Trial Outcomes & Findings for OTIVACTO Spain Non Interventional Study (NCT NCT02927795)
NCT ID: NCT02927795
Last Updated: 2019-09-30
Results Overview
Therapeutic success defined as at least 10-point increase of Physical functioning questionnaire (PF-10 ) score after approximately 6 weeks of Spiolto® Respimat® treatment. The PF-10 used for assessing the primary outcome "physical functioning" is a subdomain of the validated Short Form 36 (SF-36 ) and consists of 10 questions evaluating the extent of experienced restrictions while conducting usual activities. Each question of the PF-10 can be answered with "yes, limited a lot", "yes, limited a little" or "no, not limited at all", with a score of 1, 2 or 3. The sum of the scores of the 10 questions results in a value between 10 (a patient answering all questions with "yes, limited a lot") and 30 (a patient answering all questions with "no, not limited at all"). The final sum of the individual scores was standardized to a range of 0 to 100 using the following formula: \[(sum of scale items - 10) \* 100\] / 20. Higher scores indicate better physical functioning.
COMPLETED
257 participants
After approximately 6 weeks (visit 2)
2019-09-30
Participant Flow
Open-label observational study, including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients in Spain receiving treatment with Spiolto® Respimat® for approximately 6 weeks, which is the average time between two medical consultations. Questionnaire (quest.). 10-point increase of Physical functioning questionnaire (PF10 )
All participants were screened for eligibility to participate in the study. Participants attended primary care centres which would then ensure that all participants met all inclusion/exclusion criteria. Participants were not to be entered if any one of the specific entry criteria were not met.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Spiolto® Respimat®
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients were administered a combination of tiotropium and olodaterol in a fixed dose combination through a single Respimat® inhalation device according to approved Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) and the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
257
|
|
Overall Study
Treated
|
253
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
234
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
23
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Spiolto® Respimat®
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients were administered a combination of tiotropium and olodaterol in a fixed dose combination through a single Respimat® inhalation device according to approved Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) and the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Non-evaluable PF10 quest. at visit 2
|
19
|
|
Overall Study
Not Treated
|
4
|
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Spiolto® Respimat®
n=253 Participants
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients were administered a combination of tiotropium and olodaterol in a fixed dose combination through a single Respimat® inhalation device according to approved Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) and the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
68.41 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.83 • n=253 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
68 Participants
n=253 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
185 Participants
n=253 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: After approximately 6 weeks (visit 2)Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All screened patients with at least one documented administration of Spiolto® Respimat® and available PF-10 score at visit 1 and visit 2.
Therapeutic success defined as at least 10-point increase of Physical functioning questionnaire (PF-10 ) score after approximately 6 weeks of Spiolto® Respimat® treatment. The PF-10 used for assessing the primary outcome "physical functioning" is a subdomain of the validated Short Form 36 (SF-36 ) and consists of 10 questions evaluating the extent of experienced restrictions while conducting usual activities. Each question of the PF-10 can be answered with "yes, limited a lot", "yes, limited a little" or "no, not limited at all", with a score of 1, 2 or 3. The sum of the scores of the 10 questions results in a value between 10 (a patient answering all questions with "yes, limited a lot") and 30 (a patient answering all questions with "no, not limited at all"). The final sum of the individual scores was standardized to a range of 0 to 100 using the following formula: \[(sum of scale items - 10) \* 100\] / 20. Higher scores indicate better physical functioning.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Spiolto® Respimat®
n=234 Participants
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients were administered a combination of tiotropium and olodaterol in a fixed dose combination through a single Respimat® inhalation device according to approved Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) and the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Patients With Therapeutic Success at Week 6 Approximately (Approx.) (Visit 2)
|
66.2 Percentage of Patients (%)
Interval 60.2 to 72.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (visit 1) and after approx. week 6 (visit 2)Population: FAS
The change in Physical functioning questionnaire (PF-10 ) score was determined by taking into account the individual change of each patient between Baseline (Visit 1) and Week 6 (approx.) (Visit 2) and then the mean for change from baseline values across all patients was calculated. The PF-10 consists of 10 questions evaluating the extent of experienced restrictions while conducting usual activities. Each question of the PF-10 can be answered with "yes, limited a lot", "yes, limited a little" or "no, not limited at all", with a score of 1, 2 or 3. The sum of the scores of the 10 questions results in a value between 10 (a patient answering all questions with "yes, limited a lot") and 30 (a patient answering all questions with "no, not limited at all"). The final sum of the individual scores was standardized to a range of 0 to 100 using the following formula: \[(sum of scale items - 10) \* 100\] / 20. Higher scores indicate better physical functioning.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Spiolto® Respimat®
n=234 Participants
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients were administered a combination of tiotropium and olodaterol in a fixed dose combination through a single Respimat® inhalation device according to approved Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) and the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines
|
|---|---|
|
The Mean Change in the PF-10 Score From Visit 1 (Baseline) to Visit 2
|
16.04 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 18.18
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (visit 1) and after approx.week 6 (visit 2)Population: FAS
The patient's general condition was evaluated by means of Physician's Global Evaluation (PGE) score. The PGE score is documented on a scale from 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent) at both visits. 1-2: poor; 3-4: satisfactory; 5-6: good; 7-8: excellent
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Spiolto® Respimat®
n=234 Participants
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients were administered a combination of tiotropium and olodaterol in a fixed dose combination through a single Respimat® inhalation device according to approved Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) and the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines
|
|---|---|
|
Patients General Condition Evaluated by the Physician (PGE Score) at Visit 1 and Visit 2
Baseline (Visit 1) : PGE score 1
|
2 Participants
|
|
Patients General Condition Evaluated by the Physician (PGE Score) at Visit 1 and Visit 2
Baseline (Visit 1) : PGE score 2
|
48 Participants
|
|
Patients General Condition Evaluated by the Physician (PGE Score) at Visit 1 and Visit 2
Baseline (Visit 1) : PGE score 3
|
57 Participants
|
|
Patients General Condition Evaluated by the Physician (PGE Score) at Visit 1 and Visit 2
Baseline (Visit 1) : PGE score 4
|
49 Participants
|
|
Patients General Condition Evaluated by the Physician (PGE Score) at Visit 1 and Visit 2
Baseline (Visit 1) : PGE score 5
|
35 Participants
|
|
Patients General Condition Evaluated by the Physician (PGE Score) at Visit 1 and Visit 2
Baseline (Visit 1) : PGE score 6
|
31 Participants
|
|
Patients General Condition Evaluated by the Physician (PGE Score) at Visit 1 and Visit 2
Baseline (Visit 1) : PGE score 7
|
7 Participants
|
|
Patients General Condition Evaluated by the Physician (PGE Score) at Visit 1 and Visit 2
Baseline (Visit 1) : PGE score 8
|
5 Participants
|
|
Patients General Condition Evaluated by the Physician (PGE Score) at Visit 1 and Visit 2
Week 6 (approx.) (Visit 2): Score 1
|
1 Participants
|
|
Patients General Condition Evaluated by the Physician (PGE Score) at Visit 1 and Visit 2
Week 6 (approx.) (Visit 2): Score 2
|
5 Participants
|
|
Patients General Condition Evaluated by the Physician (PGE Score) at Visit 1 and Visit 2
Week 6 (approx.) (Visit 2): Score 3
|
14 Participants
|
|
Patients General Condition Evaluated by the Physician (PGE Score) at Visit 1 and Visit 2
Week 6 (approx.) (Visit 2): Score 4
|
42 Participants
|
|
Patients General Condition Evaluated by the Physician (PGE Score) at Visit 1 and Visit 2
Week 6 (approx.) (Visit 2): Score 5
|
46 Participants
|
|
Patients General Condition Evaluated by the Physician (PGE Score) at Visit 1 and Visit 2
Week 6 (approx.) (Visit 2): Score 6
|
83 Participants
|
|
Patients General Condition Evaluated by the Physician (PGE Score) at Visit 1 and Visit 2
Week 6 (approx.) (Visit 2): Score 7
|
36 Participants
|
|
Patients General Condition Evaluated by the Physician (PGE Score) at Visit 1 and Visit 2
Week 6 (approx.) (Visit 2): Score 8
|
7 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: After approx. 6 weeks (visit 2) of treatment initiationPopulation: FAS who completed the questionnaire.14 patients with missing data were excluded from the analysis.
A patient satisfaction questionnaire on how overall satisfied they were with the Spiolto® Respimat® treatment was also completed during visit 2, using a 7-point ordinal scale, from 1 (very unsatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Spiolto® Respimat®
n=220 Participants
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients were administered a combination of tiotropium and olodaterol in a fixed dose combination through a single Respimat® inhalation device according to approved Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) and the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines
|
|---|---|
|
Patient Overall Satisfaction With Spiolto® Respimat® at Visit 2
Very unsatisfied
|
0 Participants
|
|
Patient Overall Satisfaction With Spiolto® Respimat® at Visit 2
Unsatisfied
|
2 Participants
|
|
Patient Overall Satisfaction With Spiolto® Respimat® at Visit 2
Rather unsatisfied
|
6 Participants
|
|
Patient Overall Satisfaction With Spiolto® Respimat® at Visit 2
Neither satisfied, nor unsatisfied
|
15 Participants
|
|
Patient Overall Satisfaction With Spiolto® Respimat® at Visit 2
Rather satisfied
|
27 Participants
|
|
Patient Overall Satisfaction With Spiolto® Respimat® at Visit 2
Satisfied
|
127 Participants
|
|
Patient Overall Satisfaction With Spiolto® Respimat® at Visit 2
Very satisfied
|
43 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: After approx. 6 weeks (visit 2) of treatment initiationPopulation: FAS
A patient satisfaction questionnaire on how satisfied they were by inhaling with the Respimat® device was also completed during visit 2, using a 7-point ordinal scale, from 1 (very unsatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Spiolto® Respimat®
n=234 Participants
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients were administered a combination of tiotropium and olodaterol in a fixed dose combination through a single Respimat® inhalation device according to approved Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) and the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines
|
|---|---|
|
Patient Satisfaction With Inhaling From the Respimat® Device
Very unsatisfied
|
1 Participants
|
|
Patient Satisfaction With Inhaling From the Respimat® Device
Unsatisfied
|
3 Participants
|
|
Patient Satisfaction With Inhaling From the Respimat® Device
Rather unsatisfied
|
2 Participants
|
|
Patient Satisfaction With Inhaling From the Respimat® Device
Neither satisfied, nor unsatisfied
|
16 Participants
|
|
Patient Satisfaction With Inhaling From the Respimat® Device
Rather satisfied
|
25 Participants
|
|
Patient Satisfaction With Inhaling From the Respimat® Device
Satisfied
|
129 Participants
|
|
Patient Satisfaction With Inhaling From the Respimat® Device
Very satisfied
|
58 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: After approx. 6 weeks (visit 2) of treatment initiationPopulation: FAS
A patient satisfaction questionnaire on how satisfied they were with handling of the Respimat® inhalation device was also completed during visit 2, using a 7-point ordinal scale, from 1 (very unsatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Spiolto® Respimat®
n=234 Participants
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients were administered a combination of tiotropium and olodaterol in a fixed dose combination through a single Respimat® inhalation device according to approved Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) and the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines
|
|---|---|
|
Patient Satisfaction With Handling of the Respimat® Inhalation Device
Very unsatisfied
|
0 Participants
|
|
Patient Satisfaction With Handling of the Respimat® Inhalation Device
Unsatisfied
|
2 Participants
|
|
Patient Satisfaction With Handling of the Respimat® Inhalation Device
Rather unsatisfied
|
4 Participants
|
|
Patient Satisfaction With Handling of the Respimat® Inhalation Device
Neither satisfied, nor unsatisfied
|
14 Participants
|
|
Patient Satisfaction With Handling of the Respimat® Inhalation Device
Rather satisfied
|
29 Participants
|
|
Patient Satisfaction With Handling of the Respimat® Inhalation Device
Satisfied
|
132 Participants
|
|
Patient Satisfaction With Handling of the Respimat® Inhalation Device
Very satisfied
|
53 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Spiolto® Respimat®
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Spiolto® Respimat®
n=253 participants at risk
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients were administered a combination of tiotropium and olodaterol in a fixed dose combination through a single Respimat® inhalation device according to approved Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) and the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines
|
|---|---|
|
Vascular disorders
Ischaemic stroke
|
0.40%
1/253 • From first drug administration until end of study, up to approx 6 weeks.
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Boehringer Ingelheim, Call Center
Boehringer Ingelheim
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Boehringer Ingelheim (BI) acknowledges that investigators have the right to publish the study results. Investigators shall provide BI with a copy of any publication or presentation for review prior to any submission. Such review will be done with regard to proprietary information, information related to patentable inventions, medical, scientific, and statistical accuracy within 60 days. BI may request a delay of the publication in order to protect BI's intellectual property rights.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER