Trial Outcomes & Findings for A MAD Study of TT301/MW189 in Healthy Volunteers (NCT NCT02942771)
NCT ID: NCT02942771
Last Updated: 2020-06-16
Results Overview
The number of participants who experienced serious adverse events.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
35 participants
4 weeks
2020-06-16
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
No drug intervention.
Placebo: 0.9% sodium chloride
|
Cohort 1 - TT301/MW189
TT301/MW189 0.075 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 1 - TT301/MW189: 0.075 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
Cohort 2 -TT301/MW189
TT301/MW189 0.15 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 2- TT301MW189: 0.15 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
Cohort 3- TT301/MW189
TT301/MW189 0.25 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 3 - TT301/MW189: 0.25 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
Cohort 4- TT301/MW189
TT301/MW189 0.30 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 4 - TT301/MW189: 0.30 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
9
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
No drug intervention.
Placebo: 0.9% sodium chloride
|
Cohort 1 - TT301/MW189
TT301/MW189 0.075 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 1 - TT301/MW189: 0.075 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
Cohort 2 -TT301/MW189
TT301/MW189 0.15 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 2- TT301MW189: 0.15 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
Cohort 3- TT301/MW189
TT301/MW189 0.25 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 3 - TT301/MW189: 0.25 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
Cohort 4- TT301/MW189
TT301/MW189 0.30 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 4 - TT301/MW189: 0.30 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
A MAD Study of TT301/MW189 in Healthy Volunteers
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=8 Participants
No drug intervention.
Placebo: 0.9% sodium chloride
|
Cohort 1 - TT301/MW189
n=6 Participants
TT301/MW189 0.075 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 1 - TT301/MW189: 0.075 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
Cohort 2 -TT301/MW189
n=6 Participants
TT301/MW189 0.15 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 2- TT301MW189: 0.15 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
Cohort 3- TT301/MW189
n=6 Participants
TT301/MW189 0.25 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 3 - TT301/MW189: 0.25 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
Cohort 4- TT301/MW189
n=8 Participants
TT301/MW189 0.30 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 4 - TT301/MW189: 0.30 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
Total
n=34 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
8 participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 participants
n=4 Participants
|
8 participants
n=21 Participants
|
34 participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Height
|
165.8 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7 • n=5 Participants
|
171.6 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7 • n=7 Participants
|
164.0 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1 • n=5 Participants
|
170.9 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5 • n=4 Participants
|
173.1 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4 • n=21 Participants
|
169.1 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7 • n=8 Participants
|
|
Weight
|
74.5 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1 • n=5 Participants
|
70.5 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1 • n=7 Participants
|
75.2 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3 • n=5 Participants
|
85.5 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.5 • n=4 Participants
|
86.4 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7 • n=21 Participants
|
78.6 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8 • n=8 Participants
|
|
BMI
|
27.1 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9 • n=5 Participants
|
24.1 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8 • n=7 Participants
|
28.1 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7 • n=5 Participants
|
29.1 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7 • n=4 Participants
|
28.8 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8 • n=21 Participants
|
27.5 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9 • n=8 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
34.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7 • n=5 Participants
|
32.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9 • n=7 Participants
|
31.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2 • n=5 Participants
|
34.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4 • n=4 Participants
|
30.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9 • n=21 Participants
|
33.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7 • n=8 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 weeksPopulation: One subject randomized to the Placebo Group was withdrawn prior to receiving the study drug. Consequently, this subject is excluded from this safety analysis. As the remaining 8 subjects in the Placebo Group and all 8 subjects in Cohort 4 received an intervention they are included in safety outcomes.
The number of participants who experienced serious adverse events.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 4- TT301/MW189
n=8 Participants
TT301/MW189 0.30 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 4 - TT301/MW189: 0.30 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
Placebo
n=8 Participants
No drug intervention.
Placebo: 0.9% sodium chloride
|
Cohort 1 - TT301/MW189
n=6 Participants
TT301/MW189 0.075 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 1 - TT301/MW189: 0.075 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
Cohort 2 -TT301/MW189
n=6 Participants
TT301/MW189 0.15 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 2- TT301MW189: 0.15 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
Cohort 3- TT301/MW189
n=6 Participants
TT301/MW189 0.25 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 3 - TT301/MW189: 0.25 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Serious Adverse Events
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 weeksPopulation: One subject randomized to the Placebo Group was withdrawn prior to receiving the study drug. Consequently, this subject is excluded from this safety analysis. As the remaining 8 subjects in the Placebo Group and all 8 subjects in Cohort 4 received an intervention they are included in safety outcomes.
The number of participants who experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). A TEAE is defined as an adverse event that started during the treatment period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 4- TT301/MW189
n=8 Participants
TT301/MW189 0.30 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 4 - TT301/MW189: 0.30 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
Placebo
n=8 Participants
No drug intervention.
Placebo: 0.9% sodium chloride
|
Cohort 1 - TT301/MW189
n=6 Participants
TT301/MW189 0.075 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 1 - TT301/MW189: 0.075 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
Cohort 2 -TT301/MW189
n=6 Participants
TT301/MW189 0.15 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 2- TT301MW189: 0.15 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
Cohort 3- TT301/MW189
n=6 Participants
TT301/MW189 0.25 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 3 - TT301/MW189: 0.25 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
|
6 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 5 daysPopulation: Pharmacokinetic parameters for TT301/MW189 can not be analyzed in the placebo group, as they did not receive the study drug. Although 8 subjects were enrolled in Cohort 4 and are included in the safety analyses, only 4 completed sampling for PK parameters at all timepoints.
Maximum observed concentration in plasma.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 4- TT301/MW189
n=4 Participants
TT301/MW189 0.30 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 4 - TT301/MW189: 0.30 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
Placebo
No drug intervention.
Placebo: 0.9% sodium chloride
|
Cohort 1 - TT301/MW189
n=6 Participants
TT301/MW189 0.075 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 1 - TT301/MW189: 0.075 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
Cohort 2 -TT301/MW189
n=6 Participants
TT301/MW189 0.15 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 2- TT301MW189: 0.15 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
Cohort 3- TT301/MW189
n=6 Participants
TT301/MW189 0.25 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 3 - TT301/MW189: 0.25 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetics - Cmax
|
750 ng/ml
Standard Deviation 235
|
—
|
227 ng/ml
Standard Deviation 80.5
|
347 ng/ml
Standard Deviation 86.8
|
609 ng/ml
Standard Deviation 180
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 5 daysPopulation: Tmax was not measured for any group.
Time to maximum concentration
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 5 daysPopulation: Pharmacokinetic parameters for TT301/MW189 can not be analyzed in the placebo group, as they did not receive the study drug. Although 8 subjects were enrolled in Cohort 4 and are included in the safety analyses, only 4 completed sampling for PK parameters at all timepoints.
Area under the concentration-time curve
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 4- TT301/MW189
n=4 Participants
TT301/MW189 0.30 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 4 - TT301/MW189: 0.30 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
Placebo
No drug intervention.
Placebo: 0.9% sodium chloride
|
Cohort 1 - TT301/MW189
n=6 Participants
TT301/MW189 0.075 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 1 - TT301/MW189: 0.075 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
Cohort 2 -TT301/MW189
n=6 Participants
TT301/MW189 0.15 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 2- TT301MW189: 0.15 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
Cohort 3- TT301/MW189
n=6 Participants
TT301/MW189 0.25 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 3 - TT301/MW189: 0.25 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetics - AUC
|
1525 ng*h/ml
Standard Deviation 458
|
—
|
362 ng*h/ml
Standard Deviation 123
|
639 ng*h/ml
Standard Deviation 220
|
1225 ng*h/ml
Standard Deviation 474
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 5 daysPopulation: Pharmacokinetic parameters for TT301/MW189 can not be analyzed in the placebo group, as they did not receive the study drug. Although 8 subjects were enrolled in Cohort 4 and are included in the safety analyses, only 4 completed sampling for PK parameters at all timepoints.
Terminal half-life (T1/2)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 4- TT301/MW189
n=4 Participants
TT301/MW189 0.30 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 4 - TT301/MW189: 0.30 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
Placebo
No drug intervention.
Placebo: 0.9% sodium chloride
|
Cohort 1 - TT301/MW189
n=6 Participants
TT301/MW189 0.075 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 1 - TT301/MW189: 0.075 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
Cohort 2 -TT301/MW189
n=6 Participants
TT301/MW189 0.15 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 2- TT301MW189: 0.15 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
Cohort 3- TT301/MW189
n=6 Participants
TT301/MW189 0.25 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 3 - TT301/MW189: 0.25 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetics - T1/2
|
9.1 hours
Standard Deviation 2.8
|
—
|
8.5 hours
Standard Deviation 3.4
|
8.5 hours
Standard Deviation 3.7
|
8.8 hours
Standard Deviation 2.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 5 daysPopulation: Pharmacokinetic parameters for TT301/MW189 can not be analyzed in the placebo group, as they did not receive the study drug. Although 8 subjects were enrolled in Cohort 4 and are included in the safety analyses, only 4 completed sampling for PK parameters at all timepoints.
Elimination rate constant
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 4- TT301/MW189
n=4 Participants
TT301/MW189 0.30 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 4 - TT301/MW189: 0.30 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
Placebo
No drug intervention.
Placebo: 0.9% sodium chloride
|
Cohort 1 - TT301/MW189
n=6 Participants
TT301/MW189 0.075 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 1 - TT301/MW189: 0.075 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
Cohort 2 -TT301/MW189
n=6 Participants
TT301/MW189 0.15 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 2- TT301MW189: 0.15 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
Cohort 3- TT301/MW189
n=6 Participants
TT301/MW189 0.25 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 3 - TT301/MW189: 0.25 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetics - Kel
|
0.081 h^-1
Standard Deviation 0.022
|
—
|
0.090 h^-1
Standard Deviation 0.029
|
0.093 h^-1
Standard Deviation 0.034
|
0.085 h^-1
Standard Deviation 0.028
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
Cohort 1 - TT301/MW189
Cohort 2 -TT301/MW189
Cohort 3- TT301/MW189
Cohort 4- TT301/MW189
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=8 participants at risk
No drug intervention.
Placebo: 0.9% sodium chloride
|
Cohort 1 - TT301/MW189
n=6 participants at risk
TT301/MW189 0.075 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 1 - TT301/MW189: 0.075 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
Cohort 2 -TT301/MW189
n=6 participants at risk
TT301/MW189 0.15 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 2- TT301MW189: 0.15 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
Cohort 3- TT301/MW189
n=6 participants at risk
TT301/MW189 0.25 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 3 - TT301/MW189: 0.25 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
Cohort 4- TT301/MW189
n=8 participants at risk
TT301/MW189 0.30 mg/kg IV (or matched placebo). Each subject will receive 1 dose level of study drug twice daily (bid) on Days 1 through 5, inclusive
Cohort 4 - TT301/MW189: 0.30 mg/kg IV twice daily on Days 1 through 5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Sensitivity of Teeth
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Phlebitis
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
50.0%
3/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
33.3%
2/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
66.7%
4/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
25.0%
2/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Diastolic Hypertension
|
12.5%
1/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in Extremety
|
37.5%
3/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
50.0%
3/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
37.5%
3/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back Pain
|
12.5%
1/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
12.5%
1/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Contact Dermatitits
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
66.7%
4/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
25.0%
2/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Ecchymosis
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
33.3%
2/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
25.0%
2/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
|
General disorders
Infusion-Site Pain
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
12.5%
1/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
|
General disorders
Infusion-Site Erythema
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
|
General disorders
Nodule
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
|
General disorders
Peripheral Swelling
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
|
General disorders
Infusion-Site Phlebitis
|
12.5%
1/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
50.0%
4/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
33.3%
2/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
37.5%
3/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
25.0%
2/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Parasthesia
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
25.0%
2/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain, Lower
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
12.5%
1/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
12.5%
1/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
|
Investigations
ECG T-Wave Inversion
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
|
Investigations
Increased Blood Creatine Phosphokinase
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
|
Investigations
Decreased Hemoglobin
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
12.5%
1/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear Pain
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
16.7%
1/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
12.5%
1/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Road Traffic Accident
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
12.5%
1/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
12.5%
1/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
12.5%
1/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
12.5%
1/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalemia
|
12.5%
1/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/6 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
0.00%
0/8 • 4 weeks
Assessment was systematic. Safety and tolerability were assessed by clinical observation, lab tests and spontaneous reporting by subjects. Placebo group: 9 subjects were randomized,1 subject withdrew prior to starting the intervention. As this subject did not receive intervention, safety data are reported only for the remaining 8 subjects. Cohort 4: 8 subjects were randomized, only 4 completed all timepoints. As all 8 subjects received study drug, safety data are reported for all 8.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place