Trial Outcomes & Findings for The Effect of A New Perioperative Practice Model on Patient, Nursing And Organisational Outcomes (NCT NCT02906033)

NCT ID: NCT02906033

Last Updated: 2021-12-06

Results Overview

The 15D is a generic, comprehensive, 15-dimensional, standardized, self-administered measure of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) that can be used both as a profile and single index score measure. The 15 dimensions are: mobility, vision, hearing, breathing, sleeping, eating, speech, excretion, usual activities, mental functioning, discomfort and symptoms, depression, distress, vitality, and sexual activity The respondent chooses one of the five levels for each dimension that best describes his or her state of health at present moment; the best level is 1 and the worst is 5. The single index score (15D score), representing the overall HRQoL on a 0-1 scale (1=full health, 0=being dead). The results in Outcome Measure Data Table describe the changes from baseline to follow-up within the intervention group and the control group.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

517 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline and at 3 months follow up

Results posted on

2021-12-06

Participant Flow

Excluded due to general anesthesia: N=64

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Intervention Group
New perioperative practice model. New perioperative practice model: The one and same anesthesia nurse takes care of the patient during the entire perioperative process and even pays the patient a visit to the ward the day after surgery.
Control Group
Traditional practice model.
Baseline
STARTED
231
222
Baseline
15 D at Baseline
211
189
Baseline
STATE at Baseline
199
190
Baseline
TRAIT at Baseline
194
189
Baseline
COMPLETED
194
189
Baseline
NOT COMPLETED
37
33
Follow-up
STARTED
194
189
Follow-up
15 D at Follow-up
151
135
Follow-up
STATE at Follow-up
154
135
Follow-up
TRAIT at Follow-up
148
127
Follow-up
COMPLETED
148
127
Follow-up
NOT COMPLETED
46
62

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Intervention Group
New perioperative practice model. New perioperative practice model: The one and same anesthesia nurse takes care of the patient during the entire perioperative process and even pays the patient a visit to the ward the day after surgery.
Control Group
Traditional practice model.
Baseline
Protocol Violation
37
33
Follow-up
Lost to Follow-up
46
62

Baseline Characteristics

Enrolled participants

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Intervention Group
n=231 Participants
New perioperative practice model. New perioperative practice model: The one and same anesthesia nurse takes care of the patient during the entire perioperative process and even pays the patient a visit to the ward the day after surgery.
Control Group
n=222 Participants
Traditional practice model.
Total
n=453 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
67.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.41 • n=5 Participants • Enrolled participants
68.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.48 • n=7 Participants • Enrolled participants
67.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.44 • n=5 Participants • Enrolled participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
146 Participants
n=5 Participants
139 Participants
n=7 Participants
285 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
85 Participants
n=5 Participants
83 Participants
n=7 Participants
168 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
231 Participants
n=5 Participants
222 Participants
n=7 Participants
453 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Finland
231 participants
n=5 Participants
222 participants
n=7 Participants
453 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and at 3 months follow up

The 15D is a generic, comprehensive, 15-dimensional, standardized, self-administered measure of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) that can be used both as a profile and single index score measure. The 15 dimensions are: mobility, vision, hearing, breathing, sleeping, eating, speech, excretion, usual activities, mental functioning, discomfort and symptoms, depression, distress, vitality, and sexual activity The respondent chooses one of the five levels for each dimension that best describes his or her state of health at present moment; the best level is 1 and the worst is 5. The single index score (15D score), representing the overall HRQoL on a 0-1 scale (1=full health, 0=being dead). The results in Outcome Measure Data Table describe the changes from baseline to follow-up within the intervention group and the control group.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Group
n=151 Participants
New perioperative practice model. New perioperative practice model: The one and same anesthesia nurse takes care of the patient during the entire perioperative process and even pays the patient a visit to the ward the day after surgery.
Control Group
n=135 Participants
Traditional practice model.
Change From Baseline to Follow-up in Health Related Quality of Life
0.059 score on a scale
Interval 0.036 to 0.081
0.055 score on a scale
Interval 0.031 to 0.078

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and at 3 months follow-up

The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) is a commonly used measure of trait and state anxiety. It can be used in clinical settings to diagnose anxiety and to distinguish it from depressive syndromes. This instrument is composed of STATE and TRAIT scales, each of which has twenty items. The STATE items evoke feelings on a 4-point Likert scale, with responses ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The TRAIT items evoke how the respondent feels in general on a frequency scale ranging from 1 (hardly ever) to 4 (almost always). The scores of both STATE and TRAIT scales range from 20 to 80 scores. According to the raw score, anxiety is classified as low (20-39), moderate (40-59) or high (60-80). The results in Outcome Measure Data Table describe the changes from baseline to follow-up within the intervention group and the control group.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Group
n=154 Participants
New perioperative practice model. New perioperative practice model: The one and same anesthesia nurse takes care of the patient during the entire perioperative process and even pays the patient a visit to the ward the day after surgery.
Control Group
n=135 Participants
Traditional practice model.
Change in Surgery-related STATE Anxiety From Baseline to Follow-up
-4.91 score on a scale
Interval -8.02 to -1.79
-5.21 score on a scale
Interval -8.47 to -1.95

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: One-point measurement on the day of discharge (on average on the 3rd day after surgery)

Good Perioperative Nursing Care Scale is a constructed questionnaire which contains 36 statements measuring the quality of care, which are summarized into nine quality categories (sum variables/subscales): Pain management (n=5 statements), Temperature maintenance (n=2), Technical skills (n=4), Information (n=6), Encouragement (n= 3), Respect (n= 3), Staff characteristics (n= 5), Environment (n= 6) and Process (n= 2). The quality statements are answered with a five-point Likert scale (fully agree, 5 points - fully disagree, 1 point) with a neutral option "neither agree nor disagree" and an option "cannot evaluate this aspect". The value of each averaged sum variable/subscale varies from 1 to 5. In the analysis, the responses of "cannot evaluate this aspect" were excluded. The better the mean value is, the more positive experience the participant has of the quality of care.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Group
n=219 Participants
New perioperative practice model. New perioperative practice model: The one and same anesthesia nurse takes care of the patient during the entire perioperative process and even pays the patient a visit to the ward the day after surgery.
Control Group
n=217 Participants
Traditional practice model.
Quality of Perioperative Care as Experienced by Surgical Patients
Sum variable "Staff characteristics"
4.89 score on a scale
Interval 4.84 to 4.94
4.83 score on a scale
Interval 4.75 to 4.9
Quality of Perioperative Care as Experienced by Surgical Patients
Sum variable "Encouragement"
4.61 score on a scale
Interval 4.49 to 4.72
4.56 score on a scale
Interval 4.42 to 4.7
Quality of Perioperative Care as Experienced by Surgical Patients
Sum variable "Pain management"
4.85 score on a scale
Interval 4.78 to 4.91
4.83 score on a scale
Interval 4.76 to 4.89
Quality of Perioperative Care as Experienced by Surgical Patients
Sum variable "Technical skills"
4.95 score on a scale
Interval 4.92 to 4.98
4.90 score on a scale
Interval 4.84 to 4.95
Quality of Perioperative Care as Experienced by Surgical Patients
Sum variable "Information"
4.61 score on a scale
Interval 4.47 to 4.74
4.58 score on a scale
Interval 4.44 to 4.71
Quality of Perioperative Care as Experienced by Surgical Patients
Sum variable "Respect"
4.87 score on a scale
Interval 4.8 to 4.94
4.76 score on a scale
Interval 4.68 to 4.85
Quality of Perioperative Care as Experienced by Surgical Patients
Sum variable "Environment"
4.79 score on a scale
Interval 4.71 to 4.87
4.81 score on a scale
Interval 4.74 to 4.88
Quality of Perioperative Care as Experienced by Surgical Patients
Sum variable "Temperature management"
4.90 score on a scale
Interval 4.84 to 4.96
4.95 score on a scale
Interval 4.92 to 4.99
Quality of Perioperative Care as Experienced by Surgical Patients
Sum variable "Process"
4.71 score on a scale
Interval 4.6 to 4.82
4.51 score on a scale
Interval 4.35 to 4.68

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and at 3 months follow-up

The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) is a commonly used measure of trait and state anxiety. It can be used in clinical settings to diagnose anxiety and to distinguish it from depressive syndromes. This instrument is composed of STATE and TRAIT scales, each of which has twenty items. The STATE items evoke feelings on a 4-point Likert scale, with responses ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The TRAIT items evoke how the respondent feels in general on a frequency scale ranging from 1 (hardly ever) to 4 (almost always). The scores from both STATE and TRAIT scales range from 20 to 80 scores. According to the raw score, anxiety is classified as low (20-39), moderate (40-59) or high (60-80). The results in Outcome Measure Data Table describe the changes from baseline to follow-up within the intervention group and the control group.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Intervention Group
n=148 Participants
New perioperative practice model. New perioperative practice model: The one and same anesthesia nurse takes care of the patient during the entire perioperative process and even pays the patient a visit to the ward the day after surgery.
Control Group
n=127 Participants
Traditional practice model.
Change in Surgery-related TRAIT Anxiety From Baseline to Follow-up
-0.76 score on a scale
Interval -3.54 to 2.02
-2.05 score on a scale
Interval -4.98 to 0.88

Adverse Events

Intervention Group

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Control Group

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

MNSc Maria Pulkkinen

Helsinki University Hospital

Phone: +358 50 427 2678

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place