Performance Comparison Between Fanfilcon A and Senofilcon A Sphere Lenses

NCT ID: NCT02956460

Last Updated: 2018-04-02

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

64 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-10-27

Study Completion Date

2016-12-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Prospective, multi-center, bilateral, double-masked, randomized, cross-over, daily wear, 1 month dispensing study (2 weeks each lens pair)

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of this study is to determine the clinical performance of fanfilcon A in comparison to senofilcon A sphere contact lenses.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Myopia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

fanfilcon A

Participants are randomized to wear fanfilcon A for two weeks during the cross over study.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

fanfilcon A

Intervention Type DEVICE

contact lens

senofilcon A

Participants are randomized to wear senofilcon A for two weeks during the cross over study.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

senofilcon A

Intervention Type DEVICE

contact lens

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

fanfilcon A

contact lens

Intervention Type DEVICE

senofilcon A

contact lens

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

A person is eligible for inclusion in the study if he/she:

* Is between 18 and 40 years of age (inclusive)
* Has read, understood and signed the information consent letter
* Has had a self-reported eye exam in the last two years
* Is a spherical soft contact lens wearer
* Has a contact lens prescription that fits within the available parameters of the study lenses
* Has a spectacle cylinder no greater than 0.75D (Diopters) in each eye
* Can achieve best corrected spectacle distance visual acuity of 20/25 (0.10 logMAR) or better in each eye
* Can achieve a distance visual acuity of 20/30 (0.18 logMAR) or better in each eye with the study contact lenses
* Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease
* Is willing and anticipated to be able to comply with the wear schedule (8 hours per day; 5 days a week of lens wear)
* Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule

Exclusion Criteria

A person will be excluded from the study if he/she:

* Has a history of not achieving comfortable CL (Contact Lens) wear (defined as 5 days per week; \>8 hours/day)
* Is currently wearing senofilcon C (2 weeks lens), senofilcon A 1-Day, senofilcon C (monthly lens) or enfilcon A contact lenses
* Is habitually using rewetting/ lubricating eye drops more than once per day
* Presents with clinically significant anterior segment abnormalities
* Presents with ocular or systemic disease or need of medications which might interfere with contact lens wear
* Presents with slit lamp findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear such as:

* Pathological dry eye or associated findings
* Significant pterygium, pinguecula, or corneal scars within the visual axis
* Neovascularization \> 0.75 mm in from of the limbus
* Giant papillary conjunctivitis (GCP) worse than grade 1
* Anterior uveitis or iritis (or history in past year)
* Seborrheic eczema of eyelid region, Seborrheic conjunctivitis
* History of corneal ulcers or fungal infections
* Poor personal hygiene
* Has a known history of corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity)
* Has aphakia, keratoconus or a highly irregular cornea
* Has presbyopia or has dependence on spectacles for near work over the contact lenses
* Has undergone corneal refractive surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

CooperVision, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lyndon Jones, PhD, FAAO

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Centre for Contact Lens Research

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Eric M. White O. D., Inc

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Golden Vision

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

Kannarr Eye Care

Pittsburg, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Nittany Eye Associates

State College, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EX-MKTG-73

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.