Trial Outcomes & Findings for The Effect of A New Perioperative Practice Model on Patient, Nursing And Organisational Outcomes (NCT NCT02906033)
NCT ID: NCT02906033
Last Updated: 2021-12-06
Results Overview
The 15D is a generic, comprehensive, 15-dimensional, standardized, self-administered measure of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) that can be used both as a profile and single index score measure. The 15 dimensions are: mobility, vision, hearing, breathing, sleeping, eating, speech, excretion, usual activities, mental functioning, discomfort and symptoms, depression, distress, vitality, and sexual activity The respondent chooses one of the five levels for each dimension that best describes his or her state of health at present moment; the best level is 1 and the worst is 5. The single index score (15D score), representing the overall HRQoL on a 0-1 scale (1=full health, 0=being dead). The results in Outcome Measure Data Table describe the changes from baseline to follow-up within the intervention group and the control group.
COMPLETED
NA
517 participants
Baseline and at 3 months follow up
2021-12-06
Participant Flow
Excluded due to general anesthesia: N=64
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Intervention Group
New perioperative practice model.
New perioperative practice model: The one and same anesthesia nurse takes care of the patient during the entire perioperative process and even pays the patient a visit to the ward the day after surgery.
|
Control Group
Traditional practice model.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Baseline
STARTED
|
231
|
222
|
|
Baseline
15 D at Baseline
|
211
|
189
|
|
Baseline
STATE at Baseline
|
199
|
190
|
|
Baseline
TRAIT at Baseline
|
194
|
189
|
|
Baseline
COMPLETED
|
194
|
189
|
|
Baseline
NOT COMPLETED
|
37
|
33
|
|
Follow-up
STARTED
|
194
|
189
|
|
Follow-up
15 D at Follow-up
|
151
|
135
|
|
Follow-up
STATE at Follow-up
|
154
|
135
|
|
Follow-up
TRAIT at Follow-up
|
148
|
127
|
|
Follow-up
COMPLETED
|
148
|
127
|
|
Follow-up
NOT COMPLETED
|
46
|
62
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Intervention Group
New perioperative practice model.
New perioperative practice model: The one and same anesthesia nurse takes care of the patient during the entire perioperative process and even pays the patient a visit to the ward the day after surgery.
|
Control Group
Traditional practice model.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Baseline
Protocol Violation
|
37
|
33
|
|
Follow-up
Lost to Follow-up
|
46
|
62
|
Baseline Characteristics
Enrolled participants
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=231 Participants
New perioperative practice model.
New perioperative practice model: The one and same anesthesia nurse takes care of the patient during the entire perioperative process and even pays the patient a visit to the ward the day after surgery.
|
Control Group
n=222 Participants
Traditional practice model.
|
Total
n=453 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
67.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.41 • n=5 Participants • Enrolled participants
|
68.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.48 • n=7 Participants • Enrolled participants
|
67.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.44 • n=5 Participants • Enrolled participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
146 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
139 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
285 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
85 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
83 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
168 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
231 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
222 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
453 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Finland
|
231 participants
n=5 Participants
|
222 participants
n=7 Participants
|
453 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and at 3 months follow upThe 15D is a generic, comprehensive, 15-dimensional, standardized, self-administered measure of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) that can be used both as a profile and single index score measure. The 15 dimensions are: mobility, vision, hearing, breathing, sleeping, eating, speech, excretion, usual activities, mental functioning, discomfort and symptoms, depression, distress, vitality, and sexual activity The respondent chooses one of the five levels for each dimension that best describes his or her state of health at present moment; the best level is 1 and the worst is 5. The single index score (15D score), representing the overall HRQoL on a 0-1 scale (1=full health, 0=being dead). The results in Outcome Measure Data Table describe the changes from baseline to follow-up within the intervention group and the control group.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=151 Participants
New perioperative practice model.
New perioperative practice model: The one and same anesthesia nurse takes care of the patient during the entire perioperative process and even pays the patient a visit to the ward the day after surgery.
|
Control Group
n=135 Participants
Traditional practice model.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Follow-up in Health Related Quality of Life
|
0.059 score on a scale
Interval 0.036 to 0.081
|
0.055 score on a scale
Interval 0.031 to 0.078
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and at 3 months follow-upThe State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) is a commonly used measure of trait and state anxiety. It can be used in clinical settings to diagnose anxiety and to distinguish it from depressive syndromes. This instrument is composed of STATE and TRAIT scales, each of which has twenty items. The STATE items evoke feelings on a 4-point Likert scale, with responses ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The TRAIT items evoke how the respondent feels in general on a frequency scale ranging from 1 (hardly ever) to 4 (almost always). The scores of both STATE and TRAIT scales range from 20 to 80 scores. According to the raw score, anxiety is classified as low (20-39), moderate (40-59) or high (60-80). The results in Outcome Measure Data Table describe the changes from baseline to follow-up within the intervention group and the control group.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=154 Participants
New perioperative practice model.
New perioperative practice model: The one and same anesthesia nurse takes care of the patient during the entire perioperative process and even pays the patient a visit to the ward the day after surgery.
|
Control Group
n=135 Participants
Traditional practice model.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Surgery-related STATE Anxiety From Baseline to Follow-up
|
-4.91 score on a scale
Interval -8.02 to -1.79
|
-5.21 score on a scale
Interval -8.47 to -1.95
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: One-point measurement on the day of discharge (on average on the 3rd day after surgery)Good Perioperative Nursing Care Scale is a constructed questionnaire which contains 36 statements measuring the quality of care, which are summarized into nine quality categories (sum variables/subscales): Pain management (n=5 statements), Temperature maintenance (n=2), Technical skills (n=4), Information (n=6), Encouragement (n= 3), Respect (n= 3), Staff characteristics (n= 5), Environment (n= 6) and Process (n= 2). The quality statements are answered with a five-point Likert scale (fully agree, 5 points - fully disagree, 1 point) with a neutral option "neither agree nor disagree" and an option "cannot evaluate this aspect". The value of each averaged sum variable/subscale varies from 1 to 5. In the analysis, the responses of "cannot evaluate this aspect" were excluded. The better the mean value is, the more positive experience the participant has of the quality of care.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=219 Participants
New perioperative practice model.
New perioperative practice model: The one and same anesthesia nurse takes care of the patient during the entire perioperative process and even pays the patient a visit to the ward the day after surgery.
|
Control Group
n=217 Participants
Traditional practice model.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of Perioperative Care as Experienced by Surgical Patients
Sum variable "Staff characteristics"
|
4.89 score on a scale
Interval 4.84 to 4.94
|
4.83 score on a scale
Interval 4.75 to 4.9
|
|
Quality of Perioperative Care as Experienced by Surgical Patients
Sum variable "Encouragement"
|
4.61 score on a scale
Interval 4.49 to 4.72
|
4.56 score on a scale
Interval 4.42 to 4.7
|
|
Quality of Perioperative Care as Experienced by Surgical Patients
Sum variable "Pain management"
|
4.85 score on a scale
Interval 4.78 to 4.91
|
4.83 score on a scale
Interval 4.76 to 4.89
|
|
Quality of Perioperative Care as Experienced by Surgical Patients
Sum variable "Technical skills"
|
4.95 score on a scale
Interval 4.92 to 4.98
|
4.90 score on a scale
Interval 4.84 to 4.95
|
|
Quality of Perioperative Care as Experienced by Surgical Patients
Sum variable "Information"
|
4.61 score on a scale
Interval 4.47 to 4.74
|
4.58 score on a scale
Interval 4.44 to 4.71
|
|
Quality of Perioperative Care as Experienced by Surgical Patients
Sum variable "Respect"
|
4.87 score on a scale
Interval 4.8 to 4.94
|
4.76 score on a scale
Interval 4.68 to 4.85
|
|
Quality of Perioperative Care as Experienced by Surgical Patients
Sum variable "Environment"
|
4.79 score on a scale
Interval 4.71 to 4.87
|
4.81 score on a scale
Interval 4.74 to 4.88
|
|
Quality of Perioperative Care as Experienced by Surgical Patients
Sum variable "Temperature management"
|
4.90 score on a scale
Interval 4.84 to 4.96
|
4.95 score on a scale
Interval 4.92 to 4.99
|
|
Quality of Perioperative Care as Experienced by Surgical Patients
Sum variable "Process"
|
4.71 score on a scale
Interval 4.6 to 4.82
|
4.51 score on a scale
Interval 4.35 to 4.68
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and at 3 months follow-upThe State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) is a commonly used measure of trait and state anxiety. It can be used in clinical settings to diagnose anxiety and to distinguish it from depressive syndromes. This instrument is composed of STATE and TRAIT scales, each of which has twenty items. The STATE items evoke feelings on a 4-point Likert scale, with responses ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The TRAIT items evoke how the respondent feels in general on a frequency scale ranging from 1 (hardly ever) to 4 (almost always). The scores from both STATE and TRAIT scales range from 20 to 80 scores. According to the raw score, anxiety is classified as low (20-39), moderate (40-59) or high (60-80). The results in Outcome Measure Data Table describe the changes from baseline to follow-up within the intervention group and the control group.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention Group
n=148 Participants
New perioperative practice model.
New perioperative practice model: The one and same anesthesia nurse takes care of the patient during the entire perioperative process and even pays the patient a visit to the ward the day after surgery.
|
Control Group
n=127 Participants
Traditional practice model.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Surgery-related TRAIT Anxiety From Baseline to Follow-up
|
-0.76 score on a scale
Interval -3.54 to 2.02
|
-2.05 score on a scale
Interval -4.98 to 0.88
|
Adverse Events
Intervention Group
Control Group
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place