Trial Outcomes & Findings for Dose Ranging Study of ALX-0171 in Infants Hospitalized for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (NCT NCT02979431)
NCT ID: NCT02979431
Last Updated: 2019-10-18
Results Overview
The primary endpoint for this trial was the time needed for the viral load to drop below the quantification limit (time-to-BQL) of the plaque assay in nasal mid-turbinate swab specimens. Time-to-BQL was defined as the time from the first study drug administration to the first occurrence of a value below the quantification limit (BQL), provided the next measured value was also below the limit of quantification. The time to BQL for subjects with missing data and/or who did not reach BQL during the trial were censored at the last non-missing viral load assessment. The primary endpoint was analysed using logrank test to compare time-to-BQL between each of the ALX-0171 treatment groups and the combined placebo group. The tests were performed in a sequential way to preserve the family-wise error rate at 0.05. The comparisons were performed in the following order: ALX-0171 9 mg/kg vs Placebo, followed by ALX-0171 6mg/kg vs Placebo, ALX-0171 3mg/kg vs Placebo.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
180 participants
Overall Study Period (i.e., approximately 28 days)
2019-10-18
Participant Flow
A total of 301 subjects were screened.180 subjects were randomized to receive ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg, ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg, ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg or placebo, yielding an overall allocation ratio of 3:1 active to placebo.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Inhalation of Placebo once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg
Inhalation of ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg
Inhalation of ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kg
Inhalation of ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
44
|
46
|
45
|
45
|
|
Overall Study
Included in the mITT Population
|
42
|
45
|
43
|
45
|
|
Overall Study
Included in the Safety Population
|
40
|
45
|
44
|
46
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
40
|
44
|
43
|
44
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
Inhalation of Placebo once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg
Inhalation of ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg
Inhalation of ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kg
Inhalation of ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Parent/guardian withdrew consent
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Randomized but received no study drug
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Subject left country after Day14
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=42 Participants
Inhalation of Placebo once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg
n=45 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg
n=43 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kg
n=45 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
Total
n=175 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
42 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
45 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
45 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
175 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
6.964 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.0668 • n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
6.933 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8827 • n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
6.657 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2605 • n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
7.022 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6884 • n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
6.896 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9234 • n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Age, Customized
Age categories · < 6 months
|
24 Participants
n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
23 Participants
n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
27 Participants
n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
25 Participants
n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
99 Participants
n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Age, Customized
Age categories · ≥ 6 months and < 12 months
|
8 Participants
n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
13 Participants
n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
7 Participants
n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
12 Participants
n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
40 Participants
n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Age, Customized
Age categories · ≥ 12 months
|
10 Participants
n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
9 Participants
n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
9 Participants
n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
8 Participants
n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
36 Participants
n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Age, Customized
Gestational Age
|
38.5 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.78 • n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
38.6 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.99 • n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
38.6 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.62 • n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
38.3 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.54 • n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
38.5 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.73 • n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
24 Participants
n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
15 Participants
n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
19 Participants
n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
17 Participants
n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
75 Participants
n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
18 Participants
n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
30 Participants
n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
24 Participants
n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
28 Participants
n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
100 Participants
n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
4 Participants
n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
5 Participants
n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
5 Participants
n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
18 Participants
n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
38 Participants
n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
41 Participants
n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
38 Participants
n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
40 Participants
n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
157 Participants
n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
0 Participants
n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · Asian
|
7 Participants
n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
7 Participants
n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
3 Participants
n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
10 Participants
n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
27 Participants
n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
1 Participants
n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · Multiple
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
2 Participants
n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
2 Participants
n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · Other
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
3 Participants
n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
4 Participants
n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · White
|
35 Participants
n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
38 Participants
n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
36 Participants
n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
32 Participants
n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
141 Participants
n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
|
2 Participants
n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
3 Participants
n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
1 Participants
n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
9 Participants
n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Bulgaria
|
7 Participants
n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
8 Participants
n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
6 Participants
n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
11 Participants
n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
32 Participants
n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Chile
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
4 Participants
n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
4 Participants
n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Colombia
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
1 Participants
n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Croatia
|
6 Participants
n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
8 Participants
n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
3 Participants
n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
23 Participants
n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Germany
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
3 Participants
n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
2 Participants
n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
6 Participants
n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
|
7 Participants
n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
8 Participants
n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
4 Participants
n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
25 Participants
n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Israel
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
1 Participants
n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
4 Participants
n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Latvia
|
2 Participants
n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
2 Participants
n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
5 Participants
n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
10 Participants
n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Malaysia
|
4 Participants
n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
3 Participants
n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
3 Participants
n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
14 Participants
n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Philippines
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
3 Participants
n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
5 Participants
n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Poland
|
5 Participants
n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
5 Participants
n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
3 Participants
n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
13 Participants
n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Slovakia
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
2 Participants
n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
2 Participants
n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
4 Participants
n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Spain
|
5 Participants
n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
7 Participants
n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
2 Participants
n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
1 Participants
n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
15 Participants
n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Thailand
|
2 Participants
n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
5 Participants
n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
10 Participants
n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Number of days between symtpom onset and the first dose of study drug
|
3.16 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.207 • n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
3.34 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.144 • n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
3.23 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.845 • n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
3.25 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.149 • n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
3.25 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.088 • n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Global Severity Score (GSS)
|
9.1 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.44 • n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
9.2 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.00 • n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
9.3 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.09 • n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
9.4 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.41 • n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
9.2 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.23 • n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Respiratory Distress Instrument (RDAI)
|
8.5 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.74 • n=93 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
8.41 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.07 • n=4 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
8.74 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.19 • n=27 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
8.11 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.80 • n=483 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
8.44 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.693 • n=36 Participants • modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
|
|
Height
|
65.84 centimetres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.997 • n=93 Participants
|
65.71 centimetres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.210 • n=4 Participants
|
65.25 centimetres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.190 • n=27 Participants
|
66.55 centimetres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.580 • n=483 Participants
|
65.85 centimetres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.915 • n=36 Participants
|
|
Weight
|
7.065 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4193 • n=93 Participants
|
7.188 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2278 • n=4 Participants
|
6.988 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4084 • n=27 Participants
|
7.020 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2474 • n=483 Participants
|
7.066 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3059 • n=36 Participants
|
|
Weight category
≥ 3.0 kg and < 4.0 kg
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Weight category
≥ 4.0 kg and < 5.0 kg
|
8 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Weight category
≥ 5.0 kg and < 7.0 kg
|
15 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
55 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Weight category
≥ 7.0 kg and < 10.0 kg
|
11 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
59 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Weight category
≥ 10.0 kg and < 12.0 kg
|
6 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Weight category
≥ 12.0 kg and < 15.0 kg
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Overall Study Period (i.e., approximately 28 days)Population: modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
The primary endpoint for this trial was the time needed for the viral load to drop below the quantification limit (time-to-BQL) of the plaque assay in nasal mid-turbinate swab specimens. Time-to-BQL was defined as the time from the first study drug administration to the first occurrence of a value below the quantification limit (BQL), provided the next measured value was also below the limit of quantification. The time to BQL for subjects with missing data and/or who did not reach BQL during the trial were censored at the last non-missing viral load assessment. The primary endpoint was analysed using logrank test to compare time-to-BQL between each of the ALX-0171 treatment groups and the combined placebo group. The tests were performed in a sequential way to preserve the family-wise error rate at 0.05. The comparisons were performed in the following order: ALX-0171 9 mg/kg vs Placebo, followed by ALX-0171 6mg/kg vs Placebo, ALX-0171 3mg/kg vs Placebo.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=42 Participants
Inhalation of Placebo once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg
n=45 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg
n=43 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kg
n=45 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time for Viral Load to Drop Below Assay Quantification Limit (BQL) (Plaque Assay Analysis)
|
46.1 hours
Interval 29.33 to 94.42
|
14.2 hours
Interval 5.17 to 26.28
|
5.1 hours
Interval 4.78 to 24.72
|
5.1 hours
Interval 4.97 to 5.17
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: from Baseline untill Day 2 (5 hours post-dose)A formal comparison for change from Baseline in GSS to Day 2, 5 hours post-dose was performed using a contrast analysis on a longitudinal mixed model with random factor subject and fixed effects baseline value, treatment group and timepoint, including the treatment-by-timepoint interaction term. All data up to and including Day 3 were used in the longitudinal mixed model. The Kenward-Roger approximation of degrees of freedom was used. The model was fitted using an unstructured variance-covariance matrix. The individual pair-wise comparisons were reported (comparison in least square \[LS\] means for 9.0 mg/kg versus placebo; 6.0mg/kg versus placebo; 3.0 mg/kg versus placebo). Evolution over time in Global Severity Score. The maximum total score is 20 (minimum:0 to manimum:20); higher score indicates more severe disease.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=42 Participants
Inhalation of Placebo once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg
n=45 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg
n=43 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kg
n=45 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Global Severity Score on Day 2 (5 Hours Post-dose)
|
-3.6392 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4160
|
-3.8548 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4103
|
-4.1296 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4129
|
-4.2844 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4099
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Overall Study Period (i.e., approximately 28 days)Population: modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All randomized subjects who received at least 1 study drug administration. In this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e.,using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
The time-to-clinical response was defined as the time between the first study drug administration and the time of achieving adequate oxygen saturation (defined as SpO2 \> 92% over a period of at least 4 hours) and adequate oral feeding (which is sufficient to maintain sufficient hydration, in the judgment of the Investigator).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=42 Participants
Inhalation of Placebo once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg
n=45 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg
n=43 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kg
n=45 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time-to-Clinical Response
Time-to-Clinical Response
|
47.9 hours
Interval 29.17 to 64.08
|
44.1 hours
Interval 28.33 to 51.2
|
27.9 hours
Interval 21.08 to 43.68
|
46.3 hours
Interval 38.0 to 50.38
|
|
Time-to-Clinical Response
Time-to-adequate oral feeding
|
43.7 hours
Interval 22.5 to 47.58
|
44.0 hours
Interval 25.92 to 52.0
|
17.6 hours
Interval 6.5 to 25.85
|
23.8 hours
Interval 17.17 to 38.0
|
|
Time-to-Clinical Response
Time-to-adequate oxygen saturation
|
53.4 hours
Interval 28.7 to 71.78
|
38.5 hours
Interval 24.75 to 61.93
|
29.5 hours
Interval 20.75 to 47.43
|
46.5 hours
Interval 42.15 to 48.25
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Overall Study Period (i.e., approximately 28 days)Population: The modified ITT (mITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects who received at least 1 administration of study drug. When using this population, the subjects were classified as randomized (i.e., using the treatment to which the subject was randomized).
As secondary endpoint, the time-to-BQL using RT-qPCR was summarized using Kaplan Meier (KM) estimates. No p-values were calculated. For RSV load by RT-qPCR, the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 2.4 log10 copies/mL. The upper limit confidence interval (CI) could not be calculated; Values of the 25 percentile are reported here.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=42 Participants
Inhalation of Placebo once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg
n=45 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg
n=43 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kg
n=45 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time-to-BQL (RT-qPCR)
|
26.7 hours
Interval 5.0 to 49.92
|
26.8 hours
Interval 5.17 to 44.62
|
28.9 hours
Interval 18.25 to 49.25
|
6.3 hours
Interval 4.97 to 25.25
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Overall Study Period (i.e., approximately 28 days)Population: RSV-Infected Population: A central RSV test was used for defining the RSV-Infected population. The RSV-Infected population consisted of all randomized subjects with RSV infection, as confirmed by RT-qPCR (hVIVO quantitative PCR assay) on Day 1 (pre- or post-dose), who received at least 1 administration of study drug.
The time-to-undetectability (hours), defined as the time from the first study drug administration to the first occurrence of viral titer below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), and target not detected provided the next measured value was also below the quantification limit and undetected, were summarized using KM estimates, based on the plaque assay. The time-to-event for subjects with missing data and/or subjects who did not reach undetectability during the trial were censored at the last non-missing viral load assessment. For RSV load by plaque assay the LLOQ was 1.7 log10 pfu/mL.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=35 Participants
Inhalation of Placebo once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg
n=40 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg
n=40 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kg
n=38 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time-to-undetectable Viral Load (Plaque Assay Analysis)
|
95.9 hours
Interval 47.23 to 121.82
|
26.3 hours
Interval 20.25 to 28.92
|
21.0 hours
Interval 4.88 to 28.25
|
5.1 hours
Interval 5.0 to 5.87
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline until Day 14 (Follow-up) (Baseline; Day 1, 5 hours post-dose; Day 3, 2 hours post-dose; and Follow-up reported)Population: RSV-Infected Population: A central RSV test was used for defining the RSV-Infected population. The RSV-Infected population consisted of all randomized subjects with RSV infection, as confirmed by RT-qPCR (hVIVO quantitative PCR assay) on Day 1 (pre- or post-dose), who received at least 1 administration of study drug.
Change from Baseline in RSV Load measured by Plaque Assay (RSV Infected Population)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=35 Participants
Inhalation of Placebo once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg
n=40 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg
n=40 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kg
n=38 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Viral Load Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)
Baseline
|
3.494 log10 pfu/mL
Standard Error 0.2396
|
3.312 log10 pfu/mL
Standard Error 0.2165
|
3.135 log10 pfu/mL
Standard Error 0.2430
|
2.385 log10 pfu/mL
Standard Error 0.2526
|
|
Viral Load Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)
Day 1, 5 hours post-dose
|
-0.270 log10 pfu/mL
Standard Error 0.1607
|
-2.173 log10 pfu/mL
Standard Error 0.2123
|
-2.189 log10 pfu/mL
Standard Error 0.2676
|
-1.535 log10 pfu/mL
Standard Error 0.2526
|
|
Viral Load Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)
Day 3, 2 hours post-dose
|
-1.936 log10 pfu/mL
Standard Error 0.2317
|
-2.396 log10 pfu/mL
Standard Error 0.2234
|
-2.134 log10 pfu/mL
Standard Error 0.2525
|
-1.516 log10 pfu/mL
Standard Error 0.2558
|
|
Viral Load Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)
Follow-up
|
-2.368 log10 pfu/mL
Standard Error 0.2946
|
-2.431 log10 pfu/mL
Standard Error 0.2202
|
-2.279 log10 pfu/mL
Standard Error 0.2576
|
-1.416 log10 pfu/mL
Standard Error 0.2821
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline until Day 14 (Follow-up) (Baseline; Day 1, 5 hours post-dose; Day 3, 2 hours post-dose; and Follow-up reported)Population: RSV-Infected Population: A central RSV test was used for defining the RSV-Infected population. The RSV-Infected population consisted of all randomized subjects with RSV infection, as confirmed by RT-qPCR (hVIVO quantitative PCR assay) on Day 1 (pre- or post-dose), who received at least 1 administration of study drug.
Change from Baseline in RSV Load measured by RT-qPCR (RSV Infected Population)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=35 Participants
Inhalation of Placebo once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg
n=40 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg
n=40 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kg
n=38 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Viral Load Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)
Baseline
|
5.236 log10 copies/mL
Standard Error 0.2827
|
4.966 log10 copies/mL
Standard Error 0.2095
|
5.232 log10 copies/mL
Standard Error 0.1899
|
4.525 log10 copies/mL
Standard Error 0.2937
|
|
Viral Load Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)
Day 1, 5 hours post-dose
|
-0.221 log10 copies/mL
Standard Error 0.1601
|
-0.544 log10 copies/mL
Standard Error 0.1286
|
-0.241 log10 copies/mL
Standard Error 0.2031
|
-0.449 log10 copies/mL
Standard Error 0.1883
|
|
Viral Load Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)
Day 3, 2 hours post-dose
|
-2.156 log10 copies/mL
Standard Error 0.2454
|
-2.589 log10 copies/mL
Standard Error 0.2138
|
-2.310 log10 copies/mL
Standard Error 0.2797
|
-2.025 log10 copies/mL
Standard Error 0.2840
|
|
Viral Load Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)
Follow-up
|
-3.413 log10 copies/mL
Standard Error 0.3715
|
-3.665 log10 copies/mL
Standard Error 0.2203
|
-3.972 log10 copies/mL
Standard Error 0.2032
|
-3.033 log10 copies/mL
Standard Error 0.3252
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline until Day 14 (Follow-up) (Baseline, Day 3, and Follow-up reported)Population: RSV-Infected Population: A central RSV test was used for defining the RSV-Infected population. The RSV-Infected population consisted of all randomized subjects with RSV infection, as confirmed by RT-qPCR (hVIVO quantitative PCR assay) on Day 1 (pre- or post-dose), who received at least 1 administration of study drug.
The time-weighted average change from baseline to Day x was defined as (AUCx - x\* viral load at baseline) /x, where AUCx denotes the AUC between baseline and Day x. For subjects who only had data up to Day t (t\<x), the endpoint was defined as (AUCt - t\*viral load at baseline) / t.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=35 Participants
Inhalation of Placebo once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg
n=40 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg
n=40 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kg
n=38 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Viral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)
Baseline
|
3.494 log10 pfu/mL
Standard Error 0.2396
|
3.312 log10 pfu/mL
Standard Error 0.2165
|
3.135 log10 pfu/mL
Standard Error 0.2430
|
2.385 log10 pfu/mL
Standard Error 0.2526
|
|
Viral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)
Day 3
|
-1.014 log10 pfu/mL
Standard Error 0.1540
|
-1.924 log10 pfu/mL
Standard Error 0.1659
|
-1.804 log10 pfu/mL
Standard Error 0.2098
|
-1.330 log10 pfu/mL
Standard Error 0.2434
|
|
Viral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (Plaque Assay Analysis)
Follow-Up
|
-2.096 log10 pfu/mL
Standard Error 0.2443
|
-2.295 log10 pfu/mL
Standard Error 0.2116
|
-2.028 log10 pfu/mL
Standard Error 0.2217
|
-1.419 log10 pfu/mL
Standard Error 0.2488
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline until Day 14 (Follow-up) (Baseline, Day 3, and Follow-up reported)Population: RSV-Infected Population: A central RSV test was used for defining the RSV-Infected population. The RSV-Infected population consisted of all randomized subjects with RSV infection, as confirmed by RT-qPCR (hVIVO quantitative PCR assay) on Day 1 (pre- or post-dose), who received at least 1 administration of study drug.
The time-weighted average change from baseline to Day x was defined as (AUCx - x\* viral load at baseline) /x, where AUCx denotes the AUC between baseline and Day x. For subjects who only had data up to Day t (t\<x), the endpoint was defined as (AUCt - t\*viral load at baseline) / t.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=35 Participants
Inhalation of Placebo once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg
n=40 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg
n=40 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kg
n=38 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Viral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)
Baseline
|
5.236 log10 copies/mL
Standard Error 0.2827
|
4.966 log10 copies/mL
Standard Error 0.2095
|
5.232 log10 copies/mL
Standard Error 0.1899
|
4.525 log10 copies/mL
Standard Error 0.2937
|
|
Viral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)
Day 3
|
-0.933 log10 copies/mL
Standard Error 0.1421
|
-1.209 log10 copies/mL
Standard Error 0.1301
|
-1.113 log10 copies/mL
Standard Error 0.1932
|
-0.842 log10 copies/mL
Standard Error 0.1842
|
|
Viral Load Time-weighted Average Changes From Baseline (RT-qPCR Analysis)
Follow-up
|
-2.684 log10 copies/mL
Standard Error 0.2263
|
-2.828 log10 copies/mL
Standard Error 0.2099
|
-2.756 log10 copies/mL
Standard Error 0.1831
|
-2.292 log10 copies/mL
Standard Error 0.2581
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Overall Study Period (i.e., approximately 28 days)Population: The Safety Population consisted of all subjects who received at least 1 administration of study drug. When using this population, the subjects were classified as treated (i.e., using the treatment that the subject actually received). Number of subjects with non-missing ADA results were: placebo:39; ALX-0171 3.0mg/kg:45; 6.0mg/kg:44; 9.0mg/kg:46.
The number of subjects with treatment-emergent (TE) anti-drug antibodies (ADA; TE ADA) based on ADA assay by treatment group for the Safety Population. Blood samples for immunogenicity assessments were collected at Baseline and on Day 14. Immunogenicity data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=39 Participants
Inhalation of Placebo once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg
n=45 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg
n=44 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kg
n=46 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Immunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug Antibodies
Total TE ADA Positive
|
10 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug Antibodies
Total TE ADA Negative
|
16 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug Antibodies
TE ADA Equivocal
|
12 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug Antibodies
TE ADA Inconclusive
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Overall Study Period (i.e., approximately 28 days)Population: The Safety Population consisted of all subjects who received at least 1 administration of study drug. When using this population, the subjects were classified as treated (i.e., using the treatment that the subject actually received).Number of subjects with non-missing NAb results were: placebo:39; ALX-0171 3.0mg/kg:45; 6.0mg/kg:44; 9.0mg/kg:46.
Number of subjects with treatment-emergent neutralizing antibodies (TE NAb) as detected with the competitive ligand binding NAb assay. Blood samples for immunogenicity assessments were collected at Baseline and on Day 14. Immunogenicity data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=39 Participants
Inhalation of Placebo once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg
n=45 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg
n=44 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kg
n=46 Participants
Inhalation of ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Immunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Neutralizing Antibodies
Post-dose Positive
|
2 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Neutralizing Antibodies
Post-dose Negative
|
36 Participants
|
33 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
31 Participants
|
|
Immunogenicity; Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Neutralizing Antibodies
Post-dose Missing
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=40 participants at risk
Inhalation of Placebo once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg
n=45 participants at risk
Inhalation of ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg
n=44 participants at risk
Inhalation of ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kg
n=46 participants at risk
Inhalation of ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
0.00%
0/40 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/45 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
2.3%
1/44 • Number of events 1 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/46 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
|
General disorders
Vessel puncture site phlebitis
|
0.00%
0/40 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/45 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
2.3%
1/44 • Number of events 1 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/46 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia bacterial
|
2.5%
1/40 • Number of events 1 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/45 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
2.3%
1/44 • Number of events 1 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
2.2%
1/46 • Number of events 1 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchiolitis
|
2.5%
1/40 • Number of events 1 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/44 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/46 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
2.5%
1/40 • Number of events 1 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/44 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/46 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/40 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/44 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/46 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonococcal bacteraemia
|
0.00%
0/40 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/45 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/44 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
2.2%
1/46 • Number of events 1 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/40 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/45 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/44 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
2.2%
1/46 • Number of events 1 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory syncytial virus infection
|
0.00%
0/40 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/44 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/46 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
2.5%
1/40 • Number of events 1 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/45 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/44 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/46 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia viral
|
2.5%
1/40 • Number of events 1 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/45 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/44 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/46 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=40 participants at risk
Inhalation of Placebo once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg
n=45 participants at risk
Inhalation of ALX-0171 3.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg
n=44 participants at risk
Inhalation of ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
ALX-0171 9.0mg/kg
n=46 participants at risk
Inhalation of ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg once daily for 3 consecutive days
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
5.0%
2/40 • Number of events 2 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/45 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
2.3%
1/44 • Number of events 1 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/46 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhea
|
2.5%
1/40 • Number of events 1 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
13.3%
6/45 • Number of events 7 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
6.8%
3/44 • Number of events 3 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
4.3%
2/46 • Number of events 2 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
2.5%
1/40 • Number of events 1 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
4.4%
2/45 • Number of events 2 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
6.8%
3/44 • Number of events 3 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
4.3%
2/46 • Number of events 2 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
2.5%
1/40 • Number of events 1 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
4.4%
2/45 • Number of events 3 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
9.1%
4/44 • Number of events 4 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/46 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
5.0%
2/40 • Number of events 2 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 2 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/44 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/46 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
5.0%
2/40 • Number of events 2 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/45 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/44 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/46 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
7.5%
3/40 • Number of events 3 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
6.7%
3/45 • Number of events 3 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
6.8%
3/44 • Number of events 4 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
4.3%
2/46 • Number of events 2 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Conjuctivitis
|
5.0%
2/40 • Number of events 2 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
4.4%
2/45 • Number of events 2 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
2.3%
1/44 • Number of events 1 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
2.2%
1/46 • Number of events 1 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Rhinitis
|
0.00%
0/40 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/45 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
2.3%
1/44 • Number of events 1 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
6.5%
3/46 • Number of events 3 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Otitis media
|
7.5%
3/40 • Number of events 3 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/45 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/44 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
0.00%
0/46 • All adverse events (AEs) were reported from first study drug intake to the end of study visit (Day 28) or withdrawal visit.
A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as any AE starting or worsening in severity (for preexisting conditions) from the start of study drug administration, until completion of the subject's last visit. Adverse event data were analyzed using the Safety Population. This population differs from the ITT and mITT Populations as 2 subjects who were originally randomized to placebo, received active treatment once; one subject received ALX-0171 6.0 mg/kg and one subject ALX-0171 9.0 mg/kg.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Publication of any results from this study will be according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, and will require prior review and written agreement of the Sponsor.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER