Trial Outcomes & Findings for Presbyopia Screening by Community Health Worker in Bangladesh (NCT NCT03001258)
NCT ID: NCT03001258
Last Updated: 2017-04-21
Results Overview
The outcome was considered as accurate and coded as "1" if the screening result agreed with the gold standard. That is, if the screening result is positive for presbyopia and the refractionist also reported it as positive or the screening result is negative and the refractionist also reported as negative.
COMPLETED
2001 participants
The study duration was for 5 months, however, data was collected by organizing the eye camps over 2 weeks period
2017-04-21
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
PO (Program Organizers)
PO (program organizers): Employed by Brac as field level organizers. A two day presbyopia screening training were provided.
A total of eight POs organized eye camps in two sub districts. POs were responsible for identifying the presbyopia patients through screening and SS assisted in organizing and mobilizing the community people for the eye camps, and glass sale (on the spot). Four camps were organized per day for five days by four POs in each sub-district. A total of 40 eye camps were held in two sub districts by eight POs.
Presbyopia screening training: The training module and the protocol were designed in a way that a layman with limited education could be trained for screening and could sell reading glasses without any hassle, accurately and responsibly. Training module included the general anatomy of eye, common vision problems, aetiologies, determination of proper acuity of vision, sales techniques of the reading glass, marketing of products and services, and managemen
|
USS (Upgraded Shashthya Shebika)
USS (Upgraded Shashthya Shebika): A new caddre of community health workers of Brac. A two day presbyopia screening training were provided.
In this arm, 20 USSs were assigned in two upazillas to run the two camp-day i.e. screening patients and selling glasses during the total 40 eye camps.
Presbyopia screening training: The training module and the protocol were designed in a way that a layman with limited education could be trained for screening and could sell reading glasses without any hassle, accurately and responsibly. Training module included the general anatomy of eye, common vision problems, aetiologies, determination of proper acuity of vision, sales techniques of the reading glass, marketing of products and services, and management of inventory and referrals. All the providers who participated in the current study, had no prior experience/training of screening presbyopia before the intervention. Each of the intervention arm used letter acuity chart i.e. Snellen chart as
|
SS (Shashthya Shebika)
SS: Community health workers of Brac. A two day presbyopia screening training were provided.
In this arm, the SS, undertook the screening of potential presbyopia cases. A total of 27 SS organized 25 eye camps in eight days in two upazilas.
Presbyopia screening training: The training module and the protocol were designed in a way that a layman with limited education could be trained for screening and could sell reading glasses without any hassle, accurately and responsibly. Training module included the general anatomy of eye, common vision problems, aetiologies, determination of proper acuity of vision, sales techniques of the reading glass, marketing of products and services, and management of inventory and referrals. All the providers who participated in the current study, had no prior experience/training of screening presbyopia before the intervention. Each of the intervention arm used letter acuity chart i.e. Snellen chart as it commonly used for as a test of visual acuity
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
765
|
751
|
485
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
765
|
751
|
485
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
It is distribution of total population by customized age catagory
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
PO (Program Organizers)
n=400 Participants
PO (program organizers): Employed by Brac as field level organizers. A two day presbyopia screening training were provided. The training module and the protocol were designed in a way that a layman with limited education could be trained for screening and could sell reading glasses without any hassle, accurately and responsibly. Training module included the general anatomy of eye, common vision problems, aetiologies, determination of proper acuity of vision, sales techniques of the reading glass, marketing of products and services, and management of inventory and referrals. All the providers who participated in the current study, had no prior experience/training of screening presbyopia before the intervention. Each of the intervention arm used letter acuity chart i.e. Snellen chart as it commonly used for as a test of visual acuity.
A total of 40 eye camps were held in two sub districts by eight POs.
|
USS (Upgraded Shashthya Shebika)
n=440 Participants
USS (Upgraded Shashthya Shebika): A new cadre of community health workers of Brac. A two day presbyopia screening training were provided.
20 USSs were assigned in two upazillas to run the two camp-day i.e. screening patients and selling glasses during the camps.
The training module and the protocol were designed in a way that a layman with limited education could be trained for screening and could sell reading glasses without any hassle, accurately and responsibly. Training module included the general anatomy of eye, common vision problems, aetiologies, determination of proper acuity of vision, sales techniques of the reading glass, marketing of products and services, and management of inventory and referrals. All the providers who participated in the current study, had no prior experience/training of screening presbyopia before the intervention. Each of the intervention arm used letter acuity chart i.e. Snellen chart as it commonly used for as a test of visual acuity.
|
SS (Shashthya Shebika)
n=250 Participants
SS: Community health workers of Brac. A two day presbyopia screening training were provided.
In this arm, the SS, undertook the screening of potential presbyopia cases. A total of 27 SS organized 25 eye camps in eight days in two upazilas.
Presbyopia screening training: The training module and the protocol were designed in a way that a layman with limited education could be trained for screening and could sell reading glasses without any hassle, accurately and responsibly. Training module included the general anatomy of eye, common vision problems, aetiologies, determination of proper acuity of vision, sales techniques of the reading glass, marketing of products and services, and management of inventory and referrals. All the providers who participated in the current study, had no prior experience/training of screening presbyopia before the intervention. Each of the intervention arm used letter acuity chart i.e. Snellen chart as it commonly used for as a test of visual acuity
|
Total
n=1090 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
<40
|
60 participants
n=60 Participants • It is distribution of total population by customized age catagory
|
64 participants
n=64 Participants • It is distribution of total population by customized age catagory
|
45 participants
n=45 Participants • It is distribution of total population by customized age catagory
|
169 participants
n=169 Participants • It is distribution of total population by customized age catagory
|
|
Age, Customized
40-44
|
126 participants
n=126 Participants • It is distribution of total population by customized age catagory
|
146 participants
n=146 Participants • It is distribution of total population by customized age catagory
|
52 participants
n=52 Participants • It is distribution of total population by customized age catagory
|
324 participants
n=324 Participants • It is distribution of total population by customized age catagory
|
|
Age, Customized
45-49
|
88 participants
n=88 Participants • It is distribution of total population by customized age catagory
|
108 participants
n=108 Participants • It is distribution of total population by customized age catagory
|
65 participants
n=65 Participants • It is distribution of total population by customized age catagory
|
261 participants
n=261 Participants • It is distribution of total population by customized age catagory
|
|
Age, Customized
50-54
|
67 participants
n=67 Participants • It is distribution of total population by customized age catagory
|
64 participants
n=64 Participants • It is distribution of total population by customized age catagory
|
47 participants
n=47 Participants • It is distribution of total population by customized age catagory
|
178 participants
n=178 Participants • It is distribution of total population by customized age catagory
|
|
Age, Customized
≥ 55
|
59 participants
n=59 Participants • It is distribution of total population by customized age catagory
|
62 participants
n=62 Participants • It is distribution of total population by customized age catagory
|
41 participants
n=41 Participants • It is distribution of total population by customized age catagory
|
162 participants
n=162 Participants • It is distribution of total population by customized age catagory
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
314 Participants
n=400 Participants
|
385 Participants
n=440 Participants
|
214 Participants
n=250 Participants
|
913 Participants
n=1090 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
86 Participants
n=400 Participants
|
55 Participants
n=440 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=250 Participants
|
177 Participants
n=1090 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: The study duration was for 5 months, however, data was collected by organizing the eye camps over 2 weeks periodThe outcome was considered as accurate and coded as "1" if the screening result agreed with the gold standard. That is, if the screening result is positive for presbyopia and the refractionist also reported it as positive or the screening result is negative and the refractionist also reported as negative.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PO (Program Organizers)
n=765 Participants
PO (program organizers): Employed by Brac as field level organizers. A two day presbyopia screening training were provided. The training module and the protocol were designed in a way that a layman with limited education could be trained for screening and could sell reading glasses without any hassle, accurately and responsibly. Training module included the general anatomy of eye, common vision problems, aetiologies, determination of proper acuity of vision, sales techniques of the reading glass, marketing of products and services, and management of inventory and referrals. All the providers who participated in the current study, had no prior experience/training of screening presbyopia before the intervention. Each of the intervention arm used letter acuity chart i.e. Snellen chart as it commonly used for as a test of visual acuity. A total of 40 eye camps were held in two sub districts by eight POs.
|
USS (Upgraded Shashthya Shebika)
n=751 Participants
USS (Upgraded Shashthya Shebika): A new caddre of community health workers of Brac. A two day presbyopia screening training were provided.
20 USSs were assigned in two upazillas to run the two camp-day i.e. screening patients and selling glasses during the eye camps.
The training module and the protocol were designed in a way that a layman with limited education could be trained for screening and could sell reading glasses without any hassle, accurately and responsibly. Training module included the general anatomy of eye, common vision problems, aetiologies, determination of proper acuity of vision, sales techniques of the reading glass, marketing of products and services, and management of inventory and referrals. All the providers who participated in the current study, had no prior experience/training of screening presbyopia before the intervention. Each of the intervention arm used letter acuity chart i.e. Snellen chart as it commonly used for as a test of visual acuity
|
SS (Shashthya Shebika)
n=485 Participants
SS: Community health workers of Brac. A two day presbyopia screening training were provided.
In this arm, the SS, undertook the screening of potential presbyopia cases. A total of 27 SS organized 25 eye camps in eight days in two upazilas.
Presbyopia screening training: The training module and the protocol were designed in a way that a layman with limited education could be trained for screening and could sell reading glasses without any hassle, accurately and responsibly. Training module included the general anatomy of eye, common vision problems, aetiologies, determination of proper acuity of vision, sales techniques of the reading glass, marketing of products and services, and management of inventory and referrals. All the providers who participated in the current study, had no prior experience/training of screening presbyopia before the intervention. Each of the intervention arm used letter acuity chart i.e. Snellen chart as it commonly used for as a test of visual acuity
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Screening Accuracy
Sensitivity
|
76.9 percentage of cases
Interval 72.6 to 80.8
|
75.7 percentage of cases
Interval 71.8 to 79.3
|
58.1 percentage of cases
Interval 52.8 to 63.3
|
|
Screening Accuracy
Specificity
|
78.3 percentage of cases
Interval 73.5 to 82.6
|
67.0 percentage of cases
Interval 60.3 to 73.1
|
69.3 percentage of cases
Interval 60.5 to 77.2
|
|
Screening Accuracy
Positive Predictive Value
|
81.5 percentage of cases
Interval 77.3 to 85.2
|
84.6 percentage of cases
Interval 81.0 to 87.7
|
84.2 percentage of cases
Interval 79.1 to 88.5
|
|
Screening Accuracy
Negative Predictive Value
|
73.2 percentage of cases
Interval 68.3 to 77.6
|
53.4 percentage of cases
Interval 47.4 to 59.4
|
84.2 percentage of cases
Interval 79.1 to 88.5
|
|
Screening Accuracy
Accuracy
|
77.5 percentage of cases
Interval 74.4 to 80.3
|
73.1 percentage of cases
Interval 69.8 to 76.2
|
61.0 percentage of cases
Interval 56.6 to 65.3
|
|
Screening Accuracy
False Positive Rate
|
23.1 percentage of cases
Interval 19.4 to 27.4
|
24.3 percentage of cases
Interval 20.9 to 28.2
|
41.9 percentage of cases
Interval 36.9 to 47.1
|
|
Screening Accuracy
False Negative Rate
|
21.7 percentage of cases
Interval 17.7 to 26.4
|
33.0 percentage of cases
Interval 27.2 to 39.5
|
30.7 percentage of cases
Interval 23.4 to 39.2
|
Adverse Events
PO (Program Organizers)
USS (Upgraded Shashthya Shebika)
SS (Shashthya Shebika)
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Anita Sharif Chowdhury/Research Fellow of BRAC Research and Evaluation Division
BRAC
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place