Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study of Dual-energy (DE) Contrast-enhanced (CE) Digital Mammography (NCT NCT02995980)
NCT ID: NCT02995980
Last Updated: 2019-09-25
Results Overview
•The primary endpoint of this study is to determine the accuracy of DE CE mammography when compared to full field digital mammography (FFDM) in patients with increased breast density (Breast Imaging-Reporting And Data System (BI-RADS) category c or d breast density).
COMPLETED
NA
128 participants
1 year
2019-09-25
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Contrast Enhanced Mammography vs Standard Digital Mammograpm
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for the detection breast cancer .
Dual-Energy Contrast-Enhanced (DECE) mammography: Contrast mammography
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
128
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
114
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
14
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Contrast Enhanced Mammography vs Standard Digital Mammograpm
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for the detection breast cancer .
Dual-Energy Contrast-Enhanced (DECE) mammography: Contrast mammography
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
14
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study of Dual-energy (DE) Contrast-enhanced (CE) Digital Mammography
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Contrast Enhanced Mammography vs Standard Digital Mammograpm
n=128 Participants
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for the detection breast cancer .
DECE mammography: Contrast mammography
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
100 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
128 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
100 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearPopulation: Consented 128 patients, 114 patients completed both mammograms
•The primary endpoint of this study is to determine the accuracy of DE CE mammography when compared to full field digital mammography (FFDM) in patients with increased breast density (Breast Imaging-Reporting And Data System (BI-RADS) category c or d breast density).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Contrast Enhanced Mammography
n=114 Participants
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for the detection breast cancer .
DECE mammography: Contrast mammography
|
Standard Digital Mammogram
n=114 Participants
Full field digital mammography for the detection breast cancer
digital mammography: routine digital mammography
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Accuracy of Contrast Mammography
|
100 percentage of accuracy
Interval 29.0 to 100.0
|
67 percentage of accuracy
Interval 9.0 to 99.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearPopulation: Consented 128 patients, 114 patients completed both mammograms
•The primary endpoint of this study is to detect the presence of cancer using DE CE mammography when compared to full field digital mammography (FFDM) in patients with increased breast density (BI-RADS category c or d breast density).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Contrast Enhanced Mammography
n=114 Participants
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for the detection breast cancer .
DECE mammography: Contrast mammography
|
Standard Digital Mammogram
n=114 Participants
Full field digital mammography for the detection breast cancer
digital mammography: routine digital mammography
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Cancer Detected
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearPopulation: Consented 128 patients, 114 patients completed both mammograms
•The patients identified for additional imaging based on unconfirmed findings.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Contrast Enhanced Mammography
n=114 Participants
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for the detection breast cancer .
DECE mammography: Contrast mammography
|
Standard Digital Mammogram
n=114 Participants
Full field digital mammography for the detection breast cancer
digital mammography: routine digital mammography
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Call Backs With Contrast Mammography
|
10 percentage of participants
Interval 5.0 to 17.0
|
11 percentage of participants
Interval 6.0 to 19.0
|
Adverse Events
Contrast Enhanced Mammography vs Standard Digital Mammograpm
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Rachael Lancaster, MD
University of Alabama at Birmingahm
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place