A Prospective Validation Study of a Rapid Point-of-Care Breath Test for Breast Cancer

NCT ID: NCT02888366

Last Updated: 2018-10-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

500 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-03-01

Study Completion Date

2018-08-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a multicenter, blinded prospective study of 2,000 women undergoing mammography for breast -related symptoms or signs. Breath tests will be performed in order to demonstrate that the outcome of mammography results combined with breast test results improves clinical sensitivity and specificity in a group that has an increased prior probability of cancer. Breath will be collected and analyzed with a rapid point-of-care instrument (BreathLink™) and also with a laboratory-based assay of samples collected into an inflatable bag (BreathBag™).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Introduction

Clinical perspective on breath testing for breast cancer:

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women, in whom it is second only to lung cancer as a cause of cancer death. The National Cancer Institute estimated that more than 232,000 US women would be diagnosed with breast cancer in 2013 and nearly 40,000 would die of the disease.

Screening mammography and its limitations: In order to reduce the number of breast cancer deaths, many countries have established screening mammography programs to detect and treat early-stage disease. However, the impact of screening mammography on mortality has been questioned. Also, screening mammography is limited by its very low yield: a 2005 retrospective analysis reported that 510 US radiologists performed 2,289,132 screening mammograms and found 9,030 cancers i.e. only one cancer was found for every 253 mammograms. 99.6% of all screening mammograms were negative for cancer: they provided reassurance, but at a human cost of millions of women exposed to potentially hazardous radiation and discomfort, and a financial cost of several million dollars. Also, screening mammography may be associated with an increased risk of radiation-induced breast cancer, as well as with overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Many women decide not to take the test even when it is readily available, and screening mammography may be underutilized because of fear of pain and radiation exposure, ethnicity, poverty, and level of education.

Breath tests - a new diagnostic tool: Abnormal volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in breath have been identified in breast cancer. Breath VOC biomarkers have been reported in other disorders including bronchial asthma, lung cancer, active pulmonary tuberculosis, radiation exposure, and heart transplant rejection. The Food \& Drug Administration (FDA) approved the nitric oxide breath test in bronchial asthma, the urea breath test for H. pylori, and Menssana Research's Heartsbreath test for heart transplant rejection under the Humanitarian Device Exemption regulations.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Breath samples taken, no treatment given.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Female aged 18 years or over
2. Referred for mammography for a breast-related concern (e.g. breast mass, nipple discharge etc.)
3. Understands the study, and is willing to give written informed consent to participate
4. Approves collection of relevant additional data for clinical research record if and when it becomes available, including results of mammogram and any other imaging studies, biopsy results, TNM staging, and other relevant biomarker data e.g. status of BRCA1, BRCA2, HER2 and receptors (ER+ or ER-) and progesterone (PgR+ or PgR-)

Exclusion Criteria

1. Known serious or potentially life-threatening disease (e.g. severe cardiac or infectious disease)
2. Previous history of treated breast cancer, or cancer of any other site, with the exception of basal cell carcinoma of skin.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Southern California

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hackensack Meridian Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

St. Michael's Medical Center

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Menssana Research, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael Phillips, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Menssana Research, Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Southern California

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Hackensack Medical Center, Mountainside Hospital

Montclair, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

St. Michael's Medical Center

Newark, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

MD Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MR2016-03

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.