Sorafenib Versus Best Supportive Care in Egyptian Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients.

NCT ID: NCT02971696

Last Updated: 2018-06-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

55 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-12-31

Study Completion Date

2018-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of sorafenib, compared to the best supportive care (BSC), in two cohorts of patients who presented with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on etiology of hepatitis C virus.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In Egypt, chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection occurs in around 10% of the population (about 8 million individuals), and is a leading cause of liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and mortality. Although HCV genotype 4 constitutes about 20% of HCV infections worldwide, the prevalence in Egypt is more than 90%.(Waked et al., 2016)

In 2014 Omar et al. reviewed 41 patients in a study to evaluate Sorafenib for Egyptian patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma at a median follow up period of 13 months, the median PFS for the whole group was 4 months; the median OS for the whole group is 6.25 months.(Abdel-Rahman et al., 2014)

Till current, no studies have evaluated the Sorafenib efficacy in comparison to the best supportive care treatment in HCC patients whose etiology from HCV genotype 4 ( the most prevalent hepatitis C virus genotype in Egypt).

So, The study aims to evaluate the efficacy of sorafenib, compared to the best supportive care (BSC), in two cohorts of patients who presented with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on etiology of hepatitis C virus.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HCC

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

HCC patients (Group 1)

Sorafenib will be administrated at a dose of 400 mg twice daily (consisting of two 200-mg tablets).Treatment interruptions and up to two dose reductions (first to 400 mg once daily and then to 400 mg every 2 days) will permitted for drug- related adverse effects. If further dose reductions will required, patients will withdraw from the study

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sorafenib

Intervention Type DRUG

Sorafenib will be administrated at a dose of 400 mg twice daily (consisting of two 200-mg tablets).Treatment interruptions and up to two dose reductions (first to 400 mg once daily and then to 400 mg every 2 days) will permitted for drug- related adverse effects. If further dose reductions will required, patients will withdraw from the study

HCC patients (Group 2)

Patient will take best supportive care

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Best Supportive care

Intervention Type DRUG

Liver Support, pain management

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sorafenib

Sorafenib will be administrated at a dose of 400 mg twice daily (consisting of two 200-mg tablets).Treatment interruptions and up to two dose reductions (first to 400 mg once daily and then to 400 mg every 2 days) will permitted for drug- related adverse effects. If further dose reductions will required, patients will withdraw from the study

Intervention Type DRUG

Best Supportive care

Liver Support, pain management

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

nexavar Liver Support

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients ≥18 years of age
2. Patients based on etiology of hepatitis C virus.
3. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 2 or less
4. Child-Pugh liver function class A,B
5. A life expectancy of 12 weeks or more
6. adequate hematologic function (platelet count, ≥60×109 per liter; hemoglobin, ≥8.5 g per deciliter; and prothrombin time international normalized ratio, ≤2.3; or prothrombin time, ≤6 seconds above control), adequate hepatic function (albumin, ≥2.8 g per deciliter; total bilirubin, ≤3 mg per deciliter \[51.3 µmol per liter\]; and alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase, ≤5 times the upper limit of the normal range), and adequate renal function (serum creatinine, ≤1.5 times the upper limit of the normal range).
7. Patients were required to have at least one untreated target lesion that could be measured in one dimension, according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)

Exclusion Criteria

1. Had previously received molecularly targeted therapies or any other systemic treatment.
2. Any co morbid disease that will confuse the assessment of the Quality of life questionnaire scoreFHSI-8 score.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ain Shams University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Noha El Baghdady

Ph.D Candidate

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

AbdelRahman Elnaggar, Prof.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

MTI University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

El Kahraba Hosital

Cairo, N/A = Not Applicable, Egypt

Site Status

Ain Shams University Hospital

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Nasser Institute

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

40

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.