Trial Outcomes & Findings for Preoperative Cognitive Screening in Older Spinal Surgical Patients (NCT NCT02922634)
NCT ID: NCT02922634
Last Updated: 2021-07-21
Results Overview
The median ages of patients who did or did not develop post-operative delirium as assessed by the Confusion Assessment Method. The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) is a short diagnostic interview for CAM-defined delirium. Delirium is defined as the sudden change in someone's thinking ability that can have devastating consequences and can be very easily missed due to its frequent subtlety. The 4 CAM features assessed by the CAM include: acute onset or fluctuation, inattention, disorganized thinking, or altered level of consciousness.
COMPLETED
229 participants
up to 3 days post-op
2021-07-21
Participant Flow
Between April 17, 2017 and October 9, 2018, study staff members recruited patients ≥ 70 yr of age scheduled for elective spine surgery at the Brigham and Women's Hospital and were expected to have an inpatient admission after their procedure. We selected this patient population because spine surgery is the third most common surgical procedure in older persons18 and our previous work showed that nearly 20% of this surgical demographic develops delirium postoperatively.
Older patients ≥ 70 years of age presenting for elective spine surgery.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Older Surgical Patients Having Spine Surgery
Older surgical patients (≥ 70 years of age) presenting for elective spine surgery.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
229
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
219
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
10
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Older Surgical Patients Having Spine Surgery
Older surgical patients (≥ 70 years of age) presenting for elective spine surgery.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Did not have their surgery
|
5
|
Baseline Characteristics
5 patients withdrew from the study, 5 patients did not have their surgery
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Older Surgical Patients
n=219 Participants
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery by neurosurgeons Dr. Groff, Dr. Lu and Dr. Chi
Mini Cog: short cognitive screen, short Frailty screen
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=219 Participants • 5 patients withdrew from the study, 5 patients did not have their surgery
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
0 Participants
n=219 Participants • 5 patients withdrew from the study, 5 patients did not have their surgery
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
219 Participants
n=219 Participants • 5 patients withdrew from the study, 5 patients did not have their surgery
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
75 Year
n=219 Participants • 5 Patients withdrew from the study, 5 patients did not have surgery
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
95 Participants
n=219 Participants • 5 patients withdrew from the study and 5 patients did not have surgery
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
124 Participants
n=219 Participants • 5 patients withdrew from the study and 5 patients did not have surgery
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
219 participants
n=219 Participants
|
|
Frail Scale
Score 0
|
48 Participants
n=218 Participants • 5 patients withdrew from the study, 5 patients did not have their surgery and 1 patient left before completing the frail scale.
|
|
Frail Scale
Score 1-2
|
117 Participants
n=218 Participants • 5 patients withdrew from the study, 5 patients did not have their surgery and 1 patient left before completing the frail scale.
|
|
Frail Scale
Score 3-5
|
53 Participants
n=218 Participants • 5 patients withdrew from the study, 5 patients did not have their surgery and 1 patient left before completing the frail scale.
|
|
Mini-Cog
|
4 units on a scale
n=219 Participants • 5 patients withdrew from the study and 5 patients did not have surgery
|
|
Animal Verbal Fluency
|
18 animals
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6 • n=219 Participants • 5 patients withdrew from the study and 5 patients did not have surgery
|
|
Surgical Invasiveness
Tier 1 and 2
|
111 Participants
n=219 Participants • 5 patients withdrew from the study and 5 patients did not have their surgery
|
|
Surgical Invasiveness
Tier 3 and 4
|
108 Participants
n=219 Participants • 5 patients withdrew from the study and 5 patients did not have their surgery
|
|
Body Mass Index
|
28 kg/m^2
n=217 Participants • 5 of these patients withdrew from the study and 5 did not have their surgical procedure and 2 patients did not have their BMI recorded in the medical record
|
|
Level of education
Bachelors degree or higher
|
144 Participants
n=212 Participants • 5 of these patients withdrew from the study and 5 did not have their surgical procedure. An additional 7 did not provide information on their level of education.
|
|
Level of education
Less than a bachelors degree
|
68 Participants
n=212 Participants • 5 of these patients withdrew from the study and 5 did not have their surgical procedure. An additional 7 did not provide information on their level of education.
|
|
ASA Physical Status
ASA 1 or 2
|
70 Participants
n=219 Participants • 5 patients withdrew from the study and 5 patients did not have their surgery.
|
|
ASA Physical Status
ASA 3 or 4
|
149 Participants
n=219 Participants • 5 patients withdrew from the study and 5 patients did not have their surgery.
|
|
Metabolic equivalents of task
METS < 4
|
60 Participants
n=209 Participants • 5 of these patients withdrew from the study and 5 did not have their surgical procedure and an additional 10 patients did not have this noted in their medical record.
|
|
Metabolic equivalents of task
METS ≥ 4
|
149 Participants
n=209 Participants • 5 of these patients withdrew from the study and 5 did not have their surgical procedure and an additional 10 patients did not have this noted in their medical record.
|
|
Total number of medications
|
8 total number of medications
n=219 Participants • 5 patients withdrew from the study and 5 patients did not have their surgery
|
|
Preoperative use of opioids
preoperative opioid use
|
55 Participants
n=219 Participants • 5 patients withdrew from the study and 5 patients did not have their surgery
|
|
Preoperative use of opioids
No preoperative use of opioids
|
164 Participants
n=219 Participants • 5 patients withdrew from the study and 5 patients did not have their surgery
|
|
Alcohol consumption
Yes
|
125 Participants
n=219 Participants • 5 patients withdrew from the study and 5 patients did not have their surgery.
|
|
Alcohol consumption
No
|
94 Participants
n=219 Participants • 5 patients withdrew from the study and 5 patients did not have their surgery.
|
|
History of depression
Yes
|
39 Participants
n=219 Participants • 5 patients withdrew from the study and 5 patients did not have their surgery
|
|
History of depression
No
|
180 Participants
n=219 Participants • 5 patients withdrew from the study and 5 patients did not have their surgery
|
|
Psychiatric History
Yes
|
22 Participants
n=219 Participants • 5 patients withdrew from the study and 5 patients did not have their surgery
|
|
Psychiatric History
No
|
197 Participants
n=219 Participants • 5 patients withdrew from the study and 5 patients did not have their surgery
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 3 days post-opPopulation: Patients over the age of 70 undergoing spinal surgeries
The median ages of patients who did or did not develop post-operative delirium as assessed by the Confusion Assessment Method. The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) is a short diagnostic interview for CAM-defined delirium. Delirium is defined as the sudden change in someone's thinking ability that can have devastating consequences and can be very easily missed due to its frequent subtlety. The 4 CAM features assessed by the CAM include: acute onset or fluctuation, inattention, disorganized thinking, or altered level of consciousness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
No Delirium
n=164 Participants
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery that did not develop post-op delirium
|
Delirium
n=55 Participants
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery that did develop post-op delirium
|
|---|---|---|
|
Delirium by Age
|
75 years
Interval 73.0 to 79.0
|
77 years
Interval 72.0 to 80.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 3 days post-opSex of patients who did or did not develop post-operative delirium as assessed by the Confusion Assessment Method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
No Delirium
n=164 Participants
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery that did not develop post-op delirium
|
Delirium
n=55 Participants
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery that did develop post-op delirium
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Delirium by Sex
Male
|
94 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Delirium by Sex
Female
|
70 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 3 days post-opMedian body mass index of patients who did or did not develop post-operative delirium as assessed by the Confusion Assessment Method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
No Delirium
n=164 Participants
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery that did not develop post-op delirium
|
Delirium
n=55 Participants
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery that did develop post-op delirium
|
|---|---|---|
|
Delirium by Body Mass Index
|
28 kg/m^2
Interval 25.0 to 32.0
|
30 kg/m^2
Interval 26.0 to 34.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 3 days post-opCounts of patients with a college degree who did or did not develop post-operative delirium as assessed by the Confusion Assessment Method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
No Delirium
n=164 Participants
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery that did not develop post-op delirium
|
Delirium
n=55 Participants
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery that did develop post-op delirium
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Delirium by College Degree
|
108 Participants
|
36 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 3 days post-opThe ASA Physical Status Classification System assesses and communicates a patient's pre-anesthesia medical co-morbidities and is on a scale of I-VI. This study recruited patients with an ASA physical status of I-III. ASA I is defined as a normal healthy patient, ASA II is defined as a patient with a mild systemic disease, ASA III is defined as a patient with severe systemic disease. ASA physical status of patients who did or did not develop post-operative delirium as assessed by the Confusion Assessment Method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
No Delirium
n=164 Participants
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery that did not develop post-op delirium
|
Delirium
n=55 Participants
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery that did develop post-op delirium
|
|---|---|---|
|
Participants With an ASA Physical Status Score and the Development of Postoperative Delirium
ASA Physical status of greater than or equal to 3
|
105 Participants
|
44 Participants
|
|
Participants With an ASA Physical Status Score and the Development of Postoperative Delirium
ASA Physical Status of less than 3
|
59 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 3 days post-opPatients with a metabolic equivalent of task (METS) score \< 4 who did or did not develop post-operative delirium as assessed by the Confusion Assessment Method. The METS score is a ratio of the working metabolic rate relative to the resting metabolic rate and is one way to describe the intensity of an exercise or activity. This was assessed by the preoperative or surgical study staff. A score of \< 3 is for light intesity activities, 3-6 for moderate intensity activities, and ≥ 6 for vigorous intensity activities.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
No Delirium
n=164 Participants
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery that did not develop post-op delirium
|
Delirium
n=55 Participants
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery that did develop post-op delirium
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Delirium by Metabolic Equivalent of Task Score < 4
|
45 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 3 days post-opMedian total number of medications of patients who did or did not develop post-operative delirium as assessed by the Confusion Assessment Method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
No Delirium
n=164 Participants
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery that did not develop post-op delirium
|
Delirium
n=55 Participants
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery that did develop post-op delirium
|
|---|---|---|
|
Delirium by Total Number of Medications Taken at Baseline
|
8 medications
Interval 5.0 to 10.0
|
9 medications
Interval 7.0 to 12.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 3 days post-opPatients with chronic use of opioids who did or did not develop post-operative delirium as assessed by the Confusion Assessment Method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
No Delirium
n=164 Participants
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery that did not develop post-op delirium
|
Delirium
n=55 Participants
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery that did develop post-op delirium
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Delirium by Opioid Use
|
34 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 3 days post-opPatients who did or did not develop post-operative delirium as assessed by the Confusion Assessment Method based on alcohol consumption.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
No Delirium
n=164 Participants
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery that did not develop post-op delirium
|
Delirium
n=55 Participants
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery that did develop post-op delirium
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Delirium by Alcohol Consumption
|
98 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 3 days post-opPatients with depression who did or did not develop post-operative delirium as assessed by the Confusion Assessment Method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
No Delirium
n=164 Participants
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery that did not develop post-op delirium
|
Delirium
n=55 Participants
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery that did develop post-op delirium
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Delirium by Presence of Depression
|
26 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 3 days post-opPatients with a history of psychiatric disorders who did or did not develop post-operative delirium as assessed by the confusion assessment method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
No Delirium
n=164 Participants
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery that did not develop post-op delirium
|
Delirium
n=55 Participants
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery that did develop post-op delirium
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Delirium by Psychiatric History
|
14 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 3 days post-opMedian mini-cog score of patients who did or did not develop post-operative delirium as assessed by the confusion assessment method. The Mini-Cog is a brief cognitive screening test for visuospatial representation, recall, and executive function. The test involves that includes recalling three words (banana, sunrise, and chair) and a clock drawing. The Mini-Cog has a scale from 0 to 5, a with higher scores suggesting better cognitive performance. One point is designated for each of 3 words recalled and up to two points for the clock drawing component.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
No Delirium
n=164 Participants
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery that did not develop post-op delirium
|
Delirium
n=55 Participants
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery that did develop post-op delirium
|
|---|---|---|
|
Delirium by Mini-cog Score
|
4 scores on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 5.0
|
4 scores on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 5.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 3 days post-opRobust, pre-frail, and frail patients who did or did not develop post-operative delirium as assessed by the confusion assessment method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
No Delirium
n=164 Participants
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery that did not develop post-op delirium
|
Delirium
n=54 Participants
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery that did develop post-op delirium
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Delirium by FRAIL Score
Frail (score 3-5)
|
29 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Delirium by FRAIL Score
Robust (score 0)
|
43 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Delirium by FRAIL Score
Pre-frail (score 1 and 2)
|
92 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 3 days post-opSurgical invasiveness for patients who did or did not develop post-operative delirium as assessed by the confusion assessment method. The levels of invasiveness were categorized clinically as the following: Tier 1 for microdiscectomy, Tier 2 for lumbar laminectomy, anterior cervical, minimally invasive, foraminotomy, facetectomy, Tier 3 for lumbar fusion, trauma, and post-cervical, and Tier 4 for tumor, infection, deformity, and anterior and posterior cervical. Higher tiers indicate greater levels of invasiveness. Since there were very few patients with an invasiveness of 1 or 4 they were placed into two groups, with invasiveness levels I and 2 or 3 and 4.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
No Delirium
n=164 Participants
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery that did not develop post-op delirium
|
Delirium
n=55 Participants
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery that did develop post-op delirium
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Delirium by Surgical Invasivness
Tier 1 + 2
|
93 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With or Without Delirium by Surgical Invasivness
Tier 3 + 4
|
71 Participants
|
37 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: duration of hospital stay, up to 30 daysPopulation: All spine surgery patients enrolled in the study.
In hospital complications after the surgical procedure including: Myocardial Infarction, congestive heart failure (CHF), Cardiac Arrest, Arrythmia, Pneumonia, pulmonary embolism (PE), Reintubation, Stroke, Delirium, Coma\>24h, deep wound infection,Superficial wound infection, Sepsis, Renal Failure, urinary tract infection (UTI), Reoperation, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), intensive care unit (ICU) admission,
Outcome measures
| Measure |
No Delirium
n=219 Participants
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery that did not develop post-op delirium
|
Delirium
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery that did develop post-op delirium
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With In-hospital Complications Were Observed During Their Length of Stay in the Hospital With Death Postoperative Death Monitored up to Day 30.
no in-hospital complications
|
151 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With In-hospital Complications Were Observed During Their Length of Stay in the Hospital With Death Postoperative Death Monitored up to Day 30.
in-hospital complications
|
68 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 30 days after the surgical procedureLocation where patients were discharged (Home vs other than home) on the day of patients discharge from the hospital.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
No Delirium
n=219 Participants
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery that did not develop post-op delirium
|
Delirium
Older surgical patients presenting for elective spine surgery that did develop post-op delirium
|
|---|---|---|
|
Participants' Discharge Location (Home vs. Other Than Home)
Home
|
138 Participants
|
—
|
|
Participants' Discharge Location (Home vs. Other Than Home)
Place other than home
|
77 Participants
|
—
|
|
Participants' Discharge Location (Home vs. Other Than Home)
Not documented
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Postoperative Outcomes in Older Patients After Spine Surgery
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place