Active City of Liverpool Active Schools and SportsLinx Project: a Clustered Randomised Controlled Trial

NCT ID: NCT02963805

Last Updated: 2016-12-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

152 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-09-30

Study Completion Date

2009-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the A-CLASS project was to measure the effect of the 4 hour offer on children's physical activity, health and physical competence.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study design

Treatment arms in this four-arm parallel-group cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) included a high intensity physical activity (HIPA) intervention group, a fundamental movement skill (FMS) intervention group, a physical activity signposting (PASS) intervention group and a control group (usual practice).

Recruitment

\- Organisation level

Sixteen primary schools were targeted by the research team in May-July 2006. The schools were targeted based on their size (student enrolment \>400 primary school; \>250 junior school), current afterschool club provision (limited), school sport facilities available for use (bi-weekly) and socioeconomic status of the school postcode classified by postcode in the Index of Multiple Deprivation as deprived (IMD \> 40). Signed consent was sought and obtained from the head teachers of the sixteen schools for pupil recruitment, study contact, laboratory visits during school time and access to school facilities. Eight from the sixteen schools were randomly selected to take part using random number allocation.

\- Individual level

All children in year 5 in consenting schools received a verbal and written overview of the study through a researcher led study information session held at the respective schools. Children were given 2 weeks to express interest via the return of a written assent form (children) and parental/guardian consent form to their school teacher. Medical questionnaires were distributed to all children who agreed to take part in the study, and they were assessed for stature and body mass in order to calculate body mass index (BMI; kg/m2). BMI was used as guide to target the children who were overweight or may be nearing overweight according to BMI cut-off thresholds stipulated by Chinn and Rona (2004). Generally, 20-25 children with the highest BMI within each school who were free from the presence of chronic disease, metabolic disorders, motor or co-ordination difficulties and prescribed medications including steroids inhaled by asthma sufferers were then enrolled to participate in the project. There was no racial or gender bias in the selection of participants.

Group assignment and Intervention

Participating schools were randomly allocated by a computer generated procedure to one of four treatments to reduce risk of contamination effects across the trial.

Data collection

Measurements took place at three time points: at baseline (month 0; September to mid-October 2006); end-intervention (9 months; June to mid-July 2007); and follow-up (3 years; October 2009). At each time point participants attended University laboratories for individual assessments. At each time point participants' habitual physical activity was objectively assessed using accelerometers, and participants' fundamental movement skills were assessed at their respective school. Prior to laboratory visits, participants were instructed to fast for a minimum of 8 hours and avoid strenuous exercise for 24 hours.

Sample size

It was feasible to recruit eight schools and randomly assign two schools to each of the four arms. With an estimated number of consenting Year 5 pupils of 20 per school, the planned sample size was around 40 participants per arm. Allowing for 10% attrition at 9 months and a design effect of 1.2 to account for school-level clustering (ICC of 0.01), our effective sample size was 30 participants per arm. This sample size provides approximately 80% power at 2P=0.05 to detect a targeted difference between intervention and control (3 planned comparisons) at the 9-month timepoint of 3 units for the total FMS skills score (based on an between-subjects standard deviations (SD) of 7 units and a reliability of r=0.8 over the timeframe of the intervention; ANCOVA model adjusting for baseline FMS score). With an anticipated attrition of up to 50% for the 2-year follow-up timepoint, our effective sample size was only 16 participants per arm. Group comparisons at this timepoint are therefore defined as exploratory, as we have relatively low power to detect the same effect size (around 50%).

Statistical analyses

There are too few clusters per arm to account robustly for the hierarchical data structure using linear mixed (multilevel) modelling, generalised estimating equations, or clustered robust standard errors. Therefore, data will be analysed at the individual level, with standard errors inflated by the square root of the design effect. The change in FMS score from baseline to post-intervention (9-months) will be compared between arms using a regression model (ANCOVA), adjusting for baseline FMS score and sex. There are 3 planned comparisons comprising each of the 3 interventions vs. usual practice. Point estimates will be derived together with uncertainty expressed as 90% confidence intervals. For the primary outcome, a purely exploratory sub-group analysis will be conducted using a sex-by-intervention group interaction term to examine the potential for differential intervention effects in boys vs. girls. Secondary outcomes will be analysed using the same general modelling approach, but with no inferential emphasis placed on the results. Where appropriate, a principled method will be applied to address missing data (e.g., multiple imputation or full information maximum likelihood).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Physical Activity Health Behavior

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Children Physical activity Physical competence Obesity School Health Fundamental movement skills

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

High intensity physical activity (HIPA)

Participants attended high intensity vigorous activity after school clubs.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

High intensity physical activity (HIPA)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This arm consisted of a twice-weekly after-school club at the intervention school for 26 weeks during school term time, delivered by qualified coaches. Each 60 minute session engaged participants in high-intensity vigorous activity using a combination of playground-style games and circuit training activities that aimed to keep children moving and maintain a mean heart rate above 70% of age-predicted maximum heart rate (\~145 beats/min) for the session duration. Intensity was verified by heart rate monitoring. Coaches delivered and monitored sessions and increased the intensity over time to allow for the children to progress. The mean heart rate for HIPA sessions was 150 beats/min, with children spending 52 min at this intensity during the session.

Fundamental movement skill (FMS)

Participants attended fundamental movement skill based after school clubs.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Fundamental movement skill (FMS)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This arm consisted of a twice-weekly after-school club at the intervention school for 26 weeks during school term time, delivered by qualified coaches. Each 60 minute session focused on improving two skills from the vertical jump, hop, sprint run, dodge, kick, catch, overarm throw, and strike. All skills were taught in equal quantities. Each session was designed to maximise participation and enjoyment, and consisted of various games, drills, self-learning activities, and offered numerous opportunities for practice. Skill components were taught to the children using simple learning cues, and skill related questions were used to develop purposeful feedback. The mean heart rate for FMS sessions was recorded at 141 beats/min, with children spending 55 min at this intensity during the session.

Physical activity signposting (PASS)

Participants attended educational physical activity signposting sessions during school hours.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Physical activity signposting (PASS)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

A researcher visited participants once per week in 6 weekly blocks to set an activity mission to complete outside school with family and friends. Twenty missions were set over 4 x 6 week blocks, each separated by a 6 week break. Each mission suggests a task as a prompt to participate in physical activity and decrease sedentariness during the week. Children received a sticker on a wall chart for returning the mission; children were rewarded with prizes if all missions were returned in each block. If all missions were returned in a block, a reward was given. 58% of children returned all twenty missions. In addition to the missions, pedometers were issued as a promotional tool for the duration of the project for self-monitoring of activity.

Control

Children in the control group received British Heart Foundation leaflets that included information on heart health (given to all groups). Children participated in their usual school curriculum including two hours of physical education and school sport per week, both within and beyond the curriculum.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

High intensity physical activity (HIPA)

This arm consisted of a twice-weekly after-school club at the intervention school for 26 weeks during school term time, delivered by qualified coaches. Each 60 minute session engaged participants in high-intensity vigorous activity using a combination of playground-style games and circuit training activities that aimed to keep children moving and maintain a mean heart rate above 70% of age-predicted maximum heart rate (\~145 beats/min) for the session duration. Intensity was verified by heart rate monitoring. Coaches delivered and monitored sessions and increased the intensity over time to allow for the children to progress. The mean heart rate for HIPA sessions was 150 beats/min, with children spending 52 min at this intensity during the session.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Fundamental movement skill (FMS)

This arm consisted of a twice-weekly after-school club at the intervention school for 26 weeks during school term time, delivered by qualified coaches. Each 60 minute session focused on improving two skills from the vertical jump, hop, sprint run, dodge, kick, catch, overarm throw, and strike. All skills were taught in equal quantities. Each session was designed to maximise participation and enjoyment, and consisted of various games, drills, self-learning activities, and offered numerous opportunities for practice. Skill components were taught to the children using simple learning cues, and skill related questions were used to develop purposeful feedback. The mean heart rate for FMS sessions was recorded at 141 beats/min, with children spending 55 min at this intensity during the session.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Physical activity signposting (PASS)

A researcher visited participants once per week in 6 weekly blocks to set an activity mission to complete outside school with family and friends. Twenty missions were set over 4 x 6 week blocks, each separated by a 6 week break. Each mission suggests a task as a prompt to participate in physical activity and decrease sedentariness during the week. Children received a sticker on a wall chart for returning the mission; children were rewarded with prizes if all missions were returned in each block. If all missions were returned in a block, a reward was given. 58% of children returned all twenty missions. In addition to the missions, pedometers were issued as a promotional tool for the duration of the project for self-monitoring of activity.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

a. body mass index (BMI) score within the lower 50th percentile relative to children in their year at their school.

Exclusion Criteria

1. family history of sudden death.
2. presence of chronic disease, metabolic disorders, motor or co-ordination difficulties
3. prescribed medications including steroids inhaled by asthma sufferers
Minimum Eligible Age

9 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

10 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Teesside University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Liverpool John Moores University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Lee Graves

Lecturer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gareth Stratton, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Swansea University

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

McWhannell N, Foweather L, Graves LEF, Henaghan JL, Ridgers ND, Stratton G. From Surveillance to Intervention: Overview and Baseline Findings for the Active City of Liverpool Active Schools and SportsLinx (A-CLASS) Project. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 23;15(4):582. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040582.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30720781 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

16-SPS-Graves1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id