Trial Outcomes & Findings for Video-Enhanced Care Management for Medically Complex Veterans (NCT NCT02962687)
NCT ID: NCT02962687
Last Updated: 2019-09-13
Results Overview
Acceptability will be assessed using the measure of likelihood of seeing a healthcare provider using videochat.
COMPLETED
NA
80 participants
14 weeks
2019-09-13
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Videoconference Care Management
12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via videoconferencing
Care management via videoconference: 12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with cognitive impairment delivered via videoconference
|
Telephone Care Management
12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via telephone calls
Care management via telephone calls: 12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with cognitive impairment delivered via telephone calls
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
40
|
40
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
30
|
32
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
10
|
8
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Videoconference Care Management
n=40 Participants
12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via videoconferencing
Care management via videoconference: 12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via videoconference
|
Telephone Care Management
n=40 Participants
12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via telephone calls
Care management via telephone calls: 12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via telephone calls
|
Total
n=80 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
Veterans
|
70.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8 • n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
74.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1 • n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
72.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1 • n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Age, Continuous
Caregivers
|
60.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.0 • n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
68.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7 • n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
64.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8 • n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Veterans · Female
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
0 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Veterans · Male
|
20 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
20 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
40 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Caregivers · Female
|
19 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
19 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
38 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Caregivers · Male
|
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
1 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
2 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Veterans · Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
0 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Veterans · Not Hispanic or Latino
|
20 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
20 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
40 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Veterans · Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
0 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers · Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
0 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers · Not Hispanic or Latino
|
20 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
20 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
40 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers · Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
0 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Veterans · American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
0 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Veterans · Asian
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
0 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Veterans · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
0 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Veterans · Black or African American
|
8 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
7 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
15 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Veterans · White
|
12 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
13 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
25 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Veterans · More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
0 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Veterans · Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
0 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers · American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
0 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers · Asian
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
0 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
0 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers · Black or African American
|
8 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
3 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
11 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers · White
|
12 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
17 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
29 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers · More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
0 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Caregivers · Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
0 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
40 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
80 Participants
n=80 Participants
|
|
Internet Use in Last Year
Veterans
|
15 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
13 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
28 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Internet Use in Last Year
Caregivers
|
19 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
13 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
32 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Comfortable with Using the Internet
Veterans
|
7 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
8 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
15 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Comfortable with Using the Internet
Caregivers
|
16 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
11 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
27 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Has Accessed Internet with Tablet Computer
Veterans
|
4 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
2 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
6 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Has Accessed Internet with Tablet Computer
Caregivers
|
12 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
4 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
16 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Previously Used Videochat
Veterans
|
5 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
6 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
11 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Previously Used Videochat
Caregivers
|
13 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
10 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
23 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Likely to see healthcare provider using videochat
Veterans
|
11 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
8 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
19 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
|
Likely to see healthcare provider using videochat
Caregivers
|
12 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
14 Participants
n=20 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
26 Participants
n=40 Participants • The overall number of baseline participants differs from the number of analyzed participants because this study involved dyads (couples/pairs). Number analyzed in video intervention group=20 dyads (20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants). Phone intervention group=20 dyads(20 Veterans + 20 caregivers = 40 participants).
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 14 weeksPopulation: These numbers represent the Veterans in the sample (Care Partners not analyzed)
Acceptability will be assessed using the measure of likelihood of seeing a healthcare provider using videochat.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Videoconference Care Management
n=15 Participants
12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via videoconferencing
Care management via videoconference: 12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via videoconference
|
Telephone Care Management
n=16 Participants
12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via telephone calls
Care management via telephone calls: 12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via telephone calls
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Reporting That They Would Be Likely to See a Healthcare Provider Using Videochat
|
6 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 14 weeksPopulation: These number represent the Veterans in the sample (Care Partners not analyzed)
Feasibility will be assessed by examining rates of adherence to intervention phone/video calls.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Videoconference Care Management
n=60 calls
12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via videoconferencing
Care management via videoconference: 12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via videoconference
|
Telephone Care Management
n=60 calls
12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via telephone calls
Care management via telephone calls: 12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via telephone calls
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Scheduled Intervention Phone or Video Calls Completed by Participants
|
46 calls
|
53 calls
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 14 weeksPopulation: The System Usability Scale was administered only to the videoconference care management Veteran participants.
Usability of the video-enhanced care management program will be examined using the System Usability Scale (SUS; range 0 - 100; higher scores are better).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Videoconference Care Management
n=15 Participants
12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via videoconferencing
Care management via videoconference: 12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via videoconference
|
Telephone Care Management
12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via telephone calls
Care management via telephone calls: 12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via telephone calls
|
|---|---|---|
|
Usability of Video-Enhanced Care Management for Medically Complex Veterans With CI
|
59.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.6
|
—
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 14 weeksPopulation: Utilization data was collected for Veteran participants only.
Descriptive analysis of emergency department visits and hospitalizations in the two study arms
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Videoconference Care Management
n=20 Participants
12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via videoconferencing
Care management via videoconference: 12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via videoconference
|
Telephone Care Management
n=20 Participants
12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via telephone calls
Care management via telephone calls: 12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via telephone calls
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Hospitalizations or Emergency Department Visits
Hospitalizations
|
2 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Hospitalizations or Emergency Department Visits
ED Visits
|
4 participants
|
1 participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 14 weeksPopulation: The PASE was administered to the Veteran participants only.
Descriptive analysis of physical activity as measured by the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE; range 0 - 360; higher scores are better)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Videoconference Care Management
n=15 Participants
12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via videoconferencing
Care management via videoconference: 12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via videoconference
|
Telephone Care Management
n=15 Participants
12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via telephone calls
Care management via telephone calls: 12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via telephone calls
|
|---|---|---|
|
Physical Activity
|
75.1 weighted sum
Standard Deviation 65.1
|
108.9 weighted sum
Standard Deviation 73.8
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 14 weeksPopulation: The PROMIS subscales were administered to the Veteran participants only.
Descriptive analysis of health-related quality of life as measured by 3 subscales of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29; range 4 - 20 for each; lower scores are better)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Videoconference Care Management
n=15 Participants
12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via videoconferencing
Care management via videoconference: 12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via videoconference
|
Telephone Care Management
n=15 Participants
12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via telephone calls
Care management via telephone calls: 12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via telephone calls
|
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of Life Outcome
PROMIS-29 (Pain Interference)
|
11.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.7
|
10.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.8
|
|
Quality of Life Outcome
PROMIS-29 (Physical Function)
|
12.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.2
|
11.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.5
|
|
Quality of Life Outcome
PROMIS-29 (Social Roles)
|
10.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.8
|
11.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.9
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 14 weeksPopulation: The PHQ-9 was administered to the Veteran participants only.
Descriptive analysis of depression as measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-Depression (PHQ-9; range 0 - 27; lower scores are better)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Videoconference Care Management
n=15 Participants
12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via videoconferencing
Care management via videoconference: 12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via videoconference
|
Telephone Care Management
n=16 Participants
12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via telephone calls
Care management via telephone calls: 12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via telephone calls
|
|---|---|---|
|
Depression
|
6.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.8
|
4.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.7
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 14 weeksPopulation: The mMOS-SS was administered to the Veteran participants only.
Descriptive analysis of social support as measured by modified Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (mMOS-SS; range 0 - 100; higher scores are better)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Videoconference Care Management
n=15 Participants
12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via videoconferencing
Care management via videoconference: 12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via videoconference
|
Telephone Care Management
n=15 Participants
12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via telephone calls
Care management via telephone calls: 12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via telephone calls
|
|---|---|---|
|
Social Support
|
70.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.0
|
72.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.0
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 14 weeksPopulation: The GAD-7 was administered to the Veteran participants only.
Descriptive analysis of anxiety as measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7; range 0 - 21; lower scores are better)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Videoconference Care Management
n=15 Participants
12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via videoconferencing
Care management via videoconference: 12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via videoconference
|
Telephone Care Management
n=16 Participants
12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via telephone calls
Care management via telephone calls: 12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via telephone calls
|
|---|---|---|
|
Anxiety
|
4.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.5
|
4.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.8
|
Adverse Events
Videoconference Care Management - Veterans
Telephone Care Management - Veterans
Videoconference Care Management - Care Partners
Telephone Care Management - Care Partners
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Videoconference Care Management - Veterans
n=20 participants at risk
12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via videoconferencing
Care management via videoconference: 12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via videoconference
|
Telephone Care Management - Veterans
n=20 participants at risk
12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via telephone calls
Care management via telephone calls: 12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via telephone calls
|
Videoconference Care Management - Care Partners
n=20 participants at risk
12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI and their care partners delivered via videoconferencing
Care management via videoconference: 12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI and their care partners delivered via videoconference
|
Telephone Care Management - Care Partners
n=20 participants at risk
12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI and their care partners delivered via telephone calls
Care management via telephone calls: 12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI and their care partners delivered via telephone calls
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Vascular disorders
Hospitalization
|
0.00%
0/20 • 14 weeks
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • 14 weeks
|
0.00%
0/20 • 14 weeks
|
0.00%
0/20 • 14 weeks
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Hospitalization
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • 14 weeks
|
0.00%
0/20 • 14 weeks
|
0.00%
0/20 • 14 weeks
|
0.00%
0/20 • 14 weeks
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Videoconference Care Management - Veterans
n=20 participants at risk
12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via videoconferencing
Care management via videoconference: 12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via videoconference
|
Telephone Care Management - Veterans
n=20 participants at risk
12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via telephone calls
Care management via telephone calls: 12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI delivered via telephone calls
|
Videoconference Care Management - Care Partners
n=20 participants at risk
12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI and their care partners delivered via videoconferencing
Care management via videoconference: 12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI and their care partners delivered via videoconference
|
Telephone Care Management - Care Partners
n=20 participants at risk
12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI and their care partners delivered via telephone calls
Care management via telephone calls: 12-week nurse care management for medically complex Veterans with CI and their care partners delivered via telephone calls
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
ED Visit
|
10.0%
2/20 • Number of events 2 • 14 weeks
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • 14 weeks
|
0.00%
0/20 • 14 weeks
|
0.00%
0/20 • 14 weeks
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
ED Visit
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • 14 weeks
|
0.00%
0/20 • 14 weeks
|
0.00%
0/20 • 14 weeks
|
0.00%
0/20 • 14 weeks
|
|
Cardiac disorders
ED Visit
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • 14 weeks
|
0.00%
0/20 • 14 weeks
|
0.00%
0/20 • 14 weeks
|
0.00%
0/20 • 14 weeks
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
ED Visit
|
0.00%
0/20 • 14 weeks
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • 14 weeks
|
0.00%
0/20 • 14 weeks
|
0.00%
0/20 • 14 weeks
|
|
General disorders
ED Visit
|
0.00%
0/20 • 14 weeks
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • 14 weeks
|
0.00%
0/20 • 14 weeks
|
0.00%
0/20 • 14 weeks
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place