Value of Urine sTREM-1 on Early Predicting AKI in Sepsis

NCT ID: NCT02920736

Last Updated: 2016-09-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

500 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-31

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine the value of urine sTREM-1 on early predicting secondary acute kidney injury in sepsis

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The clinical trial is a prospective, controlled study. All subjects were selected from among inpatients who were hospitalized between Sep.2016 and Dec.2018 in the Respiratory ICU, Surgical ICU and Emergency ICU of 6 general hospitals in Beijing. Based on the Sepsis 3.0,the population(500 subjects) selected met the diagnostic criteria. Based on the KDIGO (Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012) defines AKI as 3 degrees, the subjects were divided into acute renal injury group (AKI group) and non-acute renal injury group (non-AKI group). Approximately 110 healthy volunteers enrolled as control group. Urine samples were collected from day 1 to day 28 in all patient groups (or to the terminal time point of death), serum samples were collected on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14 and the samples were collected from healthy subjects on the day of enrollment. Blood was centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 15 minutes, and urine at 2,000 rpm for 5 minutes. The supernatants were transferred to Eppendorf tubes and stored at -80°C. All the specimens were re-numbered before the experiment. Urine sTREM-1 was measured by a double antibody sandwich ELISA. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the CPLA General Hospital (project No.2014-113-02). The following clinical datas were recorded for all patients through the unified database software: (1) basic clinical information: hospital number, gender, age, underlying disease, hospital admission. (2) Daily vital signs after admission: body temperature, blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, 24h urine volume, Glasgow score. (3) APACHE II score and SOFA score: arterial blood gas analysis, blood routine, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, blood biochemistry (liver function, renal function, brain natriuretic peptide, blood electrolytes) The APACHE II score and the SOFA score were calculated. (4) 28-day outcome (survival or death). Statistical analyses were conducted by SPSS 16.0 (SPSS, Chicago,IL, USA) and a two-tailed P \< 0.05 was considered significant.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Kidney Injury Sepsis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

sepsis with acute renal injury group

Based on definition of sepsis with Sepsis 3.0 and AKI was defined using KDIGO(Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) consensus definition of AKI.The group was the secondary AKI in sepsis patients

No interventions assigned to this group

sepsis non-acute renal injury group

The group was the non-AKI in sepsis patients

No interventions assigned to this group

control group

Approximately 110 persons(18-80years) with healthy physical examination and without liver and kidney dysfunction

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

All subjects meet the standards of sepsis 3.0 diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis of sepsis.

Exclusion Criteria

The following situations can not occur when all subjects are enrolled

1. Age\> 80 years or \<18 years
2. Chronic renal insufficiency, renal transplantation
3. Blood purification treatment
4. AKI has occurred
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

First Hospitals affiliated to the China PLA General Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Beijing Chao Yang Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Peking University Shougang Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Beijing Anzhen Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Chinese PLA General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Lixin Xie

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

lixin xie, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Chinese PLA General Hospital

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, Hotchkiss RS, Levy MM, Marshall JC, Martin GS, Opal SM, Rubenfeld GD, van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Angus DC. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26903338 (View on PubMed)

Ad-hoc working group of ERBP; Fliser D, Laville M, Covic A, Fouque D, Vanholder R, Juillard L, Van Biesen W. A European Renal Best Practice (ERBP) position statement on the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guidelines on acute kidney injury: part 1: definitions, conservative management and contrast-induced nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Dec;27(12):4263-72. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfs375. Epub 2012 Oct 8. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23045432 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

shoufa2016-1-5015

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id