Impact of Feeding Interval of Preterms on the Time of Transition From Tube Feeding to Oral Feeding
NCT ID: NCT02916914
Last Updated: 2017-08-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-09-30
2017-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparision of Two Different Feeding Method in Preterms
NCT05265143
Effects of Intermittent Feeding Methods With Nasogastric and Orogastric Tubes in Preterm Infants
NCT06765720
Comparison of the Results of Premature Babies Started Complementary Feeding
NCT04499430
NIPPV Versus Bi-level Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Following Extubation
NCT02842190
Comparison of The Effects of Initial Oral Feeding by Cup and Bottle-Feeding of Preterm Infants
NCT05683210
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Stomach volume of preterms varies a wide range of upto 20 ml. This should be taken into consideration during the process of feeding of preterms in neonatal intensive care unit. Trials were focused on early neonatal outcomes and it was found that duration of phototherapy and nasal noninvasive ventilation, and time to achieve full enteral feeds were shorter during 2-hourly feeding when compared to 3-hourly feeding, on the other hand 3-hourly feeding was shown to accelerate the stomach emptying. Besides, duration of catheterization, and ratio of feeding intolerance, apnea, and hypoglycemia were found to be similar infants who fed either 2 or 3-hourly.
Investigators aimed to investigate the impact of two feeding regimens, 2-hourly or 3-hourly, on time of transition from orogastric to oral feeding in preterms.
Patients and Methods: Preterms of birth weight less that 1500 gr and gestational age smaller than 32 weeks are going to be eligible for study if no congenital anomalies exist. Regarding current clinical protocol infants are fed every 2 hours until they weigh 1500 gr, and every 3 hours afterwards. At the day that the infants reach 1500 gr of body weight, a randomization will be performed in to two groups, Intervention group: Q2 interval (2-hourly feeding) or Control group: Q3 interval (3-hourly feeding), due to study protocol. Infants with inherited metabolic disorders, congenital anomalies, neonatal sepsis, and surgical diseases and the ones who fed with exclusively formula will be excluded.
After randomization infants will be followed until discharge. The type of feeding, volume of each feed, weight gain per week, feeding intolerance (abdominal distention, vomiting, apnea, newly onset or increase of oxygen treatment demand), day of first oral feeding, time of transition from orogastric tube to oral feeding, duration of hospitalization will be recorded.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Q2 feeding
feeding intervals: 2 hours
Q2 feeding
Infants are going to be fed every 2 hours
Q3feeding
feeding intervals: 3 hours
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Q2 feeding
Infants are going to be fed every 2 hours
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. gestational age \<= 32 weeks
3. postnatal age at randomization: between 7 - 90 days
Exclusion Criteria
* multi organ failure
* sepsis
* surgical pathology
* inherited metabolic diseases
* exclusively formula feeding
7 Days
90 Days
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Womens' Health and Teaching Hospital
UNKNOWN
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sezin Unal
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sezin Unal, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Etlik Zubeyde Hanım Women's Health Care, Training and Research Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
EtlikWHTH
Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bergman NJ. Neonatal stomach volume and physiology suggest feeding at 1-h intervals. Acta Paediatr. 2013 Aug;102(8):773-7. doi: 10.1111/apa.12291. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
Dhingra A, Agrawal SK, Kumar P, Narang A. A randomised controlled trial of two feeding schedules in neonates weighing <or=1750 g. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009 Mar;22(3):198-203. doi: 10.1080/14767050802385749.
Rudiger M, Herrmann S, Schmalisch G, Wauer RR, Hammer H, Tschirch E. Comparison of 2-h versus 3-h enteral feeding in extremely low birth weight infants, commencing after birth. Acta Paediatr. 2008 Jun;97(6):764-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.00774.x. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
DeMauro SB, Abbasi S, Lorch S. The impact of feeding interval on feeding outcomes in very low birth-weight infants. J Perinatol. 2011 Jul;31(7):481-6. doi: 10.1038/jp.2010.153. Epub 2011 Jan 20.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EZH/2015/4
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.