Sorafenib Versus Best Supportive Care in Egyptian Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients.
NCT ID: NCT02971696
Last Updated: 2018-06-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
55 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-12-31
2018-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Sorafenib In Egyptian Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
NCT06030895
Clinical Pharmacogenetic Study of Sorafenib in Egyptian Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT06527495
Sorafenib Plus Tegafur-uracil (UFT) Versus Sorafenib as First Line Systemic Treatment for Patients With Advanced Stage HCC, Unresectable & Not Eligible for Local Ablation and/or TACE
NCT01539018
Assessment of the Efficacy of Lenvatinib Versus Sorafenib in the Management of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT05391867
HAIC Plus Lenvatinib vs HAIC Plus Sorafenib for Advanced HCC
NCT03775395
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In 2014 Omar et al. reviewed 41 patients in a study to evaluate Sorafenib for Egyptian patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma at a median follow up period of 13 months, the median PFS for the whole group was 4 months; the median OS for the whole group is 6.25 months.(Abdel-Rahman et al., 2014)
Till current, no studies have evaluated the Sorafenib efficacy in comparison to the best supportive care treatment in HCC patients whose etiology from HCV genotype 4 ( the most prevalent hepatitis C virus genotype in Egypt).
So, The study aims to evaluate the efficacy of sorafenib, compared to the best supportive care (BSC), in two cohorts of patients who presented with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on etiology of hepatitis C virus.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
HCC patients (Group 1)
Sorafenib will be administrated at a dose of 400 mg twice daily (consisting of two 200-mg tablets).Treatment interruptions and up to two dose reductions (first to 400 mg once daily and then to 400 mg every 2 days) will permitted for drug- related adverse effects. If further dose reductions will required, patients will withdraw from the study
Sorafenib
Sorafenib will be administrated at a dose of 400 mg twice daily (consisting of two 200-mg tablets).Treatment interruptions and up to two dose reductions (first to 400 mg once daily and then to 400 mg every 2 days) will permitted for drug- related adverse effects. If further dose reductions will required, patients will withdraw from the study
HCC patients (Group 2)
Patient will take best supportive care
Best Supportive care
Liver Support, pain management
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sorafenib
Sorafenib will be administrated at a dose of 400 mg twice daily (consisting of two 200-mg tablets).Treatment interruptions and up to two dose reductions (first to 400 mg once daily and then to 400 mg every 2 days) will permitted for drug- related adverse effects. If further dose reductions will required, patients will withdraw from the study
Best Supportive care
Liver Support, pain management
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients based on etiology of hepatitis C virus.
3. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 2 or less
4. Child-Pugh liver function class A,B
5. A life expectancy of 12 weeks or more
6. adequate hematologic function (platelet count, ≥60×109 per liter; hemoglobin, ≥8.5 g per deciliter; and prothrombin time international normalized ratio, ≤2.3; or prothrombin time, ≤6 seconds above control), adequate hepatic function (albumin, ≥2.8 g per deciliter; total bilirubin, ≤3 mg per deciliter \[51.3 µmol per liter\]; and alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase, ≤5 times the upper limit of the normal range), and adequate renal function (serum creatinine, ≤1.5 times the upper limit of the normal range).
7. Patients were required to have at least one untreated target lesion that could be measured in one dimension, according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)
Exclusion Criteria
2. Any co morbid disease that will confuse the assessment of the Quality of life questionnaire scoreFHSI-8 score.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ain Shams University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Noha El Baghdady
Ph.D Candidate
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
AbdelRahman Elnaggar, Prof.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
MTI University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
El Kahraba Hosital
Cairo, N/A = Not Applicable, Egypt
Ain Shams University Hospital
Cairo, , Egypt
Nasser Institute
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
40
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.