Assessing Community Cancer Care After Insurance ExpanSionS

NCT ID: NCT02936609

Last Updated: 2022-04-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1939783 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-04-30

Study Completion Date

2021-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This innovative and timely study will measure the impact of Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansions on cancer screenings and preventive services. To assess this natural policy experiment, the investigators will use electronic health record data from the Accelerating Data Value Across a National Community Health Center Network (ADVANCE) clinical data research network (CDRN) of the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Cancer morbidity and mortality is greatly reduced through screening and prevention, but uninsured patients are much less likely than insured patients to receive these evidence-based services as recommended. In addition, uninsured cancer survivors receive fewer primary and preventive care services than those with health insurance. Thus, it is hypothesized that Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansions could substantially improve access to essential cancer preventive and screening services for previously uninsured patients, and facilitate better care for cancer survivors who gain health insurance. In 2012, the United States (US) Supreme Court ruled that states were not legally required to implement ACA Medicaid expansions, creating a unique natural experiment to test this hypothesis. By April 1, 2015, 30 states and the District of Columbia had implemented expansions, and 20 states had not. This led to increased Medicaid enrollment by 26% in expansion states, compared to 8% in non-expansion states. Previous single-state Medicaid expansions led to increased utilization of healthcare services and improved health outcomes post-expansion. For example, in Oregon, cervical cancer screening rates were 18-19% higher among women who gained Medicaid in 2008, compared to those who remained uninsured. However, no previous assessments of state-specific expansions had concurrent control (non-expansion) states for comparison. Further, little is known about how Medicaid expansion impacts the delivery of recommended primary and preventive care services to cancer survivors, termed 'survivor care.'

The investigators propose to use the ACA Medicaid expansion natural experiment to study the effect of state-level Medicaid expansion on rates of cancer screening and preventive services ('cancer prevention') and survivor care. Many patients likely to gain coverage through ACA Medicaid expansions receive primary care in community health centers (CHCs), our nation's healthcare 'safety net;' thus, the proposed analyses will use electronic health record (EHR) data from the ADVANCE clinical data research network (CDRN) of CHCs (ADVANCE is one of 11 CDRNs in the national PCORnet data network). The ADVANCE CDRN has patient-level data from 476 CHCs in 13 Medicaid expansion states (n=576,711 patients) and 242 CHCs in 8 non-expansion states (n=361,421 patients). This nationally unique data resource will allow us to measure outcomes in expansion versus non-expansion states, illuminating the impact of increased Medicaid opportunities on rates of cancer prevention and survivor care within the safety net. The investigators will also assess whether disparities in delivery of this care are reduced. Our specific aims for this study, titled "Assessing Community Cancer care after insurance ExpanSionS (ACCESS)," are to:

Aim 1. Compare pre-post receipt of cancer prevention and screening among vulnerable CHC patients in Medicaid expansion versus non-expansion states.

Hypothesis 1a: Cancer prevention and screening will significantly increase among CHC patients in expansion states, compared to those in non-expansion states.

Hypothesis 1b: Racial/ethnic disparities in cancer prevention and screening will be significantly reduced in expansion states versus no change in non-expansion states.

Aim 2. Compare pre-post insurance status, visits, and receipt of routine, recommended primary and preventive care among cancer survivors seen in CHCs in expansion versus non-expansion states.

Hypothesis 2a: A higher percentage of uninsured cancer survivors will have gained insurance coverage in expansion states, compared to those in non-expansion states.

Hypothesis 2b: Cancer survivors who are CHC patients in expansion states will have a significant increase in visits, visits paid by Medicaid, and survivor care relative to no change among patients in non-expansion states.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Medicaid Expansion States

Patients receiving care in community health centers in states that expanded Medicaid (intervention group)

Medicaid Expansion

Intervention Type OTHER

There will be no direct intervention, but rather an observation of change based on whether a state expanded Medicaid or not

Medicaid Non-Expansion States

Patients receiving care in community health centers in states that did not expand Medicaid (control group)

Medicaid Expansion

Intervention Type OTHER

There will be no direct intervention, but rather an observation of change based on whether a state expanded Medicaid or not

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Medicaid Expansion

There will be no direct intervention, but rather an observation of change based on whether a state expanded Medicaid or not

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients in intervention and control states aged 19-64

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients at intervention and control clinics outside of the age range 19-64
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

64 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

OCHIN, Inc.

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Health Choice Network

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fenway Community Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institutes of Health (NIH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

OHSU Knight Cancer Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jennifer Devoe, MD

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bailey SR, Marino M, Ezekiel-Herrera D, Schmidt T, Angier H, Hoopes MJ, DeVoe JE, Heintzman J, Huguet N. Tobacco Cessation in Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion States Versus Non-expansion States. Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 May 26;22(6):1016-1022. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz087.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31123754 (View on PubMed)

Hoopes M, Schmidt T, Huguet N, Winters-Stone K, Angier H, Marino M, Shannon J, DeVoe J. Identifying and characterizing cancer survivors in the US primary care safety net. Cancer. 2019 Oct 1;125(19):3448-3456. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32295. Epub 2019 Jun 7.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31174231 (View on PubMed)

Hoopes M, Voss R, Angier H, Marino M, Schmidt T, DeVoe JE, Soule J, Huguet N. Assessing Cancer History Accuracy in Primary Care Electronic Health Records Through Cancer Registry Linkage. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Jul 1;113(7):924-932. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa210.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 33377908 (View on PubMed)

Huguet N, Angier H, Rdesinski R, Hoopes M, Marino M, Holderness H, DeVoe JE. Cervical and colorectal cancer screening prevalence before and after Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion. Prev Med. 2019 Jul;124:91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.05.003. Epub 2019 May 8.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31077723 (View on PubMed)

Angier HE, Marino M, Springer RJ, Schmidt TD, Huguet N, DeVoe JE. The Affordable Care Act improved health insurance coverage and cardiovascular-related screening rates for cancer survivors seen in community health centers. Cancer. 2020 Jul 15;126(14):3303-3311. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32900. Epub 2020 Apr 15.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32294251 (View on PubMed)

Angier H, Huguet N, Marino M, Mori M, Winters-Stone K, Shannon J, Raynor L, Holderness H, DeVoe JE. Assessing Community Cancer care after insurance ExpanSionS (ACCESS) study protocol. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2017 Sep;7:136-140. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2017.06.011. Epub 2017 Jun 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29473059 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R01CA204267

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

KidneyCare Cohort Study (KCC-S)
NCT06898632 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Family History Study on Cancer Risk
NCT04145388 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA