Trial Outcomes & Findings for Olaparib and Ramucirumab in Treating Patients With Metastatic or Locally Recurrent Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer That Cannot Be Removed by Surgery (NCT NCT03008278)
NCT ID: NCT03008278
Last Updated: 2026-02-03
Results Overview
Will be assessed by National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria (CTCAE) for Adverse Events version 5.0. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
51 participants
Up to 28 days
2026-02-03
Participant Flow
51 patients received treatment / actually enrolled in the overall study. There are not two different arms of the study, the phase 1 portion of this was a lead in to the phase 2 portion.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
PHASE 1 LEVEL 1
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
LEVEL 1: 200 mg BID of olaparib
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
Phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2 portion of the study.
|
PHASE 1
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
|
PHASE 2
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
3
|
8
|
40
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
3
|
6
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
2
|
39
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
PHASE 1 LEVEL 1
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
LEVEL 1: 200 mg BID of olaparib
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
Phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2 portion of the study.
|
PHASE 1
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
|
PHASE 2
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Progressive Disease
|
0
|
0
|
32
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Olaparib and Ramucirumab in Treating Patients With Metastatic or Locally Recurrent Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer That Cannot Be Removed by Surgery
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Phase 1: Treatment (Olaparib, Ramucirumab) LEVEL 1
n=3 Participants
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
LEVEL 1: 200 mg BID of olaparib
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
Phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2 portion of the study.
|
Phase 1: Treatment (Olaparib, Ramucirumab) LEVEL 2
n=8 Participants
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
LEVEL 2: 300 mg BID of olaparib
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
Phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2 portion of the study.
|
Phase 2: Treatment (Olaparib, Ramucirumab)
n=40 Participants
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
|
Total
n=51 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
46 years
n=13 Participants
|
69 years
n=15 Participants
|
65 years
n=28 Participants
|
64 years
n=2 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
1 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=28 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
2 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=28 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=28 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=28 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=28 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=28 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
1 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=28 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=28 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
2 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=28 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
3 participants
n=13 Participants
|
8 participants
n=15 Participants
|
40 participants
n=28 Participants
|
51 participants
n=2 Participants
|
|
ECOG Performance
0
|
1 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=28 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
|
ECOG Performance
1
|
2 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=28 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
|
Location of Primary Tumor
Gastroesophageal Junction
|
1 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=28 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
|
Location of Primary Tumor
Stomach
|
2 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=28 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
|
Location of Primary Tumor
Unreported
|
0 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=28 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
|
Previous Surgical Resection
Yes
|
0 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=28 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
|
Previous Surgical Resection
No
|
3 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=28 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
|
Histology
Well-differentiated
|
1 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=28 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
|
Histology
Moderately differentiated
|
0 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=28 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
|
Histology
Poorly differentiated
|
2 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=28 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
|
Histology
Not reported
|
0 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=28 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
|
Number of prior therapies
1
|
1 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=28 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
|
Number of prior therapies
2
|
1 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=28 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
|
Number of prior therapies
3
|
1 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=28 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
|
Number of prior therapies
>= 4
|
0 Participants
n=13 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=28 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 28 daysPopulation: Only those in Phase 1 portion, 3 participants received Dose 1, 6 participants received Dose 2 (2 were not evaluable).
Will be assessed by National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria (CTCAE) for Adverse Events version 5.0. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treatment (Olaparib, Ramucirumab)
n=9 Participants
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
|
PHASE 1 LEVEL 2
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
LEVEL 2: 300 mg BID of olaparib
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
Phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2 portion of the study.
|
PHASE 2
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Dose Limiting Toxicity and Maximum Tolerated Dose of Olaparib (Phase I)
DLT at Dose Level 1
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Dose Limiting Toxicity and Maximum Tolerated Dose of Olaparib (Phase I)
DLT at Dose Level 2
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 2 yearsWill be defined as complete or partial response assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Presented are the count of those that were considered to have responded while in treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treatment (Olaparib, Ramucirumab)
n=40 Participants
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
|
PHASE 1 LEVEL 2
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
LEVEL 2: 300 mg BID of olaparib
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
Phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2 portion of the study.
|
PHASE 2
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Objective Response Rate (Phase II)
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From start of treatment to time of progression or death, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 2 yearsProgression free survival is reported as the number of days where participants did not progress while in treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treatment (Olaparib, Ramucirumab)
n=3 Participants
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
|
PHASE 1 LEVEL 2
n=8 Participants
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
LEVEL 2: 300 mg BID of olaparib
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
Phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2 portion of the study.
|
PHASE 2
n=40 Participants
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Progression Free Survival
|
4.1 months
Interval 2.5 to 4.1
|
2.3 months
Interval 1.4 to 10.0
|
4.0 months
Interval 2.1 to 5.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 2 yearsOverall survival is the overall number of days a participant was on study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treatment (Olaparib, Ramucirumab)
n=3 Participants
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
|
PHASE 1 LEVEL 2
n=8 Participants
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
LEVEL 2: 300 mg BID of olaparib
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
Phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2 portion of the study.
|
PHASE 2
n=40 Participants
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Survival
|
5.5 months
Interval 2.5 to 16.0
|
6.9 months
Interval 1.4 to 24.0
|
7.3 months
Interval 5.6 to 13.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 6 monthsPopulation: The genomic analysis was available for 35 patients.
Will be compared for duration of response survival with Kaplan-Meier estimates and log-rank tests. The Rothman CI will be reported. In addition, the possible risk factors will be compared for survival with log-rank test. The adjusted p-values of the hazard ratios and the adjusted 95% confidence interval will be reported. The timeframe and outcome were edited upon results entry to reflect the Progression Free Survival for those available from genomic analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treatment (Olaparib, Ramucirumab)
n=11 Participants
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
|
PHASE 1 LEVEL 2
n=24 Participants
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
LEVEL 2: 300 mg BID of olaparib
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
Phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2 portion of the study.
|
PHASE 2
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
BROCA-HR Status: Progression Free Survival
|
5.3 months
Interval 1.4 to
Upper bound CI was not calculable due to insufficient number of participants with events.
|
2.7 months
Interval 2.3 to 4.2
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 2 yearsPopulation: The genomic analysis was available for 35 patients.
Will be compared for duration of response survival with Kaplan-Meier estimates and log-rank tests. The Rothman CI will be reported. In addition, the possible risk factors will be compared for survival with log-rank test. The adjusted p-values of the hazard ratios and the adjusted 95% confidence interval will be reported. The timeframe and outcome were edited upon results entry to reflect the Overall Survival.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treatment (Olaparib, Ramucirumab)
n=11 Participants
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
|
PHASE 1 LEVEL 2
n=24 Participants
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
LEVEL 2: 300 mg BID of olaparib
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
Phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2 portion of the study.
|
PHASE 2
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
BROCA-HR Status: Overall Survival
|
13.5 months
Interval 7.2 to
Upper bound CI was not calculable due to insufficient number of participants with events.
|
7.3 months
Interval 5.5 to 13.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 2 yearsThe outcome was updated at the time or results entry. Presented are the count of the participants that experienced at least 1 adverse event.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treatment (Olaparib, Ramucirumab)
n=3 Participants
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
|
PHASE 1 LEVEL 2
n=8 Participants
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
LEVEL 2: 300 mg BID of olaparib
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
Phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2 portion of the study.
|
PHASE 2
n=40 Participants
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Count of Participants With Adverse Events
|
3 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
40 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Up to 6 yearsThe association of BROCA HR assay with Signature 3 will be assessed using a series of contingency table analyses. The association of the presence of an individual mutation from the BROCA HR panel with the signature 3 (yes/no) using Fisher's exact test. Using a Cochran Mantel Haenzel test the relationship across all three measures will be examined. Finally, the relationship of each of these measures with response will be examined. To do this multiple logistic regression models can be fit with the response (complete response/partial response vs stable disease/partial disease) considered as the outcome variable and the assay measures can be used predictors.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Up to 6 yearsOutcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
PHASE 1 LEVEL 1
PHASE 1 LEVEL 2
PHASE 2
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
PHASE 1 LEVEL 1
n=3 participants at risk
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
LEVEL 1: 200 mg BID of olaparib
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
Phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2 portion of the study.
|
PHASE 1 LEVEL 2
n=8 participants at risk
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
LEVEL 2: 300 mg BID of olaparib
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
Phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2 portion of the study.
|
PHASE 2
n=40 participants at risk
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Heart failure
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Obstruction gastric
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
5.0%
2/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
General disorders
Multi-organ failure
|
33.3%
1/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis perforated
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fracture
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Investigations
Blood bilirubin increased
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Investigations
Hepatic failure
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Anorexia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatremia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
5.0%
2/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrotic syndrome
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Sepsis
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
2.5%
1/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
5.0%
2/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
33.3%
1/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
PHASE 1 LEVEL 1
n=3 participants at risk
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
LEVEL 1: 200 mg BID of olaparib
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
Phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2 portion of the study.
|
PHASE 1 LEVEL 2
n=8 participants at risk
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
LEVEL 2: 300 mg BID of olaparib
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
Phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2 portion of the study.
|
PHASE 2
n=40 participants at risk
Patients receive olaparib PO BID on days 1-14 of each cycle and ramucirumab IV over 60 minutes on day 1 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 14 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Olaparib: Give PO
Ramucirumab: Given IV
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
66.7%
2/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
87.5%
7/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
55.0%
22/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
33.3%
1/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
62.5%
5/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
77.5%
31/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Weight loss
|
33.3%
1/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
50.0%
4/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
17.5%
7/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Anorexia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
37.5%
3/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
47.5%
19/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
62.5%
5/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
25.0%
10/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia
|
33.3%
1/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
37.5%
3/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
42.5%
17/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
50.0%
4/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
35.0%
14/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycemia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
50.0%
4/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
27.5%
11/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatremia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
37.5%
3/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
25.0%
10/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoalbuminemia
|
33.3%
1/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
50.0%
4/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
5.0%
2/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnea
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
50.0%
4/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
17.5%
7/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
White blood cell count decreased
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
37.5%
3/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
30.0%
12/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycemia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
37.5%
3/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
37.5%
3/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
General disorders
Hemorrhoids
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
25.0%
2/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
37.5%
3/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
5/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
37.5%
3/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
47.5%
19/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutrophil count decreased
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
25.0%
2/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
17.5%
7/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastroesophageal reflux disease
|
33.3%
1/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
25.0%
2/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
5/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
General disorders
Fever
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
25.0%
2/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
GGT increased
|
33.3%
1/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
17.5%
7/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypomagnesemia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
25.0%
2/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalemia
|
33.3%
1/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
7.5%
3/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
33.3%
1/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
15.0%
6/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypocalcemia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
37.5%
3/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
15.0%
6/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphocyte count decreased
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
25.0%
10/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Hypophosphatemia
|
33.3%
1/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Elevated WBC
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Palpitations
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Otitis ear infection
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Hypothyroidism
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
5.0%
2/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
General disorders
Blood nasal secretions
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
General disorders
G-tube site pain
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
General disorders
Chills
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Blood bilirubin increased
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
5/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
ALT increased
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
17.5%
7/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Alkaline phosphatase increased
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
20.0%
8/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
AST increased
|
33.3%
1/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
25.0%
10/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Head cold
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Stoma site infection
|
33.3%
1/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Investigations
LDH increased
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Investigations
Sore throat
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Investigations
Nail change
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Investigations
Hoarseness
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Investigations
Hypokalemia
|
33.3%
1/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Investigations
Elevated lactic acid
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Investigations
Elevated monocyte count
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Investigations
Elevated neutrophil count
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Investigations
Elevated PTT
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Investigations
Elevated PT
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Investigations
Elevated INR
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Investigations
Elevated amylase
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Investigations
Decreased total protein
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Investigations
Elevated leukocyte esterase
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Investigations
Elevated LDH
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Investigations
Elevated urine bilirubin
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Investigations
Lipase decreased
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalemia
|
33.3%
1/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypophosphatemia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
33.3%
1/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
10.0%
4/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
33.3%
1/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
5/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
5/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Hematuria
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
10.0%
4/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Shoulder pain
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Right leg weakness
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Fracture
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Right hip pain
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Right groin pain
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysguesia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
5/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
33.3%
1/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Biliary outflow obstruction
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Cholangitis
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
33.3%
1/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
33.3%
1/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
33.3%
1/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Upper respiratory infection
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Platelet count decreased
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
37.5%
15/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Eye disorders
Blurred vision
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
7.5%
3/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry Mouth
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
10.0%
4/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
15.0%
6/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
33.3%
1/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
40.0%
16/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
66.7%
2/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
47.5%
19/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
66.7%
2/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
52.5%
21/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
General disorders
Edema (limbs)
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
20.0%
8/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypermagnesemia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
7.5%
3/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Blood bicarbonate decreased
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
10.0%
4/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Creatinine increased
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
15.0%
6/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Proteinuria
|
33.3%
1/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
45.0%
18/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
7.5%
3/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Lung infection
|
33.3%
1/3 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/40 • Up to 2 years
Adverse events were collected and are reported across both phase 1 and phase 2 patients. The safety profile and adverse event reporting were collected in an intent to treat analysis so data from all patients were included in the overall analysis and there was never any plan nor intent to evaluate or report the safety profile separately. These are not two different arms of the same study, the phase 1 part of this was a lead in to the phase 2.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60