Comparison Between an Electronic Mobile Device and Optical Coherence Tomography to Determine Cup-to-disc Ratio

NCT ID: NCT02988752

Last Updated: 2016-12-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

110 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-10-31

Study Completion Date

2017-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study was a non-inferiority trial with masked data analysis. Individuals ranging from 18 to 60 years from both genders that met the pre-defined criteria were included. This study was carried out in Recife at Clinica Oftalmologica Zona Sul and at Centro de Informatica-UFPE. Using both equipment, 5 vertical cup-to-disc ratio (VCDR) evaluations were performed for each eye of the individuals, under midriatic conditions. Evaluations were done by examiners who did not know previously results obtained from other equipment. Data was collected by the main researcher of this research. This study was approved by the ethics committee before it started and all research members signed the TCLE agreement. The statistical test employed in this study was Pearson Correlation test.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Glaucoma is the second major cause of blindness in the world, lagging only behind cataract. However, unlike cataract, blindness caused by glaucoma is irreversible. Early diagnosis of the disease and progression monitoring is thus essential for proper treatment in order to avoid irreversible blindness. The most common screening exam for glaucoma diagnosis and monitoring is the eye fundus evaluation where Cup-to-Disc ratio (CDR) among other parameters are assessed. This kind of evaluation is performed by ophthalmologists based on their visual perception, requiring not only specific training but also some significant amount of time of eye examination.Objective measurement of CDR involves high cost equipment which in turn requires some specific training in order to use them. Currently, the Optical Coherence Tomography is used as the gold standard for CDR measurement. An OCT exam uses a high cost and complex equipment that most of the time is not affordable for low-income people. This study proposes a portable electronic device that captures eye fundus images, analyzes these images, performs CDR calculation and allows storing these images for further analysis. This low cost and portable device was developed to be used in several health services (public or private) and has low energy consumption, easing its mobility. Moreover, using this device is easy, not requiring any significant learning effort from ophthalmologists. In developing countries where screening programs for early diagnosis of glaucomatous neuropathy are adopted, an ever-growing number of researchers are putting a significant amount of effort to develop cost-benefit solutions that can reach low-income people and remote areas.

Objective: This study compared CDR measurements from the portable electronic device (PED) developed by Centro de Informatica da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco to CDR measurements provided by OCT.

Methods:This study was a non-inferiority trial with masked data analysis. Individuals ranging from 18 to 60 years from both genders that met the pre-defined criteria were included. This study was carried out in Recife at Clinica Oftalmologica Zona Sul and at Centro de Informatica-UFPE. Using both equipment, 5 vertical cup-to-disc ratio (VCDR) evaluations were performed for each eye of the individuals, under midriatic conditions. Evaluations were done by examiners who did not know previously results obtained from other equipment. Data was collected by the main researcher of this research. This study was approved by the ethics committee before it started and all research members signed the TCLE agreement. The statistical test employed in this study was Pearson Correlation test.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Glaucoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Electronic Mobile Device

Use an Electronic Low Cost Mobile Device To Determine C/D Ratio And Compare Results With Gold Standard Optical Coherence Tomography Results. The equipment needs mydriatic conditions and does not touch the patient's eye. The equipment uses a panoptik and a camera to access eye fundus.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Electronic Mobile Device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Measure C/D Ratio With An Equipment Attached To A Ophthalmoscope That Will Determine C/D Ratio Without Touching Patient's Eyes. To Perform It We Need Mydriatic Conditions.

Optical Coherence Tomography

Device considered as gold standard to determine c/d ratio. Needs mydriatic conditions.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Optical Coherence Tomography

Intervention Type DEVICE

Measure C/D Ratio With OCT, Considered Gold Standard Equipment

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Electronic Mobile Device

Measure C/D Ratio With An Equipment Attached To A Ophthalmoscope That Will Determine C/D Ratio Without Touching Patient's Eyes. To Perform It We Need Mydriatic Conditions.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Optical Coherence Tomography

Measure C/D Ratio With OCT, Considered Gold Standard Equipment

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

OCT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Exclusion Criteria

* Cancer
* Cataract
* Eyes transparency loss
* Best Av \< 0.4
* Eye surgery in the last 12 Months
* Use of drugs that leads to any kind of Neuropathy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Clinica Oftamologica Zona Sul

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Andrea Gondim Leitao Sarmento

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

ANDREA SARMENTO

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

COZ

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Clinica Oftalmologica Zona Sul

Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

COZ001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id