Trial Outcomes & Findings for Saline-Controlled Study of nSTRIDE APS for Knee Osteoarthritis (NCT NCT02905240)
NCT ID: NCT02905240
Last Updated: 2023-11-07
Results Overview
The primary objective of this study was to determine whether nSTRIDE APS is superior to Saline with respect to the improvement in mean WOMAC Pain score (change from baseline to 12 Months post-injection raw score). The WOMAC pain subscale consisted of five questions scored from 0 to 4. The pain score has a range of 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximal pain).
COMPLETED
NA
332 participants
Baseline and 12 Months
2023-11-07
Participant Flow
During the screening process, potential subjects provided informed consent and were then screened for eligibility. Screening consisted of meeting all inclusion and exclusion criteria, including a WOMAC LK 3.1 pain subscale score ≥ 9 and ≤ 19 and by providing objective physiological evidence of OA using the Kellgren-Lawrence scale (assessed from normal radiographs).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
nSTRIDE APS
Autologous Protein Solution prepared using the nSTRIDE APS Kit
nSTRIDE APS: single intra-articular injection
|
Saline
Saline control
Saline: single intra-articular injection
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
172
|
160
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
154
|
137
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
18
|
23
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Saline-Controlled Study of nSTRIDE APS for Knee Osteoarthritis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
nSTRIDE APS
n=172 Participants
Autologous Protein Solution prepared using the nSTRIDE APS Kit
nSTRIDE APS: single intra-articular injection
|
Saline
n=160 Participants
Saline control
Saline: single intra-articular injection
|
Total
n=332 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White (Hispanic)
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White (Non-Hispanic)
|
125 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
135 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
260 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
172 participants
n=5 Participants
|
160 participants
n=7 Participants
|
332 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
WOMAC Pain
|
11.27 points
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.23 • n=5 Participants
|
11.37 points
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.11 • n=7 Participants
|
11.32 points
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.17 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
58.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3 • n=5 Participants
|
58.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6 • n=7 Participants
|
58.55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.95 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
80 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
90 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
170 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
92 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
70 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
162 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African-American
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian or Pacific Islander
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native American
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Specified
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 MonthsThe primary objective of this study was to determine whether nSTRIDE APS is superior to Saline with respect to the improvement in mean WOMAC Pain score (change from baseline to 12 Months post-injection raw score). The WOMAC pain subscale consisted of five questions scored from 0 to 4. The pain score has a range of 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximal pain).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
nSTRIDE APS
n=172 Participants
Autologous Protein Solution prepared using the nSTRIDE APS Kit
nSTRIDE APS: single intra-articular injection
|
Saline
n=160 Participants
Saline control
Saline: single intra-articular injection
|
|---|---|---|
|
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Likert (LK) 3.1 Pain Subscale Change From Baseline to 12 Months
|
-5.6 score on a scale
Interval -6.3 to -4.9
|
-5.4 score on a scale
Interval -6.2 to -4.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 MonthsPopulation: Number of subjects with a completed VAS pain score at Baseline and at 12 Months
The Visual Analogue Scale is a common tool for measuring general pain. A 100 mm line is marked from 0 to 10 in 10 mm increments. Knee pain severity is indicated by drawing a vertical mark at the point on the line that best represents the severity of pain. No pain is indicated by the 0 at the far left, and the worst possible pain is indicated by the 100 at the far right.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
nSTRIDE APS
n=149 Participants
Autologous Protein Solution prepared using the nSTRIDE APS Kit
nSTRIDE APS: single intra-articular injection
|
Saline
n=134 Participants
Saline control
Saline: single intra-articular injection
|
|---|---|---|
|
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Change From Baseline to 12 Months
|
-25.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.09
|
-23.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.14
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Number of subjects with complete data at 12 Months to calculate responder status
The OMERACT-OARSI Responder Criteria were applied to both treatment groups, categorizing each patient into one of two categories: responder and non-responder. Responders were defined as subjects who achieved a high degree of improvement in pain or in function (improvement of ≥50% and absolute change ≥20), or a moderate degree of improvement in 2 of the 3 response domains (pain, function, global assessment).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
nSTRIDE APS
n=149 Participants
Autologous Protein Solution prepared using the nSTRIDE APS Kit
nSTRIDE APS: single intra-articular injection
|
Saline
n=134 Participants
Saline control
Saline: single intra-articular injection
|
|---|---|---|
|
Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Responders
Responder
|
101 Participants
|
92 Participants
|
|
Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Responders
Non-Responder
|
48 Participants
|
42 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 MonthsPopulation: Number of subjects with a completed WOMAC stiffness score at Baseline and at 12 Months
The WOMAC stiffness subscale consisted of two questions scored from 0 to 4. The stiffness score has a range of 0 (no stiffness) to 8 (maximal stiffness).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
nSTRIDE APS
n=149 Participants
Autologous Protein Solution prepared using the nSTRIDE APS Kit
nSTRIDE APS: single intra-articular injection
|
Saline
n=134 Participants
Saline control
Saline: single intra-articular injection
|
|---|---|---|
|
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) LK 3.1 Stiffness Subscale Change From Baseline to 12 Months
|
-2.1 score on a scale
Interval -2.4 to -1.8
|
-2.2 score on a scale
Interval -2.6 to -1.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 MonthsPopulation: Number of subjects with a completed EQ-5D score at Baseline and at 12 Months
The EQ-5D is a validated instrument that assesses an individual's current health status and heath related quality of life. The EQ-5D-3L descriptive component assesses five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression over three levels of severity. The EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) assesses the respondent's self-rated overall health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
nSTRIDE APS
n=149 Participants
Autologous Protein Solution prepared using the nSTRIDE APS Kit
nSTRIDE APS: single intra-articular injection
|
Saline
n=134 Participants
Saline control
Saline: single intra-articular injection
|
|---|---|---|
|
EQ-5D Change From Baseline to 12 Months
|
4.62 score on a scale
Interval 2.02 to 7.22
|
4.06 score on a scale
Interval 1.32 to 6.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Intent to Treat Population
Subjects experiencing at least one AE
Outcome measures
| Measure |
nSTRIDE APS
n=172 Participants
Autologous Protein Solution prepared using the nSTRIDE APS Kit
nSTRIDE APS: single intra-articular injection
|
Saline
n=160 Participants
Saline control
Saline: single intra-articular injection
|
|---|---|---|
|
Adverse Events
|
94 Participants
|
93 Participants
|
POST_HOC outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 YearPopulation: Per Protocol population at 12 Months
This criteria is based on the usage of rescue medication and restricted medication/therapy usage and the WOMAC pain subscale percent change from baseline. A patient is considered a non-responder if one or more of the following are true: 1. Early exit for Knee OA per IDMC determination 2. WOMAC Pain Percent improvement 27% 3. Rescue Medication not withheld within 48 hours of the 12 month study visit 4. Medication/therapy violation at the 12 month visit (New or Continuing) 5. Rescue medication taken most days or every day, as reported at the 12 month visit
Outcome measures
| Measure |
nSTRIDE APS
n=162 Participants
Autologous Protein Solution prepared using the nSTRIDE APS Kit
nSTRIDE APS: single intra-articular injection
|
Saline
n=151 Participants
Saline control
Saline: single intra-articular injection
|
|---|---|---|
|
Post-Hoc Pain/Medication Usage Responder Analysis
Non-Responder
|
65 Participants
|
80 Participants
|
|
Post-Hoc Pain/Medication Usage Responder Analysis
Responder
|
97 Participants
|
71 Participants
|
Adverse Events
nSTRIDE APS
Saline
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
nSTRIDE APS
n=172 participants at risk
Autologous Protein Solution prepared using the nSTRIDE APS Kit
nSTRIDE APS: single intra-articular injection
|
Saline
n=160 participants at risk
Saline control
Saline: single intra-articular injection
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Heart Attack
|
0.58%
1/172 • Number of events 1 • All AEs reported to or identified by investigative center personnel occurring during the study period, beginning on the day of procedure through completion of follow-up, an average of 12 months.
AEs had the onset and resolution date(s) listed (when known), and had their management and outcome documented (where feasible), and were assessed for severity, seriousness, relatedness, and whether they were anticipated. Narratives of SAEs were adjudicated by a Medical Monitor. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) also met periodically to review aggregate and individual subject data related to safety, data integrity and overall conduct of the trial.
|
0.00%
0/160 • All AEs reported to or identified by investigative center personnel occurring during the study period, beginning on the day of procedure through completion of follow-up, an average of 12 months.
AEs had the onset and resolution date(s) listed (when known), and had their management and outcome documented (where feasible), and were assessed for severity, seriousness, relatedness, and whether they were anticipated. Narratives of SAEs were adjudicated by a Medical Monitor. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) also met periodically to review aggregate and individual subject data related to safety, data integrity and overall conduct of the trial.
|
|
Investigations
Death
|
0.58%
1/172 • Number of events 1 • All AEs reported to or identified by investigative center personnel occurring during the study period, beginning on the day of procedure through completion of follow-up, an average of 12 months.
AEs had the onset and resolution date(s) listed (when known), and had their management and outcome documented (where feasible), and were assessed for severity, seriousness, relatedness, and whether they were anticipated. Narratives of SAEs were adjudicated by a Medical Monitor. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) also met periodically to review aggregate and individual subject data related to safety, data integrity and overall conduct of the trial.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • All AEs reported to or identified by investigative center personnel occurring during the study period, beginning on the day of procedure through completion of follow-up, an average of 12 months.
AEs had the onset and resolution date(s) listed (when known), and had their management and outcome documented (where feasible), and were assessed for severity, seriousness, relatedness, and whether they were anticipated. Narratives of SAEs were adjudicated by a Medical Monitor. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) also met periodically to review aggregate and individual subject data related to safety, data integrity and overall conduct of the trial.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.58%
1/172 • Number of events 1 • All AEs reported to or identified by investigative center personnel occurring during the study period, beginning on the day of procedure through completion of follow-up, an average of 12 months.
AEs had the onset and resolution date(s) listed (when known), and had their management and outcome documented (where feasible), and were assessed for severity, seriousness, relatedness, and whether they were anticipated. Narratives of SAEs were adjudicated by a Medical Monitor. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) also met periodically to review aggregate and individual subject data related to safety, data integrity and overall conduct of the trial.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • All AEs reported to or identified by investigative center personnel occurring during the study period, beginning on the day of procedure through completion of follow-up, an average of 12 months.
AEs had the onset and resolution date(s) listed (when known), and had their management and outcome documented (where feasible), and were assessed for severity, seriousness, relatedness, and whether they were anticipated. Narratives of SAEs were adjudicated by a Medical Monitor. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) also met periodically to review aggregate and individual subject data related to safety, data integrity and overall conduct of the trial.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Excessive Pain
|
0.58%
1/172 • Number of events 1 • All AEs reported to or identified by investigative center personnel occurring during the study period, beginning on the day of procedure through completion of follow-up, an average of 12 months.
AEs had the onset and resolution date(s) listed (when known), and had their management and outcome documented (where feasible), and were assessed for severity, seriousness, relatedness, and whether they were anticipated. Narratives of SAEs were adjudicated by a Medical Monitor. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) also met periodically to review aggregate and individual subject data related to safety, data integrity and overall conduct of the trial.
|
0.00%
0/160 • All AEs reported to or identified by investigative center personnel occurring during the study period, beginning on the day of procedure through completion of follow-up, an average of 12 months.
AEs had the onset and resolution date(s) listed (when known), and had their management and outcome documented (where feasible), and were assessed for severity, seriousness, relatedness, and whether they were anticipated. Narratives of SAEs were adjudicated by a Medical Monitor. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) also met periodically to review aggregate and individual subject data related to safety, data integrity and overall conduct of the trial.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
GERD and Hiatal Hernia
|
0.00%
0/172 • All AEs reported to or identified by investigative center personnel occurring during the study period, beginning on the day of procedure through completion of follow-up, an average of 12 months.
AEs had the onset and resolution date(s) listed (when known), and had their management and outcome documented (where feasible), and were assessed for severity, seriousness, relatedness, and whether they were anticipated. Narratives of SAEs were adjudicated by a Medical Monitor. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) also met periodically to review aggregate and individual subject data related to safety, data integrity and overall conduct of the trial.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • All AEs reported to or identified by investigative center personnel occurring during the study period, beginning on the day of procedure through completion of follow-up, an average of 12 months.
AEs had the onset and resolution date(s) listed (when known), and had their management and outcome documented (where feasible), and were assessed for severity, seriousness, relatedness, and whether they were anticipated. Narratives of SAEs were adjudicated by a Medical Monitor. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) also met periodically to review aggregate and individual subject data related to safety, data integrity and overall conduct of the trial.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Right Knee Patella Pain
|
0.00%
0/172 • All AEs reported to or identified by investigative center personnel occurring during the study period, beginning on the day of procedure through completion of follow-up, an average of 12 months.
AEs had the onset and resolution date(s) listed (when known), and had their management and outcome documented (where feasible), and were assessed for severity, seriousness, relatedness, and whether they were anticipated. Narratives of SAEs were adjudicated by a Medical Monitor. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) also met periodically to review aggregate and individual subject data related to safety, data integrity and overall conduct of the trial.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • All AEs reported to or identified by investigative center personnel occurring during the study period, beginning on the day of procedure through completion of follow-up, an average of 12 months.
AEs had the onset and resolution date(s) listed (when known), and had their management and outcome documented (where feasible), and were assessed for severity, seriousness, relatedness, and whether they were anticipated. Narratives of SAEs were adjudicated by a Medical Monitor. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) also met periodically to review aggregate and individual subject data related to safety, data integrity and overall conduct of the trial.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Perforated Diverticulitis
|
0.58%
1/172 • Number of events 1 • All AEs reported to or identified by investigative center personnel occurring during the study period, beginning on the day of procedure through completion of follow-up, an average of 12 months.
AEs had the onset and resolution date(s) listed (when known), and had their management and outcome documented (where feasible), and were assessed for severity, seriousness, relatedness, and whether they were anticipated. Narratives of SAEs were adjudicated by a Medical Monitor. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) also met periodically to review aggregate and individual subject data related to safety, data integrity and overall conduct of the trial.
|
0.00%
0/160 • All AEs reported to or identified by investigative center personnel occurring during the study period, beginning on the day of procedure through completion of follow-up, an average of 12 months.
AEs had the onset and resolution date(s) listed (when known), and had their management and outcome documented (where feasible), and were assessed for severity, seriousness, relatedness, and whether they were anticipated. Narratives of SAEs were adjudicated by a Medical Monitor. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) also met periodically to review aggregate and individual subject data related to safety, data integrity and overall conduct of the trial.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Acute Cholecystitis
|
0.58%
1/172 • Number of events 1 • All AEs reported to or identified by investigative center personnel occurring during the study period, beginning on the day of procedure through completion of follow-up, an average of 12 months.
AEs had the onset and resolution date(s) listed (when known), and had their management and outcome documented (where feasible), and were assessed for severity, seriousness, relatedness, and whether they were anticipated. Narratives of SAEs were adjudicated by a Medical Monitor. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) also met periodically to review aggregate and individual subject data related to safety, data integrity and overall conduct of the trial.
|
0.00%
0/160 • All AEs reported to or identified by investigative center personnel occurring during the study period, beginning on the day of procedure through completion of follow-up, an average of 12 months.
AEs had the onset and resolution date(s) listed (when known), and had their management and outcome documented (where feasible), and were assessed for severity, seriousness, relatedness, and whether they were anticipated. Narratives of SAEs were adjudicated by a Medical Monitor. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) also met periodically to review aggregate and individual subject data related to safety, data integrity and overall conduct of the trial.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Lap Band Slippage and Diverticulitis
|
0.00%
0/172 • All AEs reported to or identified by investigative center personnel occurring during the study period, beginning on the day of procedure through completion of follow-up, an average of 12 months.
AEs had the onset and resolution date(s) listed (when known), and had their management and outcome documented (where feasible), and were assessed for severity, seriousness, relatedness, and whether they were anticipated. Narratives of SAEs were adjudicated by a Medical Monitor. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) also met periodically to review aggregate and individual subject data related to safety, data integrity and overall conduct of the trial.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • All AEs reported to or identified by investigative center personnel occurring during the study period, beginning on the day of procedure through completion of follow-up, an average of 12 months.
AEs had the onset and resolution date(s) listed (when known), and had their management and outcome documented (where feasible), and were assessed for severity, seriousness, relatedness, and whether they were anticipated. Narratives of SAEs were adjudicated by a Medical Monitor. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) also met periodically to review aggregate and individual subject data related to safety, data integrity and overall conduct of the trial.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Confusion, Memory Loss
|
0.00%
0/172 • All AEs reported to or identified by investigative center personnel occurring during the study period, beginning on the day of procedure through completion of follow-up, an average of 12 months.
AEs had the onset and resolution date(s) listed (when known), and had their management and outcome documented (where feasible), and were assessed for severity, seriousness, relatedness, and whether they were anticipated. Narratives of SAEs were adjudicated by a Medical Monitor. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) also met periodically to review aggregate and individual subject data related to safety, data integrity and overall conduct of the trial.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • All AEs reported to or identified by investigative center personnel occurring during the study period, beginning on the day of procedure through completion of follow-up, an average of 12 months.
AEs had the onset and resolution date(s) listed (when known), and had their management and outcome documented (where feasible), and were assessed for severity, seriousness, relatedness, and whether they were anticipated. Narratives of SAEs were adjudicated by a Medical Monitor. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) also met periodically to review aggregate and individual subject data related to safety, data integrity and overall conduct of the trial.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory Syncytial Virus
|
0.00%
0/172 • All AEs reported to or identified by investigative center personnel occurring during the study period, beginning on the day of procedure through completion of follow-up, an average of 12 months.
AEs had the onset and resolution date(s) listed (when known), and had their management and outcome documented (where feasible), and were assessed for severity, seriousness, relatedness, and whether they were anticipated. Narratives of SAEs were adjudicated by a Medical Monitor. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) also met periodically to review aggregate and individual subject data related to safety, data integrity and overall conduct of the trial.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • All AEs reported to or identified by investigative center personnel occurring during the study period, beginning on the day of procedure through completion of follow-up, an average of 12 months.
AEs had the onset and resolution date(s) listed (when known), and had their management and outcome documented (where feasible), and were assessed for severity, seriousness, relatedness, and whether they were anticipated. Narratives of SAEs were adjudicated by a Medical Monitor. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) also met periodically to review aggregate and individual subject data related to safety, data integrity and overall conduct of the trial.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Abnormal Cardiac Stress Test
|
0.00%
0/172 • All AEs reported to or identified by investigative center personnel occurring during the study period, beginning on the day of procedure through completion of follow-up, an average of 12 months.
AEs had the onset and resolution date(s) listed (when known), and had their management and outcome documented (where feasible), and were assessed for severity, seriousness, relatedness, and whether they were anticipated. Narratives of SAEs were adjudicated by a Medical Monitor. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) also met periodically to review aggregate and individual subject data related to safety, data integrity and overall conduct of the trial.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Number of events 1 • All AEs reported to or identified by investigative center personnel occurring during the study period, beginning on the day of procedure through completion of follow-up, an average of 12 months.
AEs had the onset and resolution date(s) listed (when known), and had their management and outcome documented (where feasible), and were assessed for severity, seriousness, relatedness, and whether they were anticipated. Narratives of SAEs were adjudicated by a Medical Monitor. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) also met periodically to review aggregate and individual subject data related to safety, data integrity and overall conduct of the trial.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Kidney Stones
|
0.58%
1/172 • Number of events 1 • All AEs reported to or identified by investigative center personnel occurring during the study period, beginning on the day of procedure through completion of follow-up, an average of 12 months.
AEs had the onset and resolution date(s) listed (when known), and had their management and outcome documented (where feasible), and were assessed for severity, seriousness, relatedness, and whether they were anticipated. Narratives of SAEs were adjudicated by a Medical Monitor. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) also met periodically to review aggregate and individual subject data related to safety, data integrity and overall conduct of the trial.
|
0.00%
0/160 • All AEs reported to or identified by investigative center personnel occurring during the study period, beginning on the day of procedure through completion of follow-up, an average of 12 months.
AEs had the onset and resolution date(s) listed (when known), and had their management and outcome documented (where feasible), and were assessed for severity, seriousness, relatedness, and whether they were anticipated. Narratives of SAEs were adjudicated by a Medical Monitor. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) also met periodically to review aggregate and individual subject data related to safety, data integrity and overall conduct of the trial.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Thyroid Mass
|
0.58%
1/172 • Number of events 1 • All AEs reported to or identified by investigative center personnel occurring during the study period, beginning on the day of procedure through completion of follow-up, an average of 12 months.
AEs had the onset and resolution date(s) listed (when known), and had their management and outcome documented (where feasible), and were assessed for severity, seriousness, relatedness, and whether they were anticipated. Narratives of SAEs were adjudicated by a Medical Monitor. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) also met periodically to review aggregate and individual subject data related to safety, data integrity and overall conduct of the trial.
|
0.00%
0/160 • All AEs reported to or identified by investigative center personnel occurring during the study period, beginning on the day of procedure through completion of follow-up, an average of 12 months.
AEs had the onset and resolution date(s) listed (when known), and had their management and outcome documented (where feasible), and were assessed for severity, seriousness, relatedness, and whether they were anticipated. Narratives of SAEs were adjudicated by a Medical Monitor. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) also met periodically to review aggregate and individual subject data related to safety, data integrity and overall conduct of the trial.
|
|
General disorders
Severe Dizziness
|
0.58%
1/172 • Number of events 1 • All AEs reported to or identified by investigative center personnel occurring during the study period, beginning on the day of procedure through completion of follow-up, an average of 12 months.
AEs had the onset and resolution date(s) listed (when known), and had their management and outcome documented (where feasible), and were assessed for severity, seriousness, relatedness, and whether they were anticipated. Narratives of SAEs were adjudicated by a Medical Monitor. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) also met periodically to review aggregate and individual subject data related to safety, data integrity and overall conduct of the trial.
|
0.00%
0/160 • All AEs reported to or identified by investigative center personnel occurring during the study period, beginning on the day of procedure through completion of follow-up, an average of 12 months.
AEs had the onset and resolution date(s) listed (when known), and had their management and outcome documented (where feasible), and were assessed for severity, seriousness, relatedness, and whether they were anticipated. Narratives of SAEs were adjudicated by a Medical Monitor. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) also met periodically to review aggregate and individual subject data related to safety, data integrity and overall conduct of the trial.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial Fibrillation
|
0.58%
1/172 • Number of events 1 • All AEs reported to or identified by investigative center personnel occurring during the study period, beginning on the day of procedure through completion of follow-up, an average of 12 months.
AEs had the onset and resolution date(s) listed (when known), and had their management and outcome documented (where feasible), and were assessed for severity, seriousness, relatedness, and whether they were anticipated. Narratives of SAEs were adjudicated by a Medical Monitor. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) also met periodically to review aggregate and individual subject data related to safety, data integrity and overall conduct of the trial.
|
0.00%
0/160 • All AEs reported to or identified by investigative center personnel occurring during the study period, beginning on the day of procedure through completion of follow-up, an average of 12 months.
AEs had the onset and resolution date(s) listed (when known), and had their management and outcome documented (where feasible), and were assessed for severity, seriousness, relatedness, and whether they were anticipated. Narratives of SAEs were adjudicated by a Medical Monitor. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) also met periodically to review aggregate and individual subject data related to safety, data integrity and overall conduct of the trial.
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Jennifer Woodell-May, Research Associate Director
Zimmer Biomet
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place