Trial Outcomes & Findings for Proficiency Based Robotics Training Curriculum: Skill Acquisition & Transferability of Skills to Live Porcine Models (NCT NCT02895347)

NCT ID: NCT02895347

Last Updated: 2017-04-18

Results Overview

GEARS is a validated assessment tool for grading overall technical proficiency for robotic surgery. The overall proficiency score is a composite score of five different measures: depth perception, bimanual dexterity, efficiency, force sensitivity, and robotic control. Each of these subscale scores are graded 1-5, with 1 being poor and 5 being excellent. The total score is the summation of the scores from each of the five subscales and ranges from 5 to 25.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

36 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Three weeks after orientation

Results posted on

2017-04-18

Participant Flow

Of the 40 subjects who consented to participate in the study, 4 subjects failed to complete study procedures and dropped out of the study. Reason for this included inability to attend the final assessment and subjects unwilling to perform the final study assessment on a live porcine model.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Control Group
Participants in the Control Group (CG) were asked to attend an orientation reviewing the study. Three weeks later participants returned and were filmed timed completing a suturing activity on the porcine model.
Experimental Group
Participants in the Experimental Group (EG) were asked to attend an orientation reviewing the study. Then participants were instructed to complete 4 activities on the dvSS ® that modeled suturing techniques in minimally invasive robotics-assisted surgery. EG participants repeated these 4 activities over a period of 2 weeks until proficiency (91%) in all 4 activities was reached. Participants were asked to return and were filmed and timed completing a suturing activity on the porcine model.
Overall Study
STARTED
20
20
Overall Study
COMPLETED
17
19
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
3
1

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Control Group
Participants in the Control Group (CG) were asked to attend an orientation reviewing the study. Three weeks later participants returned and were filmed timed completing a suturing activity on the porcine model.
Experimental Group
Participants in the Experimental Group (EG) were asked to attend an orientation reviewing the study. Then participants were instructed to complete 4 activities on the dvSS ® that modeled suturing techniques in minimally invasive robotics-assisted surgery. EG participants repeated these 4 activities over a period of 2 weeks until proficiency (91%) in all 4 activities was reached. Participants were asked to return and were filmed and timed completing a suturing activity on the porcine model.
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
3
1

Baseline Characteristics

Proficiency Based Robotics Training Curriculum: Skill Acquisition & Transferability of Skills to Live Porcine Models

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Control Group
n=20 Participants
Participants in the Control Group (CG) were asked to attend an orientation reviewing the study. Three weeks later participants returned and were filmed timed completing a suturing activity on the porcine model.
Experimental Group
n=20 Participants
Participants in the Experimental Group (EG) were asked to attend an orientation reviewing the study. Then participants were instructed to complete 4 activities on the dvSS ® that modeled suturing techniques in minimally invasive robotics-assisted surgery. EG participants repeated these 4 activities over a period of 2 weeks until proficiency (91%) in all 4 activities was reached. Participants were asked to return and were filmed and timed completing a suturing activity on the porcine model.
Total
n=40 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
25 years
n=5 Participants
25 years
n=7 Participants
25 years
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 participants
n=5 Participants
20 participants
n=7 Participants
40 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Three weeks after orientation

GEARS is a validated assessment tool for grading overall technical proficiency for robotic surgery. The overall proficiency score is a composite score of five different measures: depth perception, bimanual dexterity, efficiency, force sensitivity, and robotic control. Each of these subscale scores are graded 1-5, with 1 being poor and 5 being excellent. The total score is the summation of the scores from each of the five subscales and ranges from 5 to 25.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control Group
n=17 Participants
Participants in the Control Group (CG) were asked to attend an orientation reviewing the study. Three weeks later participants returned and were filmed timed completing a suturing activity on the porcine model.
Experimental Group
n=19 Participants
Participants in the Experimental Group (EG) were asked to attend an orientation reviewing the study. Then participants were instructed to complete 4 activities on the dvSS ® that modeled suturing techniques in minimally invasive robotics-assisted surgery. EG participants repeated these 4 activities over a period of 2 weeks until proficiency (91%) in all 4 activities was reached. Participants were asked to return and were filmed and timed completing a suturing activity on the porcine model.
Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) Scale
15.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.38
15.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.51

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Three weeks after orientation

time, measured in minutes, it took each participant to perform the suturing activity

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control Group
n=17 Participants
Participants in the Control Group (CG) were asked to attend an orientation reviewing the study. Three weeks later participants returned and were filmed timed completing a suturing activity on the porcine model.
Experimental Group
n=19 Participants
Participants in the Experimental Group (EG) were asked to attend an orientation reviewing the study. Then participants were instructed to complete 4 activities on the dvSS ® that modeled suturing techniques in minimally invasive robotics-assisted surgery. EG participants repeated these 4 activities over a period of 2 weeks until proficiency (91%) in all 4 activities was reached. Participants were asked to return and were filmed and timed completing a suturing activity on the porcine model.
Amount Time to Suture
9.9 minutes
Standard Deviation 2.07
9.2 minutes
Standard Deviation 2.65

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: assessed after the orientation and prior to the three week date for the final suturing assessment

time, measured in minutes, it took each participant in the intervention group to achieve surgical proficiency on the robotic simulator.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control Group
n=19 Participants
Participants in the Control Group (CG) were asked to attend an orientation reviewing the study. Three weeks later participants returned and were filmed timed completing a suturing activity on the porcine model.
Experimental Group
Participants in the Experimental Group (EG) were asked to attend an orientation reviewing the study. Then participants were instructed to complete 4 activities on the dvSS ® that modeled suturing techniques in minimally invasive robotics-assisted surgery. EG participants repeated these 4 activities over a period of 2 weeks until proficiency (91%) in all 4 activities was reached. Participants were asked to return and were filmed and timed completing a suturing activity on the porcine model.
Amount of Time to Achieve Proficiency
116 minutes
Interval 53.0 to 209.0

Adverse Events

Control Group

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Experimental Group

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Gaby Moawad

GWU Medical Faculty Associates

Phone: 202-741-2500

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place