Trial Outcomes & Findings for Evaluation of a Experimental Denture Adhesive to Prevent Food Ingress (NCT NCT02928380)
NCT ID: NCT02928380
Last Updated: 2018-08-27
Results Overview
Participants were provided with 30-32 g (accurately weighed) non-salted peanuts, divided into smaller portions of approximately four whole peanuts. Each portion chewed for approximately 20 seconds. After completion of the peanut consumption, participants rinsed their mouth with water, participants may remove any residual peanut particles from their mouth with water and a gauze pad. Participants than removed their dentures. Peanut particles were collected from the fit surfaces of the dentures and the gauzes, and weighed to evaluate the mass of food particles that had migrated under the denture (keeping the particles associated with the upper and lower dentures separate).
COMPLETED
NA
83 participants
Up to 17 days
2018-08-27
Participant Flow
Participants were recruited at a single center in the United States.
A total of 91 participants were screened, out of which only 83 participants were randomized to the study. 8 participants were not randomized: 7 participants due to screening failure and 1 participant due lost to follow up.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Reference Denture Adhesive/Test Denture Adhesive/No Adhesive
Participants received reference denture adhesive, test denture adhesive and no adhesive by site staff in treatment periods 1, 2, 3 respectively, to their dentures which were placed in their mouth. A single application of each adhesive was applied. The three treatment periods were separated by a washout period of 2-7 days.
|
Reference Denture Adhesive/No Adhesive/Test Denture Adhesive
Participants received reference denture adhesive, no adhesive and test denture adhesive by site staff in treatment periods 1, 2, 3 respectively, to their dentures which were placed in their mouth. A single application of each adhesive was applied. The three treatment periods were separated by a washout period of 2-7 days.
|
Test Denture Adhesive/Reference Denture Adhesive/No Adhesive
Participants received test denture adhesive, reference denture adhesive and no adhesive by site staff in treatment periods 1, 2, 3 respectively, to their dentures which were placed in their mouth. A single application of each adhesive was applied. The three treatment periods were separated by a washout period of 2-7 days.
|
Test Denture Adhesive/No Adhesive/Reference Denture Adhesive
Participants received test denture adhesive, no adhesive and reference denture adhesive by site staff in treatment periods 1, 2, 3 respectively, to their dentures which were placed in their mouth. A single application of each adhesive was applied. The three treatment periods were separated by a washout period of 2-7 days.
|
No Adhesive/Reference Denture Adhesive/Test Denture Adhesive
Participants received no adhesive, reference denture adhesive and test denture adhesive by site staff in treatment periods 1, 2, 3 respectively, to their dentures which were placed in their mouth. A single application of each adhesive was applied. The three treatment periods were separated by a washout period of 2-7 days.
|
No Adhesive/Test Denture Adhesive/Reference Denture Adhesive
Participants received no adhesive, test denture adhesive and reference denture adhesive by site staff in treatment periods 1, 2, 3 respectively, to their dentures which were placed in their mouth. A single application of each adhesive was applied. The three treatment periods were separated by a washout period of 2-7 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Period 1
STARTED
|
13
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
|
Period 1
COMPLETED
|
13
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
|
Period 1
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Wash Out Period 1
STARTED
|
13
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
|
Wash Out Period 1
COMPLETED
|
13
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
|
Wash Out Period 1
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Period 2
STARTED
|
13
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
|
Period 2
COMPLETED
|
13
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
|
Period 2
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Wash Out Period 2
STARTED
|
13
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
|
Wash Out Period 2
COMPLETED
|
13
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
|
Wash Out Period 2
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Period 3
STARTED
|
13
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
|
Period 3
COMPLETED
|
13
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
14
|
|
Period 3
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Evaluation of a Experimental Denture Adhesive to Prevent Food Ingress
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Overall Participants
n=83 Participants
All the participants received all three treatments (reference denture adhesive, test denture adhesive and no adhesive) in the study period 1, 2, and 3 according to the randomization sequence. Each treatment period was separated by washout period of 2-7 days. All randomized participants were included for baseline evaluation.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
63.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.99 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
62 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
82 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
70 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 17 daysPopulation: Analysis for this outcome was performed on ITT population including all participants who were randomized, received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one post baseline efficacy assessment.
Participants were provided with 30-32 g (accurately weighed) non-salted peanuts, divided into smaller portions of approximately four whole peanuts. Each portion chewed for approximately 20 seconds. After completion of the peanut consumption, participants rinsed their mouth with water, participants may remove any residual peanut particles from their mouth with water and a gauze pad. Participants than removed their dentures. Peanut particles were collected from the fit surfaces of the dentures and the gauzes, and weighed to evaluate the mass of food particles that had migrated under the denture (keeping the particles associated with the upper and lower dentures separate).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Reference Denture Adhesive
n=83 Participants
Participants received reference denture adhesive by site staff as a 3 dabs those were applied to upper denture and 2 dabs those were applied to lower denture which were placed in the mouth.
|
No Adhesive (Negative Control)
n=83 Participants
Participants did not receive any denture adhesive by site staff in this treatment arm.
|
No Adhesive (Negative Control)
Participants did not receive any denture adhesive by site staff in this treatment arm.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Combined Mass of Peanuts (Gram) (From Upper and Lower Dentures) for Reference Denture Adhesive and on no Adhesive Use
|
0.06 gram (g)
Standard Deviation 0.057
|
0.08 gram (g)
Standard Deviation 0.151
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 17 daysPopulation: Analysis for this outcome was performed on ITT population including all participants who were randomized, received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one post baseline efficacy assessment.
Participants were provided with 30-32 g (accurately weighed) non-salted peanuts, divided into smaller portions of approximately four whole peanuts. Each portion chewed for approximately 20 seconds. After completion of the peanut consumption, participants rinsed their mouth with water, participants may remove any residual peanut particles from their mouth with water and a gauze pad. Participants than removed their dentures. Peanut particles were collected from the fit surfaces of the dentures and the gauzes, and weighed to evaluate the mass of food particles that had migrated under the denture (keeping the particles associated with the upper and lower dentures separate).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Reference Denture Adhesive
n=83 Participants
Participants received reference denture adhesive by site staff as a 3 dabs those were applied to upper denture and 2 dabs those were applied to lower denture which were placed in the mouth.
|
No Adhesive (Negative Control)
n=83 Participants
Participants did not receive any denture adhesive by site staff in this treatment arm.
|
No Adhesive (Negative Control)
Participants did not receive any denture adhesive by site staff in this treatment arm.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Combined Mass of Peanuts (Gram) (From Upper and Lower Dentures) for an Experimental Denture Adhesive and on no Adhesive Use
|
0.07 g
Standard Deviation 0.092
|
0.08 g
Standard Deviation 0.151
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 17 daysPopulation: Analysis for this outcome was performed on ITT population including all participants who were randomized, received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one post baseline efficacy assessment.
Participants were provided with 30-32 g (accurately weighed) non-salted peanuts, divided into smaller portions of approximately four whole peanuts. Each portion chewed for approximately 20 seconds. After completion of the peanut consumption, participants rinsed their mouth with water, participants may remove any residual peanut particles from their mouth with water and a gauze pad. Participants than removed their dentures. Peanut particles were collected from the fit surfaces of the dentures and the gauzes, and weighed to evaluate the mass of food particles that had migrated under the denture (keeping the particles associated with the upper and lower dentures separate).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Reference Denture Adhesive
n=83 Participants
Participants received reference denture adhesive by site staff as a 3 dabs those were applied to upper denture and 2 dabs those were applied to lower denture which were placed in the mouth.
|
No Adhesive (Negative Control)
n=83 Participants
Participants did not receive any denture adhesive by site staff in this treatment arm.
|
No Adhesive (Negative Control)
Participants did not receive any denture adhesive by site staff in this treatment arm.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Combined Mass of Peanuts (Gram) (From Upper and Lower Dentures) for an Experimental Denture Adhesive and Reference Denture Adhesive
|
0.07 g
Standard Deviation 0.092
|
0.06 g
Standard Deviation 0.057
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 17 daysPopulation: Analysis for this outcome was performed on ITT population including all participants who were randomized, received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one post baseline efficacy assessment.
Kapur (Olshan modification) Index score was assessed to examine each denture (upper \& lower) for retention \& stability. Retention was measured as score of 0-5 to assess nature of resistance offered by denture to vertical pull \& lateral force: 5=Excellent;4=Very Good;3=Good;2=Fair;1= Poor;0=No retention. Stability was measured as score of 0-4 to assess nature of rocking offered by denture base on its supporting structures under pressure:4=Excellent (no rocking);3=Good (very slight rocking);2=Fair (slight rocking);1=Poor (moderate rocking);0=No stability (extreme rocking). Composite Kapur (Olshan modification) Index scores was measured as the sum score of retention \& stability for upper or lower dentures separately such that a sum score of zero represents no retention and stability and a sum score of 9 represents excellent retention and stability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Reference Denture Adhesive
n=83 Participants
Participants received reference denture adhesive by site staff as a 3 dabs those were applied to upper denture and 2 dabs those were applied to lower denture which were placed in the mouth.
|
No Adhesive (Negative Control)
n=83 Participants
Participants did not receive any denture adhesive by site staff in this treatment arm.
|
No Adhesive (Negative Control)
n=83 Participants
Participants did not receive any denture adhesive by site staff in this treatment arm.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Composite Kapur (Olshan Modification) Index Scores for Denture Retention and Stability
For Upper Denture
|
8.67 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.828
|
8.84 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.594
|
8.35 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.224
|
|
Composite Kapur (Olshan Modification) Index Scores for Denture Retention and Stability
For Lower Denture
|
7.42 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.815
|
8.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.593
|
6.36 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.535
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 17 daysPopulation: Analysis for this outcome was performed on ITT population including all participants who were randomized, received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one post baseline efficacy assessment.
Kapur (Olshan modification) Index scores were assessed to examine each denture (upper \& lower) for its retention ability. Retention was measured as score of 0-5 to assess nature of resistance offered by denture to vertical pull \& lateral force: 5=Excellent - denture offered excellent resistance to vertical pull and lateral force; 4= Very Good- denture offered very good resistance to vertical pull and lateral force; 3= Good- denture offered moderate resistance to vertical pull and lateral force; 2= Fair- denture offered moderate resistance to vertical pull and little or no resistance to lateral forces; 1= Poor- denture offers slight resistance to vertical pull and little or no resistance to lateral force; 0= No retention- when the denture was seated in place, it displaced itself. Higher the score, higher the retention ability of denture.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Reference Denture Adhesive
n=83 Participants
Participants received reference denture adhesive by site staff as a 3 dabs those were applied to upper denture and 2 dabs those were applied to lower denture which were placed in the mouth.
|
No Adhesive (Negative Control)
n=83 Participants
Participants did not receive any denture adhesive by site staff in this treatment arm.
|
No Adhesive (Negative Control)
n=83 Participants
Participants did not receive any denture adhesive by site staff in this treatment arm.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Kapur (Olshan Modification) Index Scores for Denture Retention
For Upper Denture
|
4.80 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.512
|
4.90 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.335
|
4.63 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.728
|
|
Kapur (Olshan Modification) Index Scores for Denture Retention
For Lower Denture
|
4.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.070
|
4.43 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.940
|
3.46 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.874
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 17 daysPopulation: Analysis for this outcome was performed on ITT population including all participants who were randomized, received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one post baseline efficacy assessment.
Kapur (Olshan modification) Index scores were assessed to examine each denture (upper \& lower) for its stability ability. Stability was measured using score of 0-4: 4= Excellent- when denture base offered no rocking on its supporting structures under pressure; 3= Good- when denture base had very slight rocking on its supporting structures under pressure; 2= Fair- when denture base had slight rocking on its supporting structures under pressure; 1= Poor- when denture base had moderate rocking on its supporting structures under pressure; 0= No stability- when denture base had extreme rocking under pressure. Higher the score, higher the stability ability of denture.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Reference Denture Adhesive
n=83 Participants
Participants received reference denture adhesive by site staff as a 3 dabs those were applied to upper denture and 2 dabs those were applied to lower denture which were placed in the mouth.
|
No Adhesive (Negative Control)
n=83 Participants
Participants did not receive any denture adhesive by site staff in this treatment arm.
|
No Adhesive (Negative Control)
n=83 Participants
Participants did not receive any denture adhesive by site staff in this treatment arm.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Kapur (Olshan Modification) Index Scores for Denture Stability
For Upper Denture
|
3.88 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.363
|
3.94 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.286
|
3.72 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.570
|
|
Kapur (Olshan Modification) Index Scores for Denture Stability
For Lower Denture
|
3.37 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.807
|
3.67 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.700
|
2.90 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.775
|
Adverse Events
Reference Denture Adhesive
Test Denture Adhesive
No Adhesive (Negative Control)
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER