Surveillance of High-risk Early Postsurgical Patients for Real-time Detection of Complications

NCT ID: NCT02957825

Last Updated: 2023-11-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

747 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-02-02

Study Completion Date

2021-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that continuous wireless monitoring on the postsurgical ward will improve patient outcome, measured as disability-free survival at three months after surgery. Further, the investigators hypothesize that this tight control regimen decreases length of hospital stay and treatment costs in patients with complications.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Every year, approximately 1,500,000 surgical procedures are performed in The Netherlands alone. After major surgery, the complication rate is conservatively estimated at 25%, with a rate of 15% for major complications. In these patients, the most important problems are a failure to timely detect developing complications and a failure to adequately rescue those patients. Currently, measurement of vital signs and standardized assessment of patient wellbeing are routinely performed intermittently for every 8-12 hours, which may lead to a failure to detect of patients with complications.

The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that continuous wireless monitoring on the postsurgical ward will improve patient outcome, measured as disability-free survival at three months after surgery. Further, the investigators hypothesize that this tight control regimen decreases length of hospital stay and treatment costs in patients with complications.

The investigators will carry out this study as an interventional, randomized (per surgical ward), prospective, clinical trial; participating wards will be included using a stepped-wedge design.

Primary outcome is disability-free survival at three months after surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Complication, Postoperative

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

Routine monitoring

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Continuous wireless monitoring

Continuous wireless monitoring

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Continuous wireless monitoring

Intervention Type DEVICE

Continuous wireless monitoring of vital signs

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Continuous wireless monitoring

Continuous wireless monitoring of vital signs

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients undergoing acute or elective major or intermediate surgery
* American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score of I to IV

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability to give written and informed consent
* Refusal to participate
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

UMC Utrecht

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

B Preckel

Professor of Anesthesiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Benedikt Preckel, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Academic Medical Centyer Amsterdam, Anesthesiology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU)

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Posthuma LM, Breteler MJM, Lirk PB, Nieveen van Dijkum EJ, Visscher MJ, Breel JS, Wensing CAGL, Schenk J, Vlaskamp LB, van Rossum MC, Ruurda JP, Dijkgraaf MGW, Hollmann MW, Kalkman CJ, Preckel B. Surveillance of high-risk early postsurgical patients for real-time detection of complications using wireless monitoring (SHEPHERD study): results of a randomized multicenter stepped wedge cluster trial. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 5;10:1295499. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1295499. eCollection 2023.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38249988 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SHEPHERD

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.