Minimal Invasive Breast Cancer Excision Using the Breast Lesion Excision System Under Ultrasound Guidance
NCT ID: NCT02975128
Last Updated: 2020-05-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
22 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-02-19
2019-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Minimal Invasive Breast Cancer Excision Using Vacuum Assisted Biopsy Under Ultrasound Guidance
NCT04107636
Efficacy of MR-HIFU Ablation of Breast Cancer
NCT02407613
A Registry Study Evaluating Outcomes in Breast Biopsy With the Intact™ Breast Lesion Excision System (BLES)
NCT03520127
Non Surgical Treatment (Microwave Ablation) of Breast Cancer
NCT05887154
Comparison of Microwave Ablation With Cryoablation for Breast Tumor
NCT03286413
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective: Our study aim is to assess whether it is feasible to remove small breast cancers completely using the BLES system under US guidance.
Study design: This is a multi-centre, translational clinical phase II study in 125 women with cancers ≤1.5 cm based upon US measurements, and without mammographic evidence of more extensive disease (e.g. microcalcifications).
Study population: Women with cancers ≤1.5 cm based upon US measurements, if there is no mammographic evidence of more extensive disease (e.g. microcalcifications or extensive architectural distortion), and the tumor lies ≥6 mm away from the dermis, nipple or pectoral muscle, are eligible for this study.
Intervention: In 125 women with cancers ≤1.5 cm based upon US measurements, and without mammographic evidence of more extensive disease (e.g. microcalcifications), we will conduct additional preoperative breast MRI to ascertain lesion size, after informed consent has been obtained. If the lesion is confirmed ≤1.5 cm on MRI and lying ≥6 mm away from the dermis, nipple and pectoral muscle, the patient is eligible. Moreover, patients will be asked to fill out the questionnaire, detailing their risk profile and comorbidity index.
Under general anaesthesia for the normal surgical procedure, the tumor is first removed using the BLES system under US guidance, through a small skin incision (\<1 cm). Next, the normal surgical procedure is performed, excising the BLES excision cavity and a ≥ 1cm margin of surrounding tissue, also guided by the US appearance after the BLES procedure. Margin assessment will be performed separately for the BLES excision and the surgical specimen of the surrounding tissue.
Main study parameters/endpoints: Main endpoint of the study is the frequency of successful complete tumor excision by the BLES system, where successful is defined as 'having tumor free margins, and no residual (in situ) cancer in the surgical specimen'.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Our approach allows to test the feasibility of this highly innovating approach to remove breast cancer, with minimal negative effects or possible complications.
While there is no direct benefit nor detrimental effect from this study to the patients participating, the study has large implications for many women, as breast cancer remains the most common cancer in women, and due to screening, most cancers are small. Further reduction of the impact of local treatment is still desired as the psychosocial and somatic effects of breast deformation can be substantial.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients
BLES system and conventional lumpectomy
Each patient undergoes the same procedure. Under general anaesthesia for the normal surgical procedure, the tumor is first removed using the BLES system under US guidance. Next, the normal surgical procedure is performed, excising the BLES excision cavity and a ≥ 1cm margin of surrounding tissue, also guided by the US appearance after the BLES procedure.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
BLES system and conventional lumpectomy
Each patient undergoes the same procedure. Under general anaesthesia for the normal surgical procedure, the tumor is first removed using the BLES system under US guidance. Next, the normal surgical procedure is performed, excising the BLES excision cavity and a ≥ 1cm margin of surrounding tissue, also guided by the US appearance after the BLES procedure.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 19 years or older
* US visible breast cancer with maximum diameter of 15 mm on US
* Histologically proven invasive breast cancer
* Willing and able to undergo preoperative breast MRI
* Able to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Breast cancer closer than 6 mm to the dermis, nipple or pectoral muscle.
* Contra-indications to breast MRI or intravenous contrast administration
* Contra-indications for the use of diathermia
* Unable to provide informed consent
* Patients with breast implants
* Patients with implanted electronics
* Pregnancy
* Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
19 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital
OTHER
Dutch Cancer Society
OTHER
Radboud University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ritse Mann, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Radboud University Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Radboudumc
Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital
Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Allen SD, Nerurkar A, Della Rovere GU. The breast lesion excision system (BLES): a novel technique in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of small indeterminate breast lesions? Eur Radiol. 2011 May;21(5):919-24. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-2000-7. Epub 2011 Jan 15.
Sie A, Bryan DC, Gaines V, Killebrew LK, Kim CH, Morrison CC, Poller WR, Romilly AP, Schilling K, Sung JH. Multicenter evaluation of the breast lesion excision system, a percutaneous, vacuum-assisted, intact-specimen breast biopsy device. Cancer. 2006 Sep 1;107(5):945-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22090.
Medjhoul A, Canale S, Mathieu MC, Uzan C, Garbay JR, Dromain C, Balleyguier C. Breast lesion excision sample (BLES biopsy) combining stereotactic biopsy and radiofrequency: is it a safe and accurate procedure in case of BIRADS 4 and 5 breast lesions? Breast J. 2013 Nov-Dec;19(6):590-4. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12184. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
Allen SD, Osin P, Nerurkar A. The radiological excision of high risk and malignant lesions using the INTACT breast lesion excision system. A case series with an imaging follow up of at least 5 years. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jul;40(7):824-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.03.022. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NL58040.091.16
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.