Trial Outcomes & Findings for Trilaciclib (G1T28), a CDK 4/6 Inhibitor, in Combination With Gemcitabine and Carboplatin in Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (mTNBC) (NCT NCT02978716)
NCT ID: NCT02978716
Last Updated: 2022-03-23
Results Overview
DSN was defined as the number of days from the date of the first absolute neutrophil count (ANC) value of less than (\<) 0.5 × 10\^9 cells/liter (L) observed between Day 1 Cycle 1 and the end of Cycle 1 to the date of the first ANC value greater than or equal to (\>=) 0.5 × 10\^9/L that met the following: (1) occurred after the ANC value of \< 0.5 × 10\^9 cells/L and (2) no other ANC values \< 0.5 × 10\^9 cells/L occurred between this day and the end of Cycle 1. Severe neutropenia (SN) was set to zero for participants who did not experience severe (Grade 4) neutropenia in Cycle 1, including those who were randomized but never treated.
TERMINATED
PHASE2
102 participants
From randomization to the end of Cycle 1 (Each cycle= 21 days)
2022-03-23
Participant Flow
This study was conducted at 34 sites in the United States (US), Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Republic of Macedonia, and Serbia from 02 February 2017 (first participant enrolled) to 28 February 2020 (last participant last visit).
Participants were screened within 28 days before the first dose of the treatment. Informed consent was obtained up to 28 days prior to first study drug administration. For tumor assessment, all sites of disease were assessed radiologically at screening. A total of 102 participants were randomized in this study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
Participants received Intravenous (IV) infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 milligrams per meter square \[mg/m\^2\] and carboplatin area under the curve \[AUC\] 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
34
|
33
|
35
|
|
Overall Study
ITT Population
|
34
|
33
|
35
|
|
Overall Study
Safety Analysis Set
|
30
|
33
|
35
|
|
Overall Study
Treated
|
30
|
33
|
35
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
34
|
33
|
35
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
Participants received Intravenous (IV) infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 milligrams per meter square \[mg/m\^2\] and carboplatin area under the curve \[AUC\] 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
25
|
13
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
6
|
4
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Sponsor terminated
|
2
|
13
|
9
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
1
|
3
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Trilaciclib (G1T28), a CDK 4/6 Inhibitor, in Combination With Gemcitabine and Carboplatin in Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (mTNBC)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=34 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Total
n=102 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6 • n=5 Participants
|
56 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1 • n=7 Participants
|
58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5 • n=5 Participants
|
56 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
101 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
93 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
78 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From randomization to the end of Cycle 1 (Each cycle= 21 days)Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants.
DSN was defined as the number of days from the date of the first absolute neutrophil count (ANC) value of less than (\<) 0.5 × 10\^9 cells/liter (L) observed between Day 1 Cycle 1 and the end of Cycle 1 to the date of the first ANC value greater than or equal to (\>=) 0.5 × 10\^9/L that met the following: (1) occurred after the ANC value of \< 0.5 × 10\^9 cells/L and (2) no other ANC values \< 0.5 × 10\^9 cells/L occurred between this day and the end of Cycle 1. Severe neutropenia (SN) was set to zero for participants who did not experience severe (Grade 4) neutropenia in Cycle 1, including those who were randomized but never treated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=34 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Severe (Grade 4) Neutropenia (DSN) During Cycle 1
|
1 days
Standard Deviation 2.6
|
1 days
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
2 days
Standard Deviation 3.5
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 daysPopulation: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants.
Number of participants with Grade 4 SN was a binary variable. If a participants had at least 1 ANC value \< 0.5 ×10\^9/L during the treatment period, the participants was assigned as "yes" to the occurrence of SN. Otherwise, it was "no".
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=34 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Severe (Grade 4) Neutropenia (SN)
Grade 4 neutropenia: No
|
27 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Severe (Grade 4) Neutropenia (SN)
Grade 4 neutropenia: Yes
|
8 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the occurrence of progressive disease or a censoring event, assessed up to a maximum of 875 daysPopulation: The response-evaluable (RE) analysis set included all participants who were in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis set, had measurable disease (target lesions \[TLs\]) at the baseline tumor assessment, and had (1) at least 1 post-baseline tumor assessment, (2) clinical progression (as noted by the investigator) before their first post-baseline tumor scan, or (3) died due to disease progression before their first post-baseline tumor scan.
BOR was defined as the best response across all time points (RECIST v1.1). The best overall response was determined once all the data for the participant is known. Each participant has been assigned one of the following categories (RECIST 1.1): complete response (CR): disappearance of all target lesions; partial response (PR): \>= 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters; progression disease (PD): \>= 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study); stable disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD); NE: not evaluable and missing.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=31 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=24 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=30 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Complete response (CR)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Not evaluable (NE)
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Missing
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Stable disease (SD)
|
15 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Progressive disease (PD)
|
3 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Partial response (PR)
|
11 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the occurrence of progressive disease or a censoring event, assessed up to a maximum of 875 daysPopulation: The RE analysis set included all participants who were in the mITT analysis set, had measurable disease TLs at the baseline tumor assessment, and had (1) at least 1 post-baseline tumor assessment, (2) clinical progression (as noted by the investigator) before their first post-baseline tumor scan, or (3) died due to disease progression before their first post-baseline tumor scan. Here, "Overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
DOR is the time between first response by RECIST Version 1.1 of CR or PR and the first date that progressive disease is documented by RECIST Version 1.1, or death. Participants who do not experience PD or death was censored at the last tumor assessment date. 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=11 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=7 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=15 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Objective Response (DOR) as Per RECIST v1.1 as Determined by Investigator
|
9.6 months
Interval 3.1 to 12.6
|
7.8 months
Interval 7.5 to
Due to small number of events, estimates (upper limit of 95% Confidence interval) from Kaplan-Meier survival curves could not be derived.
|
11.5 months
Interval 4.8 to 17.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From date of randomization to date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 1120 daysPopulation: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants.
Overall survival was defined as the time (months) from date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants who do not die during the study were censored at the date last known to be alive. The OS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=34 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Survival (OS)
|
17.8 months
Interval 12.9 to 32.7
|
12.6 months
Interval 6.3 to 15.6
|
NA months
Interval 10.2 to
Data could not be estimated due to higher number (\>50%) of censored participants.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the occurrence of disease progression, death due to any cause or a censoring event, assessed up to a maximum of 875 daysPopulation: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants.
PFS was defined as the time (months) from date of randomization until date of documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever comes first. PD: \>= 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study). The PFS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=34 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per RECIST v1.1 as Determined by Investigator
|
7.3 months
Interval 6.2 to 13.9
|
5.7 months
Interval 3.3 to 9.2
|
9.4 months
Interval 6.1 to 11.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 871 daysPopulation: The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Relative dose intensity was defined as 100% times the actual dose intensity divided by the planned dose intensity. The planned dose intensity was defined as the cumulative planned dose through the study divided by (number of cycles × 3 weeks). Relative dose intensity (%) was calculated as: for gemcitabine (100 \* \[Dose intensity (mg/m2/week) / (2000/3 (mg/m2/week)\]); for carboplatin (100 \* \[Dose intensity (AUC/week)/ (4/3) (AUC/week)\]) and for trilaciclib (100 \* \[Dose intensity (mg/m2/week)/ (480 /3 (mg/m2/week)\] for Group 2 and 100 \* \[Dose intensity (mg/m2/week) / (960 /3 (mg/m2/week)\] for Group 3).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=30 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Relative Dose Intensity of Gemcitabine and Carboplatin
Carboplatin
|
81.7 percentage of dose
Standard Deviation 16.09
|
77.5 percentage of dose
Standard Deviation 19.20
|
79.1 percentage of dose
Standard Deviation 15.88
|
|
Relative Dose Intensity of Gemcitabine and Carboplatin
Gemcitabine
|
81.0 percentage of dose
Standard Deviation 14.49
|
79.1 percentage of dose
Standard Deviation 18.29
|
80.8 percentage of dose
Standard Deviation 12.51
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 871 daysPopulation: The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Duration of exposure (days) = First dose date of study drug from the last cycle - first dose date of study drug + 21.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=30 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Exposure
|
168 days
Interval 21.0 to 436.0
|
101 days
Interval 21.0 to 469.0
|
161 days
Interval 42.0 to 637.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 871 daysPopulation: The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Participants were considered to have started a cycle if they have received at least 1 dose of any study drug.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=30 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Cycles Participants Received Treatment in Each Treatment Arm
|
8 number of cycles
Standard Deviation 4.8
|
6 number of cycles
Standard Deviation 5.0
|
9 number of cycles
Standard Deviation 6.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 871 daysPopulation: The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Cumulative dose: Sum of the total doses by cycle administered to a participant in the duration of exposure, i.e. total number of cycles received (milligram per meter square \[mg/m\^2\]).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=30 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Cumulative Dose of Gemcitabine
|
13277.2 mg/m^2
Standard Deviation 8722.51
|
10694.3 mg/m^2
Standard Deviation 9029.11
|
14680.9 mg/m^2
Standard Deviation 11557.90
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 871 daysPopulation: The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Cumulative dose: Sum of the total doses by cycle (AUC) administered to a participant in the duration of exposure, i.e. total number of cycles received (in total prescribed AUC).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=30 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Cumulative Dose of Carboplatin
|
26.0 AUC (mg/mL/min)
Standard Deviation 16.33
|
20.3 AUC (mg/mL/min)
Standard Deviation 16.47
|
27.8 AUC (mg/mL/min)
Standard Deviation 21.21
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 1): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3.5, 5, 24 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 2) and Cycle 1 Day 2 (Group 3): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 4, 5.5, 24 hours post-dose (Each cycle is of 21 days)Population: The pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set included all dosed participants with evaluable PK data. Here, "Overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Since, no participant received Trilaciclib in Group 1, data was not assessed and reported.
The observed peak plasma concentration was determined from the plasma concentration-versus time data.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=7 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=6 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Trilaciclib
|
1630 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 423
|
—
|
2280 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1790
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 1): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3.5, 5, 24 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 2) and Cycle 1 Day 2 (Group 3): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 4, 5.5, 24 hours post-dose (Each cycle is of 21 days)Population: The PK analysis set included all dosed participants with evaluable PK data. Here, "Overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Since, no participant received Trilaciclib in Group 1, data was not assessed and reported.
AUC0-t was calculated with the linear/log-trapezoidal method, which uses linear interpolation between data points to calculate the AUC. The linear/log-trapezoidal method will be employed for all incremental trapezoids arising from increasing concentrations and the logarithmic trapezoidal method will be used for those arising from decreasing concentrations.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=7 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=6 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to t Hours (AUC0-t) of Trilaciclib
|
3800 hour* nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 910
|
—
|
3610 hour* nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1870
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 1): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3.5, 5, 24 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 2) and Cycle 1 Day 2 (Group 3): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 4, 5.5, 24 hours post-dose (Each cycle is of 21 days)Population: The PK analysis set included all dosed participants with evaluable PK data. Here, "Overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Since, no participant received Trilaciclib in Group 1, data was not assessed and reported.
t1/2 was calculated as 0.693 divided by lambda z. lambda z (terminal phase rate constant) was determined by linear regression of at least 3 points on the terminal phase of the log-linear plasma concentration-time curve, the actual body exposure to drug after administration of a dose of the drug ( in mg\*h/L).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=6 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=5 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2) of Trilaciclib
|
5.31 hours
Interval 4.36 to 6.29
|
—
|
5.27 hours
Interval 3.98 to 6.64
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 1): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3.5, 5, 24 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 2) and Cycle 1 Day 2 (Group 3): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 4, 5.5, 24 hours post-dose (Each cycle is of 21 days)Population: The PK analysis set included all dosed participants with evaluable PK data. Here, "Overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
The observed peak plasma concentration was determined from the plasma concentration-versus time data.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=5 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=1 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=5 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Gemcitabine
|
23.8 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 25.9
|
NA microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation NA
Data was not available since only one participant had sample in Group 1 and it was sufficient only for assessment of carboplatin.
|
18.0 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 4.04
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 1): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3.5, 5, 24 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 2) and Cycle 1 Day 2 (Group 3): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 4, 5.5, 24 hours post-dose (Each cycle is of 21 days)Population: The PK analysis set included all dosed participants with evaluable PK data. Here, "Overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
AUC0-t was calculated with the linear/log-trapezoidal method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=5 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=1 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=5 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to t Hours (AUC0-t) of Gemcitabine
|
15.4 hour*microgram per milliliter (h*mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 7.11
|
NA hour*microgram per milliliter (h*mcg/mL)
Data was not available since only one participant had sample in Group 1 and it was sufficient only for assessment of carboplatin.
|
20.4 hour*microgram per milliliter (h*mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 11.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 1): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3.5, 5, 24 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 2) and Cycle 1 Day 2 (Group 3): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 4, 5.5, 24 hours post-dose (Each cycle is of 21 days)Population: The PK analysis set included all dosed participants with evaluable PK data. Here, "Overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
t1/2 was calculated as 0.693 divided by lambda z. lambda z (terminal phase rate constant) was determined by linear regression of at least 3 points on the terminal phase of the log-linear plasma concentration-time curve.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=5 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=1 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=5 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2) of Free Carboplatin
|
1.79 hours
Interval 1.35 to 4.86
|
5.23 hours
|
2.49 hours
Interval 1.32 to 2.93
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 1): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3.5, 5, 24 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 2) and Cycle 1 Day 2 (Group 3): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 4, 5.5, 24 hours post-dose (Each cycle is of 21 days)Population: The PK analysis set included all dosed participants with evaluable PK data. Here, "Overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Clearance after intravenous infusion administration was calculated as: CL=Dose/AUC0-inf. AUC0-inf was calculated as: AUC0-inf=AUClast+Clast/lambdaz where Clast is the last quantifiable concentration in the terminal elimination phase.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=5 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=1 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=3 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Clearance (CL) of of Free Carboplatin
|
13.7 Liter/hour (L/h)
Standard Deviation 4.48
|
6.65 Liter/hour (L/h)
|
14.0 Liter/hour (L/h)
Standard Deviation 2.80
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 1): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3.5, 5, 24 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 2) and Cycle 1 Day 2 (Group 3): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 4, 5.5, 24 hours post-dose (Each cycle is of 21 days)Population: The PK analysis set included all dosed participants with evaluable PK data. Here, "Overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Vss was the volume of distribution at steady state of free carboplatin was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=5 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=1 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=5 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of Free Carboplatin
|
34.0 Liter
Standard Deviation 8.99
|
44.4 Liter
|
35.0 Liter
Standard Deviation 12.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 daysPopulation: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants.
Hematologic toxicities events were defined as any cycle where any hematologic lab value occurs that meets the CTCAE toxicity grade criteria for \>= Grade 3 and the value is treatment emergent. The occurrence of Grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities was a binary endpoint. If a participant had at least 1 cycle with at least one Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities during the treatment period, the participant was assigned as Yes to the occurrence of Grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities; otherwise, it was No. If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 was assigned to that participant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=34 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Hematologic Toxicities
Participants with Grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities: Yes
|
27 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Hematologic Toxicities
Participants with Grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities: No
|
8 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 daysPopulation: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants.
Hematologic toxicities events are defined as any cycle where any hematologic lab value occurs that meets the CTCAE toxicity grade criteria for \>= Grade 3 and the value is treatment emergent. The occurrence of Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia was a binary endpoint. If a participant had at least 1 cycle with at least one Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia during the treatment period, the participant was assigned as "Yes" to the occurrence of Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia; otherwise, it was "No". If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 was assigned to that participant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=34 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Thrombocytopenia
|
19 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 daysPopulation: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants.
MAHE was a composite endpoint incorporating the measurement of several clinically meaningful aspects of myelosuppression into a single endpoint by summing of the total number of events across a set of pre-specified components.The individual components for MAHE were all-cause hospitalizations, all-cause dose reductions, febrile neutropenia, prolonged severe neutropenia (duration \> 5 days), RBC transfusion and platelet transfusion. Event rate for MAHE was calculated as the number of events/durations of treatment period divided by 7 days/1 week.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=34 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Major Adverse Hematologic Event (MAHE) Rate
|
0.080 event rate per week
|
0.153 event rate per week
|
0.108 event rate per week
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 daysPopulation: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants.
The criterion for identifying FN was if the PT was "FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA" the occurrence during the treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); Yes if total number of events \>=1 was observed, No for other scenarios. If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 was assigned to that participant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=34 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia (FN)
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 daysPopulation: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants.
Number of participants with infection SAEs during the treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); Yes if total number of events \>=1 was observed, No for other scenarios. If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 was assigned to that participant. The criterion for identifying the proper infection SAE records was as follows: If the system organ class (SOC) from Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) takes value "INFECTIONS AND INFESTATIONS," and the AE was a serious event.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=34 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Infection SAEs
Participants with Infection SAEs: Yes
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Infection SAEs
Participants with Infection SAEs: No
|
35 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
33 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day 35 through the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 508 daysPopulation: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants.
Each RBC transfusion with a unique start date on/after 5 weeks on study during the treatment period was defined as a separate event. Occurrence during the treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); "Yes" if the total number of events \>=1 was observed and "No" for other scenarios. If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 will be assigned to that participant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=34 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions On/After Week 5 (Day 35)
Participants with RBC transfusions on/after Week 5: Yes
|
8 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions On/After Week 5 (Day 35)
Participants with RBC transfusions on/after Week 5: No
|
27 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 daysPopulation: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants.
Each platelet transfusion with a unique start date during the treatment period was defined as a separate event. The occurrence during the treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); Yes if the total number of events \>=1 was observed and No for other scenarios. If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 will be assigned to that participant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=34 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Platelet Transfusions
Participants with platelet transfusion: Yes
|
6 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Platelet Transfusions
Participants with platelet transfusion: No
|
29 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 daysPopulation: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants.
The criterion for selecting proper records is as follows: If the chemical subgroup from the World Health Organization-Drug Dictionary (WHO-DD) takes value "COLONY STIMULATING FACTOR," the medication was classified as G-CSF. The occurrence during the treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); "Yes" if the total number of events \>=1 was observed and "No" for other scenarios. If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 will be assigned to that participant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=34 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor (G-CSF) Administration
Participants with G-CSF Administration: Yes
|
14 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor (G-CSF) Administration
Participants with G-CSF Administration: No
|
21 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 daysPopulation: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants.
The occurrence during the treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); "Yes" if total number of events \>=1 was observed, "No" for other scenarios. If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 was assigned to that participant. The criterion to select proper records was as follows: If the chemical subgroup from WHO-DD Version September 2017 (i.e., TEXT4 for CODE4) takes value "OTHER ANTIANEMIC PREPARATIONS", the medication was classified as ESAs.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=34 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agent (ESA) Administration
Participants with ESA Administration: Yes
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agent (ESA) Administration
Participants with ESA Administration: No
|
32 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
31 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 daysPopulation: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants.
The criteria for identifying an IV antibiotic administration event was (1) if the Therapeutic subgroup from WHO-DD version takes value "ANTIBACTERIALS FOR SYSTEMIC USE", and (2) the route of medication was "intravenous" or the route was "other" with the detailed specification as "IVPB". The occurrence during the treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); "Yes" if total number of events \>=1 was observed, "No" for other scenarios. If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 was assigned to that participant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=34 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Intravenous Antibiotics Use
Participants with Intravenous Antibiotics Use: Yes
|
0 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Intravenous Antibiotics Use
Participants with Intravenous Antibiotics Use: No
|
35 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 daysPopulation: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants.
Dose reductions were not permitted for trilaciclib. Dose reductions for gemcitabine or carboplatin were collected on the dosing page. No more than 3 dose modifications for toxicity in total were allowed for any participant. All dose reductions were counted as a separate event. Discontinuations of an individual component of the chemotherapy regimen were counted as a dose reduction If the participant continued the other chemotherapy drug as a monotherapy. Event rate was calculated as the total number of cycles with an event divided by the total number of cycles.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=34 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
All-cause Dose Reductions, Event Rate (Per Cycle)
|
0.133 event rate per cycle
|
0.141 event rate per cycle
|
0.118 event rate per cycle
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 871 daysPopulation: The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Dose modifications was summarized for each study drug based on number of cycles received during the treatment period. If the participant was unable to start a new cycle at that next visit, then the cycle is delayed, the reason entered, and the question was asked again at the next visit until the participant either starts a new cycle or discontinues treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=30 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Dose Modifications: Number of Participants With Cycle Delays
|
22 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 871 daysPopulation: The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Dose modifications was summarized for each study drug based on skipped doses not received during the treatment period. Primary reasons for skipped doses included toxicity, investigator decision and administrative reasons (e.g., holidays).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=30 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Dose Modifications - Number of Participants With Skipped Doses
|
13 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 871 daysPopulation: The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Dose interruptions was defined as interruption of infusion, regardless of whether the study drug was continued after the interruption.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=30 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Dose Modifications: Number of Participants With Any Dose Interruptions
Carboplatin
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Dose Modifications: Number of Participants With Any Dose Interruptions
Trilaciclib
|
5 Participants
|
NA Participants
Here, 'NA' signifies that Trilaciclib drug was not administered in this specified arm.
|
3 Participants
|
|
Dose Modifications: Number of Participants With Any Dose Interruptions
Gemcitabine
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 871 daysPopulation: The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Dose (mg/m2) reductions were not permitted for trilaciclib. Dose reductions for carboplatin and gemcitabine were determined by comparing the planned dose on the respective drug administration pages between the current cycle and the previous cycle.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=30 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Dose Modifications - Number of Participants With Dose Reductions
Carboplatin
|
15 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
|
Dose Modifications - Number of Participants With Dose Reductions
Gemcitabine
|
17 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 1116 daysPopulation: The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
An Adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Any AE that started on or after the first dose of study drugs was included as a TEAE. A Serious AE was defined as any AE, occurring at any dose (including after the informed consent form was signed and prior to dosing) and regardless of causality that met one, more of the following criteria: results in death, life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent, significant disability/incapacity, a congenital abnormality/birth defect, an important medical event. TEAEs included serious and non-serious TEAEs.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=30 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs
Participants with any TEAEs
|
34 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
33 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs
Participants with any Serious TEAEs
|
4 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
Group 2: Trilaciclib (G1T28)+ Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=30 participants at risk
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib (G1T28)+ Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 participants at risk
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 participants at risk
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Vascular disorders
Embolism
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicidal ideation
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lumbar vertebral fracture
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Subdural haematoma
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute left ventricular failure
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pericardial effusion
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Right ventricular failure
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Obstructive airways disorder
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleuritic pain
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile neutropenia
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Normochromic normocytic anaemia
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ascites
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Enteritis
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Faecaloma
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oesophageal stenosis
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Varices oesophageal
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary tract obstruction
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myositis
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetic ketoacidosis
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercalcaemia
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacteraemia
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lung infection
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=30 participants at risk
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
|
Group 2: Trilaciclib (G1T28)+ Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 participants at risk
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 participants at risk
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 7 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hot flush
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Thrombophlebitis superficial
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
8.6%
3/35 • Number of events 7 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
36.7%
11/30 • Number of events 17 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
42.4%
14/33 • Number of events 22 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
45.7%
16/35 • Number of events 35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
13.3%
4/30 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.1%
4/33 • Number of events 7 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.4%
4/35 • Number of events 8 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
18.2%
6/33 • Number of events 8 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
16.7%
5/30 • Number of events 7 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
8.6%
3/35 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Chills
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
18.2%
6/33 • Number of events 7 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Influenza like illness
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.4%
4/35 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Catheter site pain
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Chest discomfort
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Infusion site pain
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Mucosal inflammation
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.4%
4/35 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
15.2%
5/33 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
13.3%
4/30 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.4%
4/35 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Breast pain
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
8.6%
3/35 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Infusion related reaction
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
21.2%
7/33 • Number of events 35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.4%
4/35 • Number of events 6 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
|
26.7%
8/30 • Number of events 20 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
36.4%
12/33 • Number of events 50 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
31.4%
11/35 • Number of events 30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
|
26.7%
8/30 • Number of events 38 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
24.2%
8/33 • Number of events 13 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
34.3%
12/35 • Number of events 44 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.1%
4/33 • Number of events 6 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.4%
4/35 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 6 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.1%
4/33 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.4%
4/35 • Number of events 7 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
White blood cell count decreased
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 7 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.1%
4/33 • Number of events 7 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Weight decreased
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Haemoglobin decreased
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Weight increased
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
73.3%
22/30 • Number of events 61 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
48.5%
16/33 • Number of events 46 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
42.9%
15/35 • Number of events 35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
43.3%
13/30 • Number of events 49 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
45.5%
15/33 • Number of events 79 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
34.3%
12/35 • Number of events 31 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
43.3%
13/30 • Number of events 68 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
39.4%
13/33 • Number of events 55 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
31.4%
11/35 • Number of events 55 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
16.7%
5/30 • Number of events 9 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
3/33 • Number of events 12 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
27.3%
9/33 • Number of events 10 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
17.1%
6/35 • Number of events 7 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
24.2%
8/33 • Number of events 8 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
20.0%
7/35 • Number of events 9 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.4%
4/35 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
3/33 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Upper-airway cough syndrome
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
20.0%
6/30 • Number of events 9 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
27.3%
9/33 • Number of events 11 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
40.0%
14/35 • Number of events 22 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
20.0%
6/30 • Number of events 8 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.1%
4/33 • Number of events 7 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
17.1%
6/35 • Number of events 11 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
15.2%
5/33 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cognitive disorders
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Restless legs syndrome
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Burning sensation
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Eye disorders
Lacrimation increased
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Tinnitus
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
23.3%
7/30 • Number of events 8 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
42.4%
14/33 • Number of events 19 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
48.6%
17/35 • Number of events 31 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
26.7%
8/30 • Number of events 9 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
24.2%
8/33 • Number of events 23 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
31.4%
11/35 • Number of events 18 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
16.7%
5/30 • Number of events 6 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
27.3%
9/33 • Number of events 16 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
25.7%
9/35 • Number of events 11 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
13.3%
4/30 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
27.3%
9/33 • Number of events 15 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
5/35 • Number of events 6 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
15.2%
5/33 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.1%
4/33 • Number of events 6 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
3/33 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
8.6%
3/35 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
3/33 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Pollakiuria
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
15.2%
5/33 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
17.1%
6/35 • Number of events 6 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
3/33 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.4%
4/35 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.1%
4/33 • Number of events 21 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
8.6%
3/35 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
3/33 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
8.6%
3/35 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash maculo-papular
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
21.2%
7/33 • Number of events 15 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
8.6%
3/35 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
18.2%
6/33 • Number of events 7 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
8.6%
3/35 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.1%
4/33 • Number of events 6 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
8.6%
3/35 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bone pain
|
13.3%
4/30 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
16.7%
5/30 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal chest pain
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
8.6%
3/35 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.4%
4/35 • Number of events 6 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Flank pain
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
3/33 • Number of events 6 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
3/33 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.1%
4/33 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
14.3%
5/35 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
15.2%
5/33 • Number of events 6 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.4%
4/35 • Number of events 7 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Hypophosphataemia
|
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
3/33 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
8.6%
3/35 • Number of events 7 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Dehydration
|
13.3%
4/30 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypomagnesaemia
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Hypoalbuminaemia
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Hypocalcaemia
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Hyperlipidaemia
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
16.7%
5/30 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.1%
4/33 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
8.6%
3/35 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
3/33 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The investigator will submit results communications for review by the sponsor at least 60 days prior to expected submission to the intended publisher or meeting committee. This review period may be shortened upon mutual consent. The sponsor may request modification of any publication, presentation or use by the investigator if such activity may jeopardize a patent application, an existing patent, or other proprietary rights.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER