Patient Comfort Using Green vs. Yellow Pan Retinal Photocoagulation

NCT ID: NCT02995629

Last Updated: 2016-12-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-03-31

Study Completion Date

2016-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Our aim is to compare patient comfort when using the 532 nanometer (green) wavelength laser to the 577 nanometer (yellow) wavelength laser during pan retinal photocoagulation to treat patients with diabetic retinopathy. Secondary outcome measures will be power (mW) required to achieve gray-white retinal burns and duration of treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

As demonstrated in the Diabetic Retinopathy Study (DRS), panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) reduces the risk of severe vision loss in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. The DRS recommended that PRP treatment consist of 1,200 - 1,600 laser burns 500 µm in size, one half to one burn width apart, applied to the peripheral retina in a scatter fashion. Most patients who undergo PRP experience discomfort/pain during the procedure. Once present, pain can affect the number and quality of burns delivered and can indirectly increase the number of sessions required to complete the therapy.This may in turn adversely affect patient compliance. Although retrobulbar and peribulbar blocks can provide adequate anesthesia for PRP, these anesthetic methods carry rare but serious risks such as retrobulbar hemorrhage. Previous studies have explored other ways to reduce discomfort related to PRP, including optimization of laser settings, oral and topical analgesics, subconjunctival anesthesia, and even acupuncture.

Currently, green lasers (521 - 532 nm wavelength) are most commonly utilized for performing PRP in clinical practice. Yellow lasers (577 nm wavelength) have been of recent interest in treating diabetic macular edema with micropulse subthreshold grid photocoagulation, but have not been extensively studied in PRP for diabetic retinopathy. Compared to shorter wavelength laser, yellow laser comports high transmission through dense ocular media and less light scattering than shorter wavelengths which minimizes spot size and reduces thermal spread. The limited literature comparing green and yellow laser for PRP in diabetic retinopathy has shown that yellow laser requires less power to achieve a retinal burn. In theory this should translate into a reduction in perceived pain experienced during PRP, however a comparison of green and yellow lasers in this regard has not yet been directly examined and quantified.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy - High Risk

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

green (532 nm) laser

scatter laser indirect ophthalmoscopy pan retinal photocoagulation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

laser indirect ophthalmoscopy pan retinal photocoagulation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

* Prior to procedure, eligible patient is dilated and a topical anesthesia is administered 3 to 5 minutes prior to treatment initiation
* Treatment duration is fixed at 50 minutes and power is titrated until moderate gray-white burns are achieved, avoiding long ciliary nerves
* Target treatment of 250 spots
* Only one eye per eligible patient randomized with regard to whether green or yellow laser utilized first
* After treatment,pain assessment conducted:spot count, laser parameters and treatment duration recorded for each respective laser wavelength

yellow (577 nm) laser

scatter laser indirect ophthalmoscopy pan retinal photocoagulation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

laser indirect ophthalmoscopy pan retinal photocoagulation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

* Prior to procedure, eligible patient is dilated and a topical anesthesia is administered 3 to 5 minutes prior to treatment initiation
* Treatment duration is fixed at 50 minutes and power is titrated until moderate gray-white burns are achieved, avoiding long ciliary nerves
* Target treatment of 250 spots
* Only one eye per eligible patient randomized with regard to whether green or yellow laser utilized first
* After treatment,pain assessment conducted:spot count, laser parameters and treatment duration recorded for each respective laser wavelength

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

laser indirect ophthalmoscopy pan retinal photocoagulation

* Prior to procedure, eligible patient is dilated and a topical anesthesia is administered 3 to 5 minutes prior to treatment initiation
* Treatment duration is fixed at 50 minutes and power is titrated until moderate gray-white burns are achieved, avoiding long ciliary nerves
* Target treatment of 250 spots
* Only one eye per eligible patient randomized with regard to whether green or yellow laser utilized first
* After treatment,pain assessment conducted:spot count, laser parameters and treatment duration recorded for each respective laser wavelength

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

PRP laser

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patient of Wills Eye Hospital Retina Service and/or Mid Atlantic Retina
* volunteer patients age 18 years and older.
* healthy enough to participate in the study.
* willing and able to consent to participation in the study.
* diagnosis of PDR with HRC based on clinical criteria outlined by the DRS.

Exclusion Criteria

* patient less than 18 years of age
* institutionalized patient
* prisoner
* significant media opacity obscuring a view of the superior retina
* history of intra-ocular surgery except cataract surgery
* history of PRP laser within the last 30 days
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mid Atlantic Retina

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Wills Eye

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

MidAtlantic Retina

Dr. Allen Chiang, MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Allen Chiang, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mid Atlantic Retina

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mid Atlantic Retina- Wills Eye Institute

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Photocoagulation treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Clinical application of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (DRS) findings, DRS Report Number 8. The Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology. 1981 Jul;88(7):583-600.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7196564 (View on PubMed)

Richardson C, Waterman H. Pain relief during panretinal photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy: a national survey. Eye (Lond). 2009 Dec;23(12):2233-7. doi: 10.1038/eye.2008.421.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19169228 (View on PubMed)

Alvarez-Verduzco O, Garcia-Aguirre G, Lopez-Ramos Mde L, Vera-Rodriguez S, Guerrero-Naranjo JL, Morales-Canton V. Reduction of fluence to decrease pain during panretinal photocoagulation in diabetic patients. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2010 Jul-Aug;41(4):432-6. doi: 10.3928/15428877-20100525-02. Epub 2010 May 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20608612 (View on PubMed)

Mirshahi A, Lashay A, Roozbahani M, Fard MA, Molaie S, Mireshghi M, Zaferani MM. Pain score of patients undergoing single spot, short pulse laser versus conventional laser for diabetic retinopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Apr;251(4):1103-7. doi: 10.1007/s00417-012-2167-5. Epub 2012 Oct 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23052718 (View on PubMed)

Wu WC, Hsu KH, Chen TL, Hwang YS, Lin KK, Li LM, Shih CP, Lai CC. Interventions for relieving pain associated with panretinal photocoagulation: a prospective randomized trial. Eye (Lond). 2006 Jun;20(6):712-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701989. Epub 2005 Jul 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16021194 (View on PubMed)

Ko BW, Shim JH, Lee BR, Cho HY. Analgesic effects of tramadol during panretinal photocoagulation. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2009 Dec;23(4):273-6. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2009.23.4.273. Epub 2009 Dec 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20046687 (View on PubMed)

Zakrzewski PA, O'Donnell HL, Lam WC. Oral versus topical diclofenac for pain prevention during panretinal photocoagulation. Ophthalmology. 2009 Jun;116(6):1168-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.01.022. Epub 2009 Apr 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19376588 (View on PubMed)

Tesha PE, Giavedoni LR, Berger AR, Altomare F, Chow DR, Navajas EV, Yoganathan P, Wong DT, Principe A. Subconjunctival lidocaine before laser treatment: a randomized trial. Ophthalmology. 2010 Sep;117(9):1810-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.01.036. Epub 2010 Jun 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20570360 (View on PubMed)

Chiu HH, Wu PC. Manual acupuncture for relieving pain associated with panretinal photocoagulation. J Altern Complement Med. 2011 Oct;17(10):915-21. doi: 10.1089/acm.2010.0082. Epub 2011 Oct 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21978192 (View on PubMed)

Vujosevic S, Martini F, Longhin E, Convento E, Cavarzeran F, Midena E. SUBTHRESHOLD MICROPULSE YELLOW LASER VERSUS SUBTHRESHOLD MICROPULSE INFRARED LASER IN CENTER-INVOLVING DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA: Morphologic and Functional Safety. Retina. 2015 Aug;35(8):1594-603. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000521.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25719988 (View on PubMed)

Yadav NK, Jayadev C, Mohan A, Vijayan P, Battu R, Dabir S, Shetty B, Shetty R; Medscape. Subthreshold micropulse yellow laser (577 nm) in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: safety profile and treatment outcome. Eye (Lond). 2015 Feb;29(2):258-64; quiz 265. doi: 10.1038/eye.2014.315. Epub 2015 Jan 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25613846 (View on PubMed)

Mainster MA. Wavelength selection in macular photocoagulation. Tissue optics, thermal effects, and laser systems. Ophthalmology. 1986 Jul;93(7):952-8. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(86)33637-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3763141 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

16-560

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id