Groin Sentinel Node Biopsy and 18FDG-PET/CT in cN0 Vulvar Cancer Patients Candidate to Standard Lymphadenectomy
NCT ID: NCT02969278
Last Updated: 2016-11-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-07-31
2017-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* CT or MRI with contrast (abdominal and pelvic with caudal scans for inguinal regions)
* Inguinal ultrasound with US-guided biopsy/fine needle aspiration for suspicious lymph nodes.
The incidence of inguinal and pelvic lymph node metastasis not diagnosed at the pre-operative imaging is 10-35% as assessed after lymphadenectomy at pathology report.
Until 2009, the standard surgical treatment of vulvar cancer was represented by mono or bilateral systematic lymphadenectomy (at least 70% of N0 women underwent a radical surgery with the risk of severe morbidity related to the surgical procedure with no survival benefit).
Inguinal lymphadenectomy shows a high rate of local and systemic complications resulting in a longer hospitalization or recovery, as well as possible delays in adjuvant therapies.
Moreover, severe complications can lead to a further surgery.
Possibile complications described in literature are:
* Lymphedema (up to 70%)
* Infection and postoperative cellulitis (50%)
* Inguinal suture dehiscence (between 22 and 52%)
* Linfocysts (between 7 and 28%)
* Deep vein thrombosis (between 5 and 8%)
* Sepsis (1 -2%)
Since 2009, with the introduction and the validation of sentinel node biopsy (SNB), for some VC it is now possible to obtain a nodal staging with minimally invasive surgery and lower morbidity. However, the SNB technique is indicated if the tumor fits the following selection criteria:
* Infiltrating tumors with a diameter \< 40 mm;
* Monofocal tumors;
* Tumors distant more than 1 cm from the midline
* Tumors near the midline with bilateral lymphatic drainage and intraoperative detection of at least one sentinel node for each groin.
Consequently in many tumors diagnosed as N0 at preoperative imaging, SNB technique is not indicated; these tumors still require systematic lymphadenectomy.
In this subset of patients it is important to identify new methods for preoperative evaluation of nodal status or to define a sub-category of patients for which the SNB could be applied.
Objective of the study is to verify, in patients actually off-label for SNB, the accuracy of 18FDG-PET/CT in predicting nodal status, as an indipendent method or associated with the standard pre-operative imaging and the mini-invasive surgical staging.
All patients are submitted to:
* Gynecologic visit
* Vulvar biopsy and possible pelvic examination under anesthesia with the definition of clinical extent of disease
* Evaluation of serum tumor markers: SCC and Ca125
* Inguinal ultrasound and possible US guided FNAC or FNAB on suspicious lymph nodes
* CT scan (abdomen and pelvis) with contrast
* 18FDG-PET/CT
* Lymphangioscintigraphy of inguinofemoral axis
Vulvar surgery may include:
* Wide resection of vulvar disease
* Emivulvectomy (anterior, posterior or lateral)
* Simple vulvectomy
* Radical or ultra-radical vulvectomy (with possible plastic reconstruction)
During inguinal surgery all patients will undergo:
\- Sentinel node biopsy mono or bilateral followed by radical bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy
Statistical analysis will help determine the accuracy and negative predictive value of FDG-PET/CT and sentinel node biopsy in predicting nodal status.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Vulvar cancer patients cN0 unfit for sentinel node biopsy
All invasive vulvar cancer patients with cN0 status:
* T \> 4 cm;
* multicentric tumors (mono or bilateral);
* primary lesion completely excised during prior diagnostic surgery
* patients candidate to bilateral lymphadenectomy because of unilateral groin lymph node involvement, contralateral cN0
* previous radiotherapy a/o chemotherapy (sequential or concurrent). These patients are submitted to 18FDG PET/TC and sentinel node biopsy associated with standard preoperative imaging and radical groin lymphadenectomy
18FDG-PET/TC
Nuclear medicine exam (18FDG-PET/TC) to assess the status of the regional groin and pelvic lymphnodes
Sentinel node biopsy
Intradermal injection of 0.2 ml 37-148 MBq of radiocolloid and a blue dye near the tumor to locate the position of the sentinel lymph node. Intraoperatively, sentinel node localization is guided by a gamma probe and by the eyes of the surgeon who detects the lymph nodes that are stained with the blue dye.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
18FDG-PET/TC
Nuclear medicine exam (18FDG-PET/TC) to assess the status of the regional groin and pelvic lymphnodes
Sentinel node biopsy
Intradermal injection of 0.2 ml 37-148 MBq of radiocolloid and a blue dye near the tumor to locate the position of the sentinel lymph node. Intraoperatively, sentinel node localization is guided by a gamma probe and by the eyes of the surgeon who detects the lymph nodes that are stained with the blue dye.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ECOG ≤ 2
* Adequate respiratory, hepatic, cardiac, bone marrow and renal function (creatinine clearance\> 60 mL/min according to the Cockroft formula)
* Patient psychologically able to follow the study procedures
* Signature of informed consent
In addition, both major criteria and at least one of the minor criteria must be present:
MAJOR CRITERIA
* Vulvar carcinoma (stromal infiltration \> 1 mm); Histotypes different from squamous are included
* Negative lymphnodes at preoperative imaging
MINOR CRITERIA
* Vulvar lesion greater than 4 cm
* Multifocal or bilateral lesions
* Previous complete excisional biopsy of the vulvar lesion, with absent residual disease
* Previous neoadjuvant treatment (radiotherapy a/o sequential/concomitant chemotherapy)
* Previous treatment with radiotherapy a/o chemotherapy (sequential a/o concomitant) for previous vulvar cancer a/o other diseases
* Previous vulvar or inguinal surgery
* Infiltrating vulvar carcinoma with monolateral groin lymphnode involvement (N1) and contralateral N0
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy and breastfeeding
* Patients with impaired respiratory, hepatic, cardiac, bone marrow and renal function (creatinine clearance\> 60 mL / min according to the Cockroft formula)
* Patients with major depressive disorder
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Prof. Giovanni Scambia
Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Division of Gynecologic Oncology/Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli
Rome, Rome, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Giorgia Garganese, MD
Role: primary
Simona M Fragomeni, MD
Role: backup
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GroSNaPET
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id