MedDataX Logo

Comparing Between XP Endo Finisher and Conventional Irrigation Method On Post-Operative Flare Ups In Necrotic Teeth

NCT ID: NCT02952326

Last Updated: 2016-11-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

34 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-12-31

Study Completion Date

2018-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Comparing the postoperative flare ups and pain after adding the XP Endo Finisher to the final irrigation protocol on necrotic mandibular premolars.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

patients are randomized into 2 groups after meeting the eligibility criteria,

1. Each patient will be given pain scale chart in order to record his /her pain level before any intervention.
2. The tooth is anesthetized, accessed and mechanical instrumentation to be made 3 A) For the experimental group: The canals will be thoroughly irrigated using 3ml syringe of 2.5% Sodium hypochlorite between every subsequent instrument. XP Endo finisher is used after the last instrument in preparation

B) For the control group :

The canals will be thoroughly irrigated using 3ml syringe of 2.5% Sodium hypochlorite between every subsequent instrument.

4\) Obturation is done and postoperative instructions are given to the patient

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dental Pulp Necroses

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

XP Endo Finisher

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

XP Endo Finsher as final step of the irrigation protocol

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The canals will be thoroughly irrigated using 3ml syringe of 2.5% Sodium hypochlorite between every subsequent instrument. XP Endo finisher is used after the last instrument in preparation

Conventional needle irrigation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional needle irrigation only

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The canals will be thoroughly irrigated using 3ml syringe of 2.5% Sodium hypochlorite between every subsequent instrument.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

XP Endo Finsher as final step of the irrigation protocol

The canals will be thoroughly irrigated using 3ml syringe of 2.5% Sodium hypochlorite between every subsequent instrument. XP Endo finisher is used after the last instrument in preparation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional needle irrigation only

The canals will be thoroughly irrigated using 3ml syringe of 2.5% Sodium hypochlorite between every subsequent instrument.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

i. Age between 18-50 years old. ii. Males or Females. iii. mandibular Premolars

* Asymptomatic.
* Non-vital response of pulp tissue (negative response).
* With or without periapical radiolucency.

Exclusion Criteria

i. Patients allergic to penicillin. ii. Pregnant females. iii. Patients having significant systemic disorder. iv. If antibiotics have been administrated during the past two weeks preoperatively.

v. Patients having bruxism or clenching. vi. Teeth that have :

* Vital pulp tissues.
* Association with swelling
* Acute peri-apical abscess
* Periodontally affected teeth
* No possible restorability
* Previous endodontic treatment.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ghada Ihab Mohamed

Resident at Endodontic department, faculty of oral and dental medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Elnaghy AM, Mandorah A, Elsaka SE. Effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher, EndoActivator, and File agitation on debris and smear layer removal in curved root canals: a comparative study. Odontology. 2017 Apr;105(2):178-183. doi: 10.1007/s10266-016-0251-8. Epub 2016 May 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27206916 (View on PubMed)

Siqueira JF Jr. Microbial causes of endodontic flare-ups. Int Endod J. 2003 Jul;36(7):453-63. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00671.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12823700 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

XP and Protaper next

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id