Trial Outcomes & Findings for Proficiency Based Robotics Training Curriculum: Skill Acquisition & Transferability of Skills to Live Porcine Models (NCT NCT02895347)
NCT ID: NCT02895347
Last Updated: 2017-04-18
Results Overview
GEARS is a validated assessment tool for grading overall technical proficiency for robotic surgery. The overall proficiency score is a composite score of five different measures: depth perception, bimanual dexterity, efficiency, force sensitivity, and robotic control. Each of these subscale scores are graded 1-5, with 1 being poor and 5 being excellent. The total score is the summation of the scores from each of the five subscales and ranges from 5 to 25.
COMPLETED
NA
36 participants
Three weeks after orientation
2017-04-18
Participant Flow
Of the 40 subjects who consented to participate in the study, 4 subjects failed to complete study procedures and dropped out of the study. Reason for this included inability to attend the final assessment and subjects unwilling to perform the final study assessment on a live porcine model.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Control Group
Participants in the Control Group (CG) were asked to attend an orientation reviewing the study. Three weeks later participants returned and were filmed timed completing a suturing activity on the porcine model.
|
Experimental Group
Participants in the Experimental Group (EG) were asked to attend an orientation reviewing the study. Then participants were instructed to complete 4 activities on the dvSS ® that modeled suturing techniques in minimally invasive robotics-assisted surgery. EG participants repeated these 4 activities over a period of 2 weeks until proficiency (91%) in all 4 activities was reached. Participants were asked to return and were filmed and timed completing a suturing activity on the porcine model.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
20
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
17
|
19
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Control Group
Participants in the Control Group (CG) were asked to attend an orientation reviewing the study. Three weeks later participants returned and were filmed timed completing a suturing activity on the porcine model.
|
Experimental Group
Participants in the Experimental Group (EG) were asked to attend an orientation reviewing the study. Then participants were instructed to complete 4 activities on the dvSS ® that modeled suturing techniques in minimally invasive robotics-assisted surgery. EG participants repeated these 4 activities over a period of 2 weeks until proficiency (91%) in all 4 activities was reached. Participants were asked to return and were filmed and timed completing a suturing activity on the porcine model.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Proficiency Based Robotics Training Curriculum: Skill Acquisition & Transferability of Skills to Live Porcine Models
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Control Group
n=20 Participants
Participants in the Control Group (CG) were asked to attend an orientation reviewing the study. Three weeks later participants returned and were filmed timed completing a suturing activity on the porcine model.
|
Experimental Group
n=20 Participants
Participants in the Experimental Group (EG) were asked to attend an orientation reviewing the study. Then participants were instructed to complete 4 activities on the dvSS ® that modeled suturing techniques in minimally invasive robotics-assisted surgery. EG participants repeated these 4 activities over a period of 2 weeks until proficiency (91%) in all 4 activities was reached. Participants were asked to return and were filmed and timed completing a suturing activity on the porcine model.
|
Total
n=40 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
25 years
n=5 Participants
|
25 years
n=7 Participants
|
25 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
20 participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 participants
n=7 Participants
|
40 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Three weeks after orientationGEARS is a validated assessment tool for grading overall technical proficiency for robotic surgery. The overall proficiency score is a composite score of five different measures: depth perception, bimanual dexterity, efficiency, force sensitivity, and robotic control. Each of these subscale scores are graded 1-5, with 1 being poor and 5 being excellent. The total score is the summation of the scores from each of the five subscales and ranges from 5 to 25.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control Group
n=17 Participants
Participants in the Control Group (CG) were asked to attend an orientation reviewing the study. Three weeks later participants returned and were filmed timed completing a suturing activity on the porcine model.
|
Experimental Group
n=19 Participants
Participants in the Experimental Group (EG) were asked to attend an orientation reviewing the study. Then participants were instructed to complete 4 activities on the dvSS ® that modeled suturing techniques in minimally invasive robotics-assisted surgery. EG participants repeated these 4 activities over a period of 2 weeks until proficiency (91%) in all 4 activities was reached. Participants were asked to return and were filmed and timed completing a suturing activity on the porcine model.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) Scale
|
15.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.38
|
15.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.51
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Three weeks after orientationtime, measured in minutes, it took each participant to perform the suturing activity
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control Group
n=17 Participants
Participants in the Control Group (CG) were asked to attend an orientation reviewing the study. Three weeks later participants returned and were filmed timed completing a suturing activity on the porcine model.
|
Experimental Group
n=19 Participants
Participants in the Experimental Group (EG) were asked to attend an orientation reviewing the study. Then participants were instructed to complete 4 activities on the dvSS ® that modeled suturing techniques in minimally invasive robotics-assisted surgery. EG participants repeated these 4 activities over a period of 2 weeks until proficiency (91%) in all 4 activities was reached. Participants were asked to return and were filmed and timed completing a suturing activity on the porcine model.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Amount Time to Suture
|
9.9 minutes
Standard Deviation 2.07
|
9.2 minutes
Standard Deviation 2.65
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: assessed after the orientation and prior to the three week date for the final suturing assessmenttime, measured in minutes, it took each participant in the intervention group to achieve surgical proficiency on the robotic simulator.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control Group
n=19 Participants
Participants in the Control Group (CG) were asked to attend an orientation reviewing the study. Three weeks later participants returned and were filmed timed completing a suturing activity on the porcine model.
|
Experimental Group
Participants in the Experimental Group (EG) were asked to attend an orientation reviewing the study. Then participants were instructed to complete 4 activities on the dvSS ® that modeled suturing techniques in minimally invasive robotics-assisted surgery. EG participants repeated these 4 activities over a period of 2 weeks until proficiency (91%) in all 4 activities was reached. Participants were asked to return and were filmed and timed completing a suturing activity on the porcine model.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Amount of Time to Achieve Proficiency
|
116 minutes
Interval 53.0 to 209.0
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Control Group
Experimental Group
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place