A Comparison of PF708 and Forteo in Osteoporosis Patients

NCT ID: NCT03002428

Last Updated: 2018-05-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

181 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-12-31

Study Completion Date

2018-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of two teriparatide products, PF708 and Forteo, in patients with osteoporosis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a randomized, multi-center study conducted in the United States. Men and women with osteoporosis will be enrolled in a parallel-group, open-label study design to compare the effects of PF708 and Forteo after 24 weeks of treatment. Half of the subjects will be randomized to receive PF708, and the other half will be randomized to receive Forteo.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoporosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Teriparatide (PF708)

PF708 20 mcg once-daily subcutaneous injection for 24 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Teriparatide (PF708)

Intervention Type DRUG

Subcutaneous injection

Teriparatide (Forteo)

Forteo 20 mcg once-daily subcutaneous injection for 24 weeks

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Teriparatide (Forteo)

Intervention Type DRUG

Subcutaneous injection

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Teriparatide (PF708)

Subcutaneous injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Teriparatide (Forteo)

Subcutaneous injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* If female, ≥5 years postmenopausal at the time of screening, with a DXA-derived BMD value at least 1 standard deviation (SD) below the average of young, healthy women
* If male, has a DXA-derived BMD value at least 2 SD below the average of young, healthy men
* Able to use the pen injection device correctly
* Able to understand and sign the written Informed Consent Form (ICF)

Exclusion Criteria

* Treatment with oral bisphosphonates (once daily or once weekly) within 6 months of screening
* Any current or prior human PTH-derived products (e.g., Forteo, Teribone, Natpara), including for investigational purposes
* Immobility due to severe or chronically disabling conditions (e.g., stroke, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis)
* History of metabolic bone diseases other than osteoporosis
* History of malignant disease, including solid tumors and hematologic malignancies (except basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin that have been completely excised and are considered cured)
* History of Paget's disease of bone
* History of prior external beam or implant radiation therapy involving the skeleton
* Active urolithiasis or primary hyperparathyroidism
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pfenex, Inc

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hubert C Chen, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Pfenex, Inc

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Radiant Research

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

The Orthopaedic Group

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Radiant Research

Chandler, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Radiant Research

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Site Status

SunValley Arthritis Center

Peoria, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Radiant Research

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Radiant Research

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

OB-GYN Associates of Mid-Florida

Leesburg, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta Research Center

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Radiant Research

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Radiant Research

Bridgeton, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Radiant Research

Papillion, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Radiant Research

Henderson, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Radiant Research

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

New Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Lillestol Research

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Radiant Research

Akron, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Radiant Research

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Altoona Center for Clinical Research

Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pennsylvania Regional Center for Arthritis & Osteoporosis Research

Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Radiant Research

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Radiant Research

Plano, Texas, United States

Site Status

Radiant Research

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Radiant Research

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Spectrum Medical

Danville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Radiant Research

Puyallup, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PF708-301

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.