Comparison Between an Electronic Mobile Device and Optical Coherence Tomography to Determine Cup-to-disc Ratio
NCT ID: NCT02988752
Last Updated: 2016-12-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
110 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-10-31
2017-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective: This study compared CDR measurements from the portable electronic device (PED) developed by Centro de Informatica da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco to CDR measurements provided by OCT.
Methods:This study was a non-inferiority trial with masked data analysis. Individuals ranging from 18 to 60 years from both genders that met the pre-defined criteria were included. This study was carried out in Recife at Clinica Oftalmologica Zona Sul and at Centro de Informatica-UFPE. Using both equipment, 5 vertical cup-to-disc ratio (VCDR) evaluations were performed for each eye of the individuals, under midriatic conditions. Evaluations were done by examiners who did not know previously results obtained from other equipment. Data was collected by the main researcher of this research. This study was approved by the ethics committee before it started and all research members signed the TCLE agreement. The statistical test employed in this study was Pearson Correlation test.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Electronic Mobile Device
Use an Electronic Low Cost Mobile Device To Determine C/D Ratio And Compare Results With Gold Standard Optical Coherence Tomography Results. The equipment needs mydriatic conditions and does not touch the patient's eye. The equipment uses a panoptik and a camera to access eye fundus.
Electronic Mobile Device
Measure C/D Ratio With An Equipment Attached To A Ophthalmoscope That Will Determine C/D Ratio Without Touching Patient's Eyes. To Perform It We Need Mydriatic Conditions.
Optical Coherence Tomography
Device considered as gold standard to determine c/d ratio. Needs mydriatic conditions.
Optical Coherence Tomography
Measure C/D Ratio With OCT, Considered Gold Standard Equipment
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Electronic Mobile Device
Measure C/D Ratio With An Equipment Attached To A Ophthalmoscope That Will Determine C/D Ratio Without Touching Patient's Eyes. To Perform It We Need Mydriatic Conditions.
Optical Coherence Tomography
Measure C/D Ratio With OCT, Considered Gold Standard Equipment
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Exclusion Criteria
* Cataract
* Eyes transparency loss
* Best Av \< 0.4
* Eye surgery in the last 12 Months
* Use of drugs that leads to any kind of Neuropathy
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Clinica Oftamologica Zona Sul
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Andrea Gondim Leitao Sarmento
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
ANDREA SARMENTO
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
COZ
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Clinica Oftalmologica Zona Sul
Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
COZ001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id