Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
41 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-10-31
2016-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
An Educational Intervention to Improve the Success of Intubation in Newborns Using a Video Laryngoscope by Reducing the Time the Procedure Takes.
NCT06898801
Comparing the Effectiveness of a Safety Intravenous Cannula With a Standard Intravenous Cannula in Neonates
NCT03597711
Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation During Neonatal Nasal Intubation
NCT06139809
A Stylet Use May be Beneficial for Elective and Rescue Intubation of Prematurely Born Infants
NCT06316765
Mobile Application as a Clinical Decision Support Tool for Neonatal Resuscitation in the Delivery Room
NCT05613530
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To ensure that the differences in outcome of Neonatal Life Support (NLS) learning are attributable to MedNav only, a simple randomisation process was carried out just prior to testing, where candidates pulled out a folded piece of paper assigning them to either
1. No MedNav on performing NLS (control arm)
2. Assistance of MedNav when performing NLS
Blinding/masking was not possible for either the candidate or faculty as the testing process involved the use of a tablet device to display the MedNav system.
On entering the room, candidates stated whether they were using MedNav or not. Each candidate was given an identical neonatal resuscitation scenario and technical skills in neonatal resuscitation were assessed using a 12-point mark sheet adapted from the Neonatal Life Support course provided by the UK Resuscitation Council. After testing, all candidates were asked to assess their confidence in performing NLS using a seven point Likert scale.
Candidates were subsequently invited back for a follow-up session at 7 weeks. Testing of the same NLS scenario was undertaken with participants staying in their initial allocation groups. Again technical skills were assessed based on the UK resuscitation council mark sheet and candidates were asked to rate their confidence on NLS after.
For further analysis, a small sample of 9 students from the "non-MedNav" group were asked to perform NLS with the use of MedNav immediately after their secondary testing at 7 weeks. The investigators aim here was to assess if this crossover group had a significant improvement in their task completion owing largely to the use of MedNav.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
MedNav assisted resuscitators
MedNav will be used to perform neonatal resuscitation on a mannequin and assessed after teaching and 7 weeks after intervention, following this a small group will be used as a cross over study.
MedNav
MedNav is a tablet based platform that uses auditory and visual cues to prompt people to perform the correct steps in neonatal resuscitation.
No MedNav resuscitators
Neonatal resuscitation will be performed on a mannequin (without the use of MedNav) and assessed after teaching and 7 weeks after intervention.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
MedNav
MedNav is a tablet based platform that uses auditory and visual cues to prompt people to perform the correct steps in neonatal resuscitation.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Shane P Duffy, MBChB
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation trust
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ChelseaNHS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.