Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Clinical Comparison of 2 Multifocal Toric XR (Extended Range) Contact Lenses (NCT NCT03006458)
NCT ID: NCT03006458
Last Updated: 2020-06-01
Results Overview
Investigator's acceptance on overall stability for comfilcon A and omafilcon B lenses assessed using grading scale 0-4, 0=Totally unstable, can't be worn to provide acceptable vision correction for astigmatism, 4=Excellent orientation and optimum rotational.
COMPLETED
NA
24 participants
Baseline
2020-06-01
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Comfilcon A Then Omafilcon B
Participants were randomized to wear comfilcon A for two weeks during the cross over study.
comfilcon A: toric contact lens
|
Omafilcon B Then Comfilcon A
Participants were randomized to wear omafilcon B for two weeks during the cross over study.
omafilcon B: toric contact lens
|
|---|---|---|
|
First Intervention
STARTED
|
14
|
10
|
|
First Intervention
COMPLETED
|
14
|
7
|
|
First Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
3
|
|
Second Intervention
STARTED
|
14
|
10
|
|
Second Intervention
COMPLETED
|
14
|
10
|
|
Second Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Comfilcon A Then Omafilcon B
Participants were randomized to wear comfilcon A for two weeks during the cross over study.
comfilcon A: toric contact lens
|
Omafilcon B Then Comfilcon A
Participants were randomized to wear omafilcon B for two weeks during the cross over study.
omafilcon B: toric contact lens
|
|---|---|---|
|
First Intervention
Unsatisfied Vision
|
0
|
3
|
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Overall Study
n=24 Participants
Total Participants
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
24 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
56.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2 • n=24 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
11 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
13 Participants
n=24 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
|
24 participants
n=24 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselineInvestigator's acceptance on overall stability for comfilcon A and omafilcon B lenses assessed using grading scale 0-4, 0=Totally unstable, can't be worn to provide acceptable vision correction for astigmatism, 4=Excellent orientation and optimum rotational.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear comfilcon A toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
comfilcon A: toric contact lens
|
Omafilcon B
n=21 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear omafilcon B toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
omafilcon B: toric contact lens
|
|---|---|---|
|
Stability
|
3.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.5
|
2.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksInvestigator's acceptance on overall stability for comfilcon A and omafilcon B lenses assessed using grading scale 0-4, 0=Totally unstable, can't be worn to provide acceptable vision correction for astigmatism, 4=Excellent orientation and optimum rotational.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear comfilcon A toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
comfilcon A: toric contact lens
|
Omafilcon B
n=21 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear omafilcon B toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
omafilcon B: toric contact lens
|
|---|---|---|
|
Stability
|
3.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
2.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselineOverall toric lens fit acceptance is assessed for comfilcon A and omafilcon B lenses. Scale 0-4, 0=can't be worn, 1=Poor, 2=Fair, 3=Good, 4=optimum.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear comfilcon A toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
comfilcon A: toric contact lens
|
Omafilcon B
n=21 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear omafilcon B toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
omafilcon B: toric contact lens
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Toric Lens Fit Acceptance
|
3.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
|
3.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksOverall toric lens fit acceptance is assessed for comfilcon A and omafilcon B lenses. Scale 0-4, 0=can't be worn, 1=Poor, 2=Fair, 3=Good, 4=optimum.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear comfilcon A toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
comfilcon A: toric contact lens
|
Omafilcon B
n=21 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear omafilcon B toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
omafilcon B: toric contact lens
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Toric Lens Fit Acceptance
|
3.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6
|
2.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselineSubjective ratings for comfort assessed. Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, causes pain; 100=cannot be felt ever
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear comfilcon A toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
comfilcon A: toric contact lens
|
Omafilcon B
n=21 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear omafilcon B toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
omafilcon B: toric contact lens
|
|---|---|---|
|
Comfort
|
81.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.3
|
79.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.6
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksSubjective ratings for comfort assessed. Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, causes pain; 100=cannot be felt ever
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear comfilcon A toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
comfilcon A: toric contact lens
|
Omafilcon B
n=21 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear omafilcon B toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
omafilcon B: toric contact lens
|
|---|---|---|
|
Comfort
|
79.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.8
|
70.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.2
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksSubjective ratings for overall satisfaction for comfilcon A and omafilcon B lenses assessed. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely dissatisfied, 100=extremely satisfied
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear comfilcon A toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
comfilcon A: toric contact lens
|
Omafilcon B
n=21 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear omafilcon B toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
omafilcon B: toric contact lens
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Satisfaction
|
63.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.4
|
63.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 34.4
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksSubjective ratings for dryness assessed. Scale 0-100, 0=cannot be worn, extremely dry; 100=no dryness experienced at any time
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear comfilcon A toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
comfilcon A: toric contact lens
|
Omafilcon B
n=21 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear omafilcon B toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
omafilcon B: toric contact lens
|
|---|---|---|
|
Dryness
|
80.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.7
|
77.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.1
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksSubjective ratings for visual fluctuation/stability assessed. Scale 0-100, 0=totally unstable/ fluctuation/changing; 100=perfectly stable/not fluctuation/changing
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear comfilcon A toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
comfilcon A: toric contact lens
|
Omafilcon B
n=21 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear omafilcon B toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
omafilcon B: toric contact lens
|
|---|---|---|
|
Visual Fluctuation/ Stability
|
81.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.1
|
73.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.5
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksSubjective ratings for handling difficulty assessed at 2 weeks. Scale 0-100, 0=very difficult, 100=very easy
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear comfilcon A toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
comfilcon A: toric contact lens
|
Omafilcon B
n=21 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear omafilcon B toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
omafilcon B: toric contact lens
|
|---|---|---|
|
Handling
|
84.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.0
|
85.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.1
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksSubjective ratings for quality of near vision. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. cannot function, 100 - excellent vision all of the time.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear comfilcon A toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
comfilcon A: toric contact lens
|
Omafilcon B
n=21 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear omafilcon B toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
omafilcon B: toric contact lens
|
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of Near Vision
|
38.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.5
|
56.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.9
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksSubjective ratings for quality of intermediate vision. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. cannot function, 100 - excellent vision all of the time.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear comfilcon A toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
comfilcon A: toric contact lens
|
Omafilcon B
n=21 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear omafilcon B toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
omafilcon B: toric contact lens
|
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of Intermediate Vision
|
50.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.5
|
65.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.6
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksSubjective ratings for quality of distance vision. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. cannot function, 100 - excellent vision all of the time.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear comfilcon A toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
comfilcon A: toric contact lens
|
Omafilcon B
n=21 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear omafilcon B toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
omafilcon B: toric contact lens
|
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of Distance Vision
|
86.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.7
|
67.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.5
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksSubjective rating for quality of vision while driving during the day. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. cannot function, 100 - excellent vision all of the time.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Comfilcon A
n=20 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear comfilcon A toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
comfilcon A: toric contact lens
|
Omafilcon B
n=17 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear omafilcon B toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
omafilcon B: toric contact lens
|
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of Vision While Driving During the Day
|
87.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.6
|
76.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.4
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksSubjective ratings for quality of vision while driving at night. Scale 0-100, 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. cannot function, 100 - excellent vision all of the time.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Comfilcon A
n=20 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear comfilcon A toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
comfilcon A: toric contact lens
|
Omafilcon B
n=15 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear omafilcon B toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
omafilcon B: toric contact lens
|
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of Vision While Driving During the Night
|
78.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.6
|
67.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.4
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksSubjective ratings for ghosting at near assessed at 2 weeks. Scale 0-100, 0=intolerable, 100=not noticeable.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Comfilcon A
n=23 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear comfilcon A toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
comfilcon A: toric contact lens
|
Omafilcon B
n=21 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear omafilcon B toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
omafilcon B: toric contact lens
|
|---|---|---|
|
Ghosting at Near
|
66.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 35.0
|
78.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 weeksSubjective ratings for ghosting at distance assessed at 2 weeks. Scale 0-100, 0=intolerable, 100=not noticeable.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Comfilcon A
n=24 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear comfilcon A toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
comfilcon A: toric contact lens
|
Omafilcon B
n=21 Participants
Participants were randomized to wear omafilcon B toric lenses for two weeks during the cross over study.
omafilcon B: toric contact lens
|
|---|---|---|
|
Ghosting at Distance
|
83.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.8
|
86.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.4
|
Adverse Events
Comfilcon A
Omafilcon B
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place