Cost- Effectiveness and Quality of Life Assessment in Bipolar Disorder Depressive Episode

NCT ID: NCT02918097

Last Updated: 2020-11-20

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

78 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-05-31

Study Completion Date

2015-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To evaluate the effectiveness of an algorithm for Bipolar Disorder depressive episodes (BDD) using medications available in the Brazilian Public Healthcare System (SUS). Quality of life assessment of these patients was also employed.

A randomized pragmatic trial was conducted. An algorithm was developed for the treatment of episodes of bipolar disorder depression episodes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study design was that of a pragmatic randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments for mood disorders in a public healthcare context in the city of Porto Alegre, in southern Brazil. The algorithm was originally developed for the treatment of bipolar disorder depressive episodes by a Delphi panel of experts from psychiatric associations in Brazil. All subjects provided an informed consent form, in writing, in order to participate in the study protocol, which was approved by the institutional ethics committee.

Procedures and measurements of the study:

The subjects under evaluation were selected and they followed the stages defined by the treatment protocol:

1. Sample selection by being referred from the primary healthcare clinics in the municipality;
2. Informative talk about mood disorders and the research, with the informed consent forms being provided to the subjects;
3. Screening for unipolar depression episodes with the use of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and Hypomanic Symptoms Checklist Brazilian Version (HCL -32-BV);
4. Diagnostic evaluation through the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) and clinical interview for individuals with positive results in the screening instruments;
5. Baseline and demographic assessments using standardized semi-structured interviews in the first and second visits;
6. In each clinic visit, the severity of the symptoms were evealuated using the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI), Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD), and Young Manic Rating Scale (YMRS);
7. Biweekly follow-up, changed to monthly after stabilization - with a maximum follow-up period of 52 weeks.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bipolar Disorder

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Cost effectiveness Bipolar disorder Depressive episodes Quality of Life

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

This is a pragmatical clinical trial. The patients follow a pre-established algorithm About the participant flow the results the table to indicate the number of participants who received treatment in the whole algoritm, not in each step.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lithium Carbonate

Group Started: Lithium Carbonate (900mg-1500mg)

Subjects evaluated for responsiveness every 2 weeks. Responsive to treatment patients remain in the same step. Max. step duration of 8 weeks.

First step: Monotherapy with Lithium (LSL 0.6-0.8). Non responsive patients: 2nd step.

Second step: Monotherapy with lithium (LSL 1.0-1.2). Non responsive patients: 3rd step.

Third step: Lithium + Sertraline (50mg-200mg). Non responsive patients: 4th step.

Fourth step: Lithium + Nortriptyline 100mg. Non responsive patients: 5th step.

Fifth step: Lithium + Nortriptyline 100mg + Sertraline (100mg-200mg). Non responsive patients: 6th step

Sixth step: Lithium + Nortriptyline 100mg + Sertraline 200mg + Risperidone (1mg-6mg).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lithium Carbonate

Intervention Type DRUG

Sertraline

Intervention Type DRUG

Nortriptyline

Intervention Type DRUG

Risperidone

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lithium Carbonate

Intervention Type DRUG

Sertraline

Intervention Type DRUG

Nortriptyline

Intervention Type DRUG

Risperidone

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Carbolitium Zoloft Pamelor Risperdal

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. ages between 18 and 65;
2. BD current acute mixed episode;
3. total capacity to understand and respond to self-applied instruments;
4. the presence of symptoms in the last 30 days;
5. abstinence for at least 30 days for drug addicts.

Exclusion Criteria

1. presence of Organic Brain Syndrome (OBS);
2. pregnancy or lactation;
3. criteria for psychiatric hospitalization. -
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ana Flávia Barros da Silva Lima

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marcelo Fleck, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lima AF, Miguel SR, Cohen M, Zimmermann JJ, Shansis FM, Cruz LN, Ziegelmann PK, Polanczyk CA, Fleck MP. Effectiveness evaluation of mood disorder treatment algorithms in Brazilian public healthcare patients. Braz J Psychiatry. 2018 Jan-Mar;40(1):26-34. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2016-2147. Epub 2017 Aug 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28832750 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

09-013/2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id