Palliative Care Population Management Project for Integrated Care Management Program for High-Risk Patients

NCT ID: NCT02879357

Last Updated: 2019-10-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

194 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-03-31

Study Completion Date

2017-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The hypothesis of the Serious Illness Care Program (SICP) is that adherence to the Serious Illness Conversation Guide (SICG) portion, the SIGC, will enhance patient understanding and allow control over their own decisions, relieve burdens of decision-making on family members, and help patients achieve a state of peace as they approach the end of life.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of the Serious Illness Care Program (SICP) is to provide clinicians with an evidence-based structure for eliciting and documenting vital information about preferences for patient driven care of their serious illness. It is designed to help open the door for patients, families, and clinicians to talk and reflect on end-of-life issues in an ongoing way. The hypothesis of the Serious Illness Care Program is that adherence to the conversation guide portion, the SIGC, will enhance patient understanding and allow control over their own decisions, relieve burdens of decision-making on family members, and help patients achieve a state of peace as they approach the end of life. For this protocol specifically, the investigators are testing a pilot intervention of a quality improvement project; the investigators plan to train clinicians and assess the feasibility and impact of the Serious Illness Care Program, which includes patient identification, clinician training, "triggering" of clinicians to conduct the SICG conversation, and documentation, in the iCMP at the Brigham and Women's Hospital.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Failure to Thrive

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Trained Clinicians

Training in Serious Illness Communication Guide

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

1. Clinician training
2. System for patient selection
3. System of "triggering" and tracking conversations
4. Training on how to use the Serious Illness Care Guide, a guide for patients about initiating conversations with family members about end-of-life goals and values
5. Longitudinal Medical Record (LMR) documentation module to serve as a "Single source of truth" about advance care preferences in the LMR.

Untrained Clinicians

No training in Serious Illness Communication Guide

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Training

1. Clinician training
2. System for patient selection
3. System of "triggering" and tracking conversations
4. Training on how to use the Serious Illness Care Guide, a guide for patients about initiating conversations with family members about end-of-life goals and values
5. Longitudinal Medical Record (LMR) documentation module to serve as a "Single source of truth" about advance care preferences in the LMR.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Brigham and Women's Hospital or Newton Wellesley Primary Care Clinician at one of the following practices: The Phyllis Jen Center for Primary Care, Faulkner Community Physicians, Brigham and Women's Physician Group, Brigham \& Women's Primary Care Associates of Brookline, Brigham Circle Medical Associates, Faulkner
2. Care for patients enrolled in Brigham and Women's Hospital integrated Care Management Program (iCMP)


1. Over 18 years of age
2. English Speaker
3. Patient at Brigham and Women's Hospital or Newton Wellesley Primary Care Clinician at one of the following practices: The Phyllis Jen Center for Primary Care, Faulkner Community Physicians, Brigham and Women's Physician Group, Brigham \& Women's Primary Care Associates of Brookline, Brigham Circle Medical Associates, Faulkner
4. Enrolled in Brigham and Women's Hospital integrated Care Management Program

Exclusion Criteria

1. Resident in Training
2. Non-English Speaking Clinic (e.g. Spanish Clinic)


1\. Patient at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Partners HealthCare

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Brigham and Women's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bernacki, Rachelle E.,M.D.

Rachelle Bernacki, M.D., M.S.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rachelle E Bernacki, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Susan D Block, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Rebecca Cunningham, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Joshua R Lakin, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2014P000211

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Easing Psychosocial Burden for Informal Caregivers
NCT03454295 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1
Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy at Home
NCT05495737 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Efficacy of a Self-advocacy Serious Game Intervention
NCT04813276 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2