Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety and Effectiveness of the Jada System in Treating Primary Postpartum Hemorrhage (NCT NCT02883673)
NCT ID: NCT02883673
Last Updated: 2022-08-22
Results Overview
Control of postpartum hemorrhage, defined as the avoidance of non-surgical, second-line or surgical intervention to control uterine hemorrhage after the use of the Jada System per the Instructions for Use
COMPLETED
NA
107 participants
24 hrs
2022-08-22
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Intervention
Jada System for Postpartum Hemorrhage will be administered to subjects who are diagnosed with postpartum hemorrhage.
Jada System: It is a teardrop-shaped, soft silicone ring that is placed into the uterus, where gentle suction is applied to cause the uterus to contract and shrink in size, compressing the blood vessels so the bleeding stops.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
107
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
107
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Safety and Effectiveness of the Jada System in Treating Primary Postpartum Hemorrhage
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Jada Arm
n=107 Participants
Treatment Arm
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
29.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.54 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
107 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
88 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
61 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
107 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hrsPopulation: Group of participants for whom Jada was activated
Control of postpartum hemorrhage, defined as the avoidance of non-surgical, second-line or surgical intervention to control uterine hemorrhage after the use of the Jada System per the Instructions for Use
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ITT Population
n=106 Participants
Group where Jada treatment was applied
|
|---|---|
|
Efficacy: Rate of Participants With Cessation of Uterine Hemorrhaging
|
100 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeksPopulation: Participants in whom Jada was activated
Incidence (i.e., rate or number of participants), severity and seriousness of device-related Adverse Events experienced by participants will be documented during the course of the study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ITT Population
n=106 Participants
Group where Jada treatment was applied
|
|---|---|
|
Safety: Incidence (i.e., Rate or Number of Participants), Severity and Seriousness of Device-related Adverse Events Experienced by Participants
|
8 Participants
|
Adverse Events
ITT Population
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
ITT Population
n=106 participants at risk
Group where Jada treatment was applied
|
|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Endometritis
|
2.8%
3/106 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia
|
2.8%
3/106 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia leading to hysterectomy
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia and tachycardia and hypotension
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Continued bleeding due to undiscovered retained placenta
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Hypotension with complaint of dyspnea and nausea
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pregnancy related hypertension
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
C-section incision repair bleed
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation and hemorrhoid
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Laceration of cervix during difficult amniotomy
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute tubular necrosis
|
2.8%
3/106 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary edema
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Shortness of breath
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
ITT Population
n=106 participants at risk
Group where Jada treatment was applied
|
|---|---|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
acute tubular necrosis
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia
|
14.2%
15/106 • Number of events 15 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia with tachycardia
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lower uterine segment clot requiring removal
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Passed clots at 4 weeks postpartum with pain
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Pretibial edema
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Chest pain, SOB, diplopia, nausea without lab evidence of MI resolved without sequalae
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pregnancy related hypertension
|
1.9%
2/106 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Cellulitis
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Cellulitis with yeast
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
labial cyst
|
1.9%
2/106 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Leg rash associated with medication for hypertension
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
1.9%
2/106 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Hemorrhoid
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Presumed endometritis
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Presumed endometritis with pre-existing chorioamnionitis
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Infections and infestations
upper respiratory tract influenza
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Presumed endometritis with leukocytosis
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Infections and infestations
bacterial vaginosis
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Chlamydia
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Endometritis
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Mastitis
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Uncomplicated urinary tract infection
|
1.9%
2/106 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Vaginal yeast
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Migraine headache
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Spinal headache
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Vaginal pain and light bleeding from pre-existing laceration
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Breast rash
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Breast pain possibly blocked duct
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Dysuria
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Pelvic and perineal pain
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
1.9%
2/106 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
1.9%
2/106 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression, anxiety, PTSD
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypoxia
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary edema
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Shortness of breath
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Disruption of laceration repair
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from patient admission through 6-week follow-up visit post discharge (follow-up visit window was 42 days +/- 14 days).
Safety/Intent to Treat (ITT) Cohort: All subjects in whom treatment was attempted with Jada (i.e., device inserted, and vacuum turned on) were included in the Safety/ITT Cohort. One subject was excluded from the Safety/ITT analysis population as the Jada System was unable to be inserted and therefore vacuum treatment was not turned on/connected, leaving 106 subjects for the Safety/ITT Cohort. Notably there were no adverse events reported for this one excluded subject.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place