Comparison Between Two Strategies for the Diagnosis of TB
NCT ID: NCT02961569
Last Updated: 2017-04-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
34 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-07-31
2017-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
One open-label arm
Patients suspected of pulmonary TB will have sputum collection for acid fast bacilli by the classical strategy (Day 1, Day 2 and Day 3) and the intervention sputum collection for acid fast bacilli by the same day strategy (Hour 1, 2 and 3)
sputum collection for acid fast bacilli
spontaneous or post fiberoptic bronchoscopy sputa
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
sputum collection for acid fast bacilli
spontaneous or post fiberoptic bronchoscopy sputa
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hopital Lariboisière
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Célia Lloret-Linares, MD PhD
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Célia Lloret-Linares, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Unité de Recherches Thérapeutiques, Hôpital Lariboisière
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hôpital Lariboisière
Paris, Île-de-France Region, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lopes A, Mougari F, Chopin D, Pogliaghi M, Munier AL, Delcey V, Simoneau G, Raskine L, Evans J, Mouly S, Cambau E, Bergmann JF, Sellier P. Prospective study comparing the conventional and same-day strategies to diagnose pulmonary tuberculosis. Med Mal Infect. 2020 Feb;50(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2019.03.010. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TBsputum
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id