Trial Outcomes & Findings for Theta-Burst Stimulation as a Treatment for Reducing Cocaine Use (NCT NCT02927236)
NCT ID: NCT02927236
Last Updated: 2025-02-25
Results Overview
Number of cocaine dependent participants who tolerated the intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) treatment. Participants in the pilot group had a maximum of 2 weeks and participants in the EFS group had a maximum of three weeks to complete the 10 days of treatment.
TERMINATED
NA
45 participants
Up to 10 days of treatment
2025-02-25
Participant Flow
Pilot Phase: participants complete a characterization phase prior to the treatment phase and do not proceed to the treatment phase unless they tolerate a brief trial of intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) Phase: participants complete a characterization phase and do not proceed to the treatment phase unless they tolerate a brief trial of iTBS and score in the unimpaired range on Trails B, used to assess for cognitive impairment after receiving iTBS
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Pilot Group
Participants with cocaine dependence receive open label three daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions for up to 10 days.
|
Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS): Cocaine - Active Group
Participants with cocaine dependence receive three active daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions in a double-blind experiment for up to 10 days and fMRI brain scans.
|
Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS): Cocaine - Sham Group
Participants with cocaine dependence receive three sham daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions in a double-blind experiment for up to 10 days and fMRI brain scans.
|
Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS): Healthy Control
Healthy participants without cocaine dependence receive three active daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions in a double-blind experiment in one day and three sham daily iTBS sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions in a double-blind experiment in one day with at least five days between the active and sham treatment.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Characterization Phase
STARTED
|
19
|
4
|
3
|
19
|
|
Characterization Phase
COMPLETED
|
18
|
1
|
3
|
13
|
|
Characterization Phase
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
3
|
0
|
6
|
|
Treatment Phase
STARTED
|
14
|
1
|
2
|
12
|
|
Treatment Phase
COMPLETED
|
9
|
1
|
1
|
10
|
|
Treatment Phase
NOT COMPLETED
|
5
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
|
Follow-up Phase
STARTED
|
9
|
1
|
2
|
10
|
|
Follow-up Phase
COMPLETED
|
8
|
1
|
1
|
10
|
|
Follow-up Phase
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Pilot Group
Participants with cocaine dependence receive open label three daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions for up to 10 days.
|
Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS): Cocaine - Active Group
Participants with cocaine dependence receive three active daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions in a double-blind experiment for up to 10 days and fMRI brain scans.
|
Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS): Cocaine - Sham Group
Participants with cocaine dependence receive three sham daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions in a double-blind experiment for up to 10 days and fMRI brain scans.
|
Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS): Healthy Control
Healthy participants without cocaine dependence receive three active daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions in a double-blind experiment in one day and three sham daily iTBS sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions in a double-blind experiment in one day with at least five days between the active and sham treatment.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Characterization Phase
Physician Decision
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
2
|
|
Characterization Phase
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
|
Characterization Phase
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Treatment Phase
Adverse Event
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
|
Treatment Phase
Protocol Violation
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Treatment Phase
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Follow-up Phase
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Theta-Burst Stimulation as a Treatment for Reducing Cocaine Use
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Pilot Group
n=19 Participants
Participants with cocaine dependence receive open label three daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions for up to 10 days.
|
Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS): Cocaine - Active Group
n=4 Participants
Participants with cocaine dependence receive three active daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions in a double-blind experiment for up to 10 days and fMRI brain scans.
|
Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS): Cocaine - Sham Group
n=3 Participants
Participants with cocaine dependence receive three sham daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions in a double-blind experiment for up to 10 days and fMRI brain scans.
|
Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS): Healthy Control
n=19 Participants
Healthy participants without cocaine dependence receive three active daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions in a double blind experiment in one day and three sham daily iTBS sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions in a double blind experiment in one day with at least five days between the active and sham treatment.
|
Total
n=45 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
45 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
47.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6 • n=5 Participants
|
50.25 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.15 • n=7 Participants
|
42 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.89 • n=5 Participants
|
35.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.23 • n=4 Participants
|
42.26 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.68 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
19 participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 participants
n=4 Participants
|
45 participants
n=21 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 10 days of treatmentPopulation: Per protocol document, analysis applies to only participants who had cocaine dependence.
Number of cocaine dependent participants who tolerated the intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) treatment. Participants in the pilot group had a maximum of 2 weeks and participants in the EFS group had a maximum of three weeks to complete the 10 days of treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pilot Group
n=14 Participants
Participants with cocaine dependence receive open label three daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions for up to 10 days.
|
Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS): Cocaine - Active Group
n=1 Participants
Participants with cocaine dependence receive three active daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions in a double-blind experiment for up to 10 days and fMRI brain scans.
|
Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS): Healthy Control - Active Treatment
Healthy participants without cocaine dependence receive three active daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions in one day.
|
Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS): Healthy Control - Sham Treatment
Healthy participants without cocaine dependence receive three sham daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions in one day.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Cocaine Dependent Participants Who Tolerated Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation Sessions
|
9 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: pre/post treatment day 1.Population: The analysis was between-subjects for cocaine dependent participants and within-subjects for healthy participants. No imaging data was collected for the Pilot arm so no results are reported.
Participants received resting brain fMRI scan followed by three iTBS sessions then a second brain fMRI scan. Analysis was done to determine if iTBS alters brain networks and calculated as the difference between global efficiency (GE) before and after the first day of iTBS (pre-post). Global efficiency is a graph-theory measure that indicates how well information can be transferred across the entire brain network. A high global efficiency indicates that information can be rapidly transmitted across different brain regions due to short average path lengths between them, suggesting a well-connected and integrated brain network. It is calculated by defining N nodes and calculating the shortest pathway between each pair of nodes. The final value is 1/N(N-1) \* sum 1/shortest pathway between each pair of the N nodes. It ranges between 0 and 1 with higher values indicating greater efficiency.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pilot Group
n=1 Participants
Participants with cocaine dependence receive open label three daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions for up to 10 days.
|
Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS): Cocaine - Active Group
n=2 Participants
Participants with cocaine dependence receive three active daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions in a double-blind experiment for up to 10 days and fMRI brain scans.
|
Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS): Healthy Control - Active Treatment
n=11 Participants
Healthy participants without cocaine dependence receive three active daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions in one day.
|
Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS): Healthy Control - Sham Treatment
n=11 Participants
Healthy participants without cocaine dependence receive three sham daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions in one day.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Brain Global Efficiency After Day One of Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation Treatment (Acute Effect)
|
-0.03716097 unitless
Standard Deviation 0
|
0.004610517 unitless
Standard Deviation 0.003557275
|
-.01535 unitless
Standard Deviation 0.032982662
|
-0.008708172 unitless
Standard Deviation 0.021423157
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (pre-treatment) minus two weeks post treatmentPopulation: Analysis included only cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) arms who completed the baseline and follow up fMRI brain scans. Chronic effects of iTBS were not measured in the Pilot or in EFS healthy participants.
Participants received baseline resting brain fMRI scan on day one and had a repeat brain fMRI two weeks after iTBS treatment course. Analysis was done to determine change in brain network with chronic treatment in cocaine dependent participants and calculated as the difference between global efficiency (GE) from baseline to post treatment (2 weeks after end of treatment). Global efficiency is a graph-theory measure that indicates how well information can be transferred across the entire brain network. A high global efficiency indicates that information can be rapidly transmitted across different brain regions due to short average path lengths between them, suggesting a well-connected and integrated brain network. It is calculated by defining N nodes and calculating the shortest pathway between each pair of nodes. The final value is 1/N(N-1) \* sum 1/shortest pathway between each pair of the N nodes. It ranges between 0 and 1 with higher values indicating greater efficiency.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pilot Group
n=1 Participants
Participants with cocaine dependence receive open label three daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions for up to 10 days.
|
Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS): Cocaine - Active Group
n=2 Participants
Participants with cocaine dependence receive three active daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions in a double-blind experiment for up to 10 days and fMRI brain scans.
|
Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS): Healthy Control - Active Treatment
Healthy participants without cocaine dependence receive three active daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions in one day.
|
Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS): Healthy Control - Sham Treatment
Healthy participants without cocaine dependence receive three sham daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions in one day.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Brain Global Efficiency After Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation Treatment (iTBS) Course (Chronic Effect)
|
-0.009259302 unitless
Standard Deviation 0
|
-0.021988865 unitless
Standard Deviation 0.009881832
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (pre-treatment)Population: Analysis included all cocaine dependent participants (combined as one group as no intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions had been administered at this timepoint) and healthy control participants who had a baseline brain fMRI scan. No baseline scan was done on Pilot participants.
The brain global efficiency for cocaine dependent participants and healthy control participants at baseline (pre-treatment), prior to intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation Treatment (iTBS). Global efficiency is a graph-theory measure that indicates how well information can be transferred across the entire brain network. A high global efficiency indicates that information can be rapidly transmitted across different brain regions due to short average path lengths between them, suggesting a well-connected and integrated brain network. It is calculated by defining N nodes and calculating the shortest pathway between each pair of nodes. The final value is 1/N(N-1) \* sum 1/shortest pathway between each pair of the N nodes. It ranges between 0 and 1 with higher values indicating greater efficiency.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pilot Group
n=6 Participants
Participants with cocaine dependence receive open label three daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions for up to 10 days.
|
Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS): Cocaine - Active Group
n=15 Participants
Participants with cocaine dependence receive three active daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions in a double-blind experiment for up to 10 days and fMRI brain scans.
|
Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS): Healthy Control - Active Treatment
Healthy participants without cocaine dependence receive three active daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions in one day.
|
Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS): Healthy Control - Sham Treatment
Healthy participants without cocaine dependence receive three sham daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions in one day.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Brain Global Efficiency Before Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation Treatment (iTBS)
|
0.370168044 unitless
Standard Deviation 0.070814395
|
0.328063781 unitless
Standard Deviation 0.035358035
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Pilot Group
Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS): Cocaine - Active Group
Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS): Cocaine - Sham Group
Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS): Healthy Control - Active Treatment Intervention
Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS): Healthy Control - Sham Treatment Intervention
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Pilot Group
n=19 participants at risk
Participants with cocaine dependence receive open label three daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions for up to 10 days.
|
Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS): Cocaine - Active Group
n=4 participants at risk
Participants with cocaine dependence receive three active daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions in a double-blind experiment for up to 10 days and fMRI brain scans.
|
Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS): Cocaine - Sham Group
n=3 participants at risk
Participants with cocaine dependence receive three sham daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions in a double-blind experiment for up to 10 days and fMRI brain scans.
|
Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS): Healthy Control - Active Treatment Intervention
n=19 participants at risk
Healthy participants without cocaine dependence receive three active daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions in a double-blind experiment in one day and three sham daily iTBS sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions in a double-blind experiment in one day with at least five days between the active and sham treatment.
|
Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS): Healthy Control - Sham Treatment Intervention
n=19 participants at risk
Healthy participants without cocaine dependence receive three active daily intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions in a double-blind experiment in one day and three sham daily iTBS sessions with an inter-administration interval of at least 60-minutes between sessions in a double-blind experiment in one day with at least five days between the active and sham treatment.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
headache
|
36.8%
7/19 • Number of events 13 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 3 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 2 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
10.5%
2/19 • Number of events 2 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
|
Eye disorders
eye pain
|
0.00%
0/19 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Nervous system- other
|
0.00%
0/19 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urine discoloration
|
0.00%
0/19 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
eczema
|
0.00%
0/19 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
tactile hallucinations
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
scalp pain
|
0.00%
0/19 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
back pain
|
10.5%
2/19 • Number of events 3 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
hang nail bleeding
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
COPD exacerbation
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
arthritis
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 2 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
memory loss
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
muscle aches
|
10.5%
2/19 • Number of events 2 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
nausea and vomiting
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
tooth and ear pain
|
10.5%
2/19 • Number of events 2 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
tremor
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/4 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Participants in the pilot phase were followed for 6 weeks. Cocaine dependent participants in the Expanded Feasibility Study (EFS) phase were followed for 6 months. Control participants in the EFS phase were participated for about two weeks.
|
Additional Information
Yihong Yang, PhD
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place