Minimal Invasive Breast Cancer Excision Using the Breast Lesion Excision System Under Ultrasound Guidance

NCT ID: NCT02975128

Last Updated: 2020-05-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-02-19

Study Completion Date

2019-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will assess whether it is feasible to remove small breast cancers completely using the Breast Lesion Excision System under Ultrasound guidance.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rationale: In the Netherlands, ≥7000 women are operated for small breast cancers yearly. In this study, we will evaluate under which conditions it is possible to excise small breast cancers using the Breast Lesion Excision System (BLES) under ultrasound (US) guidance. When successful, this will allow ambulatory treatment of women with small breast cancers, improving the cosmetic outcome and quality of life.

Objective: Our study aim is to assess whether it is feasible to remove small breast cancers completely using the BLES system under US guidance.

Study design: This is a multi-centre, translational clinical phase II study in 125 women with cancers ≤1.5 cm based upon US measurements, and without mammographic evidence of more extensive disease (e.g. microcalcifications).

Study population: Women with cancers ≤1.5 cm based upon US measurements, if there is no mammographic evidence of more extensive disease (e.g. microcalcifications or extensive architectural distortion), and the tumor lies ≥6 mm away from the dermis, nipple or pectoral muscle, are eligible for this study.

Intervention: In 125 women with cancers ≤1.5 cm based upon US measurements, and without mammographic evidence of more extensive disease (e.g. microcalcifications), we will conduct additional preoperative breast MRI to ascertain lesion size, after informed consent has been obtained. If the lesion is confirmed ≤1.5 cm on MRI and lying ≥6 mm away from the dermis, nipple and pectoral muscle, the patient is eligible. Moreover, patients will be asked to fill out the questionnaire, detailing their risk profile and comorbidity index.

Under general anaesthesia for the normal surgical procedure, the tumor is first removed using the BLES system under US guidance, through a small skin incision (\<1 cm). Next, the normal surgical procedure is performed, excising the BLES excision cavity and a ≥ 1cm margin of surrounding tissue, also guided by the US appearance after the BLES procedure. Margin assessment will be performed separately for the BLES excision and the surgical specimen of the surrounding tissue.

Main study parameters/endpoints: Main endpoint of the study is the frequency of successful complete tumor excision by the BLES system, where successful is defined as 'having tumor free margins, and no residual (in situ) cancer in the surgical specimen'.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Our approach allows to test the feasibility of this highly innovating approach to remove breast cancer, with minimal negative effects or possible complications.

While there is no direct benefit nor detrimental effect from this study to the patients participating, the study has large implications for many women, as breast cancer remains the most common cancer in women, and due to screening, most cancers are small. Further reduction of the impact of local treatment is still desired as the psychosocial and somatic effects of breast deformation can be substantial.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breastcancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

BLES system and conventional lumpectomy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Each patient undergoes the same procedure. Under general anaesthesia for the normal surgical procedure, the tumor is first removed using the BLES system under US guidance. Next, the normal surgical procedure is performed, excising the BLES excision cavity and a ≥ 1cm margin of surrounding tissue, also guided by the US appearance after the BLES procedure.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

BLES system and conventional lumpectomy

Each patient undergoes the same procedure. Under general anaesthesia for the normal surgical procedure, the tumor is first removed using the BLES system under US guidance. Next, the normal surgical procedure is performed, excising the BLES excision cavity and a ≥ 1cm margin of surrounding tissue, also guided by the US appearance after the BLES procedure.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Female
* 19 years or older
* US visible breast cancer with maximum diameter of 15 mm on US
* Histologically proven invasive breast cancer
* Willing and able to undergo preoperative breast MRI
* Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Poor US visibility of the breast cancer
* Breast cancer closer than 6 mm to the dermis, nipple or pectoral muscle.
* Contra-indications to breast MRI or intravenous contrast administration
* Contra-indications for the use of diathermia
* Unable to provide informed consent
* Patients with breast implants
* Patients with implanted electronics
* Pregnancy
* Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Dutch Cancer Society

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Radboud University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ritse Mann, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Radboud University Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Radboudumc

Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands

Site Status

Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital

Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Allen SD, Nerurkar A, Della Rovere GU. The breast lesion excision system (BLES): a novel technique in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of small indeterminate breast lesions? Eur Radiol. 2011 May;21(5):919-24. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-2000-7. Epub 2011 Jan 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21240608 (View on PubMed)

Sie A, Bryan DC, Gaines V, Killebrew LK, Kim CH, Morrison CC, Poller WR, Romilly AP, Schilling K, Sung JH. Multicenter evaluation of the breast lesion excision system, a percutaneous, vacuum-assisted, intact-specimen breast biopsy device. Cancer. 2006 Sep 1;107(5):945-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22090.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16874817 (View on PubMed)

Medjhoul A, Canale S, Mathieu MC, Uzan C, Garbay JR, Dromain C, Balleyguier C. Breast lesion excision sample (BLES biopsy) combining stereotactic biopsy and radiofrequency: is it a safe and accurate procedure in case of BIRADS 4 and 5 breast lesions? Breast J. 2013 Nov-Dec;19(6):590-4. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12184. Epub 2013 Sep 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24102869 (View on PubMed)

Allen SD, Osin P, Nerurkar A. The radiological excision of high risk and malignant lesions using the INTACT breast lesion excision system. A case series with an imaging follow up of at least 5 years. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jul;40(7):824-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.03.022. Epub 2014 Apr 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24742589 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NL58040.091.16

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Percutaneous Excision Trial
NCT00720642 COMPLETED