Trial Outcomes & Findings for Phase 3 Study to Evaluate Efficacy of Amifampridine Phosphate in Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome (LEMS) (NCT NCT02970162)
NCT ID: NCT02970162
Last Updated: 2018-12-24
Results Overview
The QMG is a physician-rated test including 13 assessments such as facial strength, swallowing, grip strength, and duration of time that limbs can be maintained in outstretched positions. Each assessment is graded as 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), or 3 (severe), for a total range of 0-39. A higher total score indicates a worse outcome.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
26 participants
change from baseline in QMG score at end of day 4
2018-12-24
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Amifampridine Phosphate
amifampridine phosphate 10 mg (amifampridine equivalent) by mouth, 30 to 80 mg total daily dose, 3 to 4 times per day for 4 days
Amifampridine Phosphate
|
Placebo (for Amifampridine Phosphate)
placebo by mouth 3 to 4 times per day for 4 days
Placebo Oral Tablet
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
13
|
13
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
13
|
13
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Phase 3 Study to Evaluate Efficacy of Amifampridine Phosphate in Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome (LEMS)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Amifampridine Phosphate
n=13 Participants
amifampridine phosphate 10 mg (amifampridine equivalent) by mouth, 30 to 80 mg total daily dose, 3 to 4 times per day for 4 days
Amifampridine Phosphate
|
Placebo (for Amifampridine Phosphate)
n=13 Participants
placebo by mouth 3 to 4 times per day for 4 days
Placebo Oral Tablet
|
Total
n=26 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
54.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.51 • n=5 Participants
|
53.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.46 • n=7 Participants
|
54.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.30 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Weight
|
77.62 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.312 • n=5 Participants
|
93.95 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.449 • n=7 Participants
|
85.78 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.545 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: change from baseline in QMG score at end of day 4The QMG is a physician-rated test including 13 assessments such as facial strength, swallowing, grip strength, and duration of time that limbs can be maintained in outstretched positions. Each assessment is graded as 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), or 3 (severe), for a total range of 0-39. A higher total score indicates a worse outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Amifampridine Phosphate
n=13 Participants
amifampridine phosphate 10 mg (amifampridine equivalent) by mouth, 30 to 80 mg total daily dose, 3 to 4 times per day for 4 days
Amifampridine Phosphate
|
Placebo (for Amifampridine Phosphate)
n=13 Participants
placebo by mouth 3 to 4 times per day for 4 days
Placebo Oral Tablet
|
|---|---|---|
|
Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score
Baseline
|
7.8 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.20
|
8.5 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.43
|
|
Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score
Day 4
|
7.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.94
|
15.0 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.90
|
|
Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Score
Change from baseline
|
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.07
|
6.5 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.82
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: change from baseline in SGI score at end of day 4The SGI is a 7-point scale on which the patient rates their global impression of the effects of a study treatment (1=terrible to 7=delighted). The SGI was assessed by the patient or the patient's parent/guardian/caregiver if the patient was unable to complete the SGI. The SGI has demonstrated concordance with the physician's assessment of improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Amifampridine Phosphate
n=13 Participants
amifampridine phosphate 10 mg (amifampridine equivalent) by mouth, 30 to 80 mg total daily dose, 3 to 4 times per day for 4 days
Amifampridine Phosphate
|
Placebo (for Amifampridine Phosphate)
n=13 Participants
placebo by mouth 3 to 4 times per day for 4 days
Placebo Oral Tablet
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subject Global Impression (SGI) Score
Baseline
|
6.1 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
5.8 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.90
|
|
Subject Global Impression (SGI) Score
Day 4
|
5.3 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.65
|
2.4 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.76
|
|
Subject Global Impression (SGI) Score
Change from baseline to Day 4
|
-0.8 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.74
|
-3.5 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.18
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: change from baseline in CGI-I score at end of day 4The CGI-I captures the Investigator's global impression of the patient's improvement or worsening from baseline status. The 7-point scale is scored by the Investigator based on changes in symptoms, behavior, and functional abilities. Each symptom is rated as 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (much worse), or 7 (very much worse). The total score can range from 0 to 49. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Amifampridine Phosphate
n=13 Participants
amifampridine phosphate 10 mg (amifampridine equivalent) by mouth, 30 to 80 mg total daily dose, 3 to 4 times per day for 4 days
Amifampridine Phosphate
|
Placebo (for Amifampridine Phosphate)
n=13 Participants
placebo by mouth 3 to 4 times per day for 4 days
Placebo Oral Tablet
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Clinician's Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Day 4 Compared to Baseline
|
3.8 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8
|
5.5 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.27
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: change from baseline in 3TUG at end of day 4Population: The number and proportion of patients with a ≥20% increase in 3TUG average time
The 3TUG is a functional mobility test that requires a patient to stand up from a straight-backed armchair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back, and sit down in the chair. A modification of this is where the individual performs the test 3 times without pause, and the measurement is the average time required to complete each of the 3 repetitions. Based upon literature reports that a significant change in gait for a similar walk-test is an increase in time of more than 20%, this has been incorporated into the endpoint.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Amifampridine Phosphate
n=13 Participants
amifampridine phosphate 10 mg (amifampridine equivalent) by mouth, 30 to 80 mg total daily dose, 3 to 4 times per day for 4 days
Amifampridine Phosphate
|
Placebo (for Amifampridine Phosphate)
n=13 Participants
placebo by mouth 3 to 4 times per day for 4 days
Placebo Oral Tablet
|
|---|---|---|
|
Triple Timed Up and Go Walk Test (3TUG)
|
1 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Amifampridine Phosphate
Placebo (for Amifampridine Phosphate)
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Amifampridine Phosphate
n=13 participants at risk
amifampridine phosphate 10 mg (amifampridine equivalent) by mouth, 30 to 80 mg total daily dose, 3 to 4 times per day for 4 days
Amifampridine Phosphate
|
Placebo (for Amifampridine Phosphate)
n=13 participants at risk
placebo by mouth 3 to 4 times per day for 4 days
Placebo Oral Tablet
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
atrial fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
7.7%
1/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
myocardial ischemia
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
30.8%
4/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
motion sickness
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
7.7%
1/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Eye disorders
diplopia
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
7.7%
1/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Eye disorders
eyelid ptosis
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
7.7%
1/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
dry mouth
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
15.4%
2/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
7.7%
1/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
dysphagia
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
7.7%
1/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
hypoaesthesia, oral
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
7.7%
1/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
impaired gastric emptying
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
7.7%
1/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
nausea
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
7.7%
1/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
oral disorder
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
7.7%
1/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
vomiting
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
7.7%
1/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
General disorders
fatigue
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
30.8%
4/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
asthenia
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
15.4%
2/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
General disorders
feeling hot
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
15.4%
2/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
General disorders
gait disturbance
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
7.7%
1/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
General disorders
pain
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
7.7%
1/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
7.7%
1/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
decreased appetite
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
7.7%
1/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
muscular weakness
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
38.5%
5/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
limb discomfort
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
15.4%
2/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
muscle spasm
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
15.4%
2/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
7.7%
1/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
back pain
|
7.7%
1/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
musculoskeletal stiffness
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
7.7%
1/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
pain in extremity
|
7.7%
1/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
balance disorder
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
15.4%
2/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
eyelid ptosis
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
7.7%
1/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
facial nerve disorder
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
7.7%
1/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
headache
|
7.7%
1/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
movement disorder
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
7.7%
1/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
somnolence
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
7.7%
1/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
speech disorder
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
7.7%
1/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
insomnia
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
7.7%
1/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
dysphonia
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
7.7%
1/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
7.7%
1/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
dermatitis contact
|
0.00%
0/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
7.7%
1/13 • All AEs were observed for each patient from enrollment until study completion (up to 12 days per patient).
Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized using system organ class and PT by treatment and overall for all patients in the safety population.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60