was excluded from analysis for absence from meals on 3 or more days in multiple intervention periods.

Differences in daily intake of food and beverages by weight, in grams

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
100% Food Energy Density
n=49 Participants
Baseline Food Energy Density Food Energy Density: Food Energy density manipulated
80% Food Energy Density
n=49 Participants
Lower Food Energy Density Food Energy Density: Food Energy density manipulated
120% Food Energy Density
n=49 Participants
Higher Food Energy Density Food Energy Density: Food Energy density manipulated
Differences in Food and Beverage Intake by Weight
997 grams
Standard Error 41
952 grams
Standard Error 41
988 grams
Standard Error 41

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Days 1-5 in weeks 1, 2, and 3

Population: Data of 1 enrolled participant was excluded from analysis for absence from meals on 3 or more days in multiple intervention periods.

Differences in daily intake of food and beverages by energy density, in kcal/g

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
100% Food Energy Density
n=49 Participants
Baseline Food Energy Density Food Energy Density: Food Energy density manipulated
80% Food Energy Density
n=49 Participants
Lower Food Energy Density Food Energy Density: Food Energy density manipulated
120% Food Energy Density
n=49 Participants
Higher Food Energy Density Food Energy Density: Food Energy density manipulated
Differences in Food and Beverage Intake by Energy Density
0.97 kilocalories/gram
Standard Error 0.02
0.93 kilocalories/gram
Standard Error 0.02
1.06 kilocalories/gram
Standard Error 0.03

Adverse Events

80% Food Energy Density

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

100% Food Energy Density

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

120% Food Energy Density

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Barbara J. Rolls

Laboratory for the Study of Human Ingestive Behavior, The Pennsylvania State University

Phone: 814-863-8481

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place