Trial Outcomes & Findings for Trilaciclib (G1T28), a CDK 4/6 Inhibitor, in Combination With Gemcitabine and Carboplatin in Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (mTNBC) (NCT NCT02978716)

NCT ID: NCT02978716

Last Updated: 2022-03-23

Results Overview

DSN was defined as the number of days from the date of the first absolute neutrophil count (ANC) value of less than (\<) 0.5 × 10\^9 cells/liter (L) observed between Day 1 Cycle 1 and the end of Cycle 1 to the date of the first ANC value greater than or equal to (\>=) 0.5 × 10\^9/L that met the following: (1) occurred after the ANC value of \< 0.5 × 10\^9 cells/L and (2) no other ANC values \< 0.5 × 10\^9 cells/L occurred between this day and the end of Cycle 1. Severe neutropenia (SN) was set to zero for participants who did not experience severe (Grade 4) neutropenia in Cycle 1, including those who were randomized but never treated.

Recruitment status

TERMINATED

Study phase

PHASE2

Target enrollment

102 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

From randomization to the end of Cycle 1 (Each cycle= 21 days)

Results posted on

2022-03-23

Participant Flow

This study was conducted at 34 sites in the United States (US), Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Republic of Macedonia, and Serbia from 02 February 2017 (first participant enrolled) to 28 February 2020 (last participant last visit).

Participants were screened within 28 days before the first dose of the treatment. Informed consent was obtained up to 28 days prior to first study drug administration. For tumor assessment, all sites of disease were assessed radiologically at screening. A total of 102 participants were randomized in this study.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
Participants received Intravenous (IV) infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 milligrams per meter square \[mg/m\^2\] and carboplatin area under the curve \[AUC\] 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Overall Study
STARTED
34
33
35
Overall Study
ITT Population
34
33
35
Overall Study
Safety Analysis Set
30
33
35
Overall Study
Treated
30
33
35
Overall Study
COMPLETED
0
0
0
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
34
33
35

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
Participants received Intravenous (IV) infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 milligrams per meter square \[mg/m\^2\] and carboplatin area under the curve \[AUC\] 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Overall Study
Death
25
13
20
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
0
0
1
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
6
4
5
Overall Study
Sponsor terminated
2
13
9
Overall Study
Other
1
3
0

Baseline Characteristics

Trilaciclib (G1T28), a CDK 4/6 Inhibitor, in Combination With Gemcitabine and Carboplatin in Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (mTNBC)

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=34 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Total
n=102 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6 • n=5 Participants
56 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1 • n=7 Participants
58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5 • n=5 Participants
56 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8 • n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
32 Participants
n=7 Participants
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
101 Participants
n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
93 Participants
n=4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
14 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
22 Participants
n=7 Participants
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
78 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=4 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From randomization to the end of Cycle 1 (Each cycle= 21 days)

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants.

DSN was defined as the number of days from the date of the first absolute neutrophil count (ANC) value of less than (\<) 0.5 × 10\^9 cells/liter (L) observed between Day 1 Cycle 1 and the end of Cycle 1 to the date of the first ANC value greater than or equal to (\>=) 0.5 × 10\^9/L that met the following: (1) occurred after the ANC value of \< 0.5 × 10\^9 cells/L and (2) no other ANC values \< 0.5 × 10\^9 cells/L occurred between this day and the end of Cycle 1. Severe neutropenia (SN) was set to zero for participants who did not experience severe (Grade 4) neutropenia in Cycle 1, including those who were randomized but never treated.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=34 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Duration of Severe (Grade 4) Neutropenia (DSN) During Cycle 1
1 days
Standard Deviation 2.6
1 days
Standard Deviation 2.2
2 days
Standard Deviation 3.5

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 days

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants.

Number of participants with Grade 4 SN was a binary variable. If a participants had at least 1 ANC value \< 0.5 ×10\^9/L during the treatment period, the participants was assigned as "yes" to the occurrence of SN. Otherwise, it was "no".

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=34 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Number of Participants With Severe (Grade 4) Neutropenia (SN)
Grade 4 neutropenia: No
27 Participants
25 Participants
21 Participants
Number of Participants With Severe (Grade 4) Neutropenia (SN)
Grade 4 neutropenia: Yes
8 Participants
9 Participants
12 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From date of randomization until the occurrence of progressive disease or a censoring event, assessed up to a maximum of 875 days

Population: The response-evaluable (RE) analysis set included all participants who were in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis set, had measurable disease (target lesions \[TLs\]) at the baseline tumor assessment, and had (1) at least 1 post-baseline tumor assessment, (2) clinical progression (as noted by the investigator) before their first post-baseline tumor scan, or (3) died due to disease progression before their first post-baseline tumor scan.

BOR was defined as the best response across all time points (RECIST v1.1). The best overall response was determined once all the data for the participant is known. Each participant has been assigned one of the following categories (RECIST 1.1): complete response (CR): disappearance of all target lesions; partial response (PR): \>= 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters; progression disease (PD): \>= 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study); stable disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD); NE: not evaluable and missing.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=31 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=24 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=30 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Complete response (CR)
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Not evaluable (NE)
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Missing
1 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Stable disease (SD)
15 Participants
11 Participants
9 Participants
Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Progressive disease (PD)
3 Participants
6 Participants
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Partial response (PR)
11 Participants
7 Participants
15 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From date of randomization until the occurrence of progressive disease or a censoring event, assessed up to a maximum of 875 days

Population: The RE analysis set included all participants who were in the mITT analysis set, had measurable disease TLs at the baseline tumor assessment, and had (1) at least 1 post-baseline tumor assessment, (2) clinical progression (as noted by the investigator) before their first post-baseline tumor scan, or (3) died due to disease progression before their first post-baseline tumor scan. Here, "Overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

DOR is the time between first response by RECIST Version 1.1 of CR or PR and the first date that progressive disease is documented by RECIST Version 1.1, or death. Participants who do not experience PD or death was censored at the last tumor assessment date. 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=11 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=7 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=15 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Duration of Objective Response (DOR) as Per RECIST v1.1 as Determined by Investigator
9.6 months
Interval 3.1 to 12.6
7.8 months
Interval 7.5 to
Due to small number of events, estimates (upper limit of 95% Confidence interval) from Kaplan-Meier survival curves could not be derived.
11.5 months
Interval 4.8 to 17.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From date of randomization to date of death due to any cause, assessed up to a maximum of 1120 days

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants.

Overall survival was defined as the time (months) from date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants who do not die during the study were censored at the date last known to be alive. The OS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=34 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Overall Survival (OS)
17.8 months
Interval 12.9 to 32.7
12.6 months
Interval 6.3 to 15.6
NA months
Interval 10.2 to
Data could not be estimated due to higher number (\>50%) of censored participants.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From date of randomization until the occurrence of disease progression, death due to any cause or a censoring event, assessed up to a maximum of 875 days

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants.

PFS was defined as the time (months) from date of randomization until date of documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever comes first. PD: \>= 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study). The PFS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=34 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per RECIST v1.1 as Determined by Investigator
7.3 months
Interval 6.2 to 13.9
5.7 months
Interval 3.3 to 9.2
9.4 months
Interval 6.1 to 11.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 871 days

Population: The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

Relative dose intensity was defined as 100% times the actual dose intensity divided by the planned dose intensity. The planned dose intensity was defined as the cumulative planned dose through the study divided by (number of cycles × 3 weeks). Relative dose intensity (%) was calculated as: for gemcitabine (100 \* \[Dose intensity (mg/m2/week) / (2000/3 (mg/m2/week)\]); for carboplatin (100 \* \[Dose intensity (AUC/week)/ (4/3) (AUC/week)\]) and for trilaciclib (100 \* \[Dose intensity (mg/m2/week)/ (480 /3 (mg/m2/week)\] for Group 2 and 100 \* \[Dose intensity (mg/m2/week) / (960 /3 (mg/m2/week)\] for Group 3).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=30 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Relative Dose Intensity of Gemcitabine and Carboplatin
Carboplatin
81.7 percentage of dose
Standard Deviation 16.09
77.5 percentage of dose
Standard Deviation 19.20
79.1 percentage of dose
Standard Deviation 15.88
Relative Dose Intensity of Gemcitabine and Carboplatin
Gemcitabine
81.0 percentage of dose
Standard Deviation 14.49
79.1 percentage of dose
Standard Deviation 18.29
80.8 percentage of dose
Standard Deviation 12.51

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 871 days

Population: The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

Duration of exposure (days) = First dose date of study drug from the last cycle - first dose date of study drug + 21.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=30 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Duration of Exposure
168 days
Interval 21.0 to 436.0
101 days
Interval 21.0 to 469.0
161 days
Interval 42.0 to 637.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 871 days

Population: The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

Participants were considered to have started a cycle if they have received at least 1 dose of any study drug.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=30 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Number of Cycles Participants Received Treatment in Each Treatment Arm
8 number of cycles
Standard Deviation 4.8
6 number of cycles
Standard Deviation 5.0
9 number of cycles
Standard Deviation 6.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 871 days

Population: The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

Cumulative dose: Sum of the total doses by cycle administered to a participant in the duration of exposure, i.e. total number of cycles received (milligram per meter square \[mg/m\^2\]).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=30 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Cumulative Dose of Gemcitabine
13277.2 mg/m^2
Standard Deviation 8722.51
10694.3 mg/m^2
Standard Deviation 9029.11
14680.9 mg/m^2
Standard Deviation 11557.90

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 871 days

Population: The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

Cumulative dose: Sum of the total doses by cycle (AUC) administered to a participant in the duration of exposure, i.e. total number of cycles received (in total prescribed AUC).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=30 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Cumulative Dose of Carboplatin
26.0 AUC (mg/mL/min)
Standard Deviation 16.33
20.3 AUC (mg/mL/min)
Standard Deviation 16.47
27.8 AUC (mg/mL/min)
Standard Deviation 21.21

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 1): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3.5, 5, 24 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 2) and Cycle 1 Day 2 (Group 3): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 4, 5.5, 24 hours post-dose (Each cycle is of 21 days)

Population: The pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set included all dosed participants with evaluable PK data. Here, "Overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Since, no participant received Trilaciclib in Group 1, data was not assessed and reported.

The observed peak plasma concentration was determined from the plasma concentration-versus time data.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=7 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=6 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Trilaciclib
1630 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 423
2280 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1790

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 1): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3.5, 5, 24 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 2) and Cycle 1 Day 2 (Group 3): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 4, 5.5, 24 hours post-dose (Each cycle is of 21 days)

Population: The PK analysis set included all dosed participants with evaluable PK data. Here, "Overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Since, no participant received Trilaciclib in Group 1, data was not assessed and reported.

AUC0-t was calculated with the linear/log-trapezoidal method, which uses linear interpolation between data points to calculate the AUC. The linear/log-trapezoidal method will be employed for all incremental trapezoids arising from increasing concentrations and the logarithmic trapezoidal method will be used for those arising from decreasing concentrations.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=7 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=6 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to t Hours (AUC0-t) of Trilaciclib
3800 hour* nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 910
3610 hour* nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1870

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 1): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3.5, 5, 24 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 2) and Cycle 1 Day 2 (Group 3): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 4, 5.5, 24 hours post-dose (Each cycle is of 21 days)

Population: The PK analysis set included all dosed participants with evaluable PK data. Here, "Overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Since, no participant received Trilaciclib in Group 1, data was not assessed and reported.

t1/2 was calculated as 0.693 divided by lambda z. lambda z (terminal phase rate constant) was determined by linear regression of at least 3 points on the terminal phase of the log-linear plasma concentration-time curve, the actual body exposure to drug after administration of a dose of the drug ( in mg\*h/L).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=6 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=5 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2) of Trilaciclib
5.31 hours
Interval 4.36 to 6.29
5.27 hours
Interval 3.98 to 6.64

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 1): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3.5, 5, 24 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 2) and Cycle 1 Day 2 (Group 3): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 4, 5.5, 24 hours post-dose (Each cycle is of 21 days)

Population: The PK analysis set included all dosed participants with evaluable PK data. Here, "Overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

The observed peak plasma concentration was determined from the plasma concentration-versus time data.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=5 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=1 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=5 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Gemcitabine
23.8 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 25.9
NA microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation NA
Data was not available since only one participant had sample in Group 1 and it was sufficient only for assessment of carboplatin.
18.0 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 4.04

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 1): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3.5, 5, 24 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 2) and Cycle 1 Day 2 (Group 3): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 4, 5.5, 24 hours post-dose (Each cycle is of 21 days)

Population: The PK analysis set included all dosed participants with evaluable PK data. Here, "Overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

AUC0-t was calculated with the linear/log-trapezoidal method.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=5 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=1 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=5 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to t Hours (AUC0-t) of Gemcitabine
15.4 hour*microgram per milliliter (h*mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 7.11
NA hour*microgram per milliliter (h*mcg/mL)
Data was not available since only one participant had sample in Group 1 and it was sufficient only for assessment of carboplatin.
20.4 hour*microgram per milliliter (h*mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 11.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 1): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3.5, 5, 24 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 2) and Cycle 1 Day 2 (Group 3): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 4, 5.5, 24 hours post-dose (Each cycle is of 21 days)

Population: The PK analysis set included all dosed participants with evaluable PK data. Here, "Overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

t1/2 was calculated as 0.693 divided by lambda z. lambda z (terminal phase rate constant) was determined by linear regression of at least 3 points on the terminal phase of the log-linear plasma concentration-time curve.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=5 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=1 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=5 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2) of Free Carboplatin
1.79 hours
Interval 1.35 to 4.86
5.23 hours
2.49 hours
Interval 1.32 to 2.93

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 1): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3.5, 5, 24 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 2) and Cycle 1 Day 2 (Group 3): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 4, 5.5, 24 hours post-dose (Each cycle is of 21 days)

Population: The PK analysis set included all dosed participants with evaluable PK data. Here, "Overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

Clearance after intravenous infusion administration was calculated as: CL=Dose/AUC0-inf. AUC0-inf was calculated as: AUC0-inf=AUClast+Clast/lambdaz where Clast is the last quantifiable concentration in the terminal elimination phase.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=5 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=1 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=3 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Clearance (CL) of of Free Carboplatin
13.7 Liter/hour (L/h)
Standard Deviation 4.48
6.65 Liter/hour (L/h)
14.0 Liter/hour (L/h)
Standard Deviation 2.80

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 1): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3.5, 5, 24 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 1 (Group 2) and Cycle 1 Day 2 (Group 3): Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 4, 5.5, 24 hours post-dose (Each cycle is of 21 days)

Population: The PK analysis set included all dosed participants with evaluable PK data. Here, "Overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

Vss was the volume of distribution at steady state of free carboplatin was reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=5 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=1 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=5 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of Free Carboplatin
34.0 Liter
Standard Deviation 8.99
44.4 Liter
35.0 Liter
Standard Deviation 12.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 days

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants.

Hematologic toxicities events were defined as any cycle where any hematologic lab value occurs that meets the CTCAE toxicity grade criteria for \>= Grade 3 and the value is treatment emergent. The occurrence of Grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities was a binary endpoint. If a participant had at least 1 cycle with at least one Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities during the treatment period, the participant was assigned as Yes to the occurrence of Grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities; otherwise, it was No. If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 was assigned to that participant.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=34 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Number of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Hematologic Toxicities
Participants with Grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities: Yes
27 Participants
25 Participants
30 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Hematologic Toxicities
Participants with Grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities: No
8 Participants
9 Participants
3 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 days

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants.

Hematologic toxicities events are defined as any cycle where any hematologic lab value occurs that meets the CTCAE toxicity grade criteria for \>= Grade 3 and the value is treatment emergent. The occurrence of Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia was a binary endpoint. If a participant had at least 1 cycle with at least one Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia during the treatment period, the participant was assigned as "Yes" to the occurrence of Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia; otherwise, it was "No". If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 was assigned to that participant.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=34 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Number of Participants With Grade 3 or 4 Thrombocytopenia
19 Participants
21 Participants
12 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 days

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants.

MAHE was a composite endpoint incorporating the measurement of several clinically meaningful aspects of myelosuppression into a single endpoint by summing of the total number of events across a set of pre-specified components.The individual components for MAHE were all-cause hospitalizations, all-cause dose reductions, febrile neutropenia, prolonged severe neutropenia (duration \> 5 days), RBC transfusion and platelet transfusion. Event rate for MAHE was calculated as the number of events/durations of treatment period divided by 7 days/1 week.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=34 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Major Adverse Hematologic Event (MAHE) Rate
0.080 event rate per week
0.153 event rate per week
0.108 event rate per week

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 days

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants.

The criterion for identifying FN was if the PT was "FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA" the occurrence during the treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); Yes if total number of events \>=1 was observed, No for other scenarios. If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 was assigned to that participant.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=34 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Number of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia (FN)
0 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 days

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants.

Number of participants with infection SAEs during the treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); Yes if total number of events \>=1 was observed, No for other scenarios. If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 was assigned to that participant. The criterion for identifying the proper infection SAE records was as follows: If the system organ class (SOC) from Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) takes value "INFECTIONS AND INFESTATIONS," and the AE was a serious event.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=34 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Number of Participants With Infection SAEs
Participants with Infection SAEs: Yes
0 Participants
2 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Infection SAEs
Participants with Infection SAEs: No
35 Participants
32 Participants
33 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Day 35 through the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 508 days

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants.

Each RBC transfusion with a unique start date on/after 5 weeks on study during the treatment period was defined as a separate event. Occurrence during the treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); "Yes" if the total number of events \>=1 was observed and "No" for other scenarios. If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 will be assigned to that participant.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=34 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Number of Participants With Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions On/After Week 5 (Day 35)
Participants with RBC transfusions on/after Week 5: Yes
8 Participants
12 Participants
11 Participants
Number of Participants With Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions On/After Week 5 (Day 35)
Participants with RBC transfusions on/after Week 5: No
27 Participants
22 Participants
22 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 days

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants.

Each platelet transfusion with a unique start date during the treatment period was defined as a separate event. The occurrence during the treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); Yes if the total number of events \>=1 was observed and No for other scenarios. If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 will be assigned to that participant.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=34 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Number of Participants With Platelet Transfusions
Participants with platelet transfusion: Yes
6 Participants
4 Participants
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Platelet Transfusions
Participants with platelet transfusion: No
29 Participants
30 Participants
30 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 days

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants.

The criterion for selecting proper records is as follows: If the chemical subgroup from the World Health Organization-Drug Dictionary (WHO-DD) takes value "COLONY STIMULATING FACTOR," the medication was classified as G-CSF. The occurrence during the treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); "Yes" if the total number of events \>=1 was observed and "No" for other scenarios. If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 will be assigned to that participant.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=34 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Number of Participants With Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor (G-CSF) Administration
Participants with G-CSF Administration: Yes
14 Participants
16 Participants
21 Participants
Number of Participants With Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor (G-CSF) Administration
Participants with G-CSF Administration: No
21 Participants
18 Participants
12 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 days

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants.

The occurrence during the treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); "Yes" if total number of events \>=1 was observed, "No" for other scenarios. If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 was assigned to that participant. The criterion to select proper records was as follows: If the chemical subgroup from WHO-DD Version September 2017 (i.e., TEXT4 for CODE4) takes value "OTHER ANTIANEMIC PREPARATIONS", the medication was classified as ESAs.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=34 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Number of Participants With Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agent (ESA) Administration
Participants with ESA Administration: Yes
3 Participants
4 Participants
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agent (ESA) Administration
Participants with ESA Administration: No
32 Participants
30 Participants
31 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 days

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants.

The criteria for identifying an IV antibiotic administration event was (1) if the Therapeutic subgroup from WHO-DD version takes value "ANTIBACTERIALS FOR SYSTEMIC USE", and (2) the route of medication was "intravenous" or the route was "other" with the detailed specification as "IVPB". The occurrence during the treatment period was defined as a binary variable (Yes or No); "Yes" if total number of events \>=1 was observed, "No" for other scenarios. If a participant did not have an event, the value of 0 was assigned to that participant.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=34 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Number of Participants With Intravenous Antibiotics Use
Participants with Intravenous Antibiotics Use: Yes
0 Participants
6 Participants
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Intravenous Antibiotics Use
Participants with Intravenous Antibiotics Use: No
35 Participants
28 Participants
28 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of randomization, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 542 days

Population: The ITT analysis set included all randomized participants.

Dose reductions were not permitted for trilaciclib. Dose reductions for gemcitabine or carboplatin were collected on the dosing page. No more than 3 dose modifications for toxicity in total were allowed for any participant. All dose reductions were counted as a separate event. Discontinuations of an individual component of the chemotherapy regimen were counted as a dose reduction If the participant continued the other chemotherapy drug as a monotherapy. Event rate was calculated as the total number of cycles with an event divided by the total number of cycles.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=34 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
All-cause Dose Reductions, Event Rate (Per Cycle)
0.133 event rate per cycle
0.141 event rate per cycle
0.118 event rate per cycle

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 871 days

Population: The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

Dose modifications was summarized for each study drug based on number of cycles received during the treatment period. If the participant was unable to start a new cycle at that next visit, then the cycle is delayed, the reason entered, and the question was asked again at the next visit until the participant either starts a new cycle or discontinues treatment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=30 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Dose Modifications: Number of Participants With Cycle Delays
22 Participants
17 Participants
19 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 871 days

Population: The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

Dose modifications was summarized for each study drug based on skipped doses not received during the treatment period. Primary reasons for skipped doses included toxicity, investigator decision and administrative reasons (e.g., holidays).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=30 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Dose Modifications - Number of Participants With Skipped Doses
13 Participants
15 Participants
20 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 871 days

Population: The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

Dose interruptions was defined as interruption of infusion, regardless of whether the study drug was continued after the interruption.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=30 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Dose Modifications: Number of Participants With Any Dose Interruptions
Carboplatin
0 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
Dose Modifications: Number of Participants With Any Dose Interruptions
Trilaciclib
5 Participants
NA Participants
Here, 'NA' signifies that Trilaciclib drug was not administered in this specified arm.
3 Participants
Dose Modifications: Number of Participants With Any Dose Interruptions
Gemcitabine
0 Participants
2 Participants
4 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 871 days

Population: The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

Dose (mg/m2) reductions were not permitted for trilaciclib. Dose reductions for carboplatin and gemcitabine were determined by comparing the planned dose on the respective drug administration pages between the current cycle and the previous cycle.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=30 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Dose Modifications - Number of Participants With Dose Reductions
Carboplatin
15 Participants
10 Participants
13 Participants
Dose Modifications - Number of Participants With Dose Reductions
Gemcitabine
17 Participants
13 Participants
20 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: During the treatment period. From date of first dose, 21 day treatment cycles continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or discontinuation by the patient or investigator, assessed up to a maximum of 1116 days

Population: The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

An Adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Any AE that started on or after the first dose of study drugs was included as a TEAE. A Serious AE was defined as any AE, occurring at any dose (including after the informed consent form was signed and prior to dosing) and regardless of causality that met one, more of the following criteria: results in death, life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent, significant disability/incapacity, a congenital abnormality/birth defect, an important medical event. TEAEs included serious and non-serious TEAEs.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=30 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 Participants
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs
Participants with any TEAEs
34 Participants
30 Participants
33 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs
Participants with any Serious TEAEs
4 Participants
10 Participants
11 Participants

Adverse Events

Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)

Serious events: 10 serious events
Other events: 30 other events
Deaths: 25 deaths

Group 2: Trilaciclib (G1T28)+ Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)

Serious events: 11 serious events
Other events: 33 other events
Deaths: 13 deaths

Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)

Serious events: 4 serious events
Other events: 34 other events
Deaths: 20 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=30 participants at risk
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib (G1T28)+ Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 participants at risk
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 participants at risk
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Vascular disorders
Embolism
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
General disorders
Pain
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Psychiatric disorders
Suicidal ideation
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lumbar vertebral fracture
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Subdural haematoma
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Cardiac disorders
Acute left ventricular failure
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Cardiac disorders
Pericardial effusion
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Cardiac disorders
Right ventricular failure
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Obstructive airways disorder
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleuritic pain
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile neutropenia
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Normochromic normocytic anaemia
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ascites
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Enteritis
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Faecaloma
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oesophageal stenosis
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Varices oesophageal
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary tract obstruction
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myositis
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetic ketoacidosis
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercalcaemia
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Infections and infestations
Bacteraemia
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Infections and infestations
Lung infection
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Group 1: Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=30 participants at risk
Participants received IV infusion of standard GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The carboplatin dose was calculated using the Calvert formula, with a target AUC 2 (maximum 300 mg).
Group 2: Trilaciclib (G1T28)+ Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 1 and 8)
n=33 participants at risk
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Group 3: Trilaciclib (Days 1, 2, 8 and 9) + Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (Days 2 and 9)
n=35 participants at risk
Participants received IV infusion of trilaciclib 240 mg/m\^2 on Days 1, 2, 8, and 9 plus GC chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 and carboplatin AUC 2) IV infusion on Day 2 and 9 of 21-day cycles. Trilaciclib was administered prior to chemotherapy.
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 7 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Vascular disorders
Hot flush
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Vascular disorders
Thrombophlebitis superficial
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
8.6%
3/35 • Number of events 7 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
General disorders
Fatigue
36.7%
11/30 • Number of events 17 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
42.4%
14/33 • Number of events 22 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
45.7%
16/35 • Number of events 35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
13.3%
4/30 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
12.1%
4/33 • Number of events 7 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
11.4%
4/35 • Number of events 8 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
General disorders
Pyrexia
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
18.2%
6/33 • Number of events 8 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
General disorders
Pain
16.7%
5/30 • Number of events 7 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
8.6%
3/35 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
General disorders
Chills
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
18.2%
6/33 • Number of events 7 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
General disorders
Influenza like illness
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
11.4%
4/35 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
General disorders
Catheter site pain
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
General disorders
Chest pain
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
General disorders
Chest discomfort
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
General disorders
Infusion site pain
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
General disorders
Mucosal inflammation
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
11.4%
4/35 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
15.2%
5/33 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
13.3%
4/30 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
11.4%
4/35 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Breast pain
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
8.6%
3/35 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Infusion related reaction
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
21.2%
7/33 • Number of events 35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
11.4%
4/35 • Number of events 6 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
26.7%
8/30 • Number of events 20 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
36.4%
12/33 • Number of events 50 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
31.4%
11/35 • Number of events 30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
26.7%
8/30 • Number of events 38 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
24.2%
8/33 • Number of events 13 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
34.3%
12/35 • Number of events 44 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
12.1%
4/33 • Number of events 6 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
11.4%
4/35 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 6 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
12.1%
4/33 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
11.4%
4/35 • Number of events 7 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Investigations
White blood cell count decreased
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 7 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
12.1%
4/33 • Number of events 7 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Investigations
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Investigations
Weight decreased
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Investigations
Haemoglobin decreased
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Investigations
Weight increased
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
73.3%
22/30 • Number of events 61 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
48.5%
16/33 • Number of events 46 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
42.9%
15/35 • Number of events 35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
43.3%
13/30 • Number of events 49 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
45.5%
15/33 • Number of events 79 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
34.3%
12/35 • Number of events 31 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
43.3%
13/30 • Number of events 68 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
39.4%
13/33 • Number of events 55 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
31.4%
11/35 • Number of events 55 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
16.7%
5/30 • Number of events 9 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
9.1%
3/33 • Number of events 12 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
27.3%
9/33 • Number of events 10 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
17.1%
6/35 • Number of events 7 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
24.2%
8/33 • Number of events 8 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
20.0%
7/35 • Number of events 9 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
11.4%
4/35 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
9.1%
3/33 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Upper-airway cough syndrome
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
20.0%
6/30 • Number of events 9 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
27.3%
9/33 • Number of events 11 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
40.0%
14/35 • Number of events 22 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
20.0%
6/30 • Number of events 8 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
12.1%
4/33 • Number of events 7 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
17.1%
6/35 • Number of events 11 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
15.2%
5/33 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Nervous system disorders
Cognitive disorders
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Nervous system disorders
Restless legs syndrome
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Nervous system disorders
Burning sensation
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Eye disorders
Lacrimation increased
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Tinnitus
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
23.3%
7/30 • Number of events 8 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
42.4%
14/33 • Number of events 19 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
48.6%
17/35 • Number of events 31 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
26.7%
8/30 • Number of events 9 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
24.2%
8/33 • Number of events 23 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
31.4%
11/35 • Number of events 18 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
16.7%
5/30 • Number of events 6 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
27.3%
9/33 • Number of events 16 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
25.7%
9/35 • Number of events 11 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
13.3%
4/30 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
27.3%
9/33 • Number of events 15 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
14.3%
5/35 • Number of events 6 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
15.2%
5/33 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
12.1%
4/33 • Number of events 6 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
9.1%
3/33 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
8.6%
3/35 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
9.1%
3/33 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Renal and urinary disorders
Pollakiuria
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
15.2%
5/33 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
17.1%
6/35 • Number of events 6 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
9.1%
3/33 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
11.4%
4/35 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
12.1%
4/33 • Number of events 21 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
8.6%
3/35 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
9.1%
3/33 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
8.6%
3/35 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash maculo-papular
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
21.2%
7/33 • Number of events 15 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
8.6%
3/35 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
18.2%
6/33 • Number of events 7 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
8.6%
3/35 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
12.1%
4/33 • Number of events 6 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
8.6%
3/35 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bone pain
13.3%
4/30 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
16.7%
5/30 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal chest pain
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
8.6%
3/35 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
11.4%
4/35 • Number of events 6 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Flank pain
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
9.1%
3/33 • Number of events 6 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
9.1%
3/33 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
12.1%
4/33 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
14.3%
5/35 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
15.2%
5/33 • Number of events 6 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
11.4%
4/35 • Number of events 7 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Hypophosphataemia
0.00%
0/30 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
9.1%
3/33 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
8.6%
3/35 • Number of events 7 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Dehydration
13.3%
4/30 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypomagnesaemia
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Hypoalbuminaemia
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Hypocalcaemia
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Hyperlipidaemia
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
16.7%
5/30 • Number of events 5 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
12.1%
4/33 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
8.6%
3/35 • Number of events 4 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
9.1%
3/33 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 3 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/33 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
0.00%
0/35 • From date of randomization up to 1121 days
Safety evaluations were conducted at baseline and throughout the study. Safety surveillance reporting of AEs and SAEs commenced at the time of informed consent and continued through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (safety follow-up phone call). The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

Additional Information

Clinical Trial Info

G1 Therapeutics, Inc

Phone: +1 9192139835

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The investigator will submit results communications for review by the sponsor at least 60 days prior to expected submission to the intended publisher or meeting committee. This review period may be shortened upon mutual consent. The sponsor may request modification of any publication, presentation or use by the investigator if such activity may jeopardize a patent application, an existing patent, or other proprietary rights.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER