A Self-Guided Breastfeeding Program

NCT ID: NCT02989766

Last Updated: 2017-11-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

335 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-08-20

Study Completion Date

2017-07-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This intervention would be a series of self-help-style educational and motivational activity sheets for patients to complete independently. This will be a randomized clinical control trial.

Subjects will complete a pre delivery questionnaire and a postpartum questionnaire. Subjects in the intervention arm will complete 3 activity sheets prenatally during their wait time at the clinic. The first worksheet can be completed the day of recruitment after consent is signed.

Subjects will be contacted by phone at 3 and 6 months postpartum to assess long term duration of breast feeding.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

As the benefits of human milk become evident, the investigators are striving to improve the breastfeeding (BF) rate among new mothers. In April and May of 2014, 73 (71%) of well babies received human milk at discharge from our postpartum unit, with 40 (35%) and receiving human milk exclusively. In the neonatal intensive care unit, 83 (89%) received human milk during those months.

Many of the patients at the teaching institution share risk factors for failure to BF, including poverty, obesity, unplanned pregnancy and being African American. Efforts have had limited effect in improving initiation and duration among these patients.

Studies examining the efficacy of various modalities of antenatal education produced modest results in improving initiation and duration of BF. Several studies examined group BF education versus routine prenatal care without significant differences in initiation, exclusivity (the practice of using human milk exclusively and not supplementing with formula) or duration. Conversely, other study showed a difference in initiation with group education and showed a difference in exclusivity. Formalized education compared to routine clinical practice education did not result in a difference in exclusivity in several studies and neither did a program that included a video showed a difference in initiation with formal education.

A few studies compared peer counseling to routine prenatal care. One small study of 59 women found an increase in initiation rate, while a larger study of 2511 women did not find a difference in initiation or duration.

Other studies found no significant difference in initiation, duration or exclusivity with an educational program on practical BF skills nor a program on BF attitudes. A small study that paired BF education with material incentives increased exclusivity. Three studies comparing interventions by lactation consultants found no difference in initiation or duration, although one study showed improvement in exclusivity. Postpartum BF self-efficacy correlates with BF duration and two studies showed improvement in exclusivity with a BF class based on principles of self-efficacy. These studies based their intervention on Bandura's theory of self-efficacy, which proposes that an individual's expectation of personal efficacy will determine her initiation of coping behavior, effort expenditure and duration of persistence. This theory recognizes four components that contribute to an individual's sense of self- efficacy, and these include performance accomplishment, vicarious, or social, experience, verbal persuasion and psychological state. developed a validated scale at measuring prenatal maternal self-efficacy in breastfeeding.

These two studies used a teaching approach that assumes that pregnant women are adults who are self-motivated and have past experience that shapes their learning and are a component to their perception of self-efficacy.

Printed self-help materials are appealing as a low cost intervention that could be widely implemented. Furthermore, a large study among pregnant women showed that a self-help guide that is particularly tailored towards pregnant women could be effective in promoting another healthy behavior modification: smoking cessation. Potentially this method could be effective when used to prepare mothers for breastfeeding.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breastfeeding

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A - Intervention

Education on Breast Feeding 3 activity sheets prenatally-study related. Complete a pre-questionnaire, a pre-delivery and a postpartum questionnaire

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Education on Breast Feeding

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Subjects in the intervention arm will complete 3 activity sheets prenatally-study related.

B - Standard of Care

Complete a pre-questionnaire, a pre-delivery and a postpartum questionnaire

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Education on Breast Feeding

Subjects in the intervention arm will complete 3 activity sheets prenatally-study related.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients \< 32 weeks gestation.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient who have not had an ultrasound confirming viable intrauterine pregnancy.
* Patients beyond 32 weeks gestation will be excluded as some are unlikely to return for a sufficient number of prenatal visits to complete the intervention.
* Patients with medical contraindications to breastfeeding such as HIV or active substance abuse.
* Patients planning to take medications in the postpartum period that are incompatible with breastfeeding such as anti-metabolites.
* Patients giving birth to a nonviable infant.
* Patients without adequate reading and writing skills to complete the questionnaires and activity sheets.
Minimum Eligible Age

14 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

St. Louis University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jaye Shyken, MD

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jaye Shyken, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

St. Louis University

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

25115

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id