Trial Outcomes & Findings for Treatment of Bacterial Conjunctivitis With SHP640 Compared to PVP-Iodine and Placebo (NCT NCT03004924)
NCT ID: NCT03004924
Last Updated: 2021-06-09
Results Overview
Clinical resolution was defined as absence (score=0) of bulbar conjunctival injection and ocular conjunctival discharge in the study eye. Bulbar conjunctival injection was assessed based on 0 (Normal conjunctival vascular pattern) - 4 (Markedly prominent, intense diffuse hyperemia) scale which used pictures from validated bulbar redness (VBR) scale. Ocular conjunctival discharge was assessed based on 0 (No evidence of discharge in conjunctiva) - 3 (Abundant quantity of mucopurulent or purulent discharge) scale. The study eye was defined as an eye with score of at least 1 for both ocular conjunctival discharge and bulbar conjunctival redness at baseline. Data analysis was performed in SHP640 and placebo reporting groups only but not in PVP-I 0.6%.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
753 participants
Day 5
2021-06-09
Participant Flow
Study was conducted at 121 centers in 14 countries between 29 Mar 2017 (first participant first visit) and 01 Oct 2018 (last participant last visit).
A total of 1080 participants were screened, of them 753 enrolled and randomized to treatment. One participant was randomized in error and therefore captured only in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
SHP640
Participants administered 1 drop of SHP640 (povidone-iodine \[PVP-I\] 0.6 percent \[%\] and Dexamethasone 0.1%) ophthalmic suspension in each eye 4 times a day (QID) for 7 days.
|
PVP-I 0.6%
Participants administered 1 drop of PVP-I 0.6% ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
Placebo
Participants administered 1 drop of placebo ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
324
|
108
|
321
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
297
|
94
|
293
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
27
|
14
|
28
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
SHP640
Participants administered 1 drop of SHP640 (povidone-iodine \[PVP-I\] 0.6 percent \[%\] and Dexamethasone 0.1%) ophthalmic suspension in each eye 4 times a day (QID) for 7 days.
|
PVP-I 0.6%
Participants administered 1 drop of PVP-I 0.6% ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
Placebo
Participants administered 1 drop of placebo ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
6
|
5
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
4
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
5
|
3
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
6
|
1
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by parent/guardian
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Screen Failure
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Pregnancy
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Terminated by Sponsor
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Missed Study Visit
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
HSV1 Positive
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Treatment of Bacterial Conjunctivitis With SHP640 Compared to PVP-Iodine and Placebo
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
SHP640
n=324 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of SHP640 ophthalmic suspension in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
PVP-I 0.6%
n=108 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of PVP-I 0.6% ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
Placebo
n=321 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of placebo ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
Total
n=753 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
44.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.87 • n=5 Participants
|
43.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.03 • n=7 Participants
|
44.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.00 • n=5 Participants
|
44.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.92 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
191 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
71 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
199 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
461 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
133 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
122 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
292 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity · Hispanic or Latino
|
62 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
87 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
179 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity · Not Hispanic or Latino
|
254 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
76 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
230 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
560 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity · Not reported
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity · Other
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · Asian
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · Black or African American
|
54 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
54 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
126 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · White
|
250 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
88 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
250 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
588 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · Other
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · Multiple
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 5Population: Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population included participants who received at least one dose of investigational product (IP) and had a positive bacterial culture (presence of one or more bacterial species at or above pathological threshold) at baseline in the study. Analysis was done in SHP640 and placebo reporting groups only.
Clinical resolution was defined as absence (score=0) of bulbar conjunctival injection and ocular conjunctival discharge in the study eye. Bulbar conjunctival injection was assessed based on 0 (Normal conjunctival vascular pattern) - 4 (Markedly prominent, intense diffuse hyperemia) scale which used pictures from validated bulbar redness (VBR) scale. Ocular conjunctival discharge was assessed based on 0 (No evidence of discharge in conjunctiva) - 3 (Abundant quantity of mucopurulent or purulent discharge) scale. The study eye was defined as an eye with score of at least 1 for both ocular conjunctival discharge and bulbar conjunctival redness at baseline. Data analysis was performed in SHP640 and placebo reporting groups only but not in PVP-I 0.6%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PVP-I 0.6%
Participants administered 1 drop of PVP-I 0.6% ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
SHP640
n=220 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of SHP640 (povidone-iodine \[PVP-I\] 0.6 percent \[%\] and Dexamethasone 0.1%) ophthalmic suspension in each eye 4 times a day (QID) for 7 days.
|
Placebo
n=222 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of placebo ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Resolution Among Who Received SHP640 or Placebo on Day 5
|
0 Participants
|
111 Participants
|
95 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 5Population: mITT population included participants who received at least one dose of IP and had a positive bacterial culture (presence of one or more bacterial species at or above pathological threshold) at baseline in the study. Here, the number of participants analyzed refer to the participants evaluable for this outcome at specified time point.
Bacterial eradication was defined as absence of all bacterial species present at or above pathological threshold at baseline in the study eye. Bacterial species were identified by Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry, using their unique protein patterns. Pathological threshold for individual bacterial species was based on colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL threshold levels established by Cagle and modified by Leibowitz for different ocular bacterial species found in the specimens collected from each participant. Data analysis was performed in SHP640 and placebo reporting groups only but not in PVP-I 0.6%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PVP-I 0.6%
Participants administered 1 drop of PVP-I 0.6% ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
SHP640
n=217 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of SHP640 (povidone-iodine \[PVP-I\] 0.6 percent \[%\] and Dexamethasone 0.1%) ophthalmic suspension in each eye 4 times a day (QID) for 7 days.
|
Placebo
n=218 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of placebo ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Bacterial Eradication Among Who Received SHP640 or Placebo on Day 5
|
0 Participants
|
94 Participants
|
102 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 3, 8 and 12Population: mITT population included participants who received at least one dose of IP and had a positive bacterial culture (presence of one or more bacterial species at or above pathological threshold) at baseline in the study. Here, the number of participants analyzed refer to the participants evaluable for this outcome at specified time point.
Clinical resolution was defined as absence (score=0) of bulbar conjunctival injection and ocular conjunctival discharge in the study eye. Bulbar conjunctival injection was assessed based on 0 (Normal conjunctival vascular pattern) - 4 (Markedly prominent, intense diffuse hyperemia) scale which used pictures from VBR scale. Ocular conjunctival discharge was assessed based on 0 (No evidence of discharge in conjunctiva) - 3 (Abundant quantity of mucopurulent or purulent discharge) scale. The study eye was defined as an eye with score of atleast 1 for both ocular conjunctival discharge and bulbar conjunctival redness at baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PVP-I 0.6%
n=76 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of PVP-I 0.6% ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
SHP640
n=223 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of SHP640 (povidone-iodine \[PVP-I\] 0.6 percent \[%\] and Dexamethasone 0.1%) ophthalmic suspension in each eye 4 times a day (QID) for 7 days.
|
Placebo
n=227 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of placebo ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Resolution
Day 3
|
6 Participants
|
39 Participants
|
39 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Resolution
Day 8
|
39 Participants
|
148 Participants
|
133 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Resolution
Day 12
|
47 Participants
|
150 Participants
|
154 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 3, 8 and 12Population: mITT population included participants who received at least one dose of IP and had a positive bacterial culture (presence of one or more bacterial species at or above pathological threshold) at baseline in the study.
Bacterial eradication was defined as absence of all bacterial species present at or above pathological threshold at baseline in the study eye. Bacterial species were identified by Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry, using their unique protein patterns. Pathological threshold for individual bacterial species was based on CFU/mL threshold levels established by Cagle and modified by Leibowitz for different ocular bacterial species found in the specimens collected from each participant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PVP-I 0.6%
n=76 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of PVP-I 0.6% ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
SHP640
n=223 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of SHP640 (povidone-iodine \[PVP-I\] 0.6 percent \[%\] and Dexamethasone 0.1%) ophthalmic suspension in each eye 4 times a day (QID) for 7 days.
|
Placebo
n=227 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of placebo ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Bacterial Eradication
Day 3
|
33 Participants
|
76 Participants
|
79 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Bacterial Eradication
Day 8
|
25 Participants
|
85 Participants
|
87 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Bacterial Eradication
Day 12
|
21 Participants
|
83 Participants
|
82 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 3, 5, 8 and 12Population: mITT population included participants who received at least one dose of IP and had a positive bacterial culture (presence of one or more bacterial species at or above pathological threshold) at baseline in the study. Here, the number of participants analyzed refer to the participants evaluable for this outcome at specified time point.
Bulbar conjunctival injection was assessed based on 0 (Normal conjunctival vascular pattern) - 4 (Markedly prominent, intense diffuse hyperemia) scale which used pictures from VBR scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PVP-I 0.6%
n=76 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of PVP-I 0.6% ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
SHP640
n=223 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of SHP640 (povidone-iodine \[PVP-I\] 0.6 percent \[%\] and Dexamethasone 0.1%) ophthalmic suspension in each eye 4 times a day (QID) for 7 days.
|
Placebo
n=227 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of placebo ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Bulbar Conjunctival Injection Score
Day 3
|
1.3 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
1.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
1.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
|
Bulbar Conjunctival Injection Score
Day 5
|
0.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
0.5 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.77
|
0.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.80
|
|
Bulbar Conjunctival Injection Score
Day 8
|
0.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.61
|
0.3 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.64
|
0.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.61
|
|
Bulbar Conjunctival Injection Score
Day 12
|
0.2 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.47
|
0.2 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.56
|
0.2 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.48
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 3, 5, 8 and 12Population: mITT population included participants who received at least one dose of IP and had a positive bacterial culture (presence of one or more bacterial species at or above pathological threshold) at baseline in the study. Here, the number of participants analyzed refer to the participants evaluable for this outcome at specified time point.
Bulbar conjunctival injection was assessed based on 0 (Normal conjunctival vascular pattern) - 4 (Markedly prominent, intense diffuse hyperemia) scale which used pictures from VBR scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PVP-I 0.6%
n=76 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of PVP-I 0.6% ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
SHP640
n=223 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of SHP640 (povidone-iodine \[PVP-I\] 0.6 percent \[%\] and Dexamethasone 0.1%) ophthalmic suspension in each eye 4 times a day (QID) for 7 days.
|
Placebo
n=227 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of placebo ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Bulbar Conjunctival Injection Score
Day 3
|
-0.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.76
|
-1.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.77
|
-0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.76
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Bulbar Conjunctival Injection Score
Day 5
|
-1.3 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
-1.5 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
-1.3 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Bulbar Conjunctival Injection Score
Day 8
|
-1.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
-1.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
-1.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.81
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Bulbar Conjunctival Injection Score
Day 12
|
-1.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.74
|
-1.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
-1.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 3, 5, 8 and 12Population: mITT population included participants who received at least one dose of IP and had a positive bacterial culture (presence of one or more bacterial species at or above pathological threshold) at baseline in the study. Here, the number of participants analyzed refer to the participants evaluable for this outcome at specified time point.
Ocular conjunctival discharge was assessed based on a 0 (No evidence of discharge in the conjunctiva) - 3 (Abundant quantity of mucopurulent or purulent discharge) scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PVP-I 0.6%
n=76 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of PVP-I 0.6% ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
SHP640
n=223 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of SHP640 (povidone-iodine \[PVP-I\] 0.6 percent \[%\] and Dexamethasone 0.1%) ophthalmic suspension in each eye 4 times a day (QID) for 7 days.
|
Placebo
n=227 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of placebo ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Ocular Conjunctival Discharge Score
Day 3
|
0.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.74
|
0.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.73
|
0.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.76
|
|
Ocular Conjunctival Discharge Score
Day 5
|
0.2 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.44
|
0.3 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.57
|
0.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.60
|
|
Ocular Conjunctival Discharge Score
Day 8
|
0.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.31
|
0.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.43
|
0.2 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.47
|
|
Ocular Conjunctival Discharge Score
Day 12
|
0.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.22
|
0.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.49
|
0.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.28
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 3, 5, 8 and 12Population: mITT population included participants who received at least one dose of IP and had a positive bacterial culture (presence of one or more bacterial species at or above pathological threshold) at baseline in the study. Here, the number of participants analyzed refer to the participants evaluable for this outcome at specified time point.
Ocular conjunctival discharge was assessed based on a 0 (No evidence of discharge in the conjunctiva) - 3 (Abundant quantity of mucopurulent or purulent discharge) scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PVP-I 0.6%
n=76 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of PVP-I 0.6% ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
SHP640
n=223 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of SHP640 (povidone-iodine \[PVP-I\] 0.6 percent \[%\] and Dexamethasone 0.1%) ophthalmic suspension in each eye 4 times a day (QID) for 7 days.
|
Placebo
n=227 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of placebo ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Ocular Conjunctival Discharge Score
Day 3
|
-0.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.67
|
-0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.77
|
-0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Ocular Conjunctival Discharge Score
Day 5
|
-1.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.75
|
-1.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.74
|
-1.3 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.75
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Ocular Conjunctival Discharge Score
Day 8
|
-1.5 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.73
|
-1.5 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
-1.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.74
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Ocular Conjunctival Discharge Score
Day 12
|
-1.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
-1.5 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.76
|
-1.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.73
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 3, 5, 8 and 12Population: mITT population included participants who received at least one dose of IP and had a positive bacterial culture (presence of one or more bacterial species at or above pathological threshold) at baseline in the study. Here, the number of participants analyzed refer to the participants evaluable for this outcome at specified time point.
Global clinical score was defined as the sum of bulbar conjunctival injection and ocular conjunctival discharge scores. Bulbar conjunctival injection was assessed based on 0 (Normal conjunctival vascular pattern) - 4 (Markedly prominent, intense diffuse hyperemia) scale which used pictures from VBR scale. Ocular conjunctival discharge was assessed based on 0 (No evidence of discharge in conjunctiva) - 3 (Abundant quantity of mucopurulent or purulent discharge) scale. The study eye was defined as an eye with a score of at least 1 for both ocular conjunctival discharge and bulbar conjunctival redness at baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PVP-I 0.6%
n=76 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of PVP-I 0.6% ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
SHP640
n=223 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of SHP640 (povidone-iodine \[PVP-I\] 0.6 percent \[%\] and Dexamethasone 0.1%) ophthalmic suspension in each eye 4 times a day (QID) for 7 days.
|
Placebo
n=227 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of placebo ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Global Clinical Score
Day 3
|
2.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.39
|
1.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.37
|
1.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.42
|
|
Global Clinical Score
Day 5
|
0.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.19
|
0.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
|
1.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
|
|
Global Clinical Score
Day 8
|
0.5 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.77
|
0.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
0.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
|
Global Clinical Score
Day 12
|
0.3 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.55
|
0.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
0.3 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.67
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 3, 5, 8 and 12Population: mITT population included participants who received at least one dose of IP and had a positive bacterial culture (presence of one or more bacterial species at or above pathological threshold) at baseline in the study. Here, the number of participants analyzed refer to the participants evaluable for this outcome at specified time point.
Global clinical score was defined as the sum of bulbar conjunctival injection and ocular conjunctival discharge scores. Bulbar conjunctival injection was assessed based on 0 (Normal conjunctival vascular pattern) - 4 (Markedly prominent, intense diffuse hyperemia) scale which used pictures from VBR scale. Ocular conjunctival discharge was assessed based on 0 (No evidence of discharge in conjunctiva) - 3 (Abundant quantity of mucopurulent or purulent discharge) scale. The study eye was defined as an eye with a score of at least 1 for both ocular conjunctival discharge and bulbar conjunctival redness at baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PVP-I 0.6%
n=76 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of PVP-I 0.6% ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
SHP640
n=223 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of SHP640 (povidone-iodine \[PVP-I\] 0.6 percent \[%\] and Dexamethasone 0.1%) ophthalmic suspension in each eye 4 times a day (QID) for 7 days.
|
Placebo
n=227 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of placebo ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Global Clinical Score
Day 3
|
-1.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.22
|
-1.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.28
|
-1.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.30
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Global Clinical Score
Day 5
|
-2.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.47
|
-2.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.27
|
-2.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.31
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Global Clinical Score
Day 8
|
-3.2 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.25
|
-3.2 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.36
|
-3.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.25
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Global Clinical Score
Day 12
|
-3.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
-3.3 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.38
|
-3.3 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.23
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 3, 5, 8 and 12Population: mITT population included participants who received at least one dose of IP and had a positive bacterial culture (presence of one or more bacterial species at or above pathological threshold) at baseline in the study. Here, the number of participants analyzed refer to the participants evaluable for this outcome at specified time point.
Modified clinical resolution was defined as a global clinical score of 0 or 1. Global clinical score was defined as the sum of bulbar conjunctival injection and ocular conjunctival discharge scores. Global clinical score was defined as the sum of bulbar conjunctival injection and ocular conjunctival discharge scores. Bulbar conjunctival injection was assessed based on 0 (Normal conjunctival vascular pattern) - 4 (Markedly prominent, intense diffuse hyperemia) scale which used pictures from VBR scale. Ocular conjunctival discharge was assessed based on 0 (No evidence of discharge in conjunctiva) - 3 (Abundant quantity of mucopurulent or purulent discharge) scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PVP-I 0.6%
n=76 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of PVP-I 0.6% ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
SHP640
n=223 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of SHP640 (povidone-iodine \[PVP-I\] 0.6 percent \[%\] and Dexamethasone 0.1%) ophthalmic suspension in each eye 4 times a day (QID) for 7 days.
|
Placebo
n=227 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of placebo ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Modified Clinical Resolution
Day 3
|
28 Participants
|
100 Participants
|
93 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Modified Clinical Resolution
Day 5
|
48 Participants
|
166 Participants
|
143 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Modified Clinical Resolution
Day 8
|
59 Participants
|
189 Participants
|
175 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Modified Clinical Resolution
Day 12
|
59 Participants
|
182 Participants
|
173 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 3, 5, 8 and 12Population: mITT population included participants who received at least one dose of IP and had a positive bacterial culture (presence of one or more bacterial species at or above pathological threshold) at baseline in the study. Here, the number of participants analyzed refer to the participants evaluable for this outcome at specified time point.
Expanded clinical resolution was defined as a global clinical score of 0, 1, or 2 with neither injection nor discharge having a score of 2. Global clinical score was defined as the sum of bulbar conjunctival injection and ocular conjunctival discharge scores. Bulbar conjunctival injection was assessed based on 0 (Normal conjunctival vascular pattern) - 4 (Markedly prominent, intense diffuse hyperemia) scale which used pictures from VBR scale. Ocular conjunctival discharge was assessed based on 0 (No evidence of discharge in conjunctiva) - 3 (Abundant quantity of mucopurulent or purulent discharge) scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PVP-I 0.6%
n=76 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of PVP-I 0.6% ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
SHP640
n=226 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of SHP640 (povidone-iodine \[PVP-I\] 0.6 percent \[%\] and Dexamethasone 0.1%) ophthalmic suspension in each eye 4 times a day (QID) for 7 days.
|
Placebo
n=227 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of placebo ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Expanded Clinical Resolution
Day 3
|
46 Participants
|
155 Participants
|
154 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Expanded Clinical Resolution
Day 5
|
54 Participants
|
185 Participants
|
171 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Expanded Clinical Resolution
Day 8
|
63 Participants
|
193 Participants
|
192 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Expanded Clinical Resolution
Day 12
|
61 Participants
|
185 Participants
|
181 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 12Population: mITT population included participants who received at least one dose of IP and had a positive bacterial culture (presence of one or more bacterial species at or above pathological threshold) at baseline in the study.
Clinical resolution was defined as absence (score of 0) of bulbar conjunctival injection and ocular conjunctival discharge in the study eye. Bulbar conjunctival injection was assessed based on 0 (Normal conjunctival vascular pattern) - 4 (Markedly prominent, intense diffuse hyperemia) scale which used pictures from VBR scale. Ocular conjunctival discharge was assessed based on 0 (No evidence of discharge in conjunctiva) - 3 (Abundant quantity of mucopurulent or purulent discharge) scale. Time to clinical resolution defined as the date on which a participant first reached clinical resolution minus the date of first dose of investigational product, plus 1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PVP-I 0.6%
n=76 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of PVP-I 0.6% ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
SHP640
n=223 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of SHP640 (povidone-iodine \[PVP-I\] 0.6 percent \[%\] and Dexamethasone 0.1%) ophthalmic suspension in each eye 4 times a day (QID) for 7 days.
|
Placebo
n=227 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of placebo ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Clinical Resolution
|
6 Days
Interval 5.0 to 8.0
|
5 Days
Interval 5.0 to 8.0
|
8 Days
Interval 5.0 to 8.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Day 12Population: mITT population included participants who received at least one dose of IP and had a positive bacterial culture (presence of one or more bacterial species at or above pathological threshold) at baseline in the study. Here, the number of participants analyzed refer to the participants evaluable for this outcome at specified time point.
Rescue treatment with a licensed antibiotic according to the local standard of care was provided to participants if, in the judgment of the investigator, there was no clinical improvement or worsening of their condition to an extent that it would be in the best interest of the participant treated with an alternate therapy for safety reasons.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PVP-I 0.6%
n=76 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of PVP-I 0.6% ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
SHP640
n=223 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of SHP640 (povidone-iodine \[PVP-I\] 0.6 percent \[%\] and Dexamethasone 0.1%) ophthalmic suspension in each eye 4 times a day (QID) for 7 days.
|
Placebo
n=227 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of placebo ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Used Rescue Medication
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From start of study drug administration up to 14 daysPopulation: Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of investigational product.
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Any AE that occured after the first dose of investigational product instillation was considered a TEAE.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PVP-I 0.6%
n=108 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of PVP-I 0.6% ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
SHP640
n=323 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of SHP640 (povidone-iodine \[PVP-I\] 0.6 percent \[%\] and Dexamethasone 0.1%) ophthalmic suspension in each eye 4 times a day (QID) for 7 days.
|
Placebo
n=321 Participants
Participants administered 1 drop of placebo ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
|
43 Participants
|
106 Participants
|
61 Participants
|
Adverse Events
SHP640
PVP-I 0.6%
Placebo
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
SHP640
n=323 participants at risk
Participants administered 1 drop of SHP640 ophthalmic suspension in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
PVP-I 0.6%
n=108 participants at risk
Participants administered 1 drop of PVP-I 0.6% ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
Placebo
n=321 participants at risk
Participants administered 1 drop of placebo ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Instillation site pain
|
20.7%
67/323 • Number of events 68 • From start of study drug administration up to 14 days.
One participant was randomized in error and therefore captured in the ITT population, but not in the Safety Population.
|
24.1%
26/108 • Number of events 26 • From start of study drug administration up to 14 days.
One participant was randomized in error and therefore captured in the ITT population, but not in the Safety Population.
|
2.2%
7/321 • Number of events 7 • From start of study drug administration up to 14 days.
One participant was randomized in error and therefore captured in the ITT population, but not in the Safety Population.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee If a multicenter publication is not submitted within twelve (12) months after conclusion, abandonment or termination of the Study at all sites, or after Sponsor confirms there shall be no multicenter Study publication, the Institution and/or such Principal Investigator may publish the results from the Institution site individually.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER