Trial Outcomes & Findings for Avelumab In Combination Regimens That Include An Immune Agonist, Epigenetic Modulator, CD20 Antagonist and/or Conventional Chemotherapy in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) (NCT NCT02951156)
NCT ID: NCT02951156
Last Updated: 2020-12-17
Results Overview
AEs occurring in first 4 weeks of treatment,attributable to 1 of study drugs. Hematology:1)Grade 4 neutropenia,2)Grade \>=3 febrile neutropenia with single temperature of \>38.3 degrees Celsius (C)/sustained temperature of \>=38.0 degrees C for more than 1 hour with/without associated sepsis,3)Grade \>=3 neutropenic infection,4)Grade 4 thrombocytopenia/Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding,5)Grade 4 anemia 6)Any grade \>=3 non-hematology toxicity except:transient Grade 3 flu like symptoms/fever controlled with standard medical management;transient Grade 3 fatigue,localized skin reactions/headache that resolves to Grade \<=1;Grade 3 nausea,vomiting/diarrhea resolved to Grade \<=1 in ˂72 hours after initiation of adequate medical management;Grade 3 skin toxicity resolved to Grade \<=1 in ˂7 days;tumor flare;Single laboratory values that are out of normal range,that have no clinical correlate and resolve to Grade \<=1 within 7 days with adequate medical management.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
29 participants
Day 1 Cycle 1 up to 4 Weeks
2020-12-17
Participant Flow
This study included participants with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after completion of at least 2 and not more than 4 lines of rituximab-containing multi-agent chemotherapy (prior to this study), and/or in whom autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has failed, or who were not candidates for ASCT or who were not eligible for intensive chemotherapy.
This study was planned to be conducted into two phases: Phase 1b and Phase 3. Phase 3 of the study was never conducted due to early termination of study because of Phase 1b enrollment closure.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab
Avelumab 10 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) intravenous (IV) infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 milligram per meter square (mg/m\^2) IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Azacitidine 40 mg/m\^2 subcutaneous (SC) dose was administered on Days 1 to 5 of each treatment cycle until the participant no longer received clinical benefit, along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with 90 mg/m\^2 IV infusion of bendamustine on Day 2 and Day 3 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of bendamustine was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 and Day 2 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles for a maximum of 6 cycles. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
9
|
9
|
11
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
9
|
9
|
10
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab
Avelumab 10 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) intravenous (IV) infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 milligram per meter square (mg/m\^2) IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Azacitidine 40 mg/m\^2 subcutaneous (SC) dose was administered on Days 1 to 5 of each treatment cycle until the participant no longer received clinical benefit, along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with 90 mg/m\^2 IV infusion of bendamustine on Day 2 and Day 3 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of bendamustine was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 and Day 2 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles for a maximum of 6 cycles. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
3
|
8
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Progressive disease
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Study terminated by sponsor
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
5
|
1
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Avelumab In Combination Regimens That Include An Immune Agonist, Epigenetic Modulator, CD20 Antagonist and/or Conventional Chemotherapy in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (R/R DLBCL)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab
n=9 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab
n=9 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Azacitidine 40 mg/m\^2 SC dose was administered on Days 1 to 5 of each treatment cycle until the participant no longer received clinical benefit, along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
n=11 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with 90 mg/m\^2 IV infusion of bendamustine on Day 2 and Day 3 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of bendamustine was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 and Day 2 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles for a maximum of 6 cycles. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Total
n=29 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race: White
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race: Other
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 Cycle 1 up to 4 WeeksPopulation: DLT evaluable set included all participants who were randomized in the study and received at least 1 dose of study medication and either experienced DLT during the first cycle, or completed the primary DLT observation period of 4 weeks.
AEs occurring in first 4 weeks of treatment,attributable to 1 of study drugs. Hematology:1)Grade 4 neutropenia,2)Grade \>=3 febrile neutropenia with single temperature of \>38.3 degrees Celsius (C)/sustained temperature of \>=38.0 degrees C for more than 1 hour with/without associated sepsis,3)Grade \>=3 neutropenic infection,4)Grade 4 thrombocytopenia/Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding,5)Grade 4 anemia 6)Any grade \>=3 non-hematology toxicity except:transient Grade 3 flu like symptoms/fever controlled with standard medical management;transient Grade 3 fatigue,localized skin reactions/headache that resolves to Grade \<=1;Grade 3 nausea,vomiting/diarrhea resolved to Grade \<=1 in ˂72 hours after initiation of adequate medical management;Grade 3 skin toxicity resolved to Grade \<=1 in ˂7 days;tumor flare;Single laboratory values that are out of normal range,that have no clinical correlate and resolve to Grade \<=1 within 7 days with adequate medical management.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab
n=7 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab
n=5 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Azacitidine 40 mg/m\^2 SC dose was administered on Days 1 to 5 of each treatment cycle until the participant no longer received clinical benefit, along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
n=10 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with 90 mg/m\^2 IV infusion of bendamustine on Day 2 and Day 3 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of bendamustine was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 and Day 2 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles for a maximum of 6 cycles. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT)
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Randomization until date of PD, start of new anticancer therapy, discontinuation from study or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 36 months)Population: Full analysis set population included all participants who were randomized in the study.
ORR was defined as percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), as assessed by investigator per lugano response classification criteria. CR was defined as a score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake less than or equal to \[\<=\] mediastinum), or 3 (uptake less than \[\<\] mediastinum but \<=liver) with or without a residual mass on PET 5-point scale (5-PS), for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions; no evidence of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid disease in bone marrow. PR was defined as \>=50% decrease in SPD of up to six of the largest dominant lymph nodes, no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen volume, a \>=50% decrease in sum of products of diameters (SPD) of hepatic and splenic nodules, absence of other organ involvement, and no new sites of disease.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab
n=9 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab
n=9 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Azacitidine 40 mg/m\^2 SC dose was administered on Days 1 to 5 of each treatment cycle until the participant no longer received clinical benefit, along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
n=11 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with 90 mg/m\^2 IV infusion of bendamustine on Day 2 and Day 3 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of bendamustine was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 and Day 2 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles for a maximum of 6 cycles. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria
|
11.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.3 to 48.2
|
0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 33.6
|
27.3 Percentage of participants
Interval 6.0 to 61.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment up to at least 30 days after the last dose of study treatment or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy (up to 36 months)Population: Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. As per NCI-CTCAE version 4.03,severity was graded as Grade 1:asymptomatic/mild symptoms,clinical/diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2:moderate, minimal, local/noninvasive intervention indicated,limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily life (ADL); Grade 3:severe/medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4:life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5:death related to AE. TEAE was defined as events which occurred during on-treatment period beginning with first dose of study treatment through minimum (30 days + last dose of study treatment or start of new anti-cancer drug therapy). In this outcome measure participant with any TEAE of Grade 3 or above are reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab
n=8 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab
n=9 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Azacitidine 40 mg/m\^2 SC dose was administered on Days 1 to 5 of each treatment cycle until the participant no longer received clinical benefit, along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
n=11 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with 90 mg/m\^2 IV infusion of bendamustine on Day 2 and Day 3 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of bendamustine was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 and Day 2 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles for a maximum of 6 cycles. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 3, As Per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria For Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
|
4 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment up to at least 30 days after the last dose of study treatment or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy (up to 36 months)Population: Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows.
Laboratory parameters included hematological and biochemistry: Hematological parameters included: anemia, haemoglobin increased, lymphocyte count decreased, lymphocyte count increased, neutrophil count decreased, platelet count decreased and white blood cells decreased. Biochemistry parameters included alanine aminotransferase increased, alkaline phosphatase increased, aspartate aminotransferase increased, blood bilirubin increased, cholesterol high, creatine kinase(cpk) increased, creatinine increased, gamma glutamyl transferase(ggt) increased, hypercalcemia, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypermagnesemia, hypernatremia, hypertriglyceridemia, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hyponatremia, hypophosphatemia, lipase increased,serum amylase increased.Test abnormalities were graded by NCI CTCAE version 4.03 as Grade 1=mild; Grade 2=moderate; Grade 3/Grade 4=severe/life-threatening. Number of participants with abnormalities of any grade were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab
n=8 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab
n=9 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Azacitidine 40 mg/m\^2 SC dose was administered on Days 1 to 5 of each treatment cycle until the participant no longer received clinical benefit, along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
n=11 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with 90 mg/m\^2 IV infusion of bendamustine on Day 2 and Day 3 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of bendamustine was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 and Day 2 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles for a maximum of 6 cycles. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
GGT increased
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
Hypertriglyceridemia
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
Anemia
|
6 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
Hemoglobin increased
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
Lymphocyte count decreased
|
4 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
Lymphocyte count increased
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
Neutrophil count decreased
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
Platelet count decreased
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
White blood cell decreased
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
2 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
Alkaline phosphatase increased
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
3 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
Blood bilirubin increased
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
Cholesterol high
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
Cpk increased
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
Creatinine increased
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
Hypercalcemia
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
Hyperglycemia
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
Hyperkalemia
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
Hypermagnesemia
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
Hypernatremia
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
Hypoalbuminemia
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
Hypocalcemia
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
Hypoglycemia
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
Hypokalemia
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
Hypomagnesemia
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
Hyponatremia
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
Hypophosphatemia
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
Lipase increased
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
Serum amylase increased
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment up to at least 30 days after the last dose of study treatment or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy (up to 36 months)Population: Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows.
ECG abnormalities included: 1) QT interval, QT interval corrected using Bazett's formula (QTcB) and QT interval corrected using Fridericia's formula (QTcF): increase from baseline greater than (\>) 30 millisecond (ms) or 60 ms; absolute value \>450 ms, \>480 ms and \>500 ms; 2) heart rate (HR): absolute value \<=50 beats per minute (bpm) and decrease from baseline \>=20 bpm; absolute value \>=120 bpm and increase from baseline \>=20 bpm; 3) PR interval: absolute value \>=220 ms and increase from baseline \>=20 ms; 4) QRS interval: absolute value \>=120 ms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab
n=8 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab
n=9 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Azacitidine 40 mg/m\^2 SC dose was administered on Days 1 to 5 of each treatment cycle until the participant no longer received clinical benefit, along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
n=11 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with 90 mg/m\^2 IV infusion of bendamustine on Day 2 and Day 3 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of bendamustine was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 and Day 2 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles for a maximum of 6 cycles. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
QTcF: >450 ms
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
QTcF: >500 ms
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
QT: Increase from baseline >30 ms
|
4 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
QT: Increase from baseline >60 ms
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
QT: >450 ms
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
QT: >480 ms
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
QT: >500 ms
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
QTcB: Increase from baseline >30 ms
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
QTcB: Increase from baseline >60 ms
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
QTcB: >450 ms
|
4 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
QTcB: >480 ms
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
QTcB: >500 ms
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
QTcF: Increase from baseline >30 ms
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
QTcF: Increase from baseline >60 ms
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
QTcF: >480 ms
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Heart rate: <=50 bpm and decrease from baseline >=20 bpm
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Heart rate: >=120 bpm and increase from baseline >=20 bpm
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
PR: >=220 ms and increase from baseline >=20 ms
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
QRS: >=120 ms
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: First response (CR or PR) to date of PD, start of new anti-cancer therapy, discontinuation from the study, censoring date or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 36 months)Population: Participants who were randomized and achieved an objective response.
Investigator assessed DOR: was defined for participants with OR as time from first documentation of OR to time of first documentation of disease progression/death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. CR: score of 1(no uptake above background),2(uptake \<=mediastinum),or 3(uptake \<mediastinum but \<=liver) with or without a residual mass on PET 5-PS,for lymph nodes extralymphatic sites;no new lesions;no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. PR: \>=50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 of largest dominant lymph nodes,no increase in size of other nodes,liver,spleen volume,\>=50% decrease in SPD of hepatic splenic nodules,absence of other organ involvement,no new sites of disease. PD: appearance of new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis,at least a 50% increase from nadir in SPD/longest diameter of previous lesion/node. Data was censored on date of last adequate tumor assessment in participants with no event,started new anti-cancer therapy/had 2 or more missing assessments.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab
n=1 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Azacitidine 40 mg/m\^2 SC dose was administered on Days 1 to 5 of each treatment cycle until the participant no longer received clinical benefit, along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
n=3 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with 90 mg/m\^2 IV infusion of bendamustine on Day 2 and Day 3 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of bendamustine was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 and Day 2 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles for a maximum of 6 cycles. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria
|
1.81 Months
Interval 1.81 to 1.81
|
—
|
NA Months
Median and full range could not be calculated as all 3 participants who achieved OR were not observed to have PD or death on study
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the first documentation of objective response (CR or PR) (maximum up to 36 months)Population: Participants who were randomized and achieved an objective response.
TTR was defined for participants who achieved objective response as time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) that was subsequently confirmed. CR was defined as a score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake \<= mediastinum), or 3 (uptake \<mediastinum but \<=liver) with or without a residual mass on PET 5-PS, for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions; no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. PR was defined as \>=50% decrease in SPD of up to six of the largest dominant lymph nodes, no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen volume, a \>=50% decrease in SPD of hepatic and splenic nodules, absence of other organ involvement, and no new sites of disease.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab
n=1 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Azacitidine 40 mg/m\^2 SC dose was administered on Days 1 to 5 of each treatment cycle until the participant no longer received clinical benefit, along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
n=3 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with 90 mg/m\^2 IV infusion of bendamustine on Day 2 and Day 3 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of bendamustine was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 and Day 2 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles for a maximum of 6 cycles. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Tumor Response (TTR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria
|
1.8 Months
Interval 1.8 to 1.8
|
—
|
1.9 Months
Interval 1.7 to 2.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the first documentation of PD, study discontinuation, start of new anti-cancer therapy or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 36 months)Population: Full analysis set population included all participants who were randomized in the study.
Disease control rate was defined as percentage of participants with disease control. Disease Control (DC) was defined as the best overall response of CR, PR, or stable disease (SD). CR: score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake \<= mediastinum), or 3 (uptake less than \<mediastinum but \<=liver) with or without a residual mass on PET 5-PS, for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions; no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. PR: \>=50% decrease in SPD of up to six of the largest dominant lymph nodes, no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen volume, a \>=50% decrease in SPD of hepatic and splenic nodules, absence of other organ involvement, and no new sites of disease. SD: \<50% decrease in SDP of up to 6 dominant, measurable nodes and extranodal sites; no criteria for progressive disease met. To qualify as a best overall response of SD, at least one SD assessment must be observed \>=6 weeks after start date and before disease progression.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab
n=9 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab
n=9 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Azacitidine 40 mg/m\^2 SC dose was administered on Days 1 to 5 of each treatment cycle until the participant no longer received clinical benefit, along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
n=11 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with 90 mg/m\^2 IV infusion of bendamustine on Day 2 and Day 3 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of bendamustine was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 and Day 2 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles for a maximum of 6 cycles. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Disease Control Rate as Assessed by the Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria
|
22.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 2.8 to 60.0
|
0 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 33.6
|
36.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 10.9 to 69.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to progression of disease, study discontinuation, censoring date or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 36 months)Population: Full analysis set population included all participants who were randomized in the study.
Investigator assessed PFS was defined as time (in months) from date of randomization to the first documentation of disease progression or death (due to any cause), whichever occurred first. PFS data was censored on the date of the last adequate tumor assessment for participants who had no an event (PD or death), for participants who start a new anti-cancer therapy prior to an event or for participants with an event after 2 or more missing or inadequate post-baseline tumor assessment. Participants without an adequate baseline or post-baseline tumor assessment were censored on the date of randomization unless death occurred on or before the time of the second planned tumor assessment in which case the death was considered as an event.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab
n=9 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab
n=9 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Azacitidine 40 mg/m\^2 SC dose was administered on Days 1 to 5 of each treatment cycle until the participant no longer received clinical benefit, along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
n=11 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with 90 mg/m\^2 IV infusion of bendamustine on Day 2 and Day 3 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of bendamustine was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 and Day 2 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles for a maximum of 6 cycles. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria
|
1.8 Months
Interval 0.6 to 3.5
|
1.5 Months
Interval 0.3 to 1.8
|
2.7 Months
Interval 1.3 to
Due to small number of participants who had events, upper limit of 95% CI was not estimable.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to discontinuation from the study or death, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 36 months)Population: Full analysis set population included all participants who were randomized in the study.
Overall survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants last known to be alive were censored at date of last contact. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab
n=9 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab
n=9 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Azacitidine 40 mg/m\^2 SC dose was administered on Days 1 to 5 of each treatment cycle until the participant no longer received clinical benefit, along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
n=11 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with 90 mg/m\^2 IV infusion of bendamustine on Day 2 and Day 3 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of bendamustine was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 and Day 2 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles for a maximum of 6 cycles. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Survival
|
14.8 Months
Interval 0.9 to
Due to small number of participants who had events, upper limit of 95% CI was not estimable.
|
4.0 Months
Interval 0.3 to 11.3
|
5.2 Months
Interval 1.3 to
Due to small number of participants who had events, upper limit of 95% CI was not estimable.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 hour Post dose Day 2 Cycle 1, 144 hour Post dose Day 8 of Cycle 1, 0 hour Post dose Day 16 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycle 4 and Cycle 6Population: Avelumab pharmacokinetic concentration analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and who had at least 1 post-dose concentration measurement above the lower limit of quantitation for avelumab. Here, "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab
n=8 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab
n=9 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Azacitidine 40 mg/m\^2 SC dose was administered on Days 1 to 5 of each treatment cycle until the participant no longer received clinical benefit, along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
n=11 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with 90 mg/m\^2 IV infusion of bendamustine on Day 2 and Day 3 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of bendamustine was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 and Day 2 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles for a maximum of 6 cycles. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Concentration Verses Time Summary of Avelumab
Cycle 1 Day 16
|
25.33 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 13.197
|
26.53 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 9.237
|
19.36 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 7.810
|
|
Concentration Verses Time Summary of Avelumab
Cycle 1 Day 2
|
183.29 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 83.809
|
198.43 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 29.387
|
193.30 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 29.702
|
|
Concentration Verses Time Summary of Avelumab
Cycle 1 Day 8
|
75.14 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 21.357
|
68.44 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 18.553
|
65.33 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 17.913
|
|
Concentration Verses Time Summary of Avelumab
Cycle 4 Day 1
|
25.00 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 4.667
|
62.00 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation NA
Due to single participant with data available for this outcome measure at this time point, Standard Deviation was not estimable.
|
120.88 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 165.187
|
|
Concentration Verses Time Summary of Avelumab
Cycle 6 Day 1
|
—
|
7.57 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation NA
Due to single participant with data available for this outcome measure at this time point, Standard Deviation was not estimable.
|
39.43 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 18.327
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline: 2 hours pre-dose of first dose of avelumab, Post baseline: post first dose up to up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months)Population: Avelumab immunogenicity analysis set included participants who had at least 1 ADA sample collected for avelumab.
ADA never-positive was defined as no positive ADA results at any time point. ADA ever-positive was defined as at least one positive ADA result at any time point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab
n=8 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab
n=9 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Azacitidine 40 mg/m\^2 SC dose was administered on Days 1 to 5 of each treatment cycle until the participant no longer received clinical benefit, along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
n=11 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with 90 mg/m\^2 IV infusion of bendamustine on Day 2 and Day 3 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of bendamustine was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 and Day 2 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles for a maximum of 6 cycles. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Avelumab by Never and Ever Positive Status
Baseline: ADA ever-positive
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Avelumab by Never and Ever Positive Status
Baseline: ADA never-positive
|
8 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Avelumab by Never and Ever Positive Status
Post Baseline: ADA ever-positive
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Avelumab by Never and Ever Positive Status
Post Baseline: ADA never-positive
|
8 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the date of first study treatment up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months)Population: Rituximab immunogenicity analysis set included participants who had at least 1 ADA sample collected for rituximab.
ADA never-positive was defined as no positive ADA results at any time point. ADA ever-positive was defined as at least one positive ADA result at any time point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab
n=8 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab
n=11 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Azacitidine 40 mg/m\^2 SC dose was administered on Days 1 to 5 of each treatment cycle until the participant no longer received clinical benefit, along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with 90 mg/m\^2 IV infusion of bendamustine on Day 2 and Day 3 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of bendamustine was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 and Day 2 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles for a maximum of 6 cycles. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Rituximab by Never and Ever Positive Status
ADA ever-positive
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Rituximab by Never and Ever Positive Status
ADA never-positive
|
8 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the date of first study treatment up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months)Population: Utomilumab immunogenicity analysis set included participants who had at least 1 ADA sample collected for utomilumab.
ADA never-positive was defined as no positive ADA results at any time point. ADA ever-positive was defined as at least one positive ADA result at any time point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab
n=8 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab
n=9 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Azacitidine 40 mg/m\^2 SC dose was administered on Days 1 to 5 of each treatment cycle until the participant no longer received clinical benefit, along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with 90 mg/m\^2 IV infusion of bendamustine on Day 2 and Day 3 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of bendamustine was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 and Day 2 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles for a maximum of 6 cycles. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Utomilumab by Never and Ever Positive Status
ADA ever-positive
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Utomilumab by Never and Ever Positive Status
ADA never-positive
|
7 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the date of first study treatment up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months)Population: Data for this outcome measure was not collected since there was no participants with post-baseline ADA ever positive sample for avelumab.
nAb never-positive was defined as no positive nAb results at any time point and nAb ever-positive was defined as at least one positive nAb result at any time point.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the date of first study treatment up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months)Population: Data for this this outcome measure was not collected since there was no participant with rituximab ADA ever positive sample.
nAb never-positive was defined as no positive nAb results at any time point and nAb ever-positive was defined as at least one positive nAb result at any time point.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the date of first study treatment up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months)Population: Utomilumab immunogenicity analysis set included participants from the safety analysis set who had at least one ADA/nAb sample collected for utomilumab. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies number of participants who were ADA positive and whose samples were further analyzed for nAb.
nAb never-positive was defined as no positive nAb results at any time point and nAb ever-positive was defined as at least one positive nAb result at any time point.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab
n=1 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab
n=2 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Azacitidine 40 mg/m\^2 SC dose was administered on Days 1 to 5 of each treatment cycle until the participant no longer received clinical benefit, along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with 90 mg/m\^2 IV infusion of bendamustine on Day 2 and Day 3 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of bendamustine was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 and Day 2 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles for a maximum of 6 cycles. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (nAb) Against Utomilumab by Never and Ever Positive Status
nAb never-positive
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (nAb) Against Utomilumab by Never and Ever Positive Status
nAb ever-positive
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening (prior to first dose of study treatment)Population: Full analysis set population included all participants who were randomized in the study. Here 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Percentage of Tumor and Immune Cells as Assessed by Immunohistochemistry at Baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab
n=6 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab
n=8 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Azacitidine 40 mg/m\^2 SC dose was administered on Days 1 to 5 of each treatment cycle until the participant no longer received clinical benefit, along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
n=6 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with 90 mg/m\^2 IV infusion of bendamustine on Day 2 and Day 3 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of bendamustine was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 and Day 2 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles for a maximum of 6 cycles. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor and Immune Cells as Assessed by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) at Baseline
Tumor Cells (membrane)
|
0 Percentage of cells staining positive
Interval 0.0 to 5.0
|
0.5 Percentage of cells staining positive
Interval 0.0 to 10.0
|
0 Percentage of cells staining positive
Interval 0.0 to 30.0
|
|
Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor and Immune Cells as Assessed by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) at Baseline
Immune Cells
|
7.5 Percentage of cells staining positive
Interval 0.0 to 30.0
|
7.5 Percentage of cells staining positive
Interval 0.0 to 70.0
|
17.5 Percentage of cells staining positive
Interval 0.0 to 50.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycle 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18Population: Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Number of participants with MRD positive, negative and not evaluable status were reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab
n=8 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab
n=9 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Azacitidine 40 mg/m\^2 SC dose was administered on Days 1 to 5 of each treatment cycle until the participant no longer received clinical benefit, along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
n=11 Participants
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with 90 mg/m\^2 IV infusion of bendamustine on Day 2 and Day 3 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of bendamustine was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 and Day 2 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles for a maximum of 6 cycles. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status
Baseline: Positive
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status
Baseline: Negative
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status
Baseline: NE
|
5 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status
Cycle 3 Day 1: Positive
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status
Cycle 3 Day 1: Negative
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status
Cycle 3 Day 1: NE
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status
Cycle 6 Day 1: Positive
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status
Cycle 6 Day 1: Negative
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status
Cycle 6 Day 1: NE
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status
Cycle 9 Day 1: Positive
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status
Cycle 9 Day 1: Negative
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status
Cycle 9 Day 1: NE
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status
Cycle 12 Day 1: Positive
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status
Cycle 12 Day 1: Negative
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status
Cycle 12 Day 1: NE
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status
Cycle 18 Day 1: Positive
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status
Cycle 18 Day 1: Negative
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status
Cycle 18 Day 1: NE
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab
n=8 participants at risk
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab
n=9 participants at risk
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Azacitidine 40 mg/m\^2 SC dose was administered on Days 1 to 5 of each treatment cycle until the participant no longer received clinical benefit, along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
n=11 participants at risk
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with 90 mg/m\^2 IV infusion of bendamustine on Day 2 and Day 3 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of bendamustine was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 and Day 2 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles for a maximum of 6 cycles. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Death
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Disease progression
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
18.2%
2/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile neutropenia
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercalcaemia
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Laryngeal oedema
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Ophthalmic herpes zoster
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal obstruction
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Superior vena cava syndrome
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab
n=8 participants at risk
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab
n=9 participants at risk
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Azacitidine 40 mg/m\^2 SC dose was administered on Days 1 to 5 of each treatment cycle until the participant no longer received clinical benefit, along with fixed dose of 100 mg IV infusion of utomilumab on Day 2 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of utomilumab was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 of Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
n=11 participants at risk
Avelumab 10 mg/kg IV infusion was administered every 2 weeks on Day 2 and Day 16 of Cycles 1 and 2, if well tolerated then continued on Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles, until the participant no longer received clinical benefit. Rituximab 375 mg/m\^2 IV infusion was administered on Day 1 of each treatment cycle (maximum of 8 cycles), along with 90 mg/m\^2 IV infusion of bendamustine on Day 2 and Day 3 of each treatment cycle in Cycles 1 and 2. If the dose of bendamustine was well tolerated, then it was administered on Day 1 and Day 2 in Cycle 3 and all subsequent cycles for a maximum of 6 cycles. The duration of each treatment cycle was 28 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Investigations
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
22.2%
2/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
18.2%
2/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood bilirubin increased
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood calcium
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood chloride increased
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased
|
25.0%
2/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood cholesterol increased
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood triglycerides increased
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bone pain
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Chills
|
37.5%
3/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Infusion related reaction
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site erythema
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Confusional state
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctival haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
55.6%
5/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
36.4%
4/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
25.0%
2/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
18.2%
2/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site reaction
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
37.5%
3/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
27.3%
3/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Decubitus ulcer
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
25.0%
2/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
18.2%
2/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Eye disorders
Dry eye
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
18.2%
2/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea exertional
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Electrocardiogram QT prolonged
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
36.4%
4/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
18.2%
2/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Generalised oedema
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Haemoglobin decreased
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Head discomfort
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Hiatus hernia
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercalcaemia
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercholesterolaemia
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperhidrosis
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypermagnesaemia
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypernatraemia
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypertriglyceridaemia
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperuricaemia
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoalbuminaemia
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypocalcaemia
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
18.2%
2/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypomagnesaemia
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypophosphataemia
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
18.2%
2/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
18.2%
2/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Influenza like illness
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
22.2%
2/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Amylase increased
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
25.0%
2/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
22.2%
2/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
36.4%
4/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
22.2%
2/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
25.0%
2/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
25.0%
2/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
33.3%
3/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Bilirubin conjugated increased
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood alkaline phosphatase
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint range of motion decreased
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Eye disorders
Lacrimation increased
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Lethargy
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
18.2%
2/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Lipase decreased
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymph node pain
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Lymphocyte count decreased
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
27.3%
3/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Microalbuminuria
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
25.0%
2/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
22.2%
2/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
36.4%
4/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
25.0%
2/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
45.5%
5/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
18.2%
2/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Night sweats
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nocturia
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oesophageal obstruction
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Ophthalmic herpes zoster
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
18.2%
2/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Pollakiuria
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Primary hypothyroidism
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Productive cough
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Proteinuria
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
18.2%
2/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary oedema
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
37.5%
3/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
27.3%
3/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
18.2%
2/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash erythematous
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash maculo-papular
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash papular
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus bradycardia
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin abrasion
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
18.2%
2/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Superior vena cava syndrome
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Taste disorder
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
27.3%
3/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Transfusion reaction
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Tumour pain
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
25.0%
2/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
12.5%
1/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
18.2%
2/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
White blood cell count decreased
|
0.00%
0/8 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Baseline up to follow up (36 months)
Same event may appear as AE and serious AE, what is presented are distinct events. Event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another participant or 1 participant may have experienced both serious and non-serious event during study. Safety analysis set population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER